Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mica Redress

1171820222328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    So it looks like the protesters aren't happy with what the government have come up with, even though this is the largest "compensation" scheme ever dreamt up. From my view, the offer is quite generous and really should be grabbed with both hands, and I'd happily take a grant of €145/sqft to build my house.

    So where does the movement go from here? To be honest, I think it depends on how the media frame this offer. Up until now, the protesters have been treated with kid gloves and the freedom to present their story unchallenged. I think that is quite likely to change if they continue to seek further compensation.

    Then again, the protesters calculus may be that they have nothing to lose by continuing on. The government is not likely to withdraw the offer of support should protests continue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    Assuming €2 billion cost, 25k per annum house builds to pay for it, assume government pays upfront and has 2% interest to pay + expects to recoup money in around 12-13 years, then that adds €8k to the average house build price up front, or assuming a 25 year mortgage at 2.5% interest (and that the extra €8k means €8k extra needs to be paid back), about €15k extra per house/apartment built to be paid off.

    That allows for no addition cost for the additional regulations + regulator etc. - and assumes that consultant fees and other fees (and VAT) calculated are not increased by the increased construction cost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    I really hope that there was no rumours weeks ago of the requirement to have a tenancy registered with the RTB to be part of the scheme.

    It wouldn't surprise me at all if they knew they'd have to register. Would be typical of Ireland for that to happen.

    I think this 420k figure is disgraceful.

    You can talk all you like about planning, demolition and foundation costs but what about all the massive costs saved by reusing materials? Windows, Doors, Kitchens, Piping, Boilers, Fireplaces, Roofing etc should all need to be re-used.

    It is disgraceful that someone who built their house maybe 20 years ago, has barely any mortgage or no mortgage and now get a brand new house and thus, as house prices have increased massively in 20 years, they now have a massive increase in net worth.

    The state should be taking equity in every house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Excessively generous scheme, anyone looking for more now is cravenly greedy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,259 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Jesus lads, you better be careful with all those comments about people looking for a free house, you'll get yourselves in trouble!

    Oh wait, this is a real forum where you don't have to just toe the Donegal line, carry on so!



    There should be zero coverage for investment/BTL properties, its an investment that went badly, thats life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,018 ✭✭✭Shelga


    If someone had a 2400 square foot house, so will be “out of pocket to the tune of €65k” to rebuild, according to reports, couldn’t they just build a 1500 square foot house instead? That still seems like a decent size to me. And if they reuse things like kitchens, fixtures and fittings, I really don’t see how it can cost that much? Surely this can be executed in such a way that it is more cost effective than what is being made out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,259 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Well sure they could, but they want to get back exactly the house they bought/built, though of course at today's standards, and they don't want to have to pay anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,018 ✭✭✭Shelga


    If they're saying they will accept absolutely nothing less than a house the exact size as the one they had before, then I'm sorry but they've lost me completely. I'm currently buying a 900 square foot house in Dublin that I have been saving for for years and years. It's also a complete kip of a place. Me and thousands of others like me probably won't have kids, as we're ageing out, as it takes so long to get your own place.

    I think what happened with the mica houses is absolutely horrendous, I can't imagine the stress, but you know what- sometimes terrible things happen in life and you won't get out of it completely scot-free. Would another option be agreeing to add another €40k or whatever, onto the cost of their mortgage? I guess this is difficult with the banks. But there seem to be lots of options that haven't even been considered, because they do not give the mica homeowners their exact previous house at zero cost to them. Billions and billions of cost for the rest of us, but none to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,259 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    They see it as unfair that they have to pay for something that they see is not their fault, but cant see why the rest of us would see it as unfair that we have to pay for something that was nothing to do with us, all while ignoring the fact that only one side ends up with a new house.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Will the state now compensate anyone who has bad things happen to them?

    If a cowboy builder takes 50k to build and extension and the wind blows it over after a week, are the state going to rebuild it for free?

    If someone buys a car from donedeal and the car turns out to be stolen, does the state pay them the 20k they lost?

    If someone gives money to a charity that turns out to be a scammer or ceo is charged with stealing funds, does that mean the state will pay them back all their donations?

