Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back a page or two to re-sync the thread and this will then show latest posts. Thanks, Mike.

United Ireland Poll - please vote

1189190192194195220

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    You accused posters of being "exclusionary Nationalists" though...you sure about that? Care to explain who and how they are so?



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    I would also ask Nationalists to remember that btw - NI Unionists are merely continuing what has been passed down to them through generations

    Absolutely. I think a large aspect of constructing a United people in Ireland will be giving each other a break on our respective histories. We cannot change the past but we can certainly shape the future together.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,741 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    When you are having to come up with stratagem after stratagem to deny one particular aspiration (that has already been democratically decided upon) then it is you who are being 'exclusionary' blanch.

    All you are doing on this thread is desperately trying to find veto's for unionist and partitionist aspirations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    No need. Those interested in it can put it forward. Those seeking a UI don't need to. People know what they want and vote accordingly.

    You are attempting to vilify people for wanting a UI. Suggesting they need near a full majority and be open to not really wanting a UI. You don't make the same conclusions about any other view. Its just the UI you have a problem with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Not going there and falling into that trap. I would say that certain posts have displayed an exclusionary nationalist ideology or worldview and leave it at that. And, before you ask, not going to go back and resurrect examples.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Those seeking a UI are speaking to a diminishing minority.

    Not villifying them for seeking that, more pity I suppose.

    Those who seek change have to justify it, they also have to be open to critical examination of their proposal and its possibility of success.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Not at all, a united Ireland as you envisage it will never happen. All I am doing is putting forward alternatives that might work.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Not true, Britain threatened ''immediate and terrible war'' if the Irish didn't go along with the treaty so anyone advocating against the treaty was the equivalent of invading the North by fighting against British rule in it's entirety.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Not going there?

    You made the accusations. The onus is on you to back them up or retract them.

    You're not very good at this debate/discussion game are you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Those seeking a Federal state or re-joining the UK are speaking to a non-existent minority [sic].

    Why should we entertain anything you say on that basis?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,741 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You just 'excluded' me there totally unaware of yourself. 😁

    All you are doing is voiding/excluding the aspirations of your boogeymen and women.

    My 'vision' includes everyone who wants to be a democrat living on this island and also includes those whom I oppose ideologically. I have adhered to the terms of the GFA like many in the north and expect those who voted for it to do the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    n

    Never said I was seeking a federal state or re-joining the UK. I am happy with the status quo.

    However, those of you in the diminishing minority in the North would be much better off designing a more inclusive united Ireland if you have any hope of succeeding. The timeframe is diminishing though, another couple of generations and nobody will be looking for a united Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Never said I was seeking a federal state or re-joining the UK. I am happy with the status quo.

    You're exhausting.

    Are you suggesting that we should take advice from you about inclusiveness?

    ---

    Let me know when you find those examples of posts that I requested. Cheers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Its obvious you only have a problem with anyone seeking a UI.

    You want those people to be open to changing from a UI to some as yet unspecified ideas for a third option. You've gone so far as to claim you "feel pity". Seems to me you are more worried.

    People want what they want. They might not get it. Thats democracy.

    Its like people going to vote for FG in a general election and you telling them to think about voting for Renua because FG aren't looking like winners. Nonsense.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Waylon Stale Transient



    There will be compromise, but not in something as fundamental as name and (imo) flag. The simple example I always think of is the rule that primary (I think) school teachers need to have a qualification in Irish. Practically, in a UI that is going to have to be removed / postponed / whatever because you're going to have thousands of teachers in what is now NI that cannot legally teach. There will be other scenarios like that which will require compromise from Ireland to accommodate us on practical grounds that we will arrive at and deal with one by one.

    Your view that the name of the country might need to change is a really good indication of why detail cannot be worked out before a referendum, because the process would include everything and would literally be neverending.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Waylon Stale Transient



    "The point is, feel free to post any opinion you like"

    Aye, up to a point, but you need to have a bit of sense along with it. For example if I go on a board and say I really enjoyed black ink spaghetti you can't just comment a reply that I'm racist. Your views need to be grounded in some sort of logic and basic sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    How could I have a problem with anyone seeking a UI, when it is something I would want in the longer term? It would mean I had a problem with myself.

    I am happy enough with the status quo, but if the communities up North can show that they can reject the sectarian extremism of the DUP and SF, and we can move to a united Ireland where Britishness and Northern Irishness get the respect and acknowledgement they deserve, then who wouldn't be happy with that?

    The type of united Ireland that you seek doesn't have that, and doesn't have a chance of succeeding, based as it is on a philosophy of exclusionary nationalism. If we ever get a united Ireland, it will be a lot closer to the type of united Ireland that I have talked about. It is a pity I am unlikely to be around to say I told you so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    A big problem with blanch's suggestion of a Federated Ireland, Joint Sovereignty or any other 3rd option is that it's not part of the GFA.

