Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Are we becoming worse as a Nanny State?

  • 30-12-2021 05:48PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Considering an outright ban on tobacco (as if all smokers wouldn’t just empty duty frees, depriving the state of ~1 billion in tax revenue).

    Minimum alcohol pricing coming in.

    Why is the government’s answer to every issue just to ban things? What has happened to the concept of personal responsibility?

    I find it unpalatable in the extreme. That smug, condescending muinteoir “we know what’s best for you” air about them. And what frustrates me most is the vocal swathes of Helen Lovejoys who actually welcome the government further restricting their lives and their freedoms.

    We are not becoming more liberal with time, we are becoming more Puritan. Are we on a slippery slope?



«134

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    New Zealand are going down the route of banning tobacco. Pretty good idea I think. It’s a worthless habit that has a bad effect on health.

    It will probably go black market for those who are already addicted but long term I can’t see the appeal as nobody gets high off cigarettes in the same way they do with alcohol or drugs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,479 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    and their ban is going to fail because all prohibition does.

    it implements a mystical nature in relation to any sort of drug and tobacco won't be any different even though as you rightly point out it does not get one high.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    There has been a real move towards Orwellianism in the past few years


    Mandatory speed limiters for cars

    Covid certs

    Cashless society

    Carbon taxes

    Impending fags ban?


    I wonder does anyone still value their freedom? Anyone who is against any of these things is automatically branded as a conspiracy theorist or Trump supporter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭thefallingman


    We've been a nanny state for a long time, but there is serious benefits to not having tobacco in our country for the good of our health, and that of our children, but like many are pointing out, how do you police it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,949 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Why is the government’s answer to every issue just to ban things?

    You say this like both the tobacco and alcohol industries have continued for decades after the evidence of their destructive impact became evidence.

    I'm not in favour of outright bans, off the cuff, but that hasn't come close to happening in either of these cases. I am a former smoker who really enjoyed the act of smoking a cigarette and luckily I was never a heavy smoker but I have no problem with the scaled manner in which it has been targeted for reducing the number of people doing it because it was accompanied by massively overwhelming evidence as to its harm.

    Why shouldn't a government look at the potential risks to the health of a society and look to mitigate against them? Why should we have an expectation to be able to do whatever we want, whenever we want, when we rely on cohabiting and engaging with everyone else in society as part of our existence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    Pointless banning it completely...we'd just end up giving criminal gangs more money. Look at prohibition in the states and the war on drugs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,479 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    covid certs only exist because of those who won't get vaccinated because doctor youtube, and because those of us who are vaccinated have a right to go about our business seeing as we are responsible adults who took personal responsibility.

    carbon taxes are necessary so as to make things more efficient and hugely cut ridiculous pollution levels.

    speed limiters have been fitted to trucks and buses for as long as i can remember, so it actually makes sense to fit them to cars as well given people do break the speed limit and cars can cause damage in an accident situation.

    i will give you cashless society, i wish to be able to use cash as it's convenient for me but i don't think that it's removal is about nanny statism but about cost cutting by the banks.

    i obviously don't support fag bans or nonsense like MUP and believe all restrictions in relation to alcohol bar the age limit should be removed.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭HalfAndHalf


    Posted the same link earlier today with the premise of 100 deaths and 1000 admissions to hospital every single day attributed to smoking. Surprised we haven’t needed national lockdowns to protect the health system with those figures 🤦‍♂️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,949 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    What do you mean by freedom? Do you exist in a society where you don't rely on the presence and contribution of others in order to live your life as it is currently? Should you be automatically entitled to put their safety at risk just so as to not impede on your freedom?

    In relation to 'those who value their freedom', I've noticed more and more over the last months that most of those who are adamant that there shouldn't be any form of restrictions are also adamant that immigration should be controlled and cry in equal measure about the introduction of covid certs while demanding that people should have papers to show that they are entitled to be in a country.

    It seems to me these people aren't against government control, they just them to enforce the type of control that they are comfortable with. I'm not saying all of them are Trump supporters, I will say that a lot of Trump supporters fall in to this category. (and I'm only mentioning that as you introduced the topic, others will be along shortly to decry any mention of him on an Irish website.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,824 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    I don't smoke or drink anymore. driving has become unenjoyable , but I'm a free Spirit at heart, glad I grew up in the 70's when life was for living - Today the nanny state or HSE tell us how to live, we are told we are a more compassionate liberal society, but in truth we are becoming medicated robots to the system, but glad I quit smoking.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    It is just that the amount of freedom you are expected to give up for the common good is continuously increasing. It has been increasing as long as I'm alive but the last couple of years of it are really taking the biscuit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Pretty sure this is just kite flying.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,921 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the notion of speed limiters in cars being a sign of nanny statism is strange; complaining about being prevented from doing something which is already illegal is a sign that you resent it being illegal, not that you resent the new measure. i.e. people who complain about speed limiters should simply just clarify that they object to speed limits, not speed limiters.

