Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Matrix Resurrections (with Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss and Lana Wachowski)

15791011

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,348 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    There are no spoilers in that review, you have picked that up the wrong way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,492 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    So sounds like more memberberry pie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    If empire are saying the movie is a skunk…. then it’s very likely a skunk or worse…. :(



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Guardian review also terrible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,518 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    This is gonna be absolutely horrific isn't it.


    All signals point to definitely... It can't be as bad as the second or third one can it?!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    I was going to watch it Christmas night… but it might actually ruin Christmas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,518 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Nice of the Wachowski brothers to let their sister direct but doesn't make for a good movie.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Although if Bradshaw in the Guardian doesn't like it than maybe I will. Hate most stuff he gives 5 stars



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Could be a reference to not believing that Lana is really a woman, but is maybe just an autogynephilic BDSM fetishist, as was revealed in the now pulled, infamous Rolling Stone article.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,348 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Ive seen reviews saying that its the funniest Matrix film and its great fun.

    I never like to hear that a film is fun, and the Matrix films werent funny in a deliberate manner.

    Not a good sign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,518 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭blue note




  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Thinking it can't be as bad as the second, suggests you lack imagination. I imagine it could be much worse.

    Venom 2, should have been epic but it was a mess. Not seen Spider-man or Ghostbusters yet but have my expectations set pretty low.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,682 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Don’t post in this thread again. Take your trolling somewhere else

    Folks stay on topic please

    /mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,208 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Accordingly this will hit hbo max at 8am our time. So expect spoilers from 10am lol.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,695 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    Spoiler.... the film is sh1t

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,767 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    A couple of critics I've a lot of time for have been effusive in their praise for the film. Really looking forward to seeing it now, hopefully this week.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2021/12/the-matrix-resurrections-movie-review/621082/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    I watched it earlier, its passable. Not a patch on the first movie of course but some of it was very good, obviously I won't say much just in case but I enjoyed it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭thomas anderson.


    Ugh it was terrible

    Really really terrible



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I thought it was decent. As I and most predicted, not a patch on the first, but better than the sequels. They went a bit overboard on the meta stuff at the start, and Morpheus' whole inclusion in the film was entirely unnecessary, and clearly done just to have "Morpheus" in the film/trailers. The Merovingian as well was... oof....

    There were also a lot of missed opportunities. The fights were pretty bland, missing the mark between the inventiveness of the first and the overblown cgi-fest of the sequels.

    All that said, it was a decent watch. I really liked New-Smith, even though performance-wise he's not a patch on Weaving, I enjoyed his character evolution in this. Neo and Trinity were terrific as you'd expect, and the general story was okay.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just back from watching this. It's not as bad as I feared, but obviously not a patch on the original. There's plenty of throwback nostalgia nods to the original, although some of it is overdone, with trying to basically just replicate particular scenes. My teenage daughter who has only seen the original once, also enjoyed it. Although it is better than the first two sequels, it would hold no re-watch value for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,509 ✭✭✭sioda


    Just out of it there and I liked it.


    Love the kickback to the original film and the adjustment of the new world tbh.


    New Smith I get he's way more fun but Merv swung it for me quality over acting.


    Nice to see Sense8s again🤣



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,237 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    My review.

    It's a good movie. Not great, not bad.

    The end.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,649 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    God, this was tedious. It felt like a remake of the original film and it was peppered with clips from the trilogy for no unfathomable reason beyond perhaps the director thinking we'd forgotten said trilogy. Spiderman: No Way Home rewarded people who'd seen the previous sets of films with references but this felt like having nostalgia rammed down my throat rather than the new Matrix story I was expecting.

    The action sequences were completely banal, I don't remember the soundtrack at all save for Jefferson Airplane's White Rabbit. The closest thing there was to a new idea was hinting with all the subtlety of being walloped with a brick that Jessica Henwick's character is non-binary.

