Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

ESRI confirms Irish welfare dependent population is TWICE that of Germany or France

Options
1101112131416»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Because people working as carers (as an example) really deserve support



  • Registered Users Posts: 417 ✭✭CarProblem


    Cormc Lucey also wrote about this: http://cormaclucey.blogspot.com/2022/01/given-jobs-boom-how-come-ireland-has-so.html

    "Over recent decades, the state has partially used the dividends flowing from the FDI economy to allow the development of a permanent underclass of the unemployed. I don’t think it is good for them or their children. And I don’t think it is any good for the rest of us either."



  • Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They stopped the checkups to make sure people were not pretending to have DS, IIRC. Parents have a neighbour that had a son with DS and the mother used to be hopping mad about having to do it.

    On the main topic, others have said, 'welfare' money goes back into the economy.. and quick. It's not wasted money. It doesn't disappear when it's handed out. It goes straight into the economy, including into the hands of business owners. It's welfare for business owners and landlords too. Also, observe how the righties become simple-minded Marxists replete with simplistic models of oppressor/oppressed, when it suits them. :D



  • Registered Users Posts: 985 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Absolute drivel. They could also contribute to the economy by working and then spending the wages they earn, rather than taking handouts from hard working taxpayers? Have a think about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    “Jobless households contribute substantially to Ireland’s distinctively high level of income inequality.”

    Maybe getting a job would help reduce this? Just an idea.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    Could being the operative word. But for whatever reason 'they' don't. My point is not to sweat it too much, despite the apparent unfairness because that money does not vanish, it goes right back into the economy, and since shopkeepers and other businesses will pay taxes on profits, welfare also generates taxes down the line. Similarly, 'we' pay public sector wages, and viewed in isolation through a certain lens this seems deeply unfair, but of course, public sector workers pay taxes too. Could it be that you are not seeing the interconnected, circular nature of parts of the economy? It's just money going round and round. Are you seeing linear economies where you should be seeing circular economies?



  • Registered Users Posts: 417 ✭✭CarProblem


    "My point is not to sweat it too much, despite the apparent unfairness because that money does not vanish, it goes right back into the economy, and since shopkeepers and other businesses will pay taxes on profits, welfare also generates taxes down the line."

    This is utter nonsense. Let's have less people working and more on welfare - everyone wins! Apart from those crippled by excessive income taxes of course.......

    Make welfare less attractive, those people get jobs (employers are saying consistently they can't get staff). We have the same outcome you present and we can

    1. lower taxes so people who actually work, pay for everything etc are rewarded more (and can spend more); or
    2. the government can use the money productively elsewhere


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Actually, it's worth considering that people on welfare are more likely to be accessing the Black economy in terms of purchasing a wide range of products, and the suppliers of those products/services, are often foreigners (or Irish), sending their profits outside of the country (not taxed, nor spent within Ireland). There's the same problem with welfare applicants who buy online, whereby only the VAT amount and custom duties, make any returns into the Irish economy. In the modern sense, especially due to changes with regards to covid, there are heaps of ways for monies received to completely bypass the controls within the economy to retain monies within Ireland.

    Traditional beliefs in the circular return of monies within an economy tend to ignore how society, and international economics have developed over the last two-three decades. Few economies in the world are isolated enough for that to happen. Sure, some is returned... but there are many ways for a significant portion to leave the country. It's easier to point to a nation like the US which has such a broad selection of US founded businesses/products which are bought by American consumers, but that doesn't work in Ireland where a sizable amount of products/services/etc are foreign owned.

    It's definitely not money going round and round.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,417 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    lucey is a free market libertarian, so its always important to bare that in mind when reading his comments.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 467 ✭✭nj27


    I would like to have the entire social welfare program provided to me, then I invest it in my portfolio and the standard payment is deducted from the total each month and the rest is put into helping people off the streets. I’m in profit all the time, excluding crypto, and I have the magic eye via help yarmulke wearers from NYC.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 417 ✭✭CarProblem


    I'm well aware of who Cormac Lucey is

    Maybe we'd all be better off if we critiqued the argument and not the individual



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,417 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    no harm in being critical of the whole lot, all of us have biases such as lucey's....



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    If you think buying online is a problem in terms of money circulating in the economy, wait till you hear what the middle and upper classes have been doing for decades here.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Andrew, that's not accurate considering what I wrote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Meep I could understand this line, however by taking away incentives to work we are potentially ruined/disenfranchising generations.

    It's a throw money at people and hope they go away approach. We are TWICE Germany and France yet have no plan it seems to change, just throw more money at it (500m a year)



  • Registered Users Posts: 367 ✭✭OneLungDavy


    Does the government make a profit/loss on the rent received from social tenants? When do they officially own the house?



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You wrote; "There's the same problem with welfare applicants who buy online, whereby only the VAT amount and custom duties, make any returns into the Irish economy. "

    Why single out welfare recipients who buy online? Why don't you call out everyone who shops online, as upper/middle classes have been doing for decades for their lack of return to the Irish economy?



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,417 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    again, many jobs are actual 'bullsh1t jobs, offering little or no benefit to society, and making many unhappy, unhappy humans arent actually very productive in their jobs, and are also more likely to engage in dysfunctional behavior, that can in fact be very costly to all....

    many young are disenfranchised from the fact we ve financialised most of our most critical of needs, most notably our property markets, leading to many simply being unable to fulfill this critical need.

    giving citizens the money directly, pup etc, has shown us, that it benefits society far better than using this money to inflate asset markets such as property markets....



  • Registered Users Posts: 417 ✭✭CarProblem


    I don't understand it

    Less people on welfare but in jobs achieves the exact same thing in terms of money being spent, velocity of circulation etc.

    Strangely people who advocate this line for welfare recipients (btw I'm not saying you are!) don't advocate tax cuts to achieve a similar outcome



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Where has it been shown?

    So you want more on the dole and less working, and well have a better society?

    And I agree a large amount of jobs are BS, but we lack alot of tradesmen etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 417 ✭✭CarProblem


    "giving citizens the money directly, pup etc, has shown us, that it benefits society far better than using this money to inflate asset markets such as property markets..."

    What kind of rubbish is this?

    Take this:

    "again, many jobs are actual 'bullsh1t jobs, offering little or no benefit to society, and making many unhappy, unhappy humans arent actually very productive in their jobs, and are also more likely to engage in dysfunctional behavior, that can in fact be very costly to all...."

    But paying people excessive welfare benefits to contribute zero is a benefit to society? Does make people happy? And do you think none of those people engage in dysfunctional behavior, that can in fact be very costly to all?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's the problem with taking sentences out of the context of the overall paragraph, while also ignoring the quoted piece that it was responding to. Your question is answered if you take both into account.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,396 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    2019 AFS of 31 LA

    Manintenance/improvement of LA housing units = 276m

    Rents paid to LA = 569m



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is that what either of the letters actually said? Or was it just a little bit of silly bureaucracy that ended up with a letter being sent out and someone making a mistake?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,513 ✭✭✭Dazler97


    There's no middle class anymore it's only rich or poor people in this country that's probably why most people are on social welfare because its rip off ireland too



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    I'm not on social welfare and wouldn't consider myself rich. Neither are the majority of my friends.

    I don't think it's very healthy to be creating divisions and claiming that's its all due to the system etc. Need to be encouraging personal responsibility and create schemes that allow/encourage people to move from welfare



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,513 ✭✭✭Dazler97


    Yes absolutely I agree completely with you 💯



Advertisement