Kieran Creaven at it again..

Thats not interesting. Its worrying and upsetting. And its disturbing that you would be so unsympathetic to a 14 year old who has been exposed to this.

There's a campaign in England at the minute to make the sending of unsolicited explicit images a crime - think it already is in Scotland. Many's the young, and not so young female have had this happen to them and society tolerates it & makes a joke of it - but when it's a 14 year boy on the receiving end it's seen as somehow worse. Double standards. I would support chemical castration in all sexual crime convictions.

I'm not sure you meant this but it reads like you think sending dick pics should be a sexual crime and that all sexual crimes should carry a sentence that includes chemical castration. Seems a bit harsh. I'm with you in that it's very rude to send such an image to an adult but that seems like an overly harsh punishment, not to mention it's got to be against human rights to involuntarily castrate someone.

You don't think it is worse in the case where a 14 yr old is the recipient? I mean it's a child who is still developing emotionally.

I dont think anyone said its worse about a 14 year old boy receiving images.

Nothing to do with libel. I like to remain anonymous here and vent at people 😀😁

It did not involve underage - though he was only a teen himself at the time and nothing that was illegal - just perverse and you'd probably put it down as teen angst

I get the feeling that rte are enjoying reporting on this individual. They have to mention that he is a former rte employee in every headline. I don't know if it is overcompensating in trying to show what a transparent and self critical organisation they are, or whether they just like smelling their own farts.

10 years (almost certainly significantly less) isn't enough.

20 years or life without parole would better protect humanity.

Of course, my preferred sentence would involve a strong branch and a length a rope.

Sinister end to the RTE report. "The Probation Service in the UK however has found that Kieran Creaven poses a high risk of harm to children and is a moderate risk of reoffending. The Probation Service here has also assessed him as a "moderate risk". It means that while it's likely he may not abuse children again, there is also a chance that he will."

Didn't they once accidentally target a paedtricitan? Not the sharpest spoons in the drawer.

That said, I've no problem with vigilante investigation - none whatsoever - but vigilate justice is different.

Noi, that was some natives in some dump in the south of England who march on the house of a paediatrician

Yeah, it's like the IRA trying to target drug dealers in order to improve their image.