Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Womens' rugby Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread

1272830323346

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    And the only way to grow the game is to invest in it. Attendances follow success over and above anything else. The first step in making any sport successful is investment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭Luckycharm


    Good article here from a few weeks ago, sounds like the Womens squad could do with a bit of a clean out

    The shop window for the women’s rugby project in this country is a shambles

    Brendan Fanning


    November 24 2021 05:08 PM


    The lingering image from the RDS last weekend featured Ireland captain Ciara Griffin being hoisted shoulder high by her team-mates.


    For the player of the match it was an appropriate farewell on her early retirement.


    Griffin’s team had held out against Japan despite being hampered by a sending off. As a snapshot of a united group finishing a failed season on a bright note you couldn’t have done better with an art director on hand.


    The picture didn’t tell you anything of the performance, however, which illustrated the shortcomings in those rugby nations outside the handful at the top: poor skills leading to poor continuity making for a frustrating spectacle, well removed from elite status sport.


    The following day we happened across an interested party on the way into Lansdowne Road for the men’s game with Argentina.


    Their version of events in the women’s squad was well removed from sweetness and light.


    The term ‘toxic’ was mentioned a few times to describe the culture in the group. Depending on who you talk to this is either ‘on the money’ or ‘over the top’.


    What is inarguable is that the shop window for the women’s rugby project in this country is a shambles.


    Saddled in 2018, by IRFU performance director David Nucifora, with the stratospheric target of accounting for 20 per cent of the Irish rugby model inside five years it has become a grim reality show where opportunities for publicity become endurance tests.


    Going back a few months the plan for the Ireland squad was as follows: go to Parma and beat the teams Ireland were supposed to beat – Spain, Italy and Scotland – and come home happy that next year’s World Cup tickets were bought and paid for.


    Then, look forward to the November series with the US and Japan as a confidence builder ahead of the Six Nations.


    Next, crack on into that Championship with everyone on the same page and see if at least Ireland could be the best of the rest, after France and England. Maybe all the sessions and all the investment at the top end could produce some visible improvement against the big two, who are miles ahead.


    Instead the World Cup qualifiers turned into a stress-fest, at the end of which the group was mentally scarred. On the night of the defeat by Scotland the Irish women had a few drinks in the team room at the hotel, followed by a few of them opting for a late night/early hours swim.


    While it’s understood it got messy it’s important to put this in context. It wasn’t an orgy of destruction that had other guests hiding under their beds, but it was an embarrassment which compounded the disaster that had unfolded on the field earlier in the day.


    “The IRFU was made aware of some minor damage to hotel furniture following the Ireland V Scotland WRWC in Parma last September,” an IRFU spokesman confirms. “The matter has been settled amicably.”


    Most recently we were given a bizarre drama that reflected the divisions in the squad.


    When Cliodhna Moloney reacted with an online swipe at the tone-deaf interview given by IRFU women’s director Anthony Eddy it sparked a flurry of activity among her team-mates.


    It was painfully obvious the Sevens crew in the squad were reluctant to wade in to support her – they have those contracts and a potential World Cup place to be concerned about.


    For some of the others, however, Sevens is an alien planet. Seemingly some were happy to row in behind their hooker; others felt pressured to do so. It is unlikely any coaching/management manual would prescribe this as good prep in the week of a Test match.


    Eddy’s shortcomings in the communications stakes are obvious – quite a handicap given the sensitivities around the women’s game – but gathering up all the dirty laundry and putting it on display was from the same school of self-harm.


    In any team setting, from minis to adults, cliques are corrosive. Surely this is the first thing incoming coach Greg McWilliams will address. But this is easier said than done.


    The ludicrousness of the IRFU’s Strategic Plan, targeting the 20 per cent, was that it was coming off such a weak base. Any coach dreads a self-destructive core but radical surgery will almost certainly require plugging the hole with inexperienced and technically inferior players.


    The trade-off comes in suffering on the scoreboard during the transition.


    No coach wants to plead for a moratorium on the win/loss metric in his opening address, but in McWilliams’s case it might be worth it.


    You’d imagine his next move will be to recruit the coaches in the women’s AIL as de facto assistants, to speed up the operation. We’d expect him to be pushing an open door on this one.


    The domestic game is central to this production, and while it’s getting some love now you have to recognise the impact of years of neglect.


    To be going over this ground yet again clarifies the confusion in the IRFU about what is needed in the women’s game.


    You’d imagine at this point they might reckon Anthony Eddy is not the man for all seasons, and redraw his map solely for men’s Sevens, with a new appointment to the job of women’s director.


    As for Ciara Griffin, a good friend of hers tells us she will be better off without “the mental drain of the group.”


    What a sad commentary on that state of affairs. No wonder she looked so happy in the post-match snap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    But who will invest in it ?

    It looks like the IRFU have seen enough not to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    This few words from that article about the Japan game "well removed from elite status sport."

    That's what women's rugby is , well removed from elite status sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Yet for decades women have not only played rugby unpaid, but literally paid for the privilege of doing so.

    If you think there wouldn't be enough Irish qualified players interested you are very much mistaken.

    After all, some of them are already playing for English clubs and earning far less than 50k.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,172 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Huge difference being amateur and having another job on the side and earning 50k a year as a pro rugby player.

    Let’s imagine they earn 50k a year and have a 10 year career if they are lucky. They retire mid 30s. Then what?

    They’ve earned relatively little for their career, so it’s not like the men where they’ll be financially safe for life.

    it’s a big risk for anyone who is at the mid-range and below in terms of ability to take, when you consider that it’s likely many of them would have far more secure financial futures in a “normal” career and play as amateurs instead.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    A 2 year contract of 50k might suit a lot of young sportswomen, a chance to train 3 times a day for a couple of years, and take exams on the side.

    Any talented 18 year old would surely jump at the chance.

    You have to start somewhere, after that see what the next step is.

    it could be that key players could earn more, or an “academy” system pays less to younger players in college.

    Maybe a pay per play, every cap gets 2k on top.

    How many International 15’s matches are played each season?

    the only reason the men’s system works is because they play every week for a province.

    How would that work for the women? As a poster posted earlier is it a case of working with the French and English leagues to work out a partnership to pay half their wage so they’d be free for the international matches?



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    do you think the full time women sevens contracts are worth 50k?

    hint: mens are worth 18k



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    The IRFU are meant to be leading the way here. They are the governing body of the sport in this country. Of course they should invest in it. Participation numbers in the game are increasing and the game is getting more attention than ever. It isn’t being helped by all the negativity surrounding it though and the obvious issues that has led to.

    We’ve seen that there can be a market for the womens game based on other countries experiences. We know interest is growing here despite the issues in the game. So investing in it properly now may very well lead to a more sustainable game further down the line. Which is what the IRFU should be pushing for.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 54,172 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    What format of the game was it that World Rugby forced the IRFU to invest money? Was it 7s?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Yep. We had to have a mens and womens 7s programme to retain our tier 1 funding.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,172 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    So it would not be unfair to say that outside of men's 15s the IRFU's approach has been less than stellar.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Basically yes. Although to be fair to them, they didn’t want the 7s programme but couldn’t not have one. Hard to know where we’d be with the womens game if that wasn’t a factor. Although I’m not sure I’d be too confident we’d be much better off.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51 ✭✭tomgrange1978


    The blame game is something that happens

    the players don’t want to take any blame.

    the reality is this whole affair was handled badly by them, they are a poor squad and the players from 9 to 13 especially are of a standard no better then Spain Italy Scotland and Japan

    that’s the problem that needs accepting, the players are very average



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    and you see, thats exactly the problem.

    We have more women playing rugby than we did in 2014, we have more senior clubs in the AIL, we have contracted professional players. we have better paid coaches and better facilities.

    yet with all these the standards have visibly regressed since 2014.

    At what point do you stop pointing at the players and realise that there are systematic problems that are causing the issues.

    we went into a RWC play off game with an outhalf that had 3 caps (without any injury crisis)..... that is the anthesis of good management and good planning

    i have absolutely no doubt that that the group of women woudl have qualified straight out had there been better coaching, management and preparation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    You seem to have quite the agenda here. 5 of your 6 posts on Boards since you joined have been on this thread and very anti player. Disparaging would be putting it mildly.

    We have some great players at the moment but great players alone is not enough to win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭Luckycharm


    Who are the great players that would walk into say the English or French starting team? I watch all the games and Parsons would be in with a chance. Some of the basic skills are terrible.

    In 2015 we beat Scottish womens team 73-3 now they are knocking us out of RWC qualifiers, Did the Scottish womens team have bigger investment in them than Ireland inbetween? Does the Spanish team have anywhere near the investment in them that Irish women do?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    The players have accepted their underperformance in September. I’ve no idea why this notion that they don’t want to accept responsibility has taken such strong root. It isn’t based in reality, but is spouted routinely by people, ie men, who don’t actually have any concept of what has gone on in womens rugby over the years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    And the outside Influence the IRFU mentioned in their letter has stared to take effect, While an official independent review process in in progress and not yet concluded....


    Weather is deserved or not we do not know yet...Do these same Politian's say we should withhold TD's pay, if and while they are under investigation??


    "

    Members of an Oireachtas committee have suggested withholding State funding from the Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU) until it addresses the issues raised by female rugby players.......

    ......Fianna Fáil Senator Shane Cassells asked if the Government would withhold funding from the IRFU until it makes the changes that are demanded by the players......

    "


    https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/1215/1266976-womens-rugby/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Shane Cassells ?

    The same guy who was on OTB suggesting we need a third stadium in Dublin to help host the 2030 FIFA World Cup with the UK.

    Enough said.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51 ✭✭tomgrange1978


    It’s all the mens fault. Boo

    The ladies have not accepted the fact they are to fully blame for the failure to qualify

    it is plain to see that there are 2 key reasons behind the letter

    • Money and
    • power

    certain parties want their cut

    I am not saying they are wrong to want a taste but they are deluded if they think they are worth more than a thin slice. Those girls want the whole bloody pie.

    deluded



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,750 ✭✭✭LillySV


    u seem to have an awful problem with the women players, what’s your beef ? Awful sexist or u one of the highly paid officials in the Irfu that they are complaining about ? The 15s team get nothing , no money whatsoever … have played throughout the years at places where many times had no changing rooms… yet you are on about wanting their cut!! They get nothing … the useless fuks and officials in irfu are getting it while providing nothing back to them… no proper support , undermining them when they lose …. Lads Irish soccer team and indeeed the Irish rugby team have been shite many times in the past…. But continually well paid and put up in top hotels and given access to top facilities … how come you don’t complain about that or request for them to be stopped their pay for playing ****????



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    the women getting equality is not a threat to your masculinity.. theres no need to be so scared and angry.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Yeah this entire post is total garbage. It doesn’t deserve a meaningful response of any kind. The sooner this BS attitude dies off the better.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    You cannot compare the treatment the men get and what the women get.

    The men get put up in top hotels and are well paid because they are valuable assets.

    They generate a return, revenue.

    The women don't.

    The women need to be subsidized because their sport is just not popular enough or high profile enough to even get close to standing on it's own two feet.

    It sucks for the women, but it's reality.

    The only women's sport that I can think of that gets anywhere near being self sufficient is the WTA and even that is a much smaller tour than the men's version the ATP.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,750 ✭✭✭LillySV


    The men weren’t assets afew years ago when they won **** all …. In regards to the women .. they barely get the shirts on their backs and the travel costs … that’s it .. but yet huge money being spent on them apparently … where ??? The women aren’t getting it .. who is and for what ??? Time for some accountability …



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭M three


    Nail on the head. the reality is more female supporters go to mens games every week than womens games. If womens rugby is to grow and improve (and they say it will take investment for that to happen) then perhaps more female supporters should start going to their games.

    As it stands there more female supporters prefer to attend mens games so maybe the 62 people listed on that letter should start there before blaming men for everything.

    And on the investment / money point - are the 62 signatories to that letter aware that the womens national team received way more in funding that portugal? But still lost to them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    You have to love these well informed posts by people who clearly know what they’re talking about. Who certainly don’t have any misogynistic agenda and clearly spend a lot of time at rugby matches.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Is there any alternative to the Irish women's team playing professionally abroad (part-funded by the IRFU perhaps), maybe the 4 provinces could work out an arrangement with the Welsh and Scots to form a league? How else would the players be able to play professionally? If they just play club rugby it mightn't be enough to justify a full-time contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    There doesnt look like it and it most likely wouldnt be viable. Wales are contracting 10 players and another 15 will be semi pro soon enough and Scotland dont look like going pro any time soon and their ceo and others in union said any money offered now and into the near future wouldnt even make it worthwhile for most to take sabbaticals from their current jobs to go pro.

    Pro contracts would need more rugby for the players no doubt but at what level.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Are the Welsh players going to play in England?

    If we can't go fully pro, I still think there needs to be compensation for the ask of the effort they need to put in to become competitive.

    Even 10k a year for every squad member to cover basic expenses such as travel and training etc should be paid out without much of an issue, it wouldn't kill the IRFU to spend the money for a few years and see if that helps.

    How long will it be before the next qualification begins, Olympics or World Cup? If it's a few years away then it's an ideal time to kick start some investment and by then we should see it pay dividends.

    I'd imagine every sport must be having similar issues, basketball for instance, do they have a professional setup?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    I dont know. Compensation to come from where though? and there is little point in focusing on making players professional without other changes at all levels going in first. Getting the top 15-20 players on pro contracts may close the gap slightly to england, france but unless the clubs, and union make changes to all levels from age grade up then its pointless making a small number of players pros.

    10k per player for every squad member is still between everything else 300/400k at a minimum and would be much more with all other associated costs.

    If same as the previous Olympics then the 22-23 world series will be determining the 4 qualifiers for the Olympics and then regional tournaments will follow that. And as the world cup isnt going to be played for 11 months we have no idea when the qualification process will begin for the tournament in 5 years time.

    Basketball in Ireland isnt professional at all. It got into serious financial issues about a decade ago. And the sport really struggled for some time at the elite level as a result of that. those financial issues were also a major reason for some of the internationals in recent years actually taking rugby up in the first place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    If the Irish government are investing in the IRFU the least they can expect for their money is that both men and women are given the resources they need to represent the country at international level. If that means less money going to the men because some has to be invested in the women then I can't see anyone coming up with an argument to counter that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    The women's team don't play abroad, take a look at the players who do. Almost exclusively forwards. It's as if our backs don't need higher level rugby, or we can fill our back line with 7s players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I do love that Harry Enfield clip, but you are missing the point.

    Women's sport will never have the popularity of men's sport.

    Why that is so, ask an anthropologist.

    Thus the perks and rewards that are available in a sport to sportsmen will never be available in the same sport to sportswomen.

    That sucks for the women but that is the reality of the business of sport, and sport is a business.

    Women's rugby has increased it's profile in the last decade, but that does not mean that it is equal to the men's game regardless of how the men are doing on the international stage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    You're missing the point that the women are not looking for the exact same treatment, just an appropriate treatment for their efforts.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    How poplar is mens netball? Womens field hockey is more popular than mens in many countries. don't tell rachel blackmore that "the perks and rewards that are available in a sport to sportsmen will never be available in the same sport to sportswomen"

    Sorry to burst your misogynistic bubble here but Womens Tennis is more popular than Mens.

    yet for years the women had to fight for recognition of this fact in the prize money. why do you think that is? and they were fighting against the fact that the media coverage was significantly lower than the mens as well. Why did the male dominated arbiters of the sport make it so difficult to achieve parity. why do the male arbiters of other sports make it so difficult for women to achieve more in their sports? why is the male side of the IFRU regularly applauded for good governance yet the womens side rumble from embarrassing incident to embarrassing incident?


    well truth be told, your posts show me you dont have the wherewithal to consider this. You can only consider what you see in your very narrow viewpoint. you cannot see hinderances to womens sport, you cannot see possibilities of the growing game, you cannot comprehend untapped potential audience of a whole gender. It might be a shock to you but girls are not simply dress wearing, doll playing, fragile things who have no place in sport.

    and to cap this post off, which will be my last response to you, the women are not looking for like for like share of everything in the IRFU, then are looking for their sports to be given due recognition and attention and proper planning and management by the IRFU, and probably most of all, to be heard and listened to when they say what the actual issues are, and not to be given watered down "key findings" from review after review.

    if you want to deny them that fine, but thankfully you dont have any say in it



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    We’ve had some back and forth ourselves on this, but mail absolutely on head here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Net ball is super niche.

    Men's field hockey is huge in India and Pakistan, but of course the ladies game is more popular than the men's in other places, but it's not a top tier sport in any of those places like the US, Holland, Germany, Spain.

    As for tennis, the ATP is a much bigger animal than the WTA, on a typical week there will be 6 or 7 different ATP tournaments ongoing, 2 ATP tour and 4 or 5 ATP Challenger tour.

    On the WTA there is usually just 2 tournaments ongoing in the week.

    Your linked article only focuses on the grand slams, look at the big picture not just the grand slams to get the real insight about popularity.

    In a world where there are equivalent men's and women's sports, with very few exceptions the men's sport will always be more popular.

    Why that is I don't know, go ask an anthropologist as I said.

    And if your can't accept that then you are not worth debating with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    History. Men have been the ones playing these games and afforded the resources and attention for far, far, far longer than women have. So socially it’s more “normal” that men play sport at elite level. But just because something has always been so, doesn’t mean it always will. And it’s a ludicrously narrow view to take that it will. It can and should change. But that won’t happen overnight and without investment. But if you put even a minimal amount of thought into this stuff then you’d see that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Deal with the point that this is not about equality, it is about equity.

    The women's rugby players simply want to be supported in an appropriate way to match their efforts.

    They are not seeking the same pay that the men are getting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    That's fair enough, but the reality is that the IRFU and the women themselves seem very far apart on what the equity actually is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51 ✭✭tomgrange1978


    Some delusion on here

    why do the top soccer players get 400k a week and the top rugby players A million a year

    a sports support base determines wages

    womens rugby Not just Irish womens team will never be professional unless the government pick up the tab

    not commercially viable and never will be



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Congratulations on not having a clue about what the issues are.

    Well done



  • Registered Users Posts: 51 ✭✭tomgrange1978


    I get it as most people do

    money, power, jealousy and entitlement



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Haha....

    That thump was the sound of the mask ripping through the floor boards



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    “When the women created their own circuit in 1970, they did so because men did not believe in their marketing potential.”

    There was more money for men’s tennis, more spectators in the stadiums, more television audiences”

    Same tune, different decade. How’d that go for the WTA?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,172 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Climb down by the IRFU. They will publish both reports.



Advertisement