JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years

Theories

1) Oswald shot and killed JFK and acted alone

2) ?

Haven't come across any credible alternative, so far only attacks on the main theory or fluff. Nothing coherent. Nearly 60 years, countless opportunities, plenty of people on their death beds, etc - nothing. If you know of anything, feel free to present it.

Ruby actually lived for another 3+ years. He didn't have cancer when he shot Oswald. Wasn't diagnosed anyway.

Certainly adds to the case for conspiracy alright but theres nothing to suggest he was a hired hitman.

The whole thing was strange and odd from beginning to end, it doesn't mean some alternative situation occurred. If someone can give it a shot, fine, but we are pushing multiple decades now and nothing, zilch.

Yeah, its all a bit thin though. No one can explain why Ruby was in Western Union a few minutes before he shot Oswald, 80 minutes or so after Oswald was already supposed to have been transfered. Ruby had no access to phones, walkie talkies etc so he had no way of knowing.

He either got into the basement via the car ramp when a car came up or a cop let him in. He knew a lot of the cops.

The DJ John Peel was living in Dallas at the time and managed to blag his way into the police station the night Oswald was arrested. So security all round was poor.

Its difficult to argue the HSCAs case vs hard evidence such as below. Rubys Western Union receipt, time stamped at 11.16am. And hour and 16 minutes after Oswald was supposed to have been moved.

Also, he shot Oswald in the stomach. Very non mafia style.

I've yet to see one coherant theory that doesn't have swiss cheese holes in it. The mob theory - Ruby etc - is the one that gets the most attention but there are no ties to Oswald and the mob at all. Zero.

The widely accepted and established version of events is that Oswald acted alone. To date there are no other credible alternatives to that. Maybe something else did happen, but if you are claiming that is the case, then the onus is on you to demonstrate that. That's normal in history, investigation, everything.

Conspiracy theorists turn that completely on it's head. They rely on denial of the event, i.e. "picking apart" a situation in order to hint that some conspiracy took place which they deliberately avoid detailing. It's important not to fall into that trap. For example, if I so wanted, you could never demonstrate the official version events of e.g. 9/11 to me, I could subjectively reject and attack all the evidence you provide and require everything explained to me down to the nth degree, and then still reject it. We've seen some posters literally do it for years, it's very simple to do once you know the techniques.

If you have an alternative theory, I am genuinely all ears, but it is up to you to make the case for it.

Of course, The Nal seems to have an almost encyclopedic knowledge of the whole affair, if there are specific parts you don't get, then direct those at him.

I believe the CIA were involved in some way, I think that's the most Credible theory concerning JFK.

I know to an extent from researching Northern Ireland how shady the intelligence services are, MI5 were involved in killing a number ranging from dozens to hundreds of people in Northern Ireland by using proxies in the loyalist paramilitaries, it wouldn't surprise me if Oswald was a proxy or simply a guinea in the killing of JFK but I don't know enough on the subject to give a credible theory on what exactly happened but I believe the CIA were involved in some way.

Ruby ran strip clubs aswell. Maybe strippers killed JFK. Or barmen. Theres as much evidence to suggest that as there is the mob.

Regarding Oswald, he was the only one on that floor. People saw him fire the gun. It was his gun, he brought it into the building, his finger prints were on the gun, and fibres of his clothing from the shirt he was wearing. And he fled afterwards. He had no ties to the mob.

Its very suspicious and its whats keeps the theories going.

But a few points on that.

• Who silences the silencer? Ruby had a big mouth but no one killed him? Anyone who knew him says its laughable he'd keep a secret.
• Why wait 2 days? Oswald had been in custody and interrogated for 2 days by this point. He may have already spilled the beans.
• He was shot in the stomach. 90% ish survival rate.
• Ruby was still in his house when Oswald was supposed to have been moved. And in Western Union standing patiently in line minutes before he shot him.

Doesn't add up for me. Ruby just shot him on the spot. He was nicknamed "Sparky" for a reason. Wild temper.

Was the only person on the floor at the time of the shooting. Told the 2 last people leaving to send the lift back up.

He brought a long package with "curtain rods" into work, despite not having curtains. No curtain rods were found after. But a gun was found.

Easily capable of making the shot. 3 shots in about 10 seconds. He was a trained sharpshooter.

Note how you are doing exactly what I said would happen.

I missed this one. I don't think any "conspiracy" occurred, so am with the consensus of historians on the matter. I am open to conspiracies, but so far nothing credible or coherent has been presented here. As explained (multiple times now), individuals come to the thread to get others to "prove" the event to them which they'll just reject or pick at in order to hint that "something else" happened, without detailing that something else.