Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

Options
18698708728748751113

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,178 ✭✭✭Red Silurian




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Case count doesn't matter anymore; that's a pre-vaccinated era metric.

    What matters is hospitalisations etc.

    They've found that 50 percent of so-called "COVID-19 hospitalisations" in London (the figure in SA was as high as 70pc) are incidental findings i.e. that these are people who presented at hospital with some other condition, but who have been found to coincidentally carry the virus (as per hospital protocol to test everyone who arrives at the hospital).

    This isn't a "COVID-19 hospitalisation", not in the most elastic meaning of the phrase.

    Second, take a look at these graphs (below) - remarkably static admissions.

    No risk of a high surge - and this is even more true now that we know the Scottish data (and SA data) that Omicron is two-thirds less likely to cause hospitalisation.




  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭francogarbanzo


    So what you’re saying is his predictions are unfalsifiable because some things have changed since he made them? Nah, not buying it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,178 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    It was closer to 30,000 daily cases up until a few weeks ago. Still the real figure to watch is hospitals, not cases, England seem to be about a week behind us in this wave and given their case numbers would normally see a spike in hospitalisations this coming week.

    The other thing about more case numbers is it will grant natural immunity on more people, every cloud and all that



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,126 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Naturally it is hospitalisations and ICU numbers that count, but as we have seen in the past case numbers do not translate into those right of the bat. it will be a few weeks until we know if this variant is lower, the same, or higher when it comes to serious illness or deaths. While still low, admissions do appear to be tracking cases in that London graph you posted. Which again is what we have seen with previous surges. Hopefully that will tailor off, but as of yet it is too early to say.

    I don`t see where the relevance is if someone has tested positive when presenting at a hospital as opposed to random testing. It`s not a new practice where this variant is concerned with hospitals, so it does not change the percentage rise in new cases.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,126 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I have never given much heed to case numbers since the vaccination percentages started to rise, but we still know very little about the capability of the present vaccines with this virus. Just heard a report where AZ drops to zero after 3 months, Pfizer to 35% and immunity due to a prior infection to 50%. That said it all depends on how severe or not infection are from this variant and so far it is too early to tell.

    Naturally immunity was always a bit like Russian Roulette, and with natural immunity now dropping to 50% after 3 months it is not going to give the lifelong immunity some hoped or believed it would.



  • Registered Users Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    Natural immunity drops to 50% after 3 months - against what? A minor reinfection that can only be detected via a test rather than symptoms? You are throwing numbers around - can you provide some sources and atleast make an effort to provide some context.



  • Registered Users Posts: 307 ✭✭dubdaymo


    I don't give a fiddlers f*ck about whatever you're trying to say because it's all based around a lie.

    You seem to be completely oblivious to the fact that all of the restrictions imposed on the people come about from those Nolan predictions. (Some might choose to call them lies). These predictions have not only all been wrong but wildly inaccurate - to date. Anyone who doesn't see that is beyond help.

    As in all computer programming, it's Rubbish in/Rubbish out. Sadly, the people elected to run the country fall for this every time and here we are....and we will be here again next year.

    How many cases could have been prevented if Antigen Testing hadn't been delayed for a year+. Remind me who was responsible for that and is also against hepa ventilation despite the advice of real experts.

    How can you still have faith in someone with that record of incompetence?



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Hmm, where to start with this. How do you think they get from the optimistic to pessimistic scenario?

    Yeah, they change some the variables such as R number etc. So they are in fact modelling changes.

    This dovetails nicely into the next point. The past two models released were complete bunk because there were changes planned to either the vaccine rollout rate or booster program that were completely ignored and then present as a fact by the CMO and nphet.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    They have ruined the words models/modelling - can pretty young ladies aspiring to fame via their looks please recapture these terms from the increasingly incoherent old men who keep making crazy proclamations of doom?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,721 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    No its not.

    Firstly its not even modelling its worst case scenario.

    As I already explained in post #25982

    The models being produced are not predictions, they are scenarios and they only model scenarios that they are specifically told to model by the Government.

    They are modelling worse case scenario but with no probability on it and no best case scenario being produced either.

    If you know the desired outcome you can create a model to justify it.

    The Sage and Nphet models have been consistently incorrect over the last 21 months, mostly by huge margins.

    The models Sage and Nphet are creating are supposed to be based on probability and likelihood.

    Anyone with a scientific, mathematical or analytical qualification can see that the modelling being used is deeply flawed and nonsensical.

    Its been raining all day today, worst case scenario is that it could rain for the next forty days and nights.

    Using this scenario I have decided to build a big boat.



  • Registered Users Posts: 216 ✭✭Corby Trouser Press


    The English have got it right throughout 2021.

    Accepting trade off between deaths of elderly and letting the young live a little.

    Irish political and media establishment won’t ever admit it though. They just constantly feed the public with Bad Man Boris content, eagerly lapped up of course.

    They had a near normal 5 months while we agonised over the likes of staging The Electric Picnic!

    And now we’re set for another few months of nothingness after a needlessly restricted year.

    They’ll probably emerge from restrictions sooner again in 2022.

