Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cycle infrastructure planned for south Dublin

Options
1104105107109110123

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,708 ✭✭✭Economics101


    So SDCC create a traffic jamming roundabout to reduce car journeys. To quote Dowee: "As a resident of Knocklyon I can assure you that the cause of traffic jams in the area is due to huge amount of wholely unncessary journeys taken by people". How do you know that the journeys are "wholely unnecessary"? This smacks of arrogance, and reminds me of the attitude of people who are supposed to be public servants, but who want to dictate to us all the time. If you want to curb car journeys, then carbon taxes, congestion charging, parking regulations/charging are ample instruments to hand.

    Creating congestion may deter the amount of car usage, but is also worsens CO2 emissions per km travelled. Only if the former outweighs the latter is there an overall reduction in emissions. Furthermore traffic congestion has a cost in terms of wasted time. People are not generally driving cars for fun, in which case time costs might not matter.

    Finally anyone who is so keen to promote cycling (which I support), would do better to draw attention to the SDCC's atrocious performance on Grange road, which was the reason I got involved in this discussion in the first place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭ARX



    It's not that the journeys are unnecessary. Few people make journeys with no objective. But when you see your neighbour driving 400 metres to the shop to buy a bag of sausage rolls, or a dozen or so of your colleagues (in their 20s without any health issues I'm aware of) driving 2km (along a well-lit road with footpaths) from the Dublin apartment complex they live in to the office where they will be sitting down all day (and then will then sit in traffic on the way home for longer than it would take to walk) or you listen to those same colleagues moaning because they have lost the use of the car park immediately outside the building and will in future have to use the one across the road and it's so far to walk, then you get the feeling that there are a lot of people who will drive rather than walk or cycle for every journey, no matter how short.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,197 ✭✭✭Thinkingaboutit


    The roundabout where the fatality occurred has been re-ordered with a wide single lane for cars and a lane protected by soft bollards with crossing for peds and cyclists a little bit before and after the roundabout. It's good enough, and most, barring the occasional angry baldy driving a German car, most respect it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,442 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    In the office today - Deansgrange - the complete footpath blocked (no chance of a wheelchair or buggy making it), and road down to one lane, at two different spots by lorries before the cemetery. Between there and Temple Hill lots of vehicles either deliberately or ignorantly narrowing the opportunity to filter left. It needs serious action there to make it safe infrastructure to encourage cycling - you'd want to be reasonably confident around there anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 310 ✭✭Dowee


    As better described above by ARX, I should have said "unnecessary journeys by car", as opposed to unnecessary in general. A specific example might help to explain what I mean. My kids often partake in sports in the evening in St Colmcilles Secondary school, right beside the offending roundabout. I live about 1.5km - 2km from it. I cycle or walk there with them. I'm in the massive minority of parents that do that with their kids, most drive. I also live further away from the school than most in the groups my kids are in.

    Every time we are there it is absolute mayhem getting out of the carpark (for the people in cars that is, we breeze past on our bikes however), because there are far too many cars in it. No doubt some of the parents had to drive (young babies, disabilities etc) but plenty of them did not have to drive, they could walk or cycle. If all of those that can walk and cycle, do so, it lessens congestion for all, especially those who have no other choice. My views on this subject have nothing to do with arrogance, they are based on seeing the broader picture. Ensuring our roads are designed to efficiently move the increasing numbers of cars on them is not THE solution to traffic congestion, there are many more factors to it, one of which is reducing the number of cars on the road in the first place.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Now you know why so many of the locals were so resistant to the new facility - because it would make it more difficult for them to park illegally, endangering cyclists and pedestrians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭Rechuchote


    They're asking for submissions on the cycle lane - or rather on making Dean's Grange one-way, as they're putting it; the address to send your points in to is chiefexecutive@dlrcoco.ie



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,442 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    @Rechuchote do you have a link - can't see it on the website?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭bazermc


    Nice cycle Lane and Lane blockers outside Spar in Kimainham just before the Jail. Was a nightmare along there with cars pulled up



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,987 ✭✭✭cletus


    I posted what I believe is a smaller one here a number of months ago.


