Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Religion and Engaging with the Teacher

1810121314

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,912 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    This article popped up relevant to this thread

    It ranges from interesting points of view and robust debate, to childish bickering - and that is just the comment section!

    I would say it would save reading this thread!🤣

    The article was very detailed and seemed to canvas many experiences from different viewpoints. I suggest, Some posters will be quoting bits that article back up their viewpoint for years to come on boards.ie in Education/Religion debates!? 😉

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Accepted? Is that the best people can hope for? To be "accepted"? We could not have cared less whether Catholics and Protestants found what we believed to be acceptable or not. Our concern was that their beliefs did not cut the mustard with us. It's all fine and dandy for them to believe and promote those things, and it was all fine and dandy for our family to know what those beliefs were and to respect the people who hold them. But we did not want their messages of their faith undermining the belief system that we were working hard to foster in our son. So we moved house specifically to avoid sending him to a school where those messages would be promoted.

    Catholics get schools that will avoid that problem. So do Anglicans. But if you're of no religion at all, or if you belong to a very small minority belief system, there is nowhere you can go without this happening to you unless who happen to live in certain spots around the country. Not only that, but you are forced to pay a heavy price in taxation to support this system. They literally take money out of your pocket, use it to build and fund a school which can operate according to "its preferred ethos", and insist that you have to send your kids there or else move. Technically, they also say you can or should set your own up, but in reality that is only a valid option if you have big numbers locally in your "ethos group".

    You seem to be saying that this stuff doesn't matter. But it does matter. Why would you have Catholic schools or Protestant Schools or Muslim schools if it doesn't?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Indeed. I'd say that it is much less likely to be an option than before.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It makes a compelling case for change, in fairness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    What you should do is take some of that imaginative energy you put into making up your strawmen and try to direct it towards something positive.

    And yes, you don't get to force your beliefs onto others. And you will not get your desired discrimination as you earlier stated. The Constitution protects against you from attempting both.

    And finally, you still haven't come up with anything like a plausible reason why you cannot organise to have a school of your choosing set up from scratch. The only plausible reason is laziness.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Find me a kid that doesnt like christmas and the nativity play.

    People are making too big a deal of this, either choose convenience and accept the above, or stick to your beliefs and find an alternative. Its not as if any of this is a surprise to anyone. And how much of this is going to stick with kids if it isnt being reinforced at home?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    The word "accepted" here means to be given a place in that school. Schools have to accept any child as long as they have space available for them. It doesn't mean they do some kind of personal profiling of the students character. You might not be accepted into a particular school if it already oversubscribed, but if it isn't then they accept you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Accepted yes, everyone applies to a school and you either get accepted or not. Why would you take issue with that.

    And if you have a set of minority beliefs then you either do as you did or you drink the kool aid. If they are super important to you then you'll know what decision is right for your family.

    The irony is nowadays the most dogmatic people are those that are anti religion, most people have enough the be getting on with without letting this kind of thing work them up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Sure, let me introduce you to the Muslim, Sikh and athiest families and their kids who wonder why their heritage is excluded and ignored when it comes to the big family celebration at Christmas time.

    As explained to Donald, 'find an alternative' doesn't work when there are only a tiny number of ET schools which are already oversubscribed and have limited catchment areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Because they are in a huge minority thats why. If their heritage is that important to them im sure they make their own arrangements.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    And there it is - the Christian value of to hell with the minority, cos we're going to do our own thing anyway.

    See if you think it all the way through and work out why minorities can't 'make their own arrangements'. Why should people be discriminated against at school, just because they're in a minority group?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    How about the 'plausible reason' of 'it can't be done' as evidenced by the fact that you can't come up with a single example of it actually having been done in living memory. Clearly, every non-catholic parent in the country is 'just too lazy' to take on a 20-year community fundraising project with uncertain outcome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 BettyBlue22


    That's nonsense. They're not in as small a minority as you think, they arrange religious education for their children outside of school in the same way that Polish kids attend Polish School on Saturdays. This is because our fundamentally secular free primary education sector was co-opted by the Catholic and Protestant churches when the colonisers could no longer stomach funding them, so that neither religion could be deemed to be poaching the faithful of the other. The Church might have originally funded education in the early days of the state to ensure their faithful stayed under the thumb, but the tithes of the faithful well compensated them.

    The history of the Irish education system is lofa with religious interference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Take it whatever way you like Andrew , you can't accommodate everyone all the time, when the vast majority identify as one thing and are happy enough to go along with the charade then you can't accommodate the other 10 percent that are made up of dozens of different belief systems so anyone with any sense just gets on board with the system as it is and if there particular man in the sky is that important to them they can look into all that in their own time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    They are a very small minority and the rest of your post proves my point , people will make their own arrangements if it's that important to them.

