Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1216217219221222809

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Yeah, China sure stopped buying Australian coal. There were a couple of ships just sitting there full of the stuff, victims of China's noisomness. Then they had a coal problem, likely due to covid, so they suddenly and quitely offloaded all that coal and paid for it.

    China can pretend they can boycot Australian resources, but it's the best and/or cheapest, so they are cutting off their noses to spite their lying faces.

    The less China buys from Australia, the better, IMO. I loath the CCP and anything they do that undermines their own economic position is a good thing.

    "Desperate China backflips on Australian coal

    A bitter trade dispute between China and Australia helped spark a coal shortage — and now Beijing has been forced into a backflip."

    https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/desperate-china-backflips-on-australian-coal/news-story/a95b66b707a25dfda11104702bcb63b5



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,680 ✭✭✭CorkRed93




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,873 ✭✭✭amacca


    It may disappear from the rental market is one issue. Being driven out doesn't necessarily mean comes back to market available for rental or purchase etc...

    In a time when things are scarcer people don't always tend to let go of things......but if you effectively have less and less rights to your own property when you rent it out you might decide **** this for a game of soldiers but I'll hang on to the asset just in case etc


    A lot of people thought it was a good move to get rid of crappy little bedsits etc but they were probably filling a need in the marketplace and we're much more cost effective than managed apartment complexes etc for a lot of tenants...


    I'd be of the opinion a lot of the problems have been created by those regulating etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A rental property will house more people than an owner occupied property.

    Landlords driven out of the market reduces competition and affects the supply/demand dynamics



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    So landlords stuffing bunk beds into tiny rooms and putting beds in living rooms are doing a good thing?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    No it not. What he means that every house that leaves the rental market is likely to have a lower occupancy rate than a rental.

    Many houses are bough by single people or couples without children. Whereas before you may have a single person in each room or a couple.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 687 ✭✭✭houseyhouse


    Many people houseshare when renting but usually when people buy it is an individual or a couple. Of course, some people rent on their own/as a couple and families with children tend to live in their own home whether renting or buying. Still, stuffing bunk beds into tiny rooms is not necessary for it to be true that a rental property will often have more people in it than an owner occupied one. Different types of people too.

    To your original question about why it’s bad that landlords are leaving - landlords leaving means fewer homes to rent. And some people need to rent, because they’re not living in a place for the long term, because they can’t afford to buy, because they expect their needs to change in the short term etc etc. I know several people/families who have had to move because the LL was selling up and they were finding it extremely difficult to find somewhere new to rent. They were not in a position to buy. It’s a terrible situation to yourself in.

    You might like to think it’s all the LLs’ fault but most of them are decent people. The government legislation has screwed the decent LLs time and again. The ones who kept pushing rents up are the ones least impacted by RPZ rules. The government is essentially incentivising regular rent reviews.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    So the landlords care about providing a service and not their money?

    If maximising the number of rooms to rent is a priority, maybe it should be made illegal to sell a rental property? After all, selling to an owner occupier removes rooms from the market....and landlords think that's a bad idea.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    HEre is just one example of many that I know of where one house being sold / taken off the rental market leads to multiple properties being need to replace it.

    I was in a house share in my 20s. Myself and my gf. The owner and his gf. Another could and another single guy.

    We were all very happy for about 2 years.

    Then the owner decided to get married. So we were all asked to move out so they could start their new life together in their own home. A reasonable request so we all moved out before the wedding.

    So all of us used one 4 bed house between us.

    Then When we moved out we all moved to these places.

    The owners stayed in their 4 bed house with their now wife.

    Myself and my gf moved to a 1 bed apartment.

    The single guy moved to a 1 bed apartment.

    The other coulple moved to a 2 bed apartment for a while and then bought a 3 bed house about 2 years later.

    So the needs being serviced by one 4 bed house, now needed -

    One 4 bed house

    One 3 bed house

    Two 1 bed apartments.

    Basically 4 properties were required to meet the same needs that 1 property met for the same amount of people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It's a business just like many other businesses. It's exactly the same as a hotel or a holiday home service. Landlords run it as a business. If legislation was ever suggested to make it illegal to sell, every small LL in the country would serve eviction notices to there tenants and either give them to there children or sell them.

    Nobody is saying it's a bad workman idea, rather we are.pointing out the the facts of how one decision impacts on availability of rental property or how when LL leave it may actually add to the housing issue.

