Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Options
1288289291293294732

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,478 ✭✭✭valoren


    Tone deaf or, perhaps, hearing how unpopular they are loud and clear and getting the excuses in early. I'd say he actually expects tax paid police for a presidential level security detail for his wife reduced to pap walks in California. Same fella who moaned about Charles cutting him off and having to dip into his own millions during a pandemic. They are the perma-complaining gift that keeps on giving. The actual heirs can literally walk down the street in London with a single bodyguard with absolutely no problems.

    No RPO = No UK visits.

    Translation: We've been completely frozen out but, in the interests of our PR, we want to play it off as really wanting our kids to appreciate UK culture in a safe environment but we got rebuffed by the dastardly government. Pulling at the heart strings again and now their kids are victims as well. Ffs.

    Post edited by valoren on


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,177 ✭✭✭✭Purple Mountain


    Good description about the gift that keeps on giving!

    It's like watching a car crash in slow motion.

    To thine own self be true



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    To be fair he wants to pay for it - he says that the police have access to intelligence that a private security firm wouldn’t have.

    I can kind of see his point, but the home office can’t set a precedent of the police service being for hire by ex royals/celebrities. He made his bed on this one.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Would that security extend to his camera crew?



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 7,033 Mod ✭✭✭✭HildaOgdenx


    I wonder if the stuff about the children, not being protected, is a way out of then attending the queen's celebrations later this year? Harry would still be able to come, but Meghan and the children would have to stay away.

    I also wonder if this story is intended, (by the RF) to take the spotlight, even temporarily, away from Andrew.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What sort of intelligence? If there are any risks that police are aware of, obviously they act on them. wouldn't matter whether someone had close protection or not



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    I don’t know, this was apparently the reason given by Harry. Maybe he’s thinking about threats due to his service in Afghanistan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,478 ✭✭✭valoren


    Being cynical then presumably the only way he can get access to Royal Protection Officers, and enjoy the MI5 access they have which is not available to regular Met Police/private security, is to have his status as an internationally protected person re-instated i.e. he's a head of states grandson, a future head of states son. With that re-instated then when he moves back to the US the security is provided with his status as an IPP. This is particularly helpful when you're going broke at a rate of knots. The flip side to this is when this is refused (again) then the victim playing get's compounded and will be helpful when the memoir media promotion comes around later this year. The money deriving from the book will keep the wolf from the door. In reality, they've been frozen out, are persona non grata for all things Jubilee and are getting ahead of the game to generate excuses i.e. we wanted to go but our family didn't have the necessary security in place/now they'll never have an appreciation for Britain. Funny how all these neo-nazi's don't seem to bother Kate going to Sainbury's.

    Post edited by valoren on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wouldn’t the same threats be a worry anyway in the World? Not just the UK?



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,939 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Whenever this thread is bumped I do wonder what pearls of wisdom either harry and Meghan have thrown out to us, and I’m not disappointed. This comes across as “Private security is costing a **** bomb” dressed up as there being any real treat because if there was a treat against the son of a future king then they’d probably be duty bound to inform him and provide protection. And I don’t see how they wouldn’t all be protected if they returned to the UK for the jubilee because they’d be around senior working royals and would be looked after. But maybe my last sentence is a bit too logical, just like the fact their then newborn son didn’t have security which was seen as a massive slight against child, but the fact his parents had security by being senior royals got lost.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    I think they do need protection in UK but from haters of them, who they both created by their own doing...



  • Posts: 8,856 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It’s a “get out of jail” free card, in case they need excuses later this year for not going to the Queens jubilee - you’d think Obviously William and Kate or indeed any of the protected Royals haven’t offered them a bed for a few nights 😂😂😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭hamburgham


    It’s probably a bit of a shock having to wait at traffic lights, probably flagged through for most of his life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 332 ✭✭MarkEadie




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    Thank you for your concern but I read enough...



