Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

Options
19359369389409411113

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭choronzonix


    Well I remember seeing the stilted 'pods' of young people, not allowed even have a drink, standing socially distanced from each other. Even thinking about it gives me the cringe!



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,476 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Raind popping in to insult everybody because he has nothing left to offer, still true.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,617 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    On the last point. Have a look who Ursula von der Leyen is married to. Surely susceptible to conflict of interest, no?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,014 ✭✭✭Blut2


    When Tony Holohan was asked about this in Ireland didn't he claim the figure here was 5%? And NPHET have refused to release the actual data to back this up since, for some reason.

    Theres no way that 40-45% of covid cases in the UK are actually presenting with broken legs etc and just testing positive for covid incidentally, and the figure here is 1/10th of that. We have the same disease, and same national demographics. Our figure must be in or around 40% roughly too.

    Effectively halving the number of covid patients in hospital wouldn't look good for the government line of "we need to stay locked down because of covid to protect the hospitals" though I guess.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,875 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Who is she married to?

    (No prizes for anyone saying her husband!).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,649 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Married to this lad from Heiko Echter von der Leyen and since is Medical Director of the US biotech company Orgenesis.

    Now that could be wrong, it is the internet after all. :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,643 ✭✭✭✭astrofool



    Let's do a quick fire round (there would be 10x as much if all the craziness you posted was also being included ;)), but most of those were discussed long before the loons thought it was an attempt to take over the world, but anyway:

    Vaccinated can spread COVID - Known about from the trials, published with the data, 95% was against severe disease, this is now 90% for Delta, Omicron TBA, effectiveness against infection was ~60% (less for AZ and Janssen), this still held up under Delta and data looks good for Omicron post booster

    Vaccinated susceptible to variants - known about even when the vaccines were being developed, vaccines have stood up better than expected against variants leading to a Delta specific vaccine being dropped (for now at least), mRNA advantage was a quick turn around if variants escaped, hasn't happened yet

    COVID Vaccines can cause blood clots - Most issues came about due to the mass rollout of vaccines and are extremely extremely rare and in all cases the risk from the disease itself was greater, was it a conspiracy that vaccines would have side effects when all previous vaccines also have very rare side effects?

    3rd & 4th/New Shots - Annual boosters were being talked about even before the vaccines were released

    Segregation of society - Vaccine\Immunity passports were being talked about weeks after the pandemic started

    Camps for the unvaccinated - ??

    Unvaccinated unable to work - This wasn't expected, came about due to the Delta variant and herd immunity not being reached, who's behind the conspiracy here?

    Harder to access medical care for unvaccinated - Not in Ireland at the least, Singapore make the unvaccinated pay for any COVID related treatment, is any country denying treatment yet? (apart from the US, but that's mostly GOP driven and lack of public health facilities)

    Secret Contracts between Governments and Pfizer - What are the details here? Anything to do with COVID vaccines? Were AZ, Novavax, Sinovac/pharm, Janssen and Moderna involved as well?


    It's a fun image, but there's a lot wrong on it and still doesn't have an explanation for the conspiracy behind it, maybe you want to add something about that? Or just make a smart remake and run away like a baby chicken, thought so :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,617 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Medical director of a company specialised in biotech and genetics including covid vaccine development.

    She as president of the EU commission is extremely influential in determining how many and how often we need vaccines to 'keep' our freedoms. Before anyone has a go at me saying I'm a CT lizard people guy - there is surely a huge potential for conflict of interest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭floorpie


    Vaccinated can spread COVID - Known about from the trials, published with the data

    What trials? What manufacturers published this data? You maintained the opposite stance all through 2021 on this point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭BuildTheWall


    We’re at the point where even suggesting there may be conflicts of interests or corruption in political institutions is a conspiracy theory.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,266 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Here is the pfizer ceo claiming that their trials showed that the vaccine was 100% effective at stopping transmission. Didn't happen though and no one ever said they would stop cases 🙄




  • Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Shilock


    100% effictive I'll believe it when I see it. The lies and contradictions are abusive at this stage. I don't normally chat about covid. But who's fooling who ???

    I'm double vaccinated, and haven't had covid yet, but most people I know who are boosted caught it



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,643 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Reduction of transmission still means it can spread floorpie, as the vaccines reduced the severity of the symptoms, it followed that transmission would be reduced and it did leaving R at about 1 for Ireland with most opened up (and the high R of Omicron means more transmission still but still a reduction among the vaccinated as much as the unvaxxed won't admit that's the case using anecdotes).



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,611 ✭✭✭brickster69


    When you think about it. If the vaccines were 100% effective against catching covid then they must of been 100% effective against severe disease and dying from it. I mean, how are you going to die from it if you can't be infected by it ?

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭floorpie


    You're answering a question I didn't ask.

    You said it was known about from the trials that vaccinated people can spread COVID-19, and that manufacturers published this data. What trials assessed this, and what manufacturers published this data?

    You should be ashamed in my opinion to post your last two posts, after your behaviour the last year in these threads. I can link to dozens or hundreds of abusive messages from you that state the exact opposite to what you're now saying.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,643 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    That's what they saw in the trial of 800 participants, it doesn't go into whether asymptomatic cases were checked for, the age of the participants and the length of time from vaccination (which to get those results would mean it was relatively soon after vaccination due to the waning seen after 10-12 weeks). Are you saying the trial data was faked? Because it doesn't look like that was the case, infectiousness post vaccination (booster or 2nd dose) is still very low.

    As floorpie is at pains to point out, initial trials were tracking severity of disease and prevention of deaths and that's where the high % figures came (and still come) from.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭floorpie


    There have been many shoddy claims arising from trials. I'm thinking particularly of the claims of 100% effectiveness against death (e.g., Fauci mentioning this: ‘No hospitalisations and no deaths’: All three US vaccines ‘highly efficacious’, Fauci says | The Independent).

    The truth is that almost nobody died during trials from COVID-19, vaccinated or placebo. So placebo was also 100% effective against death.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,643 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Usual floorpie, now getting the content of posts completely wrong :) Is there anything you can't misread at this stage?



  • Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭BuildTheWall


    Always a smart arse answer. Would do anything rather than call a spade a spade.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,643 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Was that trial data faked? That's what is being implied by some posters.

    The transmission rates clearly don't hold out as the effectiveness of the vaccine wanes, but that isn't a smoking gun tweet even if some posters wish it were. Effectiveness against mild COVID in the initial published trials was about 60%, effectiveness against infection wasn't ascertained as they weren't testing for that (it was more an outcome of the reduction of severity of the symptoms).

    But look, an image worth of conspiracies and the only one being chatted about is transmission, anything else on there that really was a conspiracy/hoax ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    as the vaccines reduced the severity of the symptoms, it followed that transmission would be reduced

    You literally had a multi-day argument with someone last year in one of the vaccine threads, calling them all kinds of stupid and ignorant because they asserted that the reduction in transmission was caused by a reduction in symptoms.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I think he said 95% of covid patients in hospital were being treated for covid or something along those lines! Interesting choice of words if you ask me…. If I turn up with a broken leg and test positive for the rona on admission, I’ll be treated for both regardless. So I’m in hospital being treated for covid (and one of Tony’s 95%), but it’s not the reason I’m there!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭floorpie


    I'm flabbergasted at astrofool's weird flip flop on several points a few posts ago, and their general lack of humility. I just had a quick scan of their reply notifications to my posts and they were calling me a charlatan antivaxxer for pointing out that trials didn't assess infection (which they're now agreeing with) just a few months ago.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,476 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Its just more gaslighting.

    Evade, deflect, twist in the wind, say one thing and then pretend that you never said it at all, that in fact you said the other thing all along. And imply that the other party is the stupid one for not understanding.

    This country is full of such insidious behaviour, top to bottom.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    What is required now is a Whistleblower,as it is very obvious that Statistics are being manipulated to maintain the Fear Factor...!


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,476 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I doubt that the media would even report such a whistleblower. It would just get buried and deflected by the shills saying that the stats were always available so whats the problem...



  • Registered Users Posts: 991 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Just a thank you to you floorpie. You raised caution re certainty in vaccination preventing transmission very early on in vaccine inception, despite claims by those skimming the studies to the contrary. Prevention of serious illness due to vaccines an accepted fact.

    I’m not sure how you kept your patience throughout, but fair play - and know you have educated at least one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,860 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    It's clear there's deliberate manipulation of the stats that are presented - or more accurately what is presented, and how questions (softball as they are) are answered afterwards.

    We knew that when they pulled out the Concern-o-meter.

    It's the classic 'don't mind that, look over here!' tactic designed to stop the public asking awkward questions like.. "Hang on. Isn't the health service ALWAYS on the brink of collapse at this time of year?"



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    Hmmmm....didja see the date of that Tweet......?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,860 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    The problem now (for them) is the fear is gone with the huge number of minimal effect cases out there in the last few weeks.

    Everyone knows someone who's had it or "suffering" with the symptoms of a mild cold at this stage. Sure there'll always be outliers, but that's always been the case and the key is in the term.

    Soon these same people will start to connect more dots and wonder what exactly we've been shutting down businesses and jobs for, and why were we hiding away from others - and what exactly has been done with the tens of billions poured into this 'crisis' over the last year and a half!



Advertisement