Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

Options
19679689709729731113

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    I really am curious as to what 2022 will hold for us.

    Same **** as usual it would seem



  • Registered Users Posts: 230 ✭✭TalleyRand83


    Just ignore it as best you can. All the successful people who enjoy life I know are doing that as am I.

    I shouldn’t even look at these threads as some posters would swear we’re in the midst of the Black Plague…..ignore it and do minimum polite mask wearing, the best weapon any rational person has now to move on. It’ll be classed endemic before height of summer and then it’s cold / flu / covid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,110 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Because the influenza virus mutates. Something a lot on here apparently did not surprisingly seem to know as they seem to believe they were promised that a single regime of a vaccine would give them sterilising immunity to a Covid virus that was known before vaccines were available, could, and had actually mutated.

    You could say that flu vaccine, which change practically yearly are even more fast tracked than the Covid vaccines were, but nobody has a problem with that for some strange reason.



  • Registered Users Posts: 230 ✭✭TalleyRand83




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    “I know I am self aware, therefore I am smarter” and said without a hint of irony. Fuppin hell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,583 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    This may come as a surprise to you but I didn't even know that thread existed. This thread is the only one in the Covid forum that I post in. There are only so many hours in the day and it can be difficult to keep up with this one thread nevermind trying to keep up with them all. There was one stage over Christmas that I was over twenty pages behind in here. I'm only speaking for myself but it's got nothing to do with my mindset that I didn't post in that thread and more to do with the fact that I've got a life to live outside of Boards.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Ride, PJ Harvey, Pixies, Public Service Broadcasting, Therapy?, IDLES(x2)



  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭aidoh


    J&J gave me 9 hours in A & E and a myocarditis diagnosis.

    Thank you for telling me that didn't happen though, doctor. Was confused for a moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    And what’s worse is the Government are trying to sweep these injuries under the carpet, offer no medical exemption to the coerced Covid Cert & no redress scheme to those injured all the while the companies who made the product aren’t liable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 739 ✭✭✭aziz


    I had the j&j as well,and no way will I take another



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    I had moderna and tbh the worst I had was a swollen arm.

    Have to get my booster next week which just annoys the **** out of me as they are already coming out with the 4th dose story.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,861 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I won't be taking a fourth no more than I take the annual flu vaccine. Simply put, I don't need it, don't get any benefit from it, and Omicron is little more than a mild cold for the vast majority of people.

    That's not to say that I think that it shouldn't be available to those who want it, but it need to become a voluntary thing like every other covid measure (including masks).

    We cannot let this country slide into a position where businesses are closed, people put out of work, told to stay away from others and wear masks every winter just because people get the sniffles and the HSE still can't manage the health service.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The WHO and others are pushing back against the potential perpetual booster approach but we may see it here now for at risk groups. The onus is on vaccine manufacturers to come up with something longer lasting with wider protection.



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭foxsake



    the side effects that some have suffered are not "for the worse"? a bold claim.

    Anyway you continually have misrepresented what i was said in that post - it's not worth discussing with you.

    Post below is spot on accurate.




  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    Welcome to the vaccination and booster thread!



  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    Regarding restrictions: if Nphet will give advice about lifting restrictions on january 20 prior to implementation on january 30 there will be very little time for case and especially hospitalisation numbers to drop as it is only 7 days away. I would guess they would like the restrictions to stay as they are even though numbers are likely to drop further from 20 to 30 january. The government could sell that as the advice given on which they base their decision. Watch that space!

    Oh, and can we talk some more about vaccinations and boosters please?! There is very little mention of those topics..😆



  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭aidoh


    I take your point that there are separate vax/booster threads but their discussion is also related to the relaxation of restrictions since we were all sold on the promise that vaccines were the "the way out of this".

    Personally I can imagine the 8pm curfew being extended to 10pm with night clubs staying closed for the foreseeable, 'just in case'



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,795 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I believe by law you don't have to disclose your vaccination status to your employer in Ireland, maybe I am wrong?

    With the new isolation rules regarding less days isolating with the booster, are people who need to stay out of work telling employers whether they are boosted or not by the number of days they need off?

    Which in effect is telling your employer whether you are vaccinated or not?

    I have not been in this situation but it was a thought i had, I could be completely wrong so happy to delete if I am wrong.



  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    Well yes, everything is related by x degrees of separation. But to talk about the efficacy/side effects alone has very little bearance on lifting restrictions and there are separate threads on those, wouldnt you agree?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,359 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    I think the first booster was probably needed, anything after that is flogging a dead horse.


