Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mandatory vaccination in Ireland

1235711

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,651 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Once again a human rights expert who doesn’t understand what body integrity means from a human rights context.


    “Being able to move freely from place to place; being able to be secure against violent assault, including sexual assault ... having opportunities for sexual satisfaction and for choice in matters of reproduction"


    This is taken from the 10 capabilities approach by Martha Nussbaum.


    If you want to look at older definitions you can go back to the 40’s…


    "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation”


    None of this applies to life saving, medically approved vaccines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,141 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    I find that it adds comic value to read Risteard81's posts in an Ian Paisley voice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,186 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Grand, read the post. What I was looking for is some substantiation of the requirement.

    If you don't have any, fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,089 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Yeah, and let's add in contraception, and vaccines for flu, Hep b, TB ....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,186 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    you'll take the medicine , and say thank you sir.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,186 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,322 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Leaving it is working out really well for the UK.

    You can refer to northern Ireland as being Ireland I do....but you can't ignore the fact if falls under different control, so measures that are introduced in the Republic of Ireland won't be introduced in northern Ireland....the executive/Westminster will decide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Leaving the so-called "EU" is the right decision for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,322 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    You don't need to use the so-called part...it is the the EU.

    People in Ireland don't agree (support is 84% in most polls - and higher in younger people)...so it isn't going to happen. The disaster it has been for the UK (Scotland, Wales and England especially) will cement it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,322 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    If you say so.

    I have already shown there is no desire for ireland to leave it though.

    The only party pushing for it are the loopers of the Ireland freedom party...led by Hermann Kelly...with his registered address in....Belgium...lol



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Only in your mind.

    That’s mad, Lumen you are right. It does sound funnier in Ian Paisley voice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭Teacher2020


    I don't agree with mandatory vaccines as such. I do agree with restrictions for unvaccinated people though. They should be allowed to go to the supermarket, work and medical and that's it. 50 per cent of those in ICU are unvaccinated from 6% of the population. We are being held hostage because of those 6%. Restrict the unvaccinated and let the rest of us get back to living life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    Ireland wont have compulsorary, or required, vaccination. Ireland has just 5% of adults unvaccinated, 0% of over 60s . The most vulnerable are protected

    In countries like Germany or Austria who are considering manditory vaccination theres over 10% of over 60s unvaccinated, and much higher in certain regions. For Germany, to put the percentage into real numbers, thats a not insignificant 3 million unvaccinated over 60 years of age!

    Ireland is in a really good place and when Germany and Austria are seeing lockdown and restrictions next winter caused by the ticking time bomb of beligerant pensioners, Ireland will be fully open.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,942 ✭✭✭growleaves


    There are 60 unvaccinated people in ICU, many with underlying conditions.

    60 people are holding 4.9 million hostage?

    Restrictions have to go.

    And why should I need to carry and present digital personal health data on demand for the rest of my life just so 306,000 other people can be excluded from society and reduced to second class citizenship? While the Dept of Health miss their annual ICU expansion target by a third?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    There are about 200,000 to 300,000 unvaccinated and we've had something like half a million official cases in the past few months so no they are not holding us to ransom. That would be the very rapidly spreading transmissible variant causing all these cases in vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. The ICU cases, vaccinated or not, are almost all Delta.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,089 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    The ICU numbers are subject to small numbers issues.

    But overall case numbers include very many vaccinated people. Based on that, I do not see that the unvaccinated are the problem: vaccinated people who think they are bulletproof are as much of an issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,400 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    MMR, Varicella and Hepatitis B immunity is required. Either demonstrated antibodies or vaccination.

    Diphtheria is mandatory for lab workers.

    All others are only recommended to varying degrees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,322 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Ok you might have issues with the small numbers in Ireland.

    Have a look at them somewhere else in that case.

    Your view about vaccinated people walking around like they are bulletproof, is just that it isn't based on anything



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And the Irish courts have found bodily integrity to have other meanings also



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,651 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Such as, relevant to this topic?


    Actually who cares. I don’t support mandatory vaccination beyond healthcare workers anyway.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Will be much more than 300k moving forward, considering people will drop off with each "booster" and thus be deemed "unvaccinated". I'd say 500k - 1m after a year.

    Yeah, they should allow vaccinated only into nightclubs etc, then they'd never have to close them down.... oh, wait, nevermind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    So the data in the graph (which does not appear in the linked report—which has plenty of easy-to-capture graphs of its own) covers May-Dec 2021 according to the header.

    And then whoever made it apparently had a time machine, because the source given at the bottom is ICNARC COVID 19 report 7 January 2021 (a date when nobody was vaccinated, and 4 months before the purported date range covered by the graph).

    And the paper she's linked along with the report is an ICNARC report from 24 December 2021.

    Not gonna lie, it smells a bit fishy.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Can I suggest the concentration of risk around 60-69 year olds is of interest?



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Indeed, it's very specific and very far from (say) mandatory vaccination of low-risk 5-11 year olds just in case an unvaccinated 60 year old gets covid off one.

    It says "A risk assessment should be performed to establish if vaccinations are required for employees in a particular work setting." The context seems to be what's required of employers to provide employees with safe working environments. And, as you say, there's only a handful of cases where the guidance says an unqualified "should".

    I notice for Prison Officers it says they "should be strongly encouraged to receive hepatitis B vaccination". I suspect someone tried telling them it was mandatory, and spent Christmas eating his dinner through a tube.

    Now, its fair to say anti-smoking legislation got a lot of mileage out of the safe workplace idea. But would that apply here? As you say, a very specific requirement of necessity would need to be established.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    And that concentration represents a risk of 0.04% in 60-69 year olds.

    70+ — 0.01%

    60-69 — 0.04%

    50-59 — 0.01%

    40-49 — 0.004%

    30-39 — 0.002%

    18-29 — 0.0005%

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭bokale




  • Registered Users Posts: 735 ✭✭✭foxsake


    may to Dec - would you stop ffs.

    in may only 26% of the population were vaccinated.

    https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations

    We had that sh1te here too in ireland - taking a large majority of peoples conditions and lumping them on the 18% unvaccinated by Dec.

    I've no the detail on the UK but I'd imagine in early summer they were still going through vulnerable people.

    The people who I know in Ireland not choosing to take the vaccine haven't bothered their GP not mind any ICU or Critical Care.

    As I've stated - they never tell you the split of those who decline a vaccine or those that unable due to other issues. They lump all numbers on naysayers.

    It's so misleading it's lies.





  • Mandatory vaccines though honestly give me strength

    Anyone wanting this is a moron anyway, another spin to “end the pandemic”. We don’t need forced vaccine clinics to end it. We need people to fcuking do what they’re told.



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    I'm against vaccine mandates on the basis of long-held principles around informed consent and bodily autonomy. Contrary to many who ostensibly held similar opinions to mine prior to 2020, principles aren't just things I say when it's easy to say them. Indeed, principles that don't hold up under pressure are not principles at all.

    I'm also against them on the basis that they don't work and have been shown to strengthen general anti-vaccine sentiment when used, even if they provide an initial, minor boost for the specific vaccine in question.

    I would still be against them if covid-19 had the same IFR as ebola. Though I suspect many more people would take the vaccine if it did.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭Teacher2020


    Not enough though. Unvaccinated are allowed to go to outdoors hospitality. Many bars and restaurants have substantial outdoor areas now that are very comfortable even in Winter. We should be requiring vaccine certs for hairdressers, beauticians, all retail except food and medical. Restrictions are there because our health system is being clogged up by mainly unvaccinated people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    No our dog shît health service is the way it is down to cronic mismanagement for decades, you have bought the government excuse hook line and sinker

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭Teacher2020


    I agree with you that our health service is severely lacking at the best of times. However, we only can work with what we have. What we have is that unvaccinated people are in hospital taking up beds that they shouldn't be and that is why we have restrictions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,310 ✭✭✭bloopy


    I can't tell which opinions are genuine and which are extreme for satirical effect anymore.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    This is part of the reason why we have had lower deaths than other countries. Lockdowns have been used not to protect you and me but to stop the HSE being overwhelmed. As the HSE are so decrepit lockdowns needed to be introduced here at an earlier stage than countries with first world health systems as the HSE could not cope otherwise.

    It is not a funding issue either as we finance the HSE at more than the european average. It is a waste and cultural issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,141 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    It is obviously untrue we have restrictions due to unvaccinated people in hospital with COVID, or in fact any particular number in people in hospital with COVID, because:

    (a) we had restrictions when there were almost no people in hospital with COVID.

    (b) we had no restrictions when there were many people in hospital with other equally (or more) preventable respiratory viruses

    I would like to see someone attempt to formulate a law on restrictions based on hospital pressures that was both consistent with how we've managed hospital pressures and infectious diseases since the establishment of the State, and that didn't specifically mention COVID. It would be impossible.

    COVID is specifically novel but not unusual, even in the history of modern medicine.