    If I invest in $hitcoin and it turns out to be a scam, are the state going to give me back all my investment?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The way the debate has been run on the site on this issue has been disappointing to say the least tbh.

    But yeah, the inclusion of investment and second properties was never a realistic ask. Especially not when there is a genuine housing crisis - the optics would be terrible. Rebuilding empty houses while renters struggle in Dublin?

    I had long said it, on this thread and the other (before I too got banned...) That the campaign left itself with no escape route, because 100% "redress" for all was never going to happen for rebuilds. The organisers have made their own dignified climb down impossible.



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Raiden Wailing Noodle


    Your examples are the height of stupid.

    Not even remotely comparable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,259 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    The only debate allowed on the Donegal forum seems to be along the lines of "how can we avoid paying a single cent towards this".

    Unless you stay in line the moderator will make accusations against you and ban you, its the definition of an echo chamber, its no wonder they are out of touch with how the public feel about this.

    I don't think they have any intention of climbing down, they seem to genuinely believe that "the government" owes them a house and are oblivious to the fact that the government doesn't pay for anything, the tax payer does.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    'Self Certification' was the name of the game here. When you build a house by direct labour, employ or builder or purchase - it's your responsibility to do due diligence and assess whether it's fit for your purpose before you purchase. If you can't do this yourself, you employ a suitably qualified professional. But ultimately the buck stops with the purchaser. As has been repeatedly pointed out, this is the same as buying any other commodity.

    People have been burnt here by some despicable people in the local construction industries. They need a bit of help but part of the blame and cost must lie with the house purchasers. And under no circumstances should so called 'pension fund' holiday lets be given a cent, nor non RTB registered dwellings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    To be fair, the response to that is yes, but.

    The blocks the builders purchased here were certified as being produced to a certain standard. I'm a bit hazy on the detail as it's a while since I looked into it, but the standard states that the blocks must be durable as an overarching catch all, but has particular laboratory tests that also must be satisfied. Mica was not a mineral specifically tested for. Builders bought materials that they had every right to believe were good.

    Ordinarily, when a supplier sells a material that is defective, they are responsible for compensating the purchaser. The problem is that the SME with tiny capital created a multibillion euro liability. It appears that their insurance is also inadequate to cover it. That said, it also appears that the protesters have given up chasing the SME for the little money that they do have.

    Their argument that the State is liable though is completely faulty however. Where regulations are breached, or even where regulations are defective, the regulator is never liable since they are a third party to a transaction. The reason there is a state assistance programme is for political and humanitarian reasons only.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    They're the same.

    The state regulates charities and companies finances and building standards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I heard one lad on Claire Byrne talking about his 1600 sq ft house being just a small one and how difficult it was going to be for those with 'average' houses of 2600 sq ft. My heart bleeds.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    The state should be taking equity in every home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,259 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    While this is all true, I still do have to wonder if anyone ever actually checked the certificates....or even asked for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    It's extraordinary what's going down on the Donegal forum re this matter. Person after person making reasonable points, including someone who lived in a house built from these blocks - all being asked not to post again on the thread.

    There's something deeply wrong with the moderating of this topic there. It reflects very poorly on the site, which already has a pall overhanging it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    There is a long thread in helpdesk on the moderation of that forum. It's quite illuminating and will answer all your questions

    Anyway, when you drill into the complaints that the posters have with the revised scheme, you can see that they are fairly groundless. One poster over there said it it would cost him an additional 51k so I assume he has a house around 2100sqft. SCSI gives a rebuild cost for basic finish for such a house, if say gutted in a fire of 281k. The grant offers 265k. Ok add in rent and storage of max 20k and that brings it up to 301, however you also need to deduct the salvaged windows, doors, sanitary ware, average kitchen, average wardrobes, average floor coverings and heating system that are also included in the SCSI figure and you start to come close to or below €265k.

    This is a great deal for the homeowner. They need to recognise that they are being used by the investors and others who have been excluded to further their own agenda.



  • Registered Users Posts: 890 ✭✭✭doc22



    Wait till the scheme starts and the majority only get the outer leaf approved, but want a brand new house.....more moaning



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,118 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    The Donegal forum running people out of town continues unabated. Several posters today have been run out of town with absolutely reasonable questions and no goading. And it's now a place where non moderators even rule the roost and run people out themselves. There is no moderation in it. Its the wild wild west.

