Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Formula 1 Round 22 Abu Dhabi GP

Options
1454648505181

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,887 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Sky's report on decision basically says that race director can decide on the safety car procedure, overruling other rules. If that's the rules, then sounds slam dunk, but whether it's the fairest rule for future is another question...



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,242 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Dismissed!!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,657 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,099 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭BrookieD


    FIA confirm, ANY does not mean ALL... ;-) and that 15.8 over ruled article 48.12 so yes all coolio



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 75 ✭✭Amias




  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    It's all G folks.

    Max Verstappen is World Champion



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,087 ✭✭✭Longing


    Imaging if the didn't make the track changes to make it quicker. There would be no 3 extra laps added this year to the race distance. Incredible set of circumstances to finish of truly epic season.



  • Registered Users Posts: 801 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    Excellent - Toto is a disgrace



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,212 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    If that’s their decision so be it. I wanted to see Max win and I think he deserves it more than Hamilton, but I fundamentally disagree with the idea of one person being to toss the regulations of the sport aside on a whim, regardless of who that person is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    Not a fan of the race director having the power to bend the rules mid race. Hopefully that gets sorted for next season. Can't see a repeat of this mess.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭enfant terrible


    But why couldn't he hold off max for one lap. Perez on old tyres held off Lewis on fresh tyres for a lap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,230 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,242 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I posted that one earlier, 15.3 gives the race director ultimate overriding authority on the use of the safety car notwithstanding other rules. Loose wording perhaps but that's what you get in these sorts of regulations as a get out of jail free card.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 661 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING




  • Registered Users Posts: 17,971 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Correct decision made, shame it had to come to this, knives will be out for Mercedes and Hamilton next season and rightly so.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Because he was on 30-odd lap old hards and Max was on brand spanking new softs.

    The move Max made on Hamilton was an excellent one that nobody saw coming. A move worthy of winning the World Championship.

    I find it baffling how everyone can just see everything in black and white.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    My reading of the stewards verdict is simply that race director call over use of the safety car supersedes all other rules. No way Mercedes will roll over on that but it would be a shock if CAS or any legal entity try to overturn it



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,657 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Thing is, if you have situation where someone tries to change a referees decision after the event, where does that end?

    Imagine in football, offside goal, wasn't disallowed in the match but we deduct a goal after the match.

    Cricket, someone was out, after the race seems he wasn't, reinstate the wicket.

    Rugby, video ref made a mistake and someone was awarded a try, deduct the points.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Wad Max behind the backmarkers before his stop? I remember Lewis lost ground and was complaining on the radio but not sure if Max had passed them by the time the SC was out.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    So do I, but Mercedes should let it go now but it should start a very serious conversation about the powers of the Race Director and what rules he can and can't impose on a whim, for the simple reason that all it did was cause sh*tshow after sh*tshow this season.



  • Registered Users Posts: 574 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    Wow, the RB defence is really weak. I argued earlier why ‘any’ very much does have the same meaning as all. The point about 48.13 overriding 48.12 is irrelevant because at issue is whether it was legitimate to ignore 48.12. The rules state that the race director has ‘overriding authority’ over the clerk of the course, not of the rules! And lastly, it is highly dubious that the outcome would have been the same with five lapped cars between Verstappen and Hamilton.

    There was no alternative to refusing the appeal, but RB had nothing up their sleeve.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,897 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Good luck with that in Court - which is where this will end up. Millions of new viewers watched this race. They saw a driver 11 seconds ahead have his lead cut to zero by the decision of a steward when that driver had done nothing wrong. The FAI love safety cars, second grid starts etc because it increases the "excitement". It's like the ref disallowing a goal just to give the other team a chance.

    It's shown that races can be won or lost on a coin toss. That one man can decide who wins. Imaging the 5000 meters where an official decides that all the athletes must bunch back up together. It would be exciting but totally unsporting.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,657 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Terribly biased commentary on BBC website, stating all sorts of things about Red Bull benefiting from rules not being applied, but don't seem to have mentioned at all about Hamilton getting away with a blatant breach at the start. Almost like they're biased.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 661 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING


    Your first season watching F1? Cos teams have been bending rules since the dawn of time using the type of logic above. Its the reason why the rule book is the size of a phone-book.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,887 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Hopefully next season its not Mercedes versus red bull again. Nobody on either side is particularly likeable (well I like Bottas and Checo, but no Hamilton or Verstappen or the bosses)...



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,157 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Hollow victory for Max.

    Spent 50 laps in second place, 15 secs behind Hamilton up to the crash.

    Had a series of fortunate events:

    Latifi crashed and SC sent out.

    Was well placed to swap tyres.

    Hamilton was not placed to swap tyres.

    Race restarted with one lap to go.

    Lapped cars were told to get out of his way.

    We came for the drama and got it, but a clear cut win from either driver would have been far more preferable. Max is probably sitting and waiting for deliberations instead of doing body shots off Kelly Piquet.

    At the end of the day, goals win games and places win races.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭Gamb!t


    Yup, thought he took it very well. Really dont understand the hate this guy gets.

    Delighted for Max, Hamilton has been robbed right at the end as he drove really well in this rac but he has also been very lucky with some decisions earlier this season..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    The only positive of this debacle today in that Masi is done



Advertisement