Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

Options
1203204206208209308

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 29,073 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it is if you are irish.

    a little tipple is our culture and that is never going to change thank jesus.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,073 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    we can as both are charges to prop up certain sectors.

    water charges was a bank bailout tax and MUP is an indirect vintner's subsidy.

    Post edited by end of the road on

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    You have yet to give a single source for any of your statements.

    I've posted more than one to counter both the argument that it's not working in Scotland and that drug deaths are up in Scotland because of MUP

    But from yourself, nothing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,883 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I expect you will agree that the consumption level of six cans and a bottle of wine per week between two people is not harmful.

    If you do decide to reduce your consumption that is your personal decision.

    On the other hand someone else at the same level of consumption may decide to continue with their non harmful legal drinking.

    They face paying €364 per annum for the privilege of continuing to enjoy their drinks.

    This is due to Government legislation ie. MUP.

    When Government by taxation, charges or legislation like MUP increases prices to the consumer the fiscal effect is the same no matter what the reason.

    Put simply that effect is more money taken from peoples pockets.

    Post edited by elperello on


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I used to live in the US, and there was always a stereotype in the US of the Irish being drunks.

    I argued against that with Americans at the time saying it was not the case.

    Then I moved home after about 6 years and realized just how much closer it was to the truth than I thought.

    Drink is everywhere and it takes center stage in so many things.

    Look at the state (pre COVID) of any busy town on a Saturday night when the pubs and nightclubs are closing.

    It's mayhem.

    Christinings, weddings, funerals, drink plays a huge part.

    A British Indian colleague of mine asked me one day why when Irish people ask you about a wedding you were at why is the first question they ask is "what time did it finish ?"

    I was at a wedding recently and a guest at the table got up and got a drink for the whole table, except me, because I was the only one at the table not drinking alcohol. I didn't count when it came to his generosity it seems.

    On the non drinkers fourm here on boards a poster is asking what would be a good nonalcoholic draft to buy at a night out to hide the fact that they were not drinking alcohol and thus could avoid the "inevitable questions".

    Why are there inevitable questions ?

    Why do people even have to apologize for not drinking ?

    Why does the non drinker at the wedding not deserve to have a drink bought for them ?

    Why can a kid not go to a sporting event like a rugby international without wall to wall drink advertising ?

    Why does so so much resolve around drink.

    It doesn't have to be that way.

    We really need to change our relationship with drink, and saying it's our culture does just not cut it.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If the excess cash spent due to mup was going towards healthcare, I would reluctantly accept it and begrudgingly admit that it was a step in the right direction towards combating alcohol abuse.

    If it lines the pockets of businesses that the government are essentially branding as drug dealers, then I call shenanigans.

    If a drug dealer sells drugs at a high price, the government are ok with it.

    Clown world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 636 ✭✭✭MakersMark


    Good beer and wi e will hopefully remain the same price.


    Cheap muck will go up, hopefully binge drinkers will drink less.


    Failing to see the downside.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    There was a high profile report a while back that said the only alcohol consumption level that is safe is zero.

    Therefore your 6 cans and a bottle of wine per week is in fact harmful at some level.

    And obviously cutting down on that would make it less harmful.

    There is zero downside to reducing ones alcohol intake.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,735 ✭✭✭ASOT


    You were probably a snobby **** about not drinking, so I'd imagine that's why he didn't get you anything.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,301 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Luckily it's not a factor outside working class and poor areas as otherwise we could have used excise to increase the price across the board and use it to fund healthcare.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    What drivel.


    Define 'good'.

    Define 'cheap muck'.


    LIDL's €6 wine has to go up in price even though it is the same quality as an €8 wine in Tesco, Eurospar or off licence.

    Are the biggest brand names of wine, beer and spirits 'cheap muck'? Their price will effectively go up as they can't be discounted below MUP - which they regularly are.


    Is Tesco's own brand port cheap muck? That's gone up from €8.50 to €11.50.

    Care to explain how it's cheap muck?


    Do you just like being ripped off? Or are you just clueless?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,301 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    "Why does the non drinker at the wedding not deserve to have a drink bought for them ?" You should know how gift giving culture works. The key feature is that gifts should be of equal value. No one should expect teatotallers to join in because they aren't consuming at the same rate or value.

    If you want to argue about the price of soft drinks in pubs then talk to publicans because it's something that has literally driven people to drink.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Your reply is typical of the attitude towards the non drinker that I was alluding to.

    There has to be something"wrong" with them if they were not drinking.

    I was driving actually.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    That's a weird attitude.

    Don't ask the non drinker if they'd like a something because you don't expect that they should buy you one back.

    Again it shows just how much different a person not drinking, for whatever reason is viewed in Irish society.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭embraer170


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.

    MUP = more profit for the big drinks companies (with less threat of the cheap competition) = more money for these companies to put into alcohol related marketing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06



    All risks mortality studies consistently show moderate drinkers have lower mortality levels.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 45,402 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.