    Just let me at present average rents seem to be rising by more than what they legally should be able to. Some LL who had tenants in there property for a long number of years often did not rise rents. When the property becomes vacant in a RPZ they cannot rise it to a market rate. It may make more sense to sell the property pay the CGT and use the funds elsewhere. I recently say a house go for sale after longterm tenants were vacating it. The value of the house was 300k, they could only rise the rent to less than 800 euro. They decided to gift the house to there children who I tend to sell it.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Fairly explosive interview with Paul Sommerville on the Stand with Eamon Dunphy addresses many of the talking points here. Well worth a listen

    The Greatest asset price bubble of all time

    The risks from China. Chinese banking system twice as big as US and at risk from property. Contagion effect high risk

    Irrational exuberance: Rupert Murdoch scammed for 100,000,000 through a fraudulent investment as well as Henry Kissinger

    Irish property: Rents and prices sucking the life out of the domestic economy.




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    It's not a bubble. A bubble suggests prices are irrational.

    I don't know why people find it so hard to realise that asset prices are all down to interest rates.

    We have record low interest rates. Money is cheap. There's so much money.

    Once you understand how economics works, you will realise that the only risk to asset prices is interest rates. ECB may have a big problem. They want to keep rates as they are to allow countries to borrow cheap to spend on the recovery but if inflation rockets then they will need to up rates. Worries me that they still claim it'll be temporary. By the time they realise it's not, it could be too late.

    What happened in the last 10 years was very unusual and lucky in that rates were low but so was inflation. That's not typically how economics works. Increases in technology increasing production may have been the reason.

    I wish the ECB would have a rate of at least 1.5%.

    As Warren Buffet has said for a decade..."interest rates are to asset prices, what gravity is to matter".



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,206 ✭✭✭combat14


    glorious to see even more massive never ending house price increases pf 13% predicted for 2022

    real estate agents must be licking their lips with glee...

    what could possibly go wrong..

    https://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/estate-agency-sees-prices-rises-of-up-to-13pc-this-year-41224874.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Warren Buffet holds record levels of cash, one suspects he could be fearful of current valuations. The podcast addresses interest rates by the way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,299 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    funnily enough, you ll find the main influence in asset prices is the money supply, particularly the private sector money supply, i.e. the credit supply, this is one of the main reasons why property prices have skyrocketed globally, over the last few decades, this is also called financialisation of markets, this is exactly what has happened here in ireland, this is the result of encouraging and facilitating a fire sector lead economy, again, exactly what we have done here, and surprise surprise, it has lead to a rapid rise in asset prices, particularly in relation to property.

    yes, central banks have also played their part in this train wreck, by maintaining low rates, and largely ignoring the credit supply, as mainstream economics also known as neoclassical economics, has a refusal to accept the role of banks, debt and money, primarily the credit supply, in their models and ideologies, and simply referring to banks as 'intermediaries', i.e. simply moving money about the place, which is completely untrue, the main function of banks is actually 'money creation', we call this form of money 'credit'.....

    the problem central banks have now is the amount of debt thats in circulation, both public and private debts, but the more dangerous more than likely being private debt, again, this is created in the private domain, when banks create loans, again, private debt is now at an all time high, baring in mind, it was the accumulation of private debt which ultimately caused 08, again, primarily in property markets...

    ....so watch this space.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    So how long should we watch this space and what form will this space take in your opinion?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    He holds cash because he doesn't see anything good value to invest in. Typically what would happen during recessions is companies go broke and they come crawling to Buffet to save them. Thus Buffet gets a good deal on companies. Now the FED bails these companies out so Buffet doesn't have any use for his cash just yet.

    Valuations are high because rates are low. If rates stay low, valuations will stay high.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Money supply is a direct result of low interest rates and money printing

    Banks can create that money via credit because the demand is there for cheap debt.

    Debt isn't really a problem. There's record deposit levels in Ireland. In the US, the reverse repo is at 1.5 trillion a day currently. In 2019 it was 1bn a day. Reverse Repos are basically when banks have cash overnight and the FED borrows it off them for a set rate. (usually 0.05%, think this might have been increased to 0.1% not sure)

    But yes, supply of money means high asset prices. But root cause is the rates and money printing.

    People often say house prices are high due to lack of supply. I always say high prices are a result of money supply. If no one in the country can afford a 200k house then prices are not going to be at 200k. etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Is that not another way of saying we are in a bubble if the world's best investor is keeping record levels of assets in cash thus loosing value through inflation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    So?

    House sharing isn't a lifetime thing. Saying people buying means less rooms available to rent isn't a bad thing. People deserve to live by themselves at some stage.

    So landlords should be treated favourably because their rental keeps 4 people renting a room whereas if they sold it would house two? Sure why not go a step further and ban owners from buying primary homes, have all rentals? Every room would be rented out then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Buffett isn't alone. All the wealthy are turning to cash the last 12 or so months (Elon Musk being another high profile asset dumper). The central banks cannot stop the dam from bursting forever. The Fed in the US has not even started to raise rates yet but it's the mainstream view that a few rate rises will happen this year. They are only trying to do a "soft landing" though, they have no control over the situation.