    I think after this wave barring any nasty mutations COVID will become endemic to winter and only the at risk groups will be given annual boosters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,649 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    All the restrictions need to be lifted at the end of the month simple as that and then we need to just get on with living. People can then make their own choices on whether to wear a mask or not or whether they want to go to pubs or nightclubs or whatever.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,905 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    id say from februaruy 1st we will have 10pm curfew, thats what NYPHET will be happy with as its people in restauraunts who dont behave same way as people on a big sesh. so they will be happy enough to bring that in but id say everything else in hospitality offical rules will stay the same. cant see nightclubs open til mid june. they will be on about saving summer, unfortunatley we could see the nightclubs shut in late october and 10pm curfew again next winter. that would suit the medics really well, no late night A and E incidents, drunken violence after nightclubs etc. You get the feeling medics would be happy to see an 11pm curfew end of story for all hospitality in ireland. They believe people should just sit at a table drink 2 or 3 glasses of wine or 2 or 3 bottles of beer and head home, or go for dinner and glass of wine and home by 11pm. they seem to not be bothered as much with younger people having parties in houses where they can drink bottles of wine and vodka and take ecstasy and coke all night, seem happier with that than having it happen in a nightclub. I would say the likes of Galway Race week really drives them mad, where you have all ages acting like teenagers, 17-50 year olds!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,278 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Judging by the report on the Journal, it looks like 5 weeks from the end of this month before we get back to what we had on the Oct 22nd reopening.

    There appears to be no plans so far to remove masks or covid certs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭foxsake


    they can think what they like but nothing bar an unrestricted full opening is justified.

    Anyway RTE have asked the HSE for a breakdown of the numbers of who is in hospital with covid and who is in hospital because of covid.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0112/1273204-hse-hospitals-covid/

    The cat will be out of the bag I'm sure as I've always been convinced the numbers were inaccurate - in fact a sham to perpetuate the whole hysteria and rule by decree that we have endured.

    This could be a government ploy to cut the legs off NPHET scaremongering

    Meanwhile, the Health Service Executive has said it will have data tomorrow on the number of patients in hospital with Covid-19 and those in hospital for other reasons who have tested positive.

    The HSE and the Department of Health were previously unable to provide the information.

    Following a request from RTÉ News to the HSE for this information, the HSE directed the query to the Department of Health.

    The HSE said that as this information is reported to National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET), the query needed to go to that department.

    Interesting question - did NPHET have this info all the time and refused to release it?

    Post edited by foxsake on


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,858 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I'd guess we'll be 3/4th fully open by late summer then shutting up shop again in late autumn/early winter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭foxsake


    you nailed it. I have a firm belief your analysis is correct . there is control of information to control the message and process.

    if it was clear that most of those hospital cases and ICU cases would be there anyway this would have ended in the summer of 2020.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It shouldn't take that long at all. If the unwinding plan is starting in February then we'll be done by April. The only question is on masks and social distancing, which may take a lot longer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,648 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    That's correct, employers can't ask about your vaccination status barring a change in legislation happening.

    People can sue the manufacturers to their hearts content as part of the FDA full approval process and the EMA Conditional Marketing Authority (it's literally there on the site describing what CMA is), not sure why people keep pushing this as a point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,648 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    All of the data is there up to November in the CSO analysis, there will be data added for December soon enough as well.

    I think Omicron has changed the %'s but they'll still be gathering the December data for a few weeks, part of the problem with our non-digital health system (I think you can go over to Denmark for more accurate up to date information that should be broadly reflective of what we see).



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭foxsake


    did you link the wrong post? - i didn't mention suing anybody

    but in reply - this is the response in the European parliament - the answer is probably not to suing pharma.

    question

    https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2020-004950_EN.html

    Answer

    As defined by the Product Liability Directive(1), any defect will need to be established before the competent court with a proof of the damage, the defect and the causal relationship between defect and damage.

    The Commission assumes that the second question refers to a situation where a company is not held liable due to a hidden defect.

    Article 7 (e) of the Product Liability Directive provides that ‘the producer shall not be liable as a result of this directive if he proves: that the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the time when he put the product into circulation was not such as to enable the existence of the defect to be discovered’. If the company is not held liable, it will not be obliged to pay compensation.

    The COVID-19 vaccines advance purchase agreements provide for Member States to indemnify the manufacturer for possible liabilities incurred only under specific conditions set out in the agreement. In all other conditions not defined in the agreements, Member States will not be obliged to indemnify the manufacturer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,648 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    That literally backs up what I was saying. Note that the advance purchase was done under the presumption that the approval would be emergency which means that every individual batch gets sign off but that the liability falls on the country, under CMA, the liability falls on the manufacturer at the advantage that each batch doesn't need individual sign off, all European vaccines went under CMA likely due to the excellent safety profile of the mRNA vaccines which also led to the Adenovector vaccines following similar approval. CMA has a higher burden of documentation required for approval and was one of the reasons why it took longer for the EMA to approve (and one reason they started doing rolling approvals to speed up the process). The UK used emergency approval (I think it still is) and so did the FDA but have since moved to full approval for Pfizer (which again, would allow the patients to sue Pfizer but gives Pfizer greater ability to market and distribute the vaccine).

    The more pertinent question is whether anyone is trying to sue the country or manufacturer and has been blocked from doing so? I'm sure the anti-vaxxer groups will be trying to push a test case somewhere.

    And also that listed side effects are at the patients risk, but again, if there were very adverse events, the country administering the medicine would pick up the tab, as they would for any treatment (unless the issue was down to the vaccine producer as happened in Japan with Moderna, then the producer would be picking up the tab).



Advertisement