    The price change won't make a difference to most drinkers. Alcoholics and those who drink cheap shite are the losers here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,883 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Given the season that's in it I'm in a generous mood so I'm posting a link to prove your point !

    In fairness the jury is still out on the claims in that study and as we all know almost every country supplies guidelines to citizens to show them how to drink safely.

    These guidelines are signed off by medical authorities in each country such as The Surgeon General in the US. No country has tried to stop citizens drinking on health grounds.

    To come back to our own HSE the amount contained in six cans of beer and one bottle of wine comes comfortably within the limits set.

    So can we agree that the Irish Government are not trying to stop us all drinking by introducing MUP?

    Many claims have been made for MUP by interest groups and politicians but nobody has said we should all stop drinking (although I suspect some might prefer if we did).

    What is actually happening with MUP is that our sample couple are being forced by Government legislation to pay €364 extra per annum to consume a modest amount of drink which is within HSE guidelines.

    Of course there is no downside to someone deciding to abstain from alcohol if that is their personal decision and as far as I'm aware nobody on this thread has claimed there is.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,301 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Define 'good'.

    Define 'cheap muck'. +1 Beer is an acquired taste so you might as well acquire a taste for cheap beer.

    Alternatively all lagers taste similar if chilled long enough in the freezer. Brand names use that one a lot. On the other hand if there's a super abundance of hops you can even drink it warm, but multiples of what you'd find in English Dishwater Bitter.

    Beer was originally a health drink because water was dodgy back in the day and a lot of people now have genetic tolerance for it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Lower mortality rates than what ?

    Here is a BBC report on the study I was thinking about

    Edit: Ok I see you posted it already.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,045 ✭✭✭silver2020


    There's a report out almost every month. I'll show you ten reports showing a low level of alcohol is good for every report that says it's bad

    I could even ask the same questions in a different way and get different answers from medics.


    Basically these "reports" no matter what they say are to be taken with a pinch of salt.


    But mup will make a change to the harmful drinking that goes on. Those against it should visit an a+e dept at night.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Nonsense. Unless you think most drinkers have never bought the most popular branded beer wine spirits on offer?

    Or lidl aldi own brand spirits beer and wines. A quarter of the population shop there.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pno. It's a perfectly acceptable assumption. Someone drinking a soft drink shouldn't be expected to be included in rounds because it is a negative for them.

    They drink at a different pace than those drinking an alcoholic drink and drink less frequently and it would be much more expensive than remaining on their own.

    It is removing the expectation that someone should be out of pocket because they are drinking a cheaper drink.

    That's some bizarre gymnastics to frame it as if they are being punished.



  • Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is so wrong. They must address the reasons why people consume. Where my home is, wine can be €2 for a litre, vodka can be €6, and no special problems



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    But should they be given the courtesy of being asked if they would like another drink ?

    Actually I just reread this part

    Someone drinking a soft drink shouldn't be expected to be included in rounds

    That's pathetic.

    Just ask them if they want a drink.

    Typical of the attitude towards non drinkers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    There are no grounds for treating moderate consumption of alcohol as a matter of public health concern, other than in specific circumstances such as public order offences or drink driving - which contrary to MUP nonsense are more likely to occur in on sale scenarios.

    Men who are heavy drinkers have a 25 percent increased risk of mortality due to all-causes and a 67 percent increase in mortality from cancer; however, these results were not significant in women. Men and women who engaged in moderate drinking had a 13 percent and 25 percent decreased risk of all-cause mortality, and 21 and 34 percent decreased risk of cardiovascular disease mortality, respectively. There were similar findings for light drinking for both men and women.


    https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2017/08/14/12/54/consuming-alcohol-in-moderation-can-lower-mortality-risks

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    I am genuinely of the opinion that many of Ireland's addiction issues can be directly and indirectly linked to abuse during child hood...

    I know of 4 alcoholic's...3 of which are in their 50's and have been the victim's of sexual abuse in a Christian Brothers School...and the other one is a son of one of the aforementioned 3 who had a horrible childhood due to his father suffering real bad with alcohol abuse and post probably PTSD(his no longer with us, took his life a few years ago, no body believed he'd been abused until a few years after his death)

    You can make alcohol as expensive as you want, but unless we get to the root of the abuse we are pissing against the wind



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,197 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I've always believed that if you want to tackle the alcohol problem you start with the advertising, visibility and promotion, not MUP.

    Take away the tv ads, the ads at sports, the sponsorship of sports and gigs etc

    Stop making the brands ubiquitous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,883 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    This is an important point.

    The drinkers who drink to get out of their head will still go to the supermarket/off licence on Tuesday.

    They will be looking for something to take away whatever pain dominates their lives.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lol. Ok.

    A soft drink could be included in rounds but it would be unfair on the person drinking soft drinks as they would be losing money. It's more courteous and respectful to leave them out of rounds as to save them money and awkwardness when it comes to their turn.

    Thankfully I don't usually sit with people who would have such a victim complex that they couldn't understand the basic societal concept of rounds and feel singled out and disrespected.



Advertisement