    Its not a forum at this point its a Facebook group. And it's a entirely poor representation of boards.ie

    Wouldnt have been allowed to get to this point 3 years ago.


    As emotive issue as this is you'd expect the moderation of the topic to be on point. But it quite simply isn't.


    I heard Doherty again on the radio today threatening people of the nice option and the bad option. He wasn't abundently clear what the bad option entailed in detail. But it was basically do what we want or else.

    Similar theme to the forum....



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    But, sure, isn't the political system rewarding their approach. Why wouldn't they hold out for more? No-one is saying that, if this is truly the cost of rebuilding those houses, it just shouldn't be done.

    The campaigners don't engage with how their housing needs could be met for, say, a relatively modest cost of €200,000 per household, because no-one is presenting that as an alternative. No-one is saying it's not worth spending €420,000 to rehouse one family in Donegal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    And just to add, that since no means or needs test has been applied, that €420k could be for a single person or couple theoretically.

    And you're right, there is no real risk for the protesters in holding out for more. The government is never ever going to turn around and say "if you don't think this is good enough, then you get nothing at all". The State is a more mature actor.

    The only way this issue gets resolved is if the media start to frame the ask as unreasonable. While they haven't done so to date, I think that may change, as the complaints are examined. Then again, the protesters will likely enter siege mode and determine that any change in narrative from the media is "Dublin media and government" attacking them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,118 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    They've already done that have a scan through the comments. Listen to Mr Dohertys interviews. It's the media... Its Dublin... Etc etc etc etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,964 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    Nothing to do with the many genuine cases of houses affected by Mica but I wonder will people who were going to use this issue to upgrade their McMansions with the blank cheque they were campaigning for now drop out when they realise it will cost them?

    Or is the value still good for them to get for all intents and purposes a brand new house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,681 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    There was one of them on the radio when I was on the way home, the arrogance of ths guy was unreal considering the deal they were given.

    I'd say whatever bit of support they had outside of Donegal up to yeaterday is gone now, the fact that its ordinary working people who are going to be paying for all of this doesn't seem to register with them at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭SBourgaize


    Why is it so hard for you all to imagine yourselves in our shoes, even just for a moment? Just a small bit of empathy. We bought our houses (mortgaged really), did structural surveys and were told all is well, to find out our homes will crumble in a few years.


    If this happened to any one of you, you would be doing the exact thing we're doing. We don't want mansions, we don't want new kitchens, we want the house we're paying for to outlast our mortgage term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,681 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    my house could burn down tomorrow. Even though properly insured Insurance will no way cover the full rebuild cost etc. AS other posters have alluded to the state offer for works exceeds what anybody else would get. Also the size of the houses. I have no problem with the taxpayer(myself) included funding the building of a modest sized home, and i do see the % percentage of costs covered by the government do cover bigger proportion as the house size/value goes down towards an average sized family home



  • Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    oh. Can Muffler be threadbanned from this thread ? 'Tis only fair



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,902 ✭✭✭standardg60


    What did your house cost?

    How much was your initial mortgage?

    How much were your rebuild costs according to your insurance cover?

    I don't think anyone would have an issue compensating you for these amounts, what are they?



  • Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    i remember poorly moderated forums in the distant past being put into the memory hole too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭SBourgaize


    100k

    90k

    180k (173k according to scsi)


    My home is about 1200sqft, 4 bedroom semi detached.

    Based on the sliding scale, I can get a grant of (max) 167k. This doesn't include demolition or removal of demolition, nor foundation if it requires replacement.



  • Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    thank you. Good luck. IT seems the redress is 13,000euro short. Its still a very good deal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,964 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    You have a genuine case here and people will want to see you compensated. This is the sort of case that we should be hearing about,a regular person with a regular house.

    Problem is though you are getting shouted over by the people looking for a blank cheque for their McMansion to be 100% rebuilt to the latest building standards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,902 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Agree, personally i would have no issue with you receiving 100%

    Given you were happy that a 1200 sq ft home met your needs, how do you feel about those demanding full compensation for homes twice that size?