    And Fintan O’Toole and the likes will keep feeding us hot takes on how racist and horrible Brexit Britain is… while our youth will keep going there for employment and opportunity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭dragonkin


    This is conspiracy nonsense, do you think the hospitals are deliberately avoiding telling us this information? This is a rapidly moving pandemic, covid testing for the presence of the virus is the only reliable option we have. Once beyond that it’s very subjective as to say whether someone is there with/from covid. Obviously in most cases the doctor will know and feed this back to NPHET but it’s not something quantifiable that can be put in the stats.



  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭dragonkin


    Absolutely, even if it is slightly milder it’s extremely contagious so will infect far more people during the same time frame. Hospitalisations tail cases by a week or more, so there will be a much clearer picture in a few weeks. Our hospitalisation rates are much higher than they were this time last year, yet people think it’s time to open up, amazing. This was all explained in the HSE briefing.


    https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/1222/1268251-hse-covid-briefing-things-we-learned/



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,178 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Yeah I heard those figures on Sky, they represent resistance to infection, the figures to resistance from severe disease are much much higher.

    If omicron is as transmissable as they say and we get 20k cases a day that equates to 200k or 4% of our population catching it the 10 day period of somebody being contagious

    Theoretically every single person in the country will have caught it in under 8 months



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,126 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    As I said I only heard a recent report being referred to, and that was just hearing it in the background and not paying a lot of attention, but it seems the percentage for those with naturally acquired immunity is lower than I thought I heard. Extended data fig 8 is the part I was referring to, but why you are so interested with you believing COVID is just a mild infection I have no idea.

    Anyway... here you are. Fill your boots.




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,126 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Yeah, I just posted a link to the complete report. Takes a bit of wadding through, but the relevant section is in Extended Data Fig.8 and according to that, previous infection give virtually no protection from becoming reinfected. (Column on the left listed as convalescent)

    It hasn`t been peer reviewed, it has only been posted in the last few days, so hopefully it is incorrect



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,498 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    What the hell are you on about?

    A third of people have no symptoms from Covid. If a guy breaks his leg and tests positive for Covid in hospital, he's obviously there with Covid not from Covid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 991 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Sorry to break it to you but it’s not conspiracy nonsense. And can be collected for statistical purposes.

    You can apply for the data for research purposes if you clear the million hurdles first.

    Specifically the information you will have access to includes admissions as a result of Covid.

    Hearhcare is under pressure but seriously do you believe they don’t fill out a basic form stating reason for admission to hospital?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭dragonkin


    Why don’t they make this information public?


    edit: I see it’s for privacy reasons. Well nonetheless, I’m sure this information is taken into account when decisions are being made. I do think they should relax the privacy restrictions a bit as it seems valuable and important information.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If a vaccine is compulsory to partake in normal society, then surely any negative effects from the vaccine you are compelled to take should be the responsibility of the maker or the person who enforced this on you?

    As long as the makers of this "vaccine" or the government aren't responsible for any adverse effects, why wouldn't they take a punt?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So..... It's not conspiracy nonsense.

    So do you take it back?

    Are you willing to admit you are wrong?

    Or are you going to just continue?



  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭dragonkin


    I’ve heard arguments before in which it’s argued the hospitals are hiding the data and it’s part of some secret plot to stuff the ICUs full of unvaccinated etc. so I tend to roll my eyes at that stuff. I was probably a bit hasty to use that conspiracy theory in this case as looking at the post again he said they “choose not to provide this information”. However the argument is really that they’re not able to provide this information due to privacy laws.



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    Perfect summary.


    Nolan also on 2 occasions ignored an imminent vaccine/booster campaign and the incorrect output that resulted in "stark" "concerning figures" was used to justify further restrictions. Who on earth would assume "no further vaccines" on the eve of a vaccine campaign ?


    He predicted 2000 deaths over summer starting in June if indoor dining returned. Despite the fact our nearest neighbours had indoor dining and (with 13 times our population) 26000 people did not die.


    A University graduate on their first day on the job would know to validate their model by calibrating actual experience against the models expected scenarios.


    That nolan continues to not do this and the predictions continue to be (as the Irish Times called him) "drunkenly" wrong highlights how incompetent he is.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Was in bad need of a quick haircut one day in town so I went into an Nigerian barber. Even an as an anti-vaxxer I thought they were taking the piss. Place was like there was a party going on, masks down by the chin everywhere... but all positive vibes. I normal times I’d be a bit concerned at the hygiene levels but at least it was a bit of care-free / refreshing compared to much of the sterile atmosphere everywhere else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Nope, it's not really subjective, that's why we have tests. Test people on entry to hospital (where possible, and aligning symptoms). A women in hospital to give birth who develops covid is not in hospital due to covid

    They are choosing to not provide this information.

    I see you have further commented.

    Privacy law is a very convenient thing to hide behind, they can tell us vaccination status, but not covid status on entry. Its total BS



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    We have no privacy when we are asked to disclose our vaccination status, full name, DOB and phone number to get a coffee.


    Why would stats on hospitals not be able to give a generic split of due/from covid with no further identifiable info.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Part of that is down to numbers. If such stats are very small they are potentially identifiable individuals and we know that HSE will not give details on fewer than 5 people for that reason.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    Yeah I get that , but we consistently have hundreds in hospital. Even if they did it monthly or quarterly it wouldn't be beyond possibility* and would remove the risk of people being identified.


    The covid status is released, the only extra info is "due or with".

    (*other than the fact its the hse and they are probably still recording all this stuff on paper except when its digital stuff and they let hackers steal it and leak onto the dark web)



Advertisement