Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

Options
18638648668688691115

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 28,839 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Oh I completely agree... as we've seen several times in recent times, people here don't want to pay for it and can't even agree on the idea of respecting (some of) the traditions of Unionists which we'd absolutely need to do if we wanted them to feel included and part of the process (as opposed to the "we won, **** you" attitude that has been expressed)

    Then there's also my default point... we can't even manage the country we have, let alone taking on the problems up North and the new ones that would arise. Plus, other than romanticism and "beating the Brits", what advantage would there be to the citizens down here? I can see why many of those in NI would want it - retaining access/membership of the EU would be a big driver - but what would those in the Republic get out of it? More taxes? A further split/diluted Dail? Less resources to go around?

    But I digress... there's many reasons why SF should never be in Government but primarily because they have no other agenda or policies beyond whatever is populist. They would be a disaster - we've already seen the result of these approaches through FF/FG

    As for their Covid response... again, what have they proposed beyond a default "whatever is opposite to the Government's position"?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    Martin is the type of milksop who wouldn't agree to an interview unless he pre-approved the questions beforehand. I don't know the name of the other guy but he has some journalistic integrity. . It's no surprise that government shill Coleman was asking the questions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    That's how the vast majority of interviews with public figures work anyway. It gives them a chance to answer the questions well.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What I find extremely frustrating is that journalists ask NPHET the most inane questions on the planet, such as, "Does this mean people should socialise less over the coming weeks?", when what they should be asking is questions such as, "What proportion of 'COVID-19 patients' currently in hospital are there because of severe COVID-19 illness rather than being incidental cases - and to follow up on that, can you be specific about the rate of increase of this specific subset of hospitalisations?".



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,064 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    It would if enough of them would take the jab. Unfortunately that does not seem to be the case. We see that here in Europe, where even in other European states citizens are refusing to take the vaccines for various reasons. The vast majority of which being from getting their information from such "reliable" sites as Facebook, Twitter and website grifters. Many countries in Europe are also suffering from this with those of their citizens or immigrants getting their advice from their own previous home country relations based on the same "reliable" sources as well. Even Romania ended up selling 1 million of their allocated vaccines to Ireland because of low take-up.

    How anyone is going to change that, I have no idea, but right now it is what it is and it does not make a great case for any country not to avail of the boosters and donating them to others until they sort out their own population hesitancy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 842 ✭✭✭Hego Damask


    At least he is mentioning antivirals, these are the way out of this ...

    anyone gets covid - takes a pill - prevents severe illness/hospitalisation.


    This ends.

    The fact that they didn't prioritise treatment for covid since the start is a disgrace, 1000s of lives could have been saved ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Blut2


    This is a great site for looking at UK hospitalization date (which we know is far more important than case numbers):

    The number of patients on ventilators as of 2 days ago was 879, and is stable or declining. This is down from 1023 at the start of November, or 1055 in September, when there was no talk of restrictions. And Omnicron is already the dominant strain in the UK, they're at least a week ahead of us.

    In South Africa, where omnicron has been around for at least a month, hospitalization rates are only 34% that of the Delta wave. And cases have already peaked a week ago and have declined by 65% since:

    https://data.spectator.co.uk/category/south-africa

    In Ireland our number in the ICU has declined from a peak of 132 a month ago to 102 as of yesterday - a 23% decline. Numbers in hospital have declined in the same period from 685 to 483, a 33% decline.

    So why is it all we're hearing is talk of new restrictions, and not talk of rolling back the current ones if hospitalization numbers continue to be stable/declining? Its mind boggling. All we're hearing is predictions of tens of thousands in hospitals, and further lock downs, but the data doesn't support that in any way - in Ireland, the UK, or South Africa...



  • Registered Users Posts: 842 ✭✭✭Hego Damask


    It just broke Fergal's heart to type that tweet ! :D



  • Registered Users Posts: 241 ✭✭Perseverance The Second


    You will have to consider what the future case load will look like after Christmas and New Years gatherings.

    Whilst the variant in of itself is much weaker than Delta it might not make much difference should the sheer amount of cases lead to a similar number of patients entering ICU.

    And the UK is pivoting towards restrictions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    It's a measure of just how transmissible this new Omicron variant is, that it can infect imaginary neighbours.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    You need to have a look at say London.

    Cases increasing, hospital admissions increasing and people on ventilation increasing.

    Looking at the UK as a whole will mask where omicron is causing issues.

