Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

I don't think she hated it, rather she couldn't do what she wanted, threw a hissy fit and persuaded Harry she was miserable and the royal family and press were racist and made her life hell.

Is it possible that she could marry a future presidential candidate and then down the line, run for office herself, like Hilary Clinton?!

Murricans will vote for a chipmunk given a chance. It’s part and parcel of Murrican Exceptionalism.

I think she hated the most to be the second after Kate in royal hierarchy.

I doubt very much that she will succeed. After all, you would have to be thick skinned to make it in politics and the poor thing seems very sensitive. But in her head, there is no reason she couldn't succeed.

realistically that is unlikely.

there were always going to be things that didn't make it into biden's plan as compromises were going to have to be saught so as to try and get the very necessary and decades over due infrastructure bill passed.

parental leave realistically was one of those things as there were differing views on it within the democrat party unfortunately.

i was disapointed myself that it didn't make it in but i am sure it will be back again at some stage hopefully.

nothing wrong with meghan using the titles she has been given and is entitled to, to try and bring about change.

it would be stupid for her not to, it's what they are there for, granted they may not have any effect which is the way of the world in a republic, but if you don't try you definitely don't get.

Her title from the British Royal family is not to be used to interfere in foreign politics. As a private citizen she has every right to communicate with her politicians but not as a Royal subject of a foreign crown.

it is for whatever she decides it is for now as she is in the US with her husband who is a prince and will always be so, if she wants to try and use it for certain things that is exactly what will happen and whether it will work or not who knows but at least she can try.

it's no more a big deal then any other zelebrity using their status to lobby politicians on things like climate change, meals for children etc and if she can get some good done by using her title then that is a good thing.

You saying that this is not a big deal in the politic world shows your ignorance of the foreign policies as much as Meghan's ignorance towards the foreign policies.

Or you actually are aware and like Meghan have decided that all these things should change to suit her like the narcissist she is!

it shows nothing of the sort, britain is on the way to irrelevance in the world at the hands of 17000000 of it's own people.

the queen is 95, charles is a nice enough chap but not really that popular which ultimately means questions over the medium term relevance of the british monark on the world stage.

as has been shown meghan isn't a narcissist as she doesn't have the actual trates of it.

Except she or any member of the British royal family don’t get to decide how to use their titles so once again in your desire to bend over backwards to defend Meghan and Harry you will twist things in order for them to not be seen in a bad light.

And if the institution is passed it’s sell by date, then she won’t mind giving up the title because why have a title of an obsolete institution.

why not? they have them, they are entitled to them and they may as well use them while they can.

by the sounds of it it would be a very long winded and complicated process to strip them of their main titles so ultimately they can to an extent decide what they can do with them because realistically very few care about this sort of thing and lets face it, they will always be known as the duke and duchess and harry will always be known as prince harry regardless of official titles or not.

The lawyer effectively calling the people who allege bullying liars struck me as a Pee Flynn moment talking about Tom "he's not well" Gilmartin i.e. if there is any veracity at all to the claims of bullying then those people could well be watching that program and then see Meghan's lawyer calling them liars on national TV. It might provoke or move them to speak up and ensure that, like Gilmartin, they give full and complete disclosure.

If you knew you were completely in the clear regarding any allegations of bullying, that you were confident that such allegations were completely unfounded and you would be vindicated by an independent inquiry then why the hell would you send your lawyer to engage with a documentary to deny those allegations and also have them call those making those allegations liars while the investigation was actually still going on? Moreso when the actual subjects of the documentary are the two Princes and the topic of it is their relationship with the Press. I think such a completely unnecessary move of getting a lawyer involved just makes someone appear panicked, rattled and very likely guilty.

You can easily surmize the “truth” at play here for Meghan and it makes sense as to why she (unnecessarily) engaged with Oprah with an agenda to out the racist people operating inside the “Firm” who were bent on undermining her. These allegations are all part of a “smear campaign” against her. It is all part of a conspiracy arranged by Jason Knauf, Simon Case, a litany of Palace staff, medical staff in contact with traumatized victims etc. all colluding together to conduct a covert agenda to frame Meghan as a bully. They must simply hate her so much that their racism implored them to drum up false bullying allegations because she is mixed race. Or something. Pure victim playing combined with creating a narrative. The classic manipulative tactic of getting your lying side of the story out there and disseminated first which can overshadow the actual truth emerging much later.

I think sending in the lawyer is the bullying act of a rattled bully, enabled by her odious husband, who have been scrambling ever since to cover up her abusive conduct. The reality of Meghan exposed as a manipulative and calculating liar has been established. You also have Harry engaging in a campaign to tackle misinformation. Pure deflection. It now potentially extends towards engaging in similar covering up behavior regarding the allegations of bullying people. This drive to play the victim is likely her “pulling at the heart strings" again but her credibility is now, through her own fault, non-existent and it fuels the thought that the allegations may indeed be actually true. Perhaps, given that there was no policy for dealing with Principals bullying, that Megxit was akin to Principals getting sacked for which there was also no formal policy as, like the idea of a principal bullying, the prospect of firing a Principal Royal was simply something that was never envisaged. How do you actually fire a family member?

Classy