    *Edit* this one might be a bit longer, actually



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Dublin City Council recently opened a cycle lane along a stretch of road in Kilmainham that is known by anyone familiar with the area for illegal parking. A week later the local Spar has let go of some staff allegedly as a direct result of the new cycle lane...

    Politicans being populist, local SF rep Daithí Doolan soon decided to try and "resolve" the "situation" to the council...

    Apparently the owner of the shop recently opened a cafe around the corner...




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,859 ✭✭✭Duckjob


    "Hmmm.... I need to get rid of some people. What can I find to blame and take the anger away being directed to me ?". <Looks out window>

    Sounds like a case of "wake up and smell the misdirection"...



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭ARX


    Whoever runs that Twitter account appears to be an astonishingly aggressive person.




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,859 ✭✭✭Duckjob


    "I've been inundated with messages asking how emergency services are going to get down scr Kilmainham due to new poles inserted. @Pidge

    was asked but refused to answer. Residents are trapped in their homes due to this @1rorycowan

    are you affected by this as well?"



    Slight penchant for hyperbolae and melodramatics as well it seems....



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    It's really remarkable how the same hysterical claims are made every time "a parking space" (real or informally established by everyone turning a blind eye) is lost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    List of alternative options for the proposed part of the DLR Active Travel route on Deansgrange road..



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Whose document is this and what is the context?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    I believe it is a DLRCC document. I received it via a local resident, however it was issued to her following a recent meeting between DLR and the Deansgrange Business group.. It seems to have come out of DRLs commitment to go back and look at alternative route options. The business groups preferences are option 4 (Fintans Park/Villas) or Option 6 through the cemetery.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,928 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Option 6 comes out top in the assessment, but I'd imagine it would take a lot longer to implement and open a whole new can of worms by going through the cemetery?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    To be honest I cant see it being a runner. They havent said whereabouts in the cemetery it will go so it could possibly be a long detour. From the beginning of the cemetery to exiting it is probably only about 400 or 500 metres so probably easier just to stay on the road rather than coming into conflict with cemetery visitors. To my knowledge most graves run right up to the wall so I have really no idea where they intend to route it. It is only a point ahead of the original option (one way) on the scoring with the other options a good bit back..



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Meantime the noble Borough of Royal Kingstown has published a another scheme, this time for Upper Glenageary Road.

    Its a segregated two-way scheme, but keeps two way vehicular traffic going at the same time, so its unlikely to ruffle too many feathers unless someone complains about restricted access.

    I note they are persisting with delivery under Section 38, which seems mental to me, considering there remains such a huge question mark over its limits and limitations, but there you go.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,442 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    I don't know the cemetery, but it seems a convoluted route (probably could be part of bus connects!). Quite pointed that they call out the need for a council vote - I'd suggest more voters, over a wider area, will be put out by the cemetery than they would by the one way. So we'll have wasted all this time to go for the original option 🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The original option won't fly locally and the Councillors simply won't impose it. Whatever happens, it wont be that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,442 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    We'll see I guess. It got overwhelming support in public consultation, and now has gone through this scored process in consultation with the businesses. They're running out of justification to actually stop it I would suggest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,928 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    whatever about the details, I'm glad to see them settling on 2-way cyclelanes as the preferred design; I personally think they're preferable for several reasons, but mainly as they're more pleasant to cycle on.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The problem with them is that until a total network is complete you can end up doing a lot of irritating road crossing to enter and leave them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 756 ✭✭✭p15574


    They are, but the only problem is when you're on the other side of a busy road to them. They are also good in being wide enough for emergency vehicles to bypass traffic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭ARX


    I'm pretty sure I saw a Garda car with lights and sirens passing stationary traffic on the Blackrock bypass in Dublin using the cycle lane (between the two shopping centres).



Advertisement