    I consider myself quite forgiving when it comes to many things but I truly despise being bored in a cinema.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭Falthyron


    On your point about nostalgia being rammed down your throat, I think you misunderstood what was happening here. The first hour of the film is a clear critique of the current state of Hollywood remakes/reboots, etc. In fact, the line by Morpheus 'Nothing like a bit of nostalgia to comfort people's anxiety' says it all. Spiderman is pure nostalgia wankery and revels in it, but that is part of the charm of MCU so it gets a pass. Although, I would agree the flashbacks in Resurrections weren't necessary. The original Matrix treated their audience as intelligent and let them digest the plot and it's intricacies in their own time, and they should have taken the same approach with this - we didn't need to see 'connections or links'. In short, if you didn't see the originals, you shouldn't be at this film.

    Resurrections is without a doubt a sequel. So, if you are expecting a reboot/remake/remaster, rest assured, you won't get that.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,649 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I see your point. The problem there though is that whoever wrote this thought that one or two hints wouldn't be sufficient so they had to have Anderson's business partner give him the name of their giant parent company, Warner Bros. as if he wouldn't have known it already.

    It could have worked as a tongue-in-cheek quip but it just became tedious.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,475 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    The throwbacks are the lamest thing of the whole movie. Sadly, I don't think this movie surpasses even Revolutions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭santana75


    Went to see it earlier and it's atrocious. I found myself nodding off after 20 minutes, it was just boring. Keanu reeves comes across like he's perpetually baked, his delivery is really stilted and forced. Its not a good movie, simple as that. I'd recommend avoiding this one and not parting with any of your hard earned cash.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,475 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    You're spot on.

    Random shout out here but Matrix 4 reminded me of Saw 3. In Saw 3, they just kept showing clips of Saw 1 (which was a better movie than it gets credit for) hoping you'd forget how bad the new movie is.

    I'd say more but don't want to get close to spoiling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I got this on the dodgy box and I'm so happy I did.

    I'd be sick to my stomach paying money to see this movie. Turned it off after an hour.

    What did they do to the Merovingian?



  • Posts: 15,661 [Deleted User]


    I was on board with the second movie, loved it even but remember being super pissed walking out of the 3rd on day one but mellowing to it in recent years seeing it a second time out. Could have been worse says me, yeah could have been as bad as the 4th movie and even worse than the Sense 8 scutter they made for Netflix.

    I didn't rate V for Vendetta at all or Speed Racer which I think they only did screenplays for so what else have they really done other than Matrix? I just felt my time was robbed by them creating a franchise when one movie was good enough to do the job.



  • Registered Users Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Housefree


    Go in with the lowest of low expectations and you will still be disappointed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,348 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Bound, their first film, they wrote and directed it, it is excellent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,475 ✭✭✭corcaigh07




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,348 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,692 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Was a passable film - if you can make it thru the first hour or so

    Think the last 30 minutes or so saved the film from being crap


    Is it just me or were those fight scenes atrocious? I mean not Taken bad but everything seemed to be done really slow, think they could have done with speeding them up by 50% in post processing to make them look somewhat decent. You can forgive Reeves not been able for it considering he's reaching OAP bus pass age but the rest of them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭OhHiMark


    The Merovingian wasn't in the film until an hour and 20 minutes.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It takes ages to get going, even when it gets going it's boring. It looks like a cheap CSI show at times - the lighting and camera work etc just looks cheap. There's a cheesy motion-blur effect that is way overused. Most of the "team" are uncomfortably bad at acting, they wouldn't be out of place in a student movie. They have some generic black guy for Morpheus, he doesn't have 1/10th the presence of Laurence Fishborne. There are no memorable scenes or set-pieces like there were in the first movie, everything is bland and forgettable. It drags on too long.

    It pointless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 875 ✭✭✭somuj


    Muck.