    If I moved to Germany I wouldn't expect there to be an Irish Catholic ethos in the school, if that kind of thing was important to me I'd seek it out elsewhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I see you will be delighted with the double bank holiday this year for st Patrick's day. The government have also decided to give recognition to women as well. We are goint to have a new Bankholiday in 2023 on 1st February....St Bridgit Day. If you join the army you wear the boots. when in Rome do as the Romans do. and all that.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You have loads of examples. I sent you a list of about 100 ET schools. A few pages back someone listed 5 religious schools that have been set up since the turn of the century. Don't mistake your own ignorance of something as proof if its non-existence. Do you think that those 100 ET schools have been there since the time of the dinosaurs or do you think that maybe people got together and did a bit of organising?

    Again, you cannot point me to a single law which prevents you from getting off your arse and organising something for yourself. Because there is none. What you want to do is to let others put in the 20-years work and for you to scrounge in and try to steal it off them after they have built up what they want to build. You don't have the right to do that any more than the FAI would have the right to be given Croke Park.

    Instead you make up lies like trying to say that others are telling you that you have to travel to the "other side of the country". If you are barred from entering other schools along the way then that's on you. You have freedom to move to wherever you want to live also. Perhaps it came as a surprise to you that you child would have to attend school? For most people, they would be aware of that even before they had children. Even if you didn't realise that the child had to go to school until it came to you and told you itself at age 5, it would still have given you 8 years to move somewhere else so that it could finish its primary education and start secondary elsewhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 BettyBlue22


    It only does that if you're unable to read what I've written, but have at it.


    Whether you log in as Cyrus or Donald Trump doesn't change anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    As you are fond of saying yourself - "Nonsense".

    Report the accounts if you want.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    And I already explained to you that all those schools were built by the Department, not by the local community group method that you propose for others. So have you any actual examples of schools built by communities, as you propose?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    They actually could accommodate ALL pupils relatively easily, but they're not arsed to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You don't get forced to join the army though, or forced to go to Rome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




    Educate yourself dude. The mechanisms and options are there in black and white: https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/education/primary_and_post_primary_education/going_to_primary_school/ownership_of_primary_schools.html


    Traditionally, the site for national schools was provided locally - either directly by the patron or as a result of local fundraising. There was also a local contribution to the building costs and the running costs. Changes were made over the years as multi-denominational schools and Gaelscoileanna were being built and did not have a 'local' funding base. New arrangements were introduced in 1999.

    Private primary schools get no State funding.


    Cost of site - new national schools

    The State pays the full cost of the site. The patron still has the choice of funding the site cost. If the State pays, then the State owns the school building and leases it to the patron under a lease or a deed of trust.

    If the patron pays, the patron owns the school. If the State pays, it does not change who the patron is.

    I'm wasting my time giving you this information anyway. The fact that you haven't bothered your arse even to do basic research confirms you're hardly going to get off your arse to do anything positive.


    No need to thank me. I wouldn't be expecting anything.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If Catholic children had to attend Muslim schools, or schools that actively gave lessons and messages undermining their religion, unless they were willing and could afford to move house, the bishops would scream the house down (and so would you).

    The real irony comes from Catholics who take the status quo so much for granted that they think it doesn't matter, when what's actually happening is that it does matter and it suits them. They don't think it's dogmatic because they don't have to think. They don't think it's sectarian or bigoted because it suits them.

    If it doesn't matter - if you really, honestly think it doesn't matter - isn't the obvious answer to take all of the schools out of the control of Catholic (or Protestant) church figures and put them into the hands of local State-run ETBs? If it genuinely doesn't matter as you insist, then changing the patronage can't hurt at all. Right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So which of the schools in your list were paid for by the patron?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Why do you think it's OK to treat minorities worse? It's not OK to take taxes off a person and use their money to deliberately undermine the belief system they are trying to foster in their children. It doesn't matter whether the person is black, white, Catholic, Sikh, disabled, gay or any other demographic group. No taxation without representation, full stop.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Er, you might be in Rome, but the rest of us aren't. What a weird thing to say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,654 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    The state should not be funding religious instruction or indoctrination.

    The time wasted on this could be used for so much more important stuff- literacy, numeracy, 3rd language, yoga, pe.

    If parents want to opt in for religious instruction then there should be extra time given after school/weekend and paid for by the parish/diocese.