    Our rental market is being inflated by the State but it can't be sustainable for the State to write cheques for a third of all rentals.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,680 ✭✭✭CorkRed93




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Come on will you cop on. No one is saying that but he has a point and a lot of rentals have more than a 1 person/couple to 1 property ratio and with the current drought in property for sale mean that these properties are being snapped up. So are you saying that 1 bed spaces have no place in the current rental paradigm which I think is wrong and with the way small landlords are being treated by both the laws and the tax regime in this country they are leaving in droves. See how good the rent will be when the big boys who have 100s/1000s of properties for rent and they dont want to drop the rent even if it cant be afforded by the average person and they have the firepower to do so and wont give a flying feck about renters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 687 ✭✭✭houseyhouse


    Who said LLs should be treated favourably? As far as I can see nobody said people shouldn’t be allowed to buy or should have to live in houseshares forever either. You’re arguing against points that nobody is making.

    I can see you’re against landlords but what are you in favour of?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt



    People often say house prices are high due to lack of supply. I always say high prices are a result of money supply. If no one in the country can afford a 200k house then prices are not going to be at 200k. etc

    The vast majority of the "printed money" never finds its way to the general public as it is held in the financial sector. The only time it gets out to the general public is when there is fiscal spending or when banks lend out more... Bank lending has not increased dramatically so it is the fiscal spending where the 'printed money' has gotten out to the wider economy.. So in USA for example when government issued stimulus cheques this cash got out to the general public and a lot of this was invested in the stock market, houses and put on deposit with the banks. This plus the fact that people were saving during covid because they could not spend resulted in bank deposits growing.

    The growth in bank deposits meant that the banks had excess liquidity which they would either leave on deposit with the fed or a money market fund, buy high quality liquid assets (E.g. government bonds or undertake reverse repo with the fed). The increase in the reverse repo facility is down to the fed paying 0.05% to stop the money market funds attracting a negative interest rate. This guaranteed rate was not in place in 2019 as there was no chance of a negative rate. This is the reason that why the fed reverse repo facility grew so much and not because of the increase in money supply.

    Besides institutional investors investing in Irish property there has been little increase in the money supply to the general public and it can't be blamed for high house prices. The two factors that are driving house prices higher are very high rents and a lack of supply of housing. Even if you thought that a property was massively overvalued 2 years ago you would have been better off buying than renting as the chances of getting to buy the property at that prices in the future is very remote.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,482 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    No surprise. We're seeing the strongest wage inflation in a decade, increasing the amount people can pay to purchase. General inflation in the economy will impact the housing market, and when you couple it with pitiful amounts of supply it's not hugely surprising that increases of 10% may be on the cards this year. Although I suspect it could be more modest, 5 - 10% to keep up with general inflation.


    Inflation coupled with low interest rates is actually giving a helping hand to mortgage holders as their wages increase yet mortgage repayments stay the same. That is the intended ECB policy for the next 12 + months, which I find bizarre. Meanwhile, renters and people who generally don't hold assets in property continue to get screwed as rents and house prices increase. Personally I don't think the ECB will be able to hold firm on its interest rates policy, but we will see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    Paywalled but Ronan Lyons reckons to hit house building targets, prices must either rise by 24% or construction costs must fall by 40%.





  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    He is one chap who has always been impartial and always had good points within his commentary and he is on the money with this and I cant see either of those 2 figures changing in the next 3/5 years. All the doomsdayers on here are looking at China to suggest that this will impact our house pricing model and ignore the basic supply and demand issues we have here is more in hope than reality. Anyone getting any kind of building work or needing a tradesman such as a plumber or sparks in this country will tell you how much it costs. I mean I had a plumber come out for a leak under the sink there just before the xmas and I had to hand him 50 Euro before he even set foot in through the door , he changed one small piece of piping, charged 100 Euro for the small piece he replaced and another 150 for doing literally 20 minutes work. He told me how much it was before I paid and I quickly googled a few plumbers and rang them and they all came in roughly around the same price and their availability were all 2 weeks+ before they could do the job. Bonkers how much the building trade can charge and the scarcity of tradesmen we have in the country. I think it may be a good time for the powers that be start pushing some of our school leavers into the trades again, its all well and good when our population are educated to third level, but we need more people with this kind of skill and their is serious money to be made for anyone getting a trade as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,299 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...and we cant keep the current rate of price inflation, wage inflation doesnt match this, and simply wont, the state has to become more involved in the process, including in the supply of materials, its essential that this building occurs, and the state may have stronger bargaining power for materials as a whole, than relying on individual developers bargaining powers

    we ve no clue, but going by historical events, expect something, as most serious economic crashes have occurred due to rising private debt, but nobody knows exactly when, where or how, its simply not possible to know



Advertisement