  • Registered Users Posts: 332 ✭✭MarkEadie


    If you think the only people who want to do harm to Harry are some of the "I hate Harry and Meghan" tabloid lovers then you need to educate yourself in a big way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    Where did I say they are the only people? But they created much more enemies unnecessarily hence the topic of this thread starting with Oprah's interview...



  • Registered Users Posts: 332 ✭✭MarkEadie


    "I think they do need protection in UK but from haters of them, who they both created by their own doing..."



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't particularly like Meghan Markle or Harry...Whatever his second name is...but a couple of things I take from this is...

    1) it's true that victims of abuse/racism/sexism/harassment etc are scrutinized if they speak up...one of the reasons why people don't do it and imo fair play to Meghan for calling them out!

    2) Fair play to Harry too! I never liked him originally...thought he was a privileged little **** but whatever the situation he stood by his wife and he had more balls than Charles who denied Camilla for many years and went ahead and married Diane or Diana ? Whatever...even though he didn't truly love her and made a big mess for everyone (I understand his reasoning but fair play harry didn't do that)

    3) what's the word? Optionally? Optionally leaving the monarchy is a great move because monarchys are a bullshit archaic system that are on their way out anyway.



  • Administrators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,947 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Neyite


    I can understand his concern to an extent. You are talking about a man who literally grew up with the presence of police officers due to the threat of who would do him harm just because of the family he was born into. Add into that, had his mother kept the royal security detail at the time (She got rid because she was told by Bashir that they were spying on her and feeding information back to Charles), her death would likely not have happened - Al Fayed security didn't have the experience that the royal security did, and frankly, made decisions that proved to be fatal.

    So that lifelong awareness must be hard to shake off, and probably feels terrifying for him. Plus the awareness that there is a lot of xenophobic and racist hatred directed towards his wife just because of her race and her nationality in a way that Catherine never had. Catherine can go about her day in London in a way I don't think would be possible for Meghan. So maybe he's got a point that they would need experienced officers looking out for them if they come home to visit their family.

    But the powers that be have a very valid point as well - they quite rightly point out that by Harry offering to pay for this highly specialised police detail himself, then every A lister and wannabee A lister celebrity who comes to the UK could feasibly request the same. And I don't think that the UK police force should be for hire that way. And it's also possible, going by their own track record that they would be unwilling to take on board the expertise of police security detail considering that they don't seem to take advice from anyone who knows more about things than they do.

    The papers report that he chose to be a private citizen and renounce all the royal trappings but it's worth nothing that he didn't choose. What he chose in his stupidity or pigheadedness, was a royal pick & mix, of the best of both worlds. And went off half-cocked with the arrangement. It was the Queen who nixed their career plans of cashing in on their royal status by decreeing that they had to be all in or all out. And I don't think that he was wise enough either himself or to listen to those trying to advise him, to see exactly what he was giving up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,478 ✭✭✭valoren


    I am sure Harry knows that security is given based on a risk assessment by the Home Office, that the Royals don't dictate what level of personal police protection they receive. Obviously the Queen and Charles have 24/7 protection but they could pay for additional private security which is what rank and filers like Harry can also do. I'm sure this is what the likes of Andy is getting as a non-working embarrassment. You can't buy private police security but the likes of football clubs and supermarkets can pay for it because the police they are paying for are policing thousands of people in such circumstances. If the police could be bought for protecting a family, which is what Harry is deceptively implying, then you'd have every Sheikh, Dick and Harry using them. A listers are capable of using private security to travel worldwide. They are capable of doing it discreetly. The reality is that the optics for an egotistical Harry is that a fleet of high end vehicles swanning them around (such as their faux Royal tour in NY) is much better than a VW mini-van which was what Harry used for airport transfer after the Diana statue unveiling. The ego bruising must have rankled. Ultimately, their visiting the UK shouldn't even be a dilemma as why would he want to return to engage in Jubilee celebrations of an institution in the first place which caused him genetic pain and under which his wife became suicidal. The problem for them is that they need the association of Royalty as their unique selling point. What he is trying to do here is invoke sympathy and play the victim (again). He's imploring the types who don't read beyond the headlines and the deranged sussex “sugars” to think that his toxic (and racist) family won't stump up to protect him and his young family, he is, like Meghan, tugging at our heart strings because now poor little Lilibet won't ever meet her namesake. The hope being that such manipulations actually gain traction and the Bank of Dad gives them a royal bail out to cut off the PR backlash/quell potential discord in the Jubilee year. It's similar to implying Archie didn't get a Prince title because of racism i.e. that everyday Americans (their target audience) would not be up to speed on the actual protocol and thus the getting denied a title because of his potential skin color becomes more impactful. It's the same manipulation at play with the protocol regarding security i.e. it's not the Royals dictating it but many would not understand the machinations involved.