    Would it not be fairer for everyone to receive full compensation to build a similar size home to yours rather than lets face it those who chose to outdo the Jones'?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Oh it's 100% worth spending the extra few bob.

    Sure a lot of them have no mortgages at this stage. A lot of people build extensions after 20 year or so anyways. So well worth it to spend a few bob yourself to get a nice bigger newer house.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    They're in their own echo chamber at this point. I went against them after I saw tactics of using disabled children in their twitter posts, putting words in their mouths when the poor little kid wouldn't have a clue what's going on.

    It's anti Dublin too. Bit like the Healy Raes "ah feck them shower above in Dublin, they don't give a damn about us"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I don't know if that's just a feature of Irish campaigning, but I have noticed that more and more of these protest movements (not just mica and pyrite, but they are the latest) are using children to put their point across.

    I think it's a really low tactic to use children, who have no agency of their own, for political point scoring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭cruizer101


    I do think the government should offer 0%, or at least very low interest loans, to help people make up the shortfall where needed.

    Most people have no issue with funding cases like yours, the issue is with paying for oversized houses. The scheme should be based on peoples needs not compensating for what they had, the government isn't liable here it just has a moral responsibility to help. 1400sqft is more than a decent sized home for most families, many are in much smaller, and yet the average house size of those effected is around 2600 I think.

    The other issue is funding for investment properties and holiday home. Again this scheme isn't about compensating for people loss it is about making sure people don't end up homeless, people don't need an investment property they need a home.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    There is plenty of sympathy - same as for people in poor countries who lost everything because of some earthquake or hurricane. But the government doesn't take on the cost for making good those financially impacted by those earthquakes/hurricane.

    If your survey was carried out badly, you should certainly consider taking a case against the surveyor - why should the poor first time buyers of the upcoming decades be forced to pay tens of thousand Euro to make you wealthy?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    The thing is they're not getting a 20 year old house replaced with a 20 year old house.

    They're getting a 20 year old house replaced with a brand new house for free.

    Imagine when VW had the emissions scandal. Imagine you had a 20 year old VW Golf. Then the emissions scandal happened and it was found your car was affected. Now you demand a replacement and you get a brand new 2022 VW Golf. You're in a far far far better position than if your old golf had no problems at all and was the most perfect car.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    The problem is I'd argue that a large number of people are in nearly the exact same situation as the people impacted. The only major difference is the mortgage related issues. We have a housing crisis. For those that will not be in a position to buy their own house they have to join the social housing list. Everyone impacted they will not get a house paid for by the government to their own design specs(for self builds anyway). There has been no recognition of that by the campaigners.

    Everyone impacted deserves government support however they don't deserve a blank cheque. They are not the only people who are facing issues when it comes to housing in Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Was there any compensation for the builder or the person that sold it to you for the difference between their build cost and what they could sell it for? Ultimately they were out of pocket too, paying for something that exceeded its value - but no problem there when it was in the homebuyers favour.

    While I am genuinely sympathetic to people's plight here, other equally tough situations have arisen in this country that have seen no support. Renters struggling to afford rent, unaffordable homes to buy, negative equity traps, insane childcare costs to name but a few pressures that could do with 2.2bn worth of support, but get SFA. The fact is that 90% of the demands have been met and the remaining were unrealistic anyway would be seen as a major win by any other group.

    The room needs to be read here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    I honestly don't understand why the state proposal is more than "we will buy your property off you at current market value, we promise to increase social housing in your county & we will be quite sympathetic to you as regards the social housing waiting list".

    Why are home/mortgage owners considered "better & more deserving citizens" than those on social welfare/ in affordable housing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    At this stage you'd wonder if they are capable of reading the room. Infected by a bit of that same mindset found across the border that 'the government' will fund them without question.

    On a side note, having been around parts of Donegal, many of the one off houses built in recent years are large by the standards of the rest of the country, bar the wealthier parts of Wicklow & Kildare. Given that Donegal residents are forever also complaining about lack of infrastructure and industry etc., how on earth have they afforded to build them??

    Maybe there should be a parallel investigation by Revenue where dwellings exceed 200 sq metres. Just part of the process.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    When did houses start getting built with Mica blocks and when did it end?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash




  • Advertisement
Advertisement