    The same reason people were focusing solely on Gauteng figures as that was the hotspot of omicron in SA.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,649 ✭✭✭walus


    Because restrictions drive the vaccine/booster uptake. Good news don’t and so the doom and gloom ‘de variant’ narrative will continue for the next 2-4 weeks at the very least.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,608 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It was prioritised, it just takes longer as the available trial pools are smaller and there are usually more side effects to figure out. They are also much more expensive (monoclonal treatments were available before vaccines, but manufacturing is hard to ramp up and cost was prohibitive).



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,697 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    All excellent analysis and logical but you forgot to factor in the most important guiding factor for our weakling Government and Nphet, Nolans modelling.

    What does that indicate ?

    Our politicians are the dregs.

    They arent entrepreneurs or go getters. They aren't risk takers or mavericks.

    A bunch of teachers, auctioneers, failed businessmen, career politicians, half of then I wouldnt trust to run a corner shop for a few hours. They havent experience in industry, of running a business when under pressure and tight deadlines, when the wolf is at the door, thats when great leaders show their mettle.

    They know the HSE is so unfit for purpose that they cant take any risks for fear it could be pushed past its feeble capacity and they as politicians will be held responsible.

    So they just play it safe and are overly cautious.

    Its not their jobs on the line, or their money and other countries in the Europe are introducing restrictions so we can too, the public wont be too angry as its happening elsewhere .

    We can get Nolan to bang out some doomsday chart and roll Tony and George Lee out to dampen the mood before delivering the bad news.

    Its so predictable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Vaccines are easier, cheaper and offer a level of protection that does not require people to get sick and that's where the huge bucks were going. Vaccines also give pharma more time for treatments to be developed without the pressure of being the only option.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭opinionated3


    Does anyone know if the 31st January date for review of restrictions is set in stone? In other words if in say, two weeks time for example, hospital numbers are favourable and the Omicron disaster doesn't come to fruition ( that it's essentially a mild virus/ head cold) are the government willing to review said restrictions?



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,947 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Regardless of any numbers between now and then we will not be lifting any restrictions. It's just not in the dna of our leaders. Anyway, real world data has no place in our current governments strategy when we have Nolan's modelling.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭francogarbanzo


    No chance any restriction whatsoever is relaxed or lifted until April at the very earliest. If anything, more will be placed on us.



  • Registered Users Posts: 241 ✭✭Perseverance The Second


    The infection number will probably dictate reviews into restrictions.

    Not dates.

    You surely must have learnt this over the last two years at this point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,623 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre


    Exactly. People holding out for Jan 31 will be disappointed



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 241 ✭✭Perseverance The Second


    Also Edinburgh's Hogmanay street party has been cancelled and football matches will be effectively spectator-free as part of tough new Covid rules in Scotland.

    A decent chance that a lot of the UK will follow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭opinionated3


    Yeah I've learnt a lot of things over the last two years, all mainly bad. Was fishing for a bit of positivity I guess☹️



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Blanket restrictions until 31 January was always absurd.

    NPHET admit that they know next to nothing about Omicron, so why the certainty over 31 January? Why not say, "We'll review the data after 2-weeks and, if it turns out that Omicron is not what we believed it to be, we will reverse many of these restrictions".

    As usual, NPHET show themselves up as having not a clue what they're doing - apart from getting almost all modelling spectacularly incorrect.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,947 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Would that be the actual infection rates (cases i presume) or the projected worse case scenario projection infection rates?

    Because for the past year we have only used one of these metrics and it hasn't been the one grounded in reality.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,947 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    We might get closing times extended to 10pm at a push. I can't see full gigs or sporting events being allowed back anytime soon.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so



    With all the alarm over Omicron and how bad it could or might be, January 31st may just be a checkpoint. Now if it peaks and fall very quickly and doesn't leave us too badly off with hospital numbers there is a chance.  That said there will probably be something else that NPHET will point to, like "concerning" high case numbers, or concerning positivity. If it does turn out to be quite mild there is hope. I am still pencilling in February for changes.  



  • Registered Users Posts: 241 ✭✭Perseverance The Second


    I think you already know which metric they use.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The only thing learned over the past two years is that there's no logic to the decisions. €9 meal, time limit, outdoor only... places being closed yesterday not even given the option of outdoor.

    Constant flip flopping so how could anyone have learned anything.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,864 ✭✭✭acequion


    What is complete and utter bunkum is your inability to comprehend or perhaps deliberate refusal to acknowledge the psychology of personalities and the complex issue that is human decision making. You talk as if a decision is something that can be input into a computer and then a neat output, something mechanical and therefore the same in every country. The rest of your post is mere repetition of all your posts on this, I think Chris Whitty and Jaap Van Dissel are in your head 24/7.

    No point whatsoever in continuing this discussion, I wish you a nice day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 241 ✭✭MarkHenderson




Advertisement