    He was born into the risk but he is the 6th in line to the throne. The sooner he accepts his irrelevance regarding that then all the better for his mental health and ego. Others born into the same risk don't seem to be as vocal about it. I am convinced that, assuming they are actually wanted, that they would be able to visit incognito. I'm sure that any such invitations would have been rebuffed if no photos were allowed which they need to flaunt back in the US. The reality is that they've understandably been cold shouldered and it's desperation stations now because even starting off a life of financial independence with millions in inheritance to hand then when there is no income coming in to maintain a millionaire lifestyle then that cash can get dissipated frighteningly quickly in California.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,939 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    they wanted to leave which is their own choice but as was said they wanted a half in and half out deal which the queen didn’t allow because let’s be honest the whole point of being a royal is you live in the country where it is, and you then reap the perks of that. Harry seemed to think he could have it both ways and when it dawned on him, that that wasn’t the case he threw a wobbler(aka Oprah interview), and there were claims about titles and security of Archie which were EASILY disprovable.

    And the claims of racism which they were vague on, both in frequency of the alleged comments and to whom they were said and when.

    Oh and then they were arrogant enough to think the Archbishop of Canterbury would back their claims they were married before they actually were, when everyone knows the archbishop doesn’t answer to them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,148 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


     I'm sure this is what the likes of Andy is getting as a non-working embarrassment

    Nope Scotland Yard still looks after the bould Andy.

    The reality is that they've understandably been cold shouldered and it's desperation stations now because even starting off a life of financial independence with millions in inheritance to hand then when there is no income coming in to maintain a millionaire lifestyle then that cash can get dissipated frighteningly quickly in California.

    Apart from the reported 120 million dollar 5 year streaming deal.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,478 ✭✭✭valoren


    Double post.

    Post edited by valoren on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭tara73


    I wonder do they really need a 'get out of jail' card at this stage? Quite the opposite fmpov: everybody in the UK would be shocked if they even show intents of showing up at the jubilee.

    I think Harry wants to make sure he can rely on the protection he feels he needs whenever he wants to visit, be it him feeling homesick or showing his kids his (their) home country. All pure selfish, surprise, surprise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,177 ✭✭✭✭Purple Mountain


    This might be a stupid question but are they only looking for protection when they're back in the UK or for when they're in the USA also?

    To thine own self be true



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,148 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    So there is income coming in?

    Glad we sorted that so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,939 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Income coming in from what exactly ? There was one podcast I think. They’ve not produced anything of any note and I’ve no doubt that Netflix and Spotify aren’t going to hand over money for no return. I do wonder if they sold Netflix on there being some royal involvement in whatever they produce ?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They have private security in the US. These are allowed carry arms. This isn’t allowed in the UK. I really don’t get what he’s after. He wanted out of the job, yet keep the perks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭Be right back


    Is it possible that they haven't been invited to jubilee celebrations, or just don't want to go, so this is an 'excuse' to save face? Don't have security so it will be unsafe to attend..



Advertisement