    We do A La Carte Catholicism very well in this country



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I recall someone saying once that whenever society has an itch, the schools get scratched. We ask schools and the education system to carry a lot of the burden of teaching desirable skills and knowledge to our children - but some of that burden should probably fall on families and society as well. And then what? If our kids aren't good at yoga, PE, managing their diets, mindfulness, languages and all the other stuff we'd like them to learn are we going to blame schools and teachers? It wouldn't be the first time. The same goes for religion; it shouldn't be the job of teachers to foster any particular set of religious beliefs, that should be a job for parents and families.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You miss the point. The issue is not whether my kid should have applied for and been accepted to a Catholic school. It's that Catholic schools were neither suitable nor acceptable for us. If we were operating in a free market where we all picked schools like we pick shops that wouldn't matter. But it does matter when the State uses the power of tax law to take money from people and then discriminates in favour of some people and against others in how it spends that money to build and operate schools - purely on the grounds of religion. The State has passed laws to prevent itself from discriminating against people in this way for other reasons. The State legally bars itself from discriminating in this way on the grounds of gender, or marital status, or age, or disability, or sexual orientation, for example. In fact, the State legally bars itself from discriminating in most ways on the grounds of religious belief. Most ways, but not this way. The State spends something like eight billion euro of tax receipts each year on a system that is actively designed to allow this discrimination. Ireland is not a Catholic state for a Catholic people, and we have long since learned to leave that kind of sectarian thinking to hardliners in the North.

    If Catholics want Catholic schools, let them pay for them instead of taking my tax money. Same goes for Protestants or Muslims. While we're at it, let the atheists do the same and compete in the market. But you and I both know that a free market model of primary and secondary education will not work. So the only alternative is for the State to fund it - and the only logical basis for that is to accept the principle of no taxation without representation and fund a system that is not dominated by religious groups, and one religious group in particular.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I think you've fallen for too much facebook guff. You are operating in a free market. Nobody forces you to live in a particular area or to attend a particular school (you can actually even home-school your children if you want to!!). You choose where you want to live and you choose what school to send your child to or what school not to send them to.

    There is a Constitutional right to education. Which is why the State provides teachers. The teacher gets paid regardless of whether they teach in a religious or non-religious school (once that school is properly certified and approved). If the State builds a school, it owns the school. If another body builds the school, it owns the school. If the State proposes to build a school, it has an open call for potential patrons to apply for it. A parent may be any religion, or none, and send their child to the local Catholic school because they like the school. That parent pays tax. It isn't your right to decide to over-ride the Constitution and say that his child shall not receive the same funding as every other child who attends a public school. You don't get to discriminate based on your own intolerances.

    You have your set of beliefs. If you build your magical Atheist school then sure a Flying Spaghetti Monsterian can move into your area and use your argument that the government is using taxpayer money to fund your beliefs in a school rather than what they believe to be the real truth - Flying Spaghetti Monsterism.........so you're gonna have to hand over your school........



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    I take great exception to your accusation of sock puppeting, who is more likely to have multiple accounts, me that has been on here for over 15 years or you with 26 posts?

    Maybe more than one person disagrees with you, thats the problem with zealots, so convinced of their own righteousness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    You think i care whether the schools are taken out of church patronage?? i couldnt care less, but it just proves you arent reading my posts. Like i said i dont really care what man in the sky you believe in, but personally id rather get on with things than see injustice everywhere because its all a load of nonsense really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    No i dont what i think is you cant cater for everyone and if over 90% if people identify as one thing either get on with it or go somewhere you feel better represented.

    Ill repeat, if your religion is that important to you you wont be relying on a school to teach your kids about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Assumption A: that a more suitable school further away, but still within reach, exists. Most parents both have to work and driving kids about for hours every day is madness.

    Assumption B: that this school has enough places available to admit all applicants from within its catchment area, because you're outside it so will be right at the bottom of its admission policy criteria.


    Most ETs are already oversubscribed from within their own catchment area so there is no chance of a child living in an adjacent area which has no ET getting in. None whatsoever. But people still keep putting this forward as a "solution".

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Because when I started typing my reply it was the most recent post mentioning Harte and sectarianism.

    As for the second part, the programme for government has a (very unambitious and inadequate) target of 400 multi-denominational primary schools by 2030. Not only will the Dept of Education not get near that, they have no credible plan to even try, and no workable process in place for divestment. They deserve plenty more criticism on this than they are getting. It's just not good enough.

    Much more on that here:


    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    10 per cent? So you're claiming that Catholics make up 90% of the population now?

    Meanwhile, back in the real world, only 78% bothered to tick Catholic on the last census, and that figure includes OAPs. Most parents (even among those whose children do communion and confirmation) don't regularly attend church and clearly don't regard the Catholic faith as very important in their lives beyond a nice day out for the kids. You'll spot them on the day at the mass, not having a clue when to stand up or sit down because they haven't been to church since they were a child themselves.

    Most marriages taking place in Ireland are now non-religious. What makes you or anyone else think that these future parents want a school system dominated by religious ethos schools which indoctrinate during the school day?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't have Facebook. If you read my posts, you'd know that I adopted a free market approach to my problem, and moved house. Not everyone has the resources to do that.