    What is unprecedented is the response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,400 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I agree with all of that.

    As I see it, there is no legal or constitutional barrier to compulsory vaccination but the public health and safety barrier threshold is very high. I don't think that Covid has established that to date which shows how high the barrier is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,906 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I would argue that restrictions/lockdowns up until vaccine rollout were needed to save lives, many vulnerable would have died if we had opened up to "hospital capacity" level during that period of time (march 2020 - June 2021), since then, lockdowns are no longer necessary (soon to come treatments will save an extra few %, but not so many that we close off everyone), the mistake made was not opening from August to November and then bringing back some level of restrictions (probably more than we have now as case counts would have started off higher), this was borne out of a desire to only reduce restrictions and never bring them back which it turned out, wasn't possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,141 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    I think we need to be a bit clearer about what we mean by "restrictions".

    IMO the only remaining restrictions that are in any way warranted are "mask" wearing in crowded public places, e.g. on public transport. And even then it is not my preferred policy choice, since it would be both less restrictive and more effective to provide those at risk of serious illness with high quality masks.

    Restrictions on pubs and nightclubs (distancing, opening hours) are both now and with hindsight completely unwarranted.

    Vaccine certs are more a point of principle at this stage. I feel strongly that the unvaccinated are idiots, but new Omicron infections are not going to be using up significant hospital capacity from this point onwards. The current ICU occupancy is largely from Delta infections, and 1,000 cases in hospital (of 14k bed capacity) represents around the same rate of prevalance as in the community.

    There is just no good case for coercive vaccination policies, either argued from first principles and bearing in mind our well established tolerance for self-harming behaviours, or in pragmatic terms based on what we know of human behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,611 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I think it goes with out saying that Covid has exceeded that threshold at this moment in time, a once in a generation pandemic tends to do that.

    An applicant would be hard pressed to argue that it doesn't.

    The argument will be centered around the punitive actions for non vaccinated.

    e.g if someone is prevented from a earning a living, etc.

    I think there is a dozen odd European countries bringing in mandatory vaccination is some form, we shall see the court cases soon enough.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    >I think there is a dozen odd European countries bringing in mandatory vaccination is some form, we shall see the court cases soon enough.

    it wont be a dozen. So far its really only Germany and Austria and they have specific problems with millions of stone worshiping yoga lovers who believe so much in their immune system, and meditation, that they stubbornly refuse to get vaccinated, and that on top of neo nazis and government sceptic east germans BUT also most also expect to be looked after should their reliance on a healthy sun tan, hate for the government or herbal and alternative medicine somehow not work and they land into hospital

    Personally I'd be happy to have vaccines perfectly optional but maybe have the 13million odd shamans and neo nazis and former commies in Germany sign a release form that they are grand with field hospitals or no treatment should they get covid in a bad way and let the rest of us get on with life. (unfortunately it seems they cannot be excluded from treatment by the medical system so the only way to save the medical system from them is to make vaccines compulsorary)



  • Registered Users Posts: 72 ✭✭live4tkd


    No, No, absolutely f**king No! No mandatory vaccinations ever with Covid! How many vaccinated in the country now, we went through the longest restrictions in the world yet the highest case numbers in the world now! Absolute bollox now and I am saying that as someone that's triple vaxxed!

    We are only being held hostage by an overly conservative NPHET (who should should have been put in their box by our spineless Taoiseach), useless government, politicians and noisy hysterics in social and MSM who are terrified! They all should be ran out of it and anybody supporting this insane bullsh*t should be under permanent lockdowns / restrictions and let the rest of us get back to normal to f*ck!

    Ireland = The worlds most hysterical hypochondriacs and what did we get for it the highest rates of Covid! Enough is Enough now!!



  • Posts: 3,656 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Agreed. I saw a comment on a UK news website yesterday saying the Irish are the most vaccinated country in the World and are still living with an 8pm curfew on night life and restaurants 😊😊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,611 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    We are not even the most vaccinated country in Europe, I think that honor goes to Portugal who shut bars over Christmas.

    Probably best not to get your information from the Daily Mail comment section.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What is it that bothers the vaccinated so much about the unvaccinated?

    Obviously virus transmission is a key reason even though Omicron seems to be bypassing that somewhat. Overloading the hospital system is another one. But what makes some vaccinated people so angry about folks that refuse to get vaccinated.

    Is one reason that vaccinated people want 'everyone in the same boat' because of the unknown unknowns i.e. possible long term side effects? Does full compliance help validate the minor unknown risk?

    Thoughts?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement