Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty

He just used a gun he didn't own to kill 2 people.

And 2A rights advocates would argue gun control laws are sufficient as they are and in fact need to be rolled back in many instances. That some people think it is ok for a child to have a lethal weapon in public, 4 years before they are deemed to be responsible enough to buy a beer, says a hell of a lot.

I watched pretty much all of the trial because I was interested in it, and because it was useful for work-related research so I could justify sinking the time.

People with PTSD can come across that way.

Everything, when it comes to gun possession. If someone's carrying a gun in the middle of Louth it's a very different thing to someone carrying a gun in Winsconsin.

Didn't happen that day. He had stayed overnight with a friend and spent the day helping to clean up the town.

The gun has never left Winsconsin.

Presumably you apply this same scorn to the assailants who attempted to murder Kyle, yes?

He wasn't. That's why he was acquitted for the lesser includeds.

The judge was a little less on the ball than I would have liked. He did a decent enough job of reminding people of the presumption of innocence, but he should have called a mistrial with prejudice and handed out sanctions when the prosecution violated Rittenhouse's 5th amendment rights, suborned perjury, and fabricated evidence at closing.

I believe Andrew Barnes is intending to bring the prosecution's misconduct to the attention of the state bar and seek sanctions. I wish him luck with it.

Maybe. He's also being supported by anyone with half a brain who doesn't believe everything they read on Twitter.

Yeah. But why on earth would anyone expect anything you say to be accurate?

Google can be used for research, and not just ads you know.

Link

I changed accounts to use a different email address when Boards moved their data overseas.

That must've been someone else calling you on your bullshit.

No offence, but you're talking out of your ar$e!

Perhaps you should try familiarizing yourself with the facts of the case, before forming such resolute conclusions.

The interjections made by the judge, were because of quite serious breaches in protocol and procedures by the prosecution during the trial. This was by an experienced prosecutor, who knew exactly what he was doing. But of course the media tried to paint this, as the judge being biased towards Rittenhouse - which was complete nonsense. (however you appear to have swallowed that lie quite easily)

I wouldn't be surprised at all, if there were future disciplinary actions taken against the prosecution (Binger in particular) for their behavior, which was at times disgraceful and completely out of order.

Anyone who believes this, cannot also argue that gun control laws in the US are adequate. If you can travel to a different state, into an area where there is trouble, and use a gun you don't own, to kill two people, without breaking a law (I still maintain the charge of possession of a weapon should not have been dismissed) then there is something seriously wrong. Or do people just want black people to do the same thing when met with police violence?

He didn't travel "to kill two people". He was already in Kenosha having stayed with a friend the night before.

The possession charge was dismissed because it should never have been brought; Rittenhouse was legally permitted to have it. They're not allowed to just throw people in jail because they feel like something should be a law.