    The GFA specifically refers to a United Ireland, and that is what the referendum will be about.

    Blanch doesn't have a constitutional path to a 3rd option, which means his view point is outside the GFA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You claim to want it but also want to change how we get a UI and what it might mean. You are consistently highly critical of people seeking a UI, which is fine, but at least own it.

    I am happy enough with the status quo.

    I mean come on.

    You can respect and acknowledge other nations and their citizenry in your country. We all do it all the time.

    Why people want or don't want a UI is not for you to judge on behalf of everyone seeking a UI.

    Voting for party A over party B is exclusionary going by your speak. You only use that argument when speaking about a UI not those seeking to keep things as is or any of your third options.

    A UI will be a country called Ireland with all its provinces intact. No apologies and no buts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39 Just Some Young Lad


    Just because you feel like a post was from an exclusionary nationalist ideology or worldview does not mean that the person is an exclusionary nationalist. In school I spoke French, but I am not French?

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Everyone is entitled to voice their opinion. Knowing when you can do something and when you should do something is the difference between being smart and being wise...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    I notice that you correlate support for a UI, with support for Nationalist parties specifically (SF + SDLP), in order to come up with < 40% support number.

    However you are making presumptions in that calculation that are not true. For example Alliance as you know, are now the 3rd largest party and they are neither Unionist nor Nationalist by their own declaration and, they intentionally leave the Constitutional question to one side.

    AP deputy leader said in 2020:

    "Alliance is not a party that is defined by the constitutional question,” said Dr Farry. “While there may be some members who prefer the union, and some who prefer a united Ireland and indeed many who are open to persuasion, we are not only united, but defined, by our shared commitment to make this society work, to overcome division and to build a better future."

    We literally don't know the % of Alliance members that would vote for a UI, but there are clearly some. In the absence of such a data point, Alliance numbers should be in the 'Don't Know' column.


    In the 2019 UK General Election:

    317250 votes for Unionist parties.

    300590 votes for Nationalist parties.

    617840 total votes for the tribal parties.

    48% going to Nationalists



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Not forgetting the great number of people not aligned to any party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That only adds to my point. If a united Ireland is to capture the vote of those people in the middle, then it cannot be the type of united Ireland favoured by the two parties sharing the diminishing nationalist vote, it has to be a broader concept than that.

    Given that the Northern Irish identity is strongest among that middle group who generally vote Alliance, the federal concept as put forward by the New Ireland Forum (and not the silly Eire Nua version) offers the best possibility of a successful outcome in the next two decades.

    If someone is really serious about creating a united Ireland, they would be involved in discussing how federal a "Federal Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland" would be. In parallel with that, they would be discussing harmonisation and financing issues without dismissing them for the utopian future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    It means no such thing, there is no correlation between being Undeclared on the Constitutional question, and a Federal Ireland concept.

    They are literally Unknowns and Undecideds and some that are just being politically correct, but deep down are Orange or Green.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You see the world isn't as binary as you think. Thought everyone would have learned that lesson by now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Since the foundation of the irish state, a grand total of zero FFFG governments have actively pursued a UI. By pursing i mean advocating, advancing plans, proposing, promoting, advertizing, shouting from the roof tops, whatever.

    Once SF get to government here I expect that to change and shortly thereafter, the polling numbers supporting a UI will raise in tandem. Exactly like what occurred in Scotland with the Indy Ref.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.

    The New Ireland Forum Report was one of many initiatives that took place.

    However, the fundamental point was that most Irish people and governments in the South understood from very early on that a united Ireland could not be achieved without the consent of the majority in the North. It was part of Sunningdale.

    It was those who kept up the terrorist campaign after that who were the slow learners and who set back the cause of a united Ireland.

    I expect that a Sinn Fein government in the South will decrease support for a united Ireland in the North.



  • Registered Users Posts: 537 ✭✭✭Speedline


    This is like Brendan Bendars 'middle Ireland' during the water charge threads a few years back. He was literally the only poster at the time banging that drum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    There can only be a referendum on a UI blanch, not on Joint Authority or a Federal Ireland because that's what the 2 governments agreed to in the GFA.

    That's what the IRA agreed to and that's why they decommissioned weapons. If they try to exchange a UI for a Federal Ireland or a Joint Authority arrangement, that would be a breach of the GFA.

    In sales they call it bait and switch, advertise a price but once you are in the shop or at the till, that price isn't available and they replace it with another, higher price, an illegal practice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,234 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Now that is complete nonsense, unless the UK played sneakily clever to make sure something that might be acceptable to a majority was permanently off the table.

    Where in the GFA does it specify what form a united Ireland will take?

    A Federal Ireland is a form of united Ireland.



Advertisement