Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
137384042433691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    This threads always seem to attract recently registered posters all spouting its not Putins fault..



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    All the whataboutery in the world cannot absolve Russia from the loss of life that will be inflicted if they do push ahead and invade Ukraine. There is no justification for it whatsoever.

    Its sad to see people here trying defend the action as if its just Russia trying to defend itself from the west.

    The USA and Other Western forces have been guilty of many things that deserve condemnation, but the loss of life of any war in Ukraine will fall squarely on the shoulders of Putin and Russia should they invade IMO.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,773 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    That's the question will the Imperial Russian Army move West once more, will China continue its imperial agenda and use this to start the Ball rolling on Taiwan.


    Will modern Cecil Rhodes types like yourself take up the mantle as well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    ^^I suppose it's perhaps kind of a paradox of "free speech" thing (like paradox of tolerance) but I just increasingly find myself thinking it would be lovely to have some Western/democratic states only version of the "great firewall". An internet somehow cut off from a lot of the industrial amounts of bullshit and clouds of fud these autocracies spew out + poison public fora with. I'm sure would still be fairly toxic on social media etc. but would have to be better without states with huge resources (Russia/China) doing a deliberate spoiling campaign 24-7 (or even that campaign hobbled somehow by blocking).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,434 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Lots of Chechens deeply unhappy with the present arrangement...the only real thing keeping the peace there is the millions of USD ( or billions of Rubles, if you prefer ) Putin is paying Kadyrov. Should that ever stop, there will be a lot of old scores to settle. His Father ( Kadyrov senior ) was blown up while attending WW2 celebrations. That sentiment is still there.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Boards.ie Today minus ca. 84 years. It’s only the Sudetenland, sure they’re all Germans anyway. It’s British and French aggression that will provoke war. If they hadn’t been treated so badly by the western powers 20 years ago all would be fine

    Boards.ie Today minus 83 years. Sure East Prussia was always German. The Poles are cosying up to the western powers and Germany are only defending themselves

    Boards.ie Today minus 82 years. Sure what choice did they have. The french and British declared war on Germany who were only looking out for their own people

    Boards.ie Today -77 years. Why didn’t anyone do anything to stop them going into the Sudetenland?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Already brought this up ,

    But yeah according to boards Ukraine is deeply divided so let the Russians have it and they want NATO removed and it will make the Russians happy and bring ever lasting peace , exactly like what happened in 1938 Sudetenland, Hitler only wanted peace and didn't want to fight anyone ......



  • Registered Users Posts: 726 ✭✭✭Mach Two


    Most of the planet would be an economic wasteland from communism without the U.S..

    Post edited by Mach Two on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Say if Russia does launch a full scale invasion, how will it go? Would the Russians win easily or can the Ukrainians, who will be very well armed, have some success in repelling them?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They replelled them plenty of times as they tried over the last 7 years to expand the two separatists areas ,and at a time when the Ukrainian armed forces were in disarray , poorly trained and equipped and with pro Russian commanders ,but they held there own at the time ,and inflicted loses on the Russians ,they could get over run fairy quickly in some areas but will be able to hold others,this is why Russia has massively increased the forces surrounding them , along with moving forces into Belarus to possibly open another area of conflict to draw Ukrainian forces away from the east



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,515 ✭✭✭brickster69



    Yesterday Canada started removing embassy staff and advising citizens to leave Ukraine. New Zealand who have no embassy there are now advising it's citizens to leave.

    That makes all members of the five eyes intelligence group are now in the process of leaving. Could well end with another Afghanistan evacuating loads of staff in the middle of a war zone if it does kick off.

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,854 ✭✭✭✭josip


    No matter what the US may claim, there's not enough LNG in the world to make up for the shortfall of Russian gas to Europe. As long as that remains the case, Germany will resist or try to limit sanctions against Putin which will embolden him. According to the British, 3% of British gas needs come from Russia, whereas 36% of German Energy needs are met by Russian gas. There's a bit of apples and oranges in there, but how much of that 36% is for electricity generation which could be replaced by other sources? If Germany won't turn back on their reactors, can France make up for any of the shortfall? That uncharacteristic knee-jerk decision by Merkel in 2011 is going to define Europe realpolitik for the next decade. I also wonder how much Olympic Man is benefiting via back channels from Nordstream.



  • Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I thought Merkel was gone?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,854 ✭✭✭✭josip


    It was Merkel's decision in 2011 to decomission Germany's nuclear reactors that has now put them at the mercy of Putin.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Sounds a bit like Iraq pre-2003. Sometimes stability is better than "freedom". Nobody particularly wins from opening up a can of Chechen worms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Is it coincidence that we suffered a massive hack of the hse by russian hackers aka Russian intelligence and now live fire naval exercises off our coast several months later .

    At the same time the Russian embassy is looking to expand its operations here in Dublin



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If they do invade Ukraine, he should be asked to leave.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,375 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    So are we saying that the German's are once again playing a major part in potentially starting WW3 ? The irony of it all.

    Have a weather station?, why not join the Ireland Weather Network - http://irelandweather.eu/





  • Huge stretch to talk about potential WWIII.

    absolute rubbish to blame it on Germany.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Putin has publicly stated he wants the borders with Europe redrawn and wants the eastern Europe states back in Russia ,

    The only way that will happen is through military means ,bar Crimea which never had a choice , no countries any where have shown anything to suggest they want to be reoccupatied with Russians,

    Yes it a stretch but not beyond the realm of possibility if putin isn't stopped now ,he won stop at ukraine





  • That’s why I said it’s a stretch and not total rubbish, like blaming Germany for it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They have helped the situation , they literally signed to be be Putins no1 supporter because of their business deals , Germany should have been Strong but no they literally invited putin into the house and handed over the keys for a gas deal ...

    Look at this week a pro Putin naval commander and blocking weapons to Ukraine ,



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,434 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well that certainly applies to recent history re Iraq and Libya. None the less, if the Moscow money supply to Chechnya ever stops, the separatists are still there. Having said that, with the same money, Grozny has been transformed from a bombed out ruin of a city into a brand new city, barely recognizable from the old one. And as for Libya, I remember a Libyan lady telling me that now that Ghaddafi ( who she, like a lot of Libyans was no fan of ) gone, he had been replaced with multiple Ghaddafi's.





  • I see nothing wrong with Germany’s approach, it’s literally the same as ours.

    Threats of sanctions or shipping weapons across hasn’t done much to change Putins mind so far. He wants a deal (one that suits him ofc) and Germany are at least willing to listen.

    Those remarks from the Naval Commander are frankly embarrassing for Germany, but again, to imply they’re guilty of encouraging or starting a war are ridiculous. They’re doing the exact opposite, trying to keep him happy!



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Threat of sanctions while you most powerful Allie is saying well no we won't really get involved here, putin is threatening our gas supplies which we pay him billions for .

    Germany needs to be standing up and saying back off we can support ukraine or anyone else with or without your contract for gas



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭techman1


    Surely this is a serious miscalculation by Putin. His actions are now finally galvanising NATO into action and they are reinforcing Eastern Europe the one thing Putin was trying to avoid.

    It also gives NATO the opportunity to flex its muscle it the one arena Europe that the organisation was set up for against its traditional enemy Russia, not the quagmire of the ME. Putin has given NATO purpose again and is probably doing more than Trump to get Europe to get it's act together and spend serious money on defence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭Black Noel


    The US/