Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kids and hiking.

Options
  • 07-06-2021 2:43pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭


    Have a 7 year old who loves hiking.
    Done Diamond Hill, Abbey Hill, Moylussa, Lackavrea, Mount Gable, Slievecarran, Maumean

    Would he be ok to tackle Croagh Patrick?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    any thoughts on this?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,043 ✭✭✭Wabbit Ears


    Croagh Patrick is relatively easy. Its steep but nothing a 7 year old with hiking experience cant handle.

    Id also recommend Sliabh Foy in Carlingford and Sliabh Binnion In the North. My 8 year old has done both.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    Croagh Patrick is relatively easy. Its steep but nothing a 7 year old with hiking experience cant handle.

    Id also recommend Sliabh Foy in Carlingford and Sliabh Binnion In the North. My 8 year old has done both.


    Nice one, we may give it a blast so. Hard to know sometimes if climbs are suitable for kids


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭fjon


    Should be absolutely fine if she/ he has the stamina!


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    fjon wrote: »
    Should be absolutely fine if she/ he has the stamina!




    plenty stamina alright, unlike me :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 724 ✭✭✭athlone573


    To give a full picture, Croagh Patrick has loose scree which can easily twist an ankle or cause cuts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,043 ✭✭✭Wabbit Ears


    Indeed, Ankle hiking boots are a must IMHO.

    Also, its very exposed, you can get very strong winds and it can get cold quick. Treat it like a proper mountain hike, bring hats, gloves, raingear etc even if the day starts out beautiful.

    Last time we did it it was perfectly clear when in the carpark. By the time we got to the top we had 1 meter visibility and it was baltic cold.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    Indeed, Ankle hiking boots are a must IMHO.

    Also, its very exposed, you can get very strong winds and it can get cold quick. Treat it like a proper mountain hike, bring hats, gloves, raingear etc even if the day starts out beautiful.

    Last time we did it it was perfectly clear when in the carpark. By the time we got to the top we had 1 meter visibility and it was baltic cold.


    Thanks for this. So need to be prepared for weather changes.
    Looking forward to it now. Looks lovely. Highest one for us to climb.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,909 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Looked nice up there yesterday when we were passing on the way to and from Mweelrea.
    It always seems to me to have slightly better weather than the surrounding area.
    Might be Pat's influence :)
    I like about Croagh Patrick that you climb from sea level so you earn every metre of the mountain.

    I agree with hiking boots for adults, but I'd be open minded about them for children.
    Kids in my (limited) experience are less likely to twist an ankle than an adult, they're younger and more supple.
    If the kid has a pair of runners that they're comfortable in, a climb like Croagh Patrick which is dry all the way, might be more enjoyable for them in runners than in a pair of heavy hiking boots.
    Also an injury on Croagh Patrick where there are lots of people, has a better 'worst case scenario' than on a more remote mountain where there may not be anyone around to help.
    You'll have a good idea what works best with your children.
    For any boggy hikes, I'd go with boots for the kids.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    Have a question about myself. I see there are hiking boots that generally seem to go above the ankle……
    and then hiking shoes that are just the standard type shoe below the ankle.

    Is the hiking shoe just a waste of time or does it have a function?

    Seems the common sense thing would be to go for a hiking boot over a shoe?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭KAGY


    obi604 wrote: »
    Have a question about myself. I see there are hiking boots that generally seem to go above the ankle……
    and then hiking shoes that are just the standard type shoe below the ankle.

    Is the hiking shoe just a waste of time or does it have a function?

    Seems the common sense thing would be to go for a hiking boot over a shoe?

    Hiking shoes are good for trails where the ground is even, eg roads, coilte access roads etc. Much lighter.
    Hiking books if on uneven ground where you need lateral support or if the mud/puddles are over shoe height


  • Registered Users Posts: 962 ✭✭✭James 007


    Not a necessity at all, you can do it in your bear feet;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭KAGY


    obi604 wrote: »
    For Croagh Patrick, are hiking boots really a necessity?

    Seeing as people have done it in their bare feet and for hundreds of years in non technical shoes etc.

    They do it for penance and punishment:-)
    I personally would, as it's easy to slip on the scree, and I'd have a pole too, but I've seen people in sandals and runners.
    Like any safety gear you only miss it when something happens.
    In saying that, a comfortable pair of well fitting, stiff soled shoes would probably be fine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,909 ✭✭✭✭josip


    obi604 wrote: »
    For Croagh Patrick, are hiking boots really a necessity?

    Seeing as people have done it in their bare feet and for hundreds of years in non technical shoes etc.


    I think it comes down to what each individual feels most comfortable in, but the only place on Croagh Patrick that I've found hiking boots to be advantageous is on the way back down the scree section.

    Off to the side, the scree is much smaller and gives way predictably on each step.
    With the boots on, you can just go for it with 5 metre strides and be down that section in a few mins.
    https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/9871/scree-running


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    Hi. Thinking of doing the 12 o clock hills in Clare on Tuesday. With wife and kids aged 6 and 7, they are used to climbing, they did croagh Patrick during the summer

    is 12 o clock hills doable this time of year?

    What is the terrain like, mainly path or is it mucky, boggy etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    Another question. Would an 8 year old need hiking shoes/boots?

    I guess kids are are fairly nimble and light and don’t necessarily need them or I could be completely wrong.

    Post edited by obi604 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,909 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Depends on the going. If it's wet and boggy, which most routes would be this time of year, then it would be better to have boots so that they're not miserable with wet feet all walk long. It there are only going to be a few wet/boggy patches, then go with runners and they can be given a piggy back where needed. Some like to have the kids booted for scree also, but we usually don't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭embraer170


    Took my 7 year old up Carrauntoohil (in summer). Got her hiking boots from Decathlon and felt better about it than the the other kids I was seeing in trainers.

    She loved it and wants to it again. Particularly loved going up the Devil's ladder part, and wants to try going down that way sometime (we went down the zigzags).



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604



    thanks. Would hiking SHOES or BOOTS be better for an 8 year old?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,909 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Apologies for equating hiking shoes to runners in my previous answer, but in my opinion they fulfill a similar role. I don't know if kids will benefit much from the stiffer sole of a hiking shoe compared to a runner. And the hiking shoe will be of no benefit for boggy terrain and for ankle support.

    Considering how quickly they grow out of shoes at that age and the boggy nature of so much of the uplands in this country, I'd rely on runners and hiking boots.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    So you reckon hiking boots (higher up the ankle) as opposed to low cut hiking shoes (same concept, just not as high on the ankle) are better for kids



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭obi604


    woah - thats good going for a 7 year old !!

    In general, if you had a nice day in the summer, is it relatively safe for an 8 year old like my lad who has a bit of experience.

    He has climbed a few hills over last couple of years like Croagh Patrick, Diamond hill, Moylussa, Lackavrea, Bouleevin, Slieve Carran, Mount Gable, Cashel Hill, Gleninagh etc



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,710 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    For my kids we use hiking shoes for normal terrain, the stiffer soles are a much better protection for young feet on stony surfaces than street trainers. For boggy areas we swap the shoes out for rubber boots with a second pair of extra thick socks inside them. In my experience, kids hiking boots are no match for upland bog areas. Adults generally are more cautious than kids when walking across this type of terrain.



Advertisement