    re smoking, i'd be content if the price of cigarettes was simply set to accrue for the state what the cost of dealing with smoking related illnesses cost. so if you want to smoke, you fund your own healthcare and don't depend on the public purse for your hobby. thankfully smoking has declined to a point where the rest of us are much more rarely subjected to the stink of someone else's smoke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,949 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    These are the points you referred to in your earlier post.

    • Mandatory speed limiters for cars
    • Covid certs
    • Cashless society
    • Carbon taxes
    • Impending fags ban?

    First one, a direct effort to deal with 25K people dying on the roads in Europe every year. Many of these who do die, are innocent parties. Covid certs, a direct response to the most impactful global medical event of any of our lifetimes. Cashless soceity, driven by consumer use it seems to me. Carbon taxes, the climate issue is a massive chronic problem with likely catastrophic implications for the human race, action is needed. Impending fags ban, not yet a law, has come after decades of efforts to reduce their use as a consequence of the evidence of their impact.

    Covid aside, we enjoy more freedom today than the vast majority of people throughout history, the controlling of some of our behaviours so as to ensure our freedom does not impact negatively on others is completely understandable in most cases, and necessary in many.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,966 ✭✭✭corks finest




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Smoking does nothing but addict you and slowly kill you. I'm cool with it being banned outright.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    According to the above article smoking and second hand smoke related illnesses cost the state €172 million in 2016

    Annual tax revenues in Ireland for tobacco are in the region of €1.2 billion.

    So would you be in favour of tax rebates for smokers or?

    It's an inconvenient truth but they’re a huge net contributor to the state finances. The cost argument doesn’t hold water at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭nj27


    Carbon taxes will certainly save the world as China adds 43 new coal fired power plants and 18 blast furnaces to their already substantial emissions, so our barely detectable levels should be an immediate priority of course. I do tend to speed a lot, but you don't have to use all of the power all the time. I'd remove any speed restrictor from my car and decide when I want to speed myself without input from anyone else. I hate alcohol and tobacco but it's up to you if you want to indulge in that and be an unhealthy pig! I'd love to ban porno tho.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,921 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    assuming those figures are correct, i'd say it's nearly job done on tobacco so; it's dying anyway because of vaping and other factors, little need to waste money on further schemes to drive it down more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭NSAman


    While they are at it, why don’t they ban alcohol….?

    that worked under prohibition …😀



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,977 ✭✭✭growleaves


    'Covid aside, we enjoy more freedom today than the vast majority of people throughout history'

    There is no Covid aside, since it isn't clear when if ever the restrictions and the siege against the unvaccinated will be lifted.

    Many Europeans of the last thousand years lived much freer lives than people do now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yeah exactly, I just don’t see the need for further restrictive measures



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It will be interesting to see how it works out. My feeling is that as there is no great buzz with smoking then the black market would likely be small. A lot of people will just quit or not start in the first place.

    For those that still want to smoke it will push it into organised crime which will not be good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 176 ✭✭it takes 2 2 tango


    There’s a thread in AH started by yours truly 😆



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,479 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    get the vaccine and there won't be any extra restrictions on you.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,977 ✭✭✭growleaves


    We're debating how free Ireland is as a country.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Unvaccinated people pose a risk to the health service and public health. We're in a global health crisis so it's pretty logical that different rules apply. Same would have applied during world wars etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,323 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    What will we mix into our spliffs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭JizzBeans


    Can posters stop using terms like "Nanny State" & "Orwellian" please. Its so cringe and embarrassing. Alcohol & Fags are a blithe on the health system and the cost of treating related illness dwarf any potential revenue loss.

    If you really are that concerned about the future of the state, then why don't YOU get elected and run things as YOU see fit.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,757 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    But the problem is people don’t want to take personal responsibility, what they want is freedom without responsibility. And society is getting less and less tolerant of such behavior. When your lifestyle choices impacts the rest of society you can expect that your choices will be restricted.

    It is not a case of a nanny state, but more a case of people saying we are not willing to put up with your bad behavior when it impacts our health, our healthcare services and our tax bills. It’s not just Ireland, discussions are going on across the world on just how much society should have to put up with one person’s lifestyle choices impacts those around them.



Advertisement