Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

Options
17517527547567571586

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭FlubberJones


    There was, but I'm sure due to the refreshed requirement for people to not attend the office, it may of changed



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,556 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    You’d be wasting your time. Anti vaxxers will never accept the data and will do their best to twist and turn it into misinformation to suit their agenda. You can’t polish a turd unfortunately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Head of one of the hospitals on Claire Byrne this morning. May have been referring to their own hospital, but it matches with the HPSC data on ICU admissions between April and November

    Of the breakthrough infections (n=147):

    • 143 cases (97%) were reported to have an underlying medical condition 

    In other words, just 4 healthy, fully vaccinated people were admitted to ICU between April and November out of some 2.7m or so*. So to go back to the question of, "Why don't people seem to be as concerned about Covid anymore"; this is is the answer.

    One of the other fun things I learned today is that "immunocompromised" and "underlying medical conditions" are often used interchangeably in reports. Often they don't actually test to see if someone is immunocompromised, but rather they will assume they are based on their existing medical conditions and medication. Which seems obvious now that I think about it.

    *IIRC the # of vulnerable/underlying conditions people was estimated way back at ~1m.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,973 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Kind of says a lot when we struggle to handle .07% of cases. Cases are always going to matter in Ireland when that's the situation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    We won’t be given a breakdown of that data because we are not allowed to acknowledge that some people have had bad reactions to the vaccines.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Yeah, that 0.07% is still over 10% of ICU beds so there's always pressure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,804 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Just shows the vaccines are still highly effective vs serious illness.

    You have to remember immunocompromised people are left out of trials for obvious reasons. We all know the South African AZ conclusion being skewed massively by seeing a high number of breakthrough infections in HIV people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,973 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Yup, so we need to either control transmission a lot, which the vaccines do not do as much as we had hoped they would, or accept we're going to be in sh1t and fix the hospitals.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Tony still against antigen tests. His advice is not to use them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,037 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Tony spoofing about antigen testing on Radio One now

    Apparently people don't know how to use them properly

    Sounds suspiciously like his opposition to mask wearing as well



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,687 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So according to Tony over 200,000 are getting walloped in December.more crap from the untouchable



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    200,000 figure is a fraction of the population.

    I doubt this will scare people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,037 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    NPHET were always against antigen testing

    Looks at Philip Nolan's snake oil comment

    They still have the same opinion and have to be dragged kicking and screaming again to change their advice



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭statto25


    Tonys motto is a negative test isnt a negative test....so what is it?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The colossus himself, imperiously laying down the law. And offering patronising waffle when Dobbo pressed him on the Cinderella variant that becomes more potent at midnight. And still resisting the validity of antigen testing, quelle surprise. All of this while producing stark hypotheticals on national radio, brazenly intimidating the public. The man is pure poison with his arrogant grandstanding.



  • Registered Users Posts: 870 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    I think if they are not going to proceed with winding NPHET down as they promised, then they need to refresh the faces. We are all sick of Tony and his grim mug every day & that spoofer Nolan should have been ejected out on his arse after his "snake oil" comments, and double after his fisher price crystal ball projections delayed the reopening earlier in the year for nothing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,662 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,962 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Thanks for breaking down those stats Seamus. Unvaccinated accounting for 57% of ICU admissions is a crazy stat. The 43% of fully vaccinated but immunocompromised is a real worry though. Hopefully the government get off the slow boat and start pumping out boosters for those most at risk in this category.

    Seeing it laid out like that you'd have to wonder where the additional measures yesterday are coming from though. Only fully vaccinated or recently recovered are allowed in nightclubs and will be in the younger age group. So why curtail that section of society at all? Same goes for pubswith the new curfew. It's all over the place and smacks of throwing mud at a wall and seeing what sticks rather than a targeted approach.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Well this is it. We should have opened sooner and followed the UK example of opening up in the summer. This kip was too afraid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭CutieD


    Why are you blaming the government yet again for the population spreading the virus? The government can only do so much. Does the government have to guide everyone to open a window? There's nothing stopping you from wearing ffp2 masks if you want. If the government brought ffp2 masks in as a requirement for all attending nightclubs there would be people roaring and moaning about dancing in masks. They are slow on antigen testing but I can see why they or NHPET are apprehensive about the tests. There would be people moving about with symptoms of sickness taking antigen testing results as a gospel even though false negatives can occur. The most important aspect is if someone has symptoms, self isolate and PCR test.

    The government and NHPET are damned if they do and damned if they don't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    Honestly I feel this would make a huge difference to people's perception of NPHET.

    The current iteration of NPHET has failed spectacularly and none of them have any credibility remaining.

    If they're going to keep a NPHET-like body they need a complete revamp, starting with new faces and a ban from the airwaves and Twitter.

    At the moment they're rewarding failure by keeping the same people in place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 870 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    Yep and tell the media to stop getting soundbites off assholes like McConkey as well, I pay as much heed to him as I would to the beggar shouting in the middle of the street.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Careful u could get banned for saying anything bad about mr t.warnings flying around at the mention of even a letter in the alphabet



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Looks like those who carry on with Xmas plans are acting "irresponsibly" if you go by what Tony is saying .



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Absolutely. If we’re going to be making decisions based on the HSE capacity we may as well just let Colm Henry run NPHET too. Glynn is a far better communicator than any of them and has seemed to be sidelined recently.

    We could do with replacing Nolan as chair and let someone else have a go at the crayons, and send Tony back to his day job and/or tribunal into CC scandal. He is a dreadful communicator and doesn’t seem to employ any form of sympathy or empathy in his dealings with his subjects, sorry the public. Also could do with trimming NPHET, some of them such as Favier just seem to use the publicity of NPHET to push their anti alcohol agendas.

    The crux of the issue is that I don’t think anyone in government believes they have the power to change/sack/disband any part of NPHET. Martin and Donnelly seem afraid of any reaction to challenging them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,962 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Tony asking people to stay at home and work from home. We need to cut discretionary social contacts, whatever the hell that means. Yeah, that message is just going to be roundly ignored.

    He flat out lied to Dobbo when he said he was always in favour of antigen testing. He doesn't want the great unwashed using them because "reasons".

    My word he just oozes condensation from every pore.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭crossman47


    I agree with you. People just don't listen to advice. Just look at the amount of people going round with masks that don't cover their nose. In addition, Irish people don't do anything in moderation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Well now, there is another HPSC report about June to November we can use to extract some of these values.

    Total admissions to ICU: 400

    Underlying conditions: 322

    No underlyings conds: 78

    Total vaxxed: 139

    Unvaxxed/unknown: 261


    If we assume it to be correct that 97% (or 98%) of vaccinated admissions to ICU have underlying condition, then we can say with some certainty that the total breakdown is like this:

    Vaxxed w/underlying: 135 (33.75%)

    Vaxxed w/o underlying: 4 (1%)

    Unvaxxed w/underlying: 187 (46.75%)

    Unvaxxed w/o underlying: 74 (18.5%)


    This difference is pretty stark. Now, these are moving numbers. A lot of the unvaxxed may have come from earlier in the study, so it's in unfair to say for certain that being unvaxxed make you 18.5 times more likely to end up in ICU.

    If we normalise the ratios, the ratio of healthy vaxxed people in ICU is between 1:33 and 1:50. The ratio of healthy unvaxxed people is 1:2.5.

    1 in 2-and-a-half. That means that if you are healthy and unvaccinated, you are between 13 and 20 times more likely to end up in ICU than a vaccinated person.


    If we apply these numbers to today's ICU figures, we can say that there are 20-25 people in ICU today who are unvaccinated and have no underlying conditions. 20-25 ICU beds that would be available to use if these people had gotten a vaccination. 20-25 families not worrying about whether their loved one would die alone on a ventilator with no visitors allowed.


    Of course, these numbers were collected from June on, when practically everyone with underlying conditions had already been fully vaccinated. So if we can say that the 187 unvaxxed with underlying who ended up in ICU, came from (e.g.) the 5% who didn't get vaccinated, then we can say that being unvaccinated with underlying conditions probably makes you 27 times more likely to end up in ICU. Though likely way more than that.


    Again, applied to today's ICU numbers, if vaccination of adults was at or near 100%, we would have between 50 and 60 people in ICU.



Advertisement