    It's also an Orwellian abuse of the English language to say this:

    It isn't your right to decide to over-ride the Constitution and say that his child shall not receive the same funding as every other child who attends a public school. You don't get to discriminate based on your own intolerances.

    I've already said that it isn't anyone's right to do that. For the slow kids in the class, "anyone" includes me, and it includes you. You're the one arguing that you should be allowed over-ride the Constitution and discriminate against non-Catholics based on your intolerance. I'm arguing that you should not.

    It doesn't matter how often you repeat a sectarian argument, it is still sectarian.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm only assuming that you do care because you're arguing for it. You made a compelling argument for schools to be taken out of church patronage, but you stopped just short of asking for that. It's not I who needs to read your posts. It's you.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ah, "agree with me or get out". Would you say that to brown-skinned people as well? Surely not?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cheers. As I mentioned already, I don't have the highest opinion of Mickey Harte for a variety of reasons.

    You say the Department of Education deserve plenty more criticism than they are getting. But you didn't criticise them - you said that the reason Ireland isn't getting the results we should be getting is because civil servants are religious conservatives. That may be bigotry, or defamation, or extremism, or immaturity, but it's not criticism. So withdraw it. You shouldn't have said it, and it says a lot more about your mindset than it does about them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You’d have no problem with taking religion out of schools presumably, and leaving parents to teach their kids about what is important?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Please don't lie. Where did I say that I should be allowed to over-ride the Constitution and discriminate against non-Catholics? Did I say that non-Catholics should be excluded from Catholic schools? Did I say that State funding for teachers in non-Catholic schools should be removed (The converse of that was proposed by another poster who wants to deny State funding to any child that attends a Catholic school). I have repeatedly said if Catholics/Jewish/Muslims/Athiests/Flying-Spagetthi-Monsterans want to get their act together and get a proper structure in place and support for a school then they should be given support. But the don't get to sit on their arses and steal the effort of others.

    Nobody forces anyone to attend a school. Your own story is proof of same. There was a Catholic school near you which you didn't want your children to attend so you moved. That is free choice in action. I assume you moved to a non-denomination school. If there was a Catholic family living beside that school you moved to, it isn't discrimination against them that that school isn't Catholic. It would be discrimination if they were not allowed to attend it, or if there were different rules for State funding of Catholic schools compared to other denominations. People can moan that they can't afford to move house.....well that could be easily solved in advance by considering these things before they bought the house. Additionally, as others have pointed out, the vast majority of schools built in the last couple of decades have been non- or multi-denominational. These are often built in quickly growing areas. Which are also the areas with cheaper housing! The issue with not moving to those areas is not that they are not affordable, it is more snobbishness than anything.

    Maybe a person lives in a relatively large town. They live in the older part of the town. There is a nice Catholic school beside them. On the other side of the town are all the new sprawling estates. The Educate Together school was set up there 10 years ago to cater for the massive influx of people. There are lots of immigrants who moved to the town. They have a fine new school there. But maybe Mammy doesn't want little Paddy to be mixing with the "new people". That's why they won't send them to the ET school. It's "too far away" they will pretend. Mammy has high-faluting ideas that she is special and little Paddy is special and she wants special rules made for her and everyone else should change and conform to what she wants on any given day of the week. Any child should be welcome at any of the schools.

    Your argument is completely twisted. You are effectively taking the position that unless and until every single facet of education conforms to your specific desires, you are being discriminated against. If there was a single Catholic school in the country, you'd say you were being discriminated against because of its existence. That is completely self-centred madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Loads of schools are oversubscribed, the COI across the road for me is, yet one of my kids got a place despite being very low on the eligibility criteria, so saying there is no chance of getting in without trying suggests the strength of your convictions are weak, ditto assumption A, like i said its either important to you or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    So despite the fact the church is dying out, we still have almost 80% identify as catholic, 44% of marriages in 2019 were catholic.

    Im not saying people want a school with a religous but most people are sensible and dont really care as long as its a good school, using words like indoctrinate and dominate shows your true colours in that regard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Im not arguing for it, you are arguing against it, and i am suggesting that you need some perspective.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    what would the colour of your skin have to do with religion???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    non whatsoever. id much rather we didnt have to go through the charade of communion etc as i havent been to mass since i left school, but ill go along with it because there are far more important things to me in life. I dont understand anyone with strong religious convictions be they catholic, hindu or otherwise but i am happy enough to leave them to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RealJohn


    You’ve been making good, sensible arguments for the most part, but you’ve let yourself down here. You’ve essentially just said “you’re probably a racist with a viewpoint like that”, without quite coming out and saying it. Makes it seem like you’re starting to feel outmatched.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement