Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Luas Finglas

Options
1111214161724

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,945 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    so the highest frequency would be on the central section with the most on-street running and junctions. sounds about right...



  • Registered Users Posts: 383 ✭✭Ireland trains


    Will they not just extend services from the south that terminate at Parnell through to Finglas?

    Also could the 2031 completion date be accelerated if funding was given sooner?



  • Registered Users Posts: 383 ✭✭Ireland trains





  • Registered Users Posts: 17,732 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That’s not right.

    Under the Green Line Capacity Enhancement Programme, the highest frequency on the line would be between Sandyford and Charlemont where there would be a turn back facing south.

    A further turn back would be at St Stephen’s Green so that the frequency would step down gradually.

    There are limits to what can go through the city centre and we are already at that point.

    What I would see is fewer trams turning back at Parnell from the south and more continuing north to Finglas or Broombridge.

    Under BusConnects trams will be sharing roadspace with the A, E and F Spines from St. Stephen’s Green to Westmoreland Street so it won’t be physically possible for there to be any increase in tram numbers through the city centre.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Having a turnback at Charlemont makes zero sense. Almost nobody gets the Luas to go to Charlemont.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,710 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Actually, taking the Luas along Alelaide Road as far as Leeson St could make sense if it could connect with the bus services that pass there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,732 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I must be imagining the large numbers that get on and off there so.

    Remember that people would connect with Metrolink at Charlemont.

    You cannot run the full planned frequency any further north of Charlemont - it’s just not physically possible with three road crossings between there and St. Stephen’s Green all of which will have high numbers of buses passing across them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,397 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    It's a very busy connector at rush hour. Closest stop to everything on the canal. Companies like BOI, Amazon, Sky, Facebook in Ballsbridge served by that stop



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,544 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Anyone working in grand canal Dock area will get off there and take a Dublin bike up along the greenway to their work. Much handier than going to Stephens green and walking to a connecting bus.

    It's more for operational reasons though, there's no capacity North of Charlemont for more frequent trams. Additional trams added to the green line will have to terminate at Charlemont. This is what happens when youndepent on on-street trams for high capacity distant suburb to centre travel. The DART plan of 1975 called for a fully segregated electrified dart line along that alignment and here we are in 2021 with 55m trams going up the Dublin mountains.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    I'm not saying it's not a busy stop - but terminating the Luas at Charlemont coming from the southside is effectively cutting it off from much bigger trip generators further north.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,887 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    It doesn't "cut off" anything further north, it just means waiting for another Luas or using another mode of transport. It is less than ideal and disappointing that that will be the case but there are no other options. Hopefully the experience of this suboptimal situation will focus minds that Luas is not enough for the Green Line and that it will have to be upgraded to Metro. Some people will never come round but a dose of this reality will lead to the majority accepting that the short term pain of tying in is worth the long term gain of having Metrolink run from Swords to Sandyford.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,732 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It would only be certain trams that will terminate there, and only during the peak hours.

    The same existing frequency will go through the city centre and the frequency on the northern section will undoubtedly increase with far fewer trams turning back at Parnell.

    You physically cannot fit any more trams through the city centre. Unless they sprout wings, there is no other option.

    This turnback would effectively facilitate additional crowd-busting trams at peak times from Sandyford or Brides Glen. With some luck it won't be needed until Metrolink is in place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Well there is another alternative: they could look at feeding northbound trams at Charlemont to another cross city route via some alternative city-centre routing. What's clear from Luas cross city is that one central connection is not enough, so while Metrolink to Charlemont will alleviate passenger demand on the Luas network, it won't actually alleviate capacity constraints on the Luas network itself (simply because it is not part of the Luas network). Of course, it was always inevitable that more cross city Luas lines would be needed, especially without the Green line south of Charlemont being integrated as part of Metrolink. It's a problem of growth that's new to Dublin but common to other cities, Manchester being the most obvious and comparable example.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,732 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I don’t think that anymore on-street cross-city tram routes can be fitted being honest and nor should they be.

    LUAS BXD has caused havoc with the city bus service as it is and every potential cross-city route is going to now have a large number of bus routes passing along it under BusConnects to facilitate the pedestrianisation of College Green.

    The numbers using LUAS Green Line cross-city are far far less than those using the bus services.

    Going underground is the only solution.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,544 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Only additional trams would terminate there though the existing service could continue northwards. There's no possibility of increasing capacity further north



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,544 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Lots of space for cross city luas routes, it's simply a matter of removing more cars. A Gardner st-Tara st-Pearse st route for example is perfectly reasonable. A Patrick St to Church St route also very doable. Just a matter of tackling cars and the abundance of parking. Has been done in pleanty of other cities before. There should also be underground routes to accommodate longer journeys.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,732 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    None of which are even remotely on the planning radar.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,544 ✭✭✭cgcsb




  • Registered Users Posts: 17,732 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well with respect what relevance has it to a discussion about the Luas extension to Finglas?

    It is just getting crayons out for the sake of it.

    There is nothing like that remotely likely to happen in the next 20 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,544 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It doesn't. It was a response to your incorrect statement:


    "I don’t think that anymore on-street cross-city tram routes can be fitted being honest and nor should they be."


    [Edit- <snip>]

    Mod: Do not make **** comments.

    Post edited by Sam Russell on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Does anyone else thinks it's a missed opportunity to have a LUAS stop at the northern side of Tolka Valley Park? Under the current proposals, it's a 5-10 minute walk from the park to a stop. Although this isn't far, I think it's a missed opportunity to encourage greater public use of the park and discourage car use.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,397 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    There's got to be a line somewhere I guess, it can't be a bus stop that has stops at every second junction. One more stop might save some people a 5 minute walk, but it adds 90 seconds to everyones journey beyond that



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Yeah for sure I get that. Though PT is not just getting people to and from work at rush hour. We should fully utilize all amenities in the area, bringing people to the park during the day, sunny evenings and on weekends.

    There are actually very few parks on the whole length of the line, arguably only Stephen's Green and Iveagh Gardens.

    I would argue this is justification enough to have a stop at the northern side of Tolka Valley Park. Even with an extra stop here, the distance between stops is similar to most of the line south of Cabra.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,402 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Deadline for submissions is tomorrow:

    The main point for me was to put the the cycle route back in. Removing it from the plan was a big mistake.

    Post edited by Peregrine on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭p_haugh




  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,402 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Yeah, it's crazy. We have far too many different agencies with slightly different remits getting in each other's way.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    According to the scheme site, the next step for this project is RO submission in 2023.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,544 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    This will beat all other rail projects in Dublin to completion



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,402 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    They started EIA scoping a few months ago. It's a pretty straightforward project.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    I'm sure that's exactly how it'll be marketed and not plugged as some huge milestone in the country's shift to sustainable travel.



Advertisement