    It dint even look like any of them were acting. Just reading lines for the scene.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    If what was said about Warner Bros in the film is actually true, then this movie is a troll. Otherwise its a failure with some good moments here and there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,969 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    My thoughts exactly, I wouldnt say as bad a pointless nostalgia cash-in as the 2 recent Ghostbusters but it was close, a steaming turd of a film. So many scenes where its more like an SNL rip of the first film or one of those sketches they put on before the oscars, this scene in particular is where I would have walked out if Id payed for it but thankfully I downloaded it instead, pathethic:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭Tilikum17


    I started it last night with herself. I went to bed after an hour.

    Watched the 2nd have there….

    shouldn’t of bothered.

    Rubbish.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,767 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I **** loved it. Truly.

    Didn’t think Hollywood had these kind of bold, eccentric, personal, passionate sequels in it anymore. It’s a mess of ideas in the best possible way - angry meta-commentary on franchise sequels; lovely, cornball and charming romance story; pure, weirdo Matrix sequel; even a bloody heist film for a bit. If you’re just expecting ‘more Matrix’, you’ll only find drips and drabs here. If you want to see a wild new film from a major auteur using the Trojan horse of a legacy sequel… hoo boy this is something.

    Right down to the look of the thing - incredibly raw, harsh and - most surprisingly - warm digital cinematography that feels almost the polar opposite of the slick, clinical, blue/green-tinged look of the original films - it’s Lana coming back to her most famous creation, reimagining it from a new, fascinating perspective. It’s the opposite of a ‘memberberries sequel - every callback is driven by theme, and it aggressively avoids so much of the easy gratification we’ve come to expect from the ‘for the fans’ sequel. Some characters are unrecognisable or broken; others get the triumphant moments or tragic punchlines they were denied last time around. It’s also a fascinating post-war film - sidelining any kind of major, world-threatening conflict in search of something more personal and the complicated quest for true peace.

    The first 45 minutes is a delightfully cheeky meta-commentary on corporate filmmaking from within the system itself, and a reckoning with the messy legacy of The Matrix. The return to the ‘real world’ lulls a bit, it must be said, but the final act is a glorious, romantic blast. Some fantastically weird, imaginative set pieces too where the spatial and time borders just kind of collapse away.

    Reeves and Moss are fantastic, but Jessica Henwick is just magnificent.

    What can I say: I sat in the cinema with a stupid grin on my (masked) face the entire damn time. It’s big, indulgent, deeply personal filmmaking - a vivid burst of oddball creativity when almost all modern blockbusters are frigid and impersonal. Messy and indulgent? Absolutely, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.

    Post edited by johnny_ultimate on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Beauty is definitely in the eye of the beholder.

    Maybe this movie is ahead of its time and I'll come back to it in 19 years and re-evaluate.

    It worked for MGS2.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,767 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Ah sure Speed Racer has already been (rightly!) gradually re-evaluated as one of the more visionary CG blockbusters so the Wachowskis have form in that regard ;)

    I actually totally get why many won’t like this film! Maybe they will eventually come around it, maybe they won’t! I’m just speaking for myself when I say I adored the thing in all its strange, unwieldy glory :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 283 ✭✭anplaya27




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭fluke


    It's not for everyone. Sometimes the momentum gets winded, and it isn't a meat and potatoes sequel, but I enjoyed this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,039 ✭✭✭youcancallmeal


    I'm a huge fan of the original trilogy, even movies 2 and 3! This movie was utter nonsense, stupid plot, zero stakes, poor action scenes, terrible dialogue, dodgy cgi, immediately forgettable secondary characters etc etc. As the movie progressed I was getting the impression that Lana Wachowski didn't even want to make it but from watching/reading recent interviews with her I'm not so sure, I think she might just be creatively bankrupt


    Edit: I'm just thankful the ending wasnt a blatant setup for a 2nd trilogy, or maybe it is!?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,819 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I like this idea.

    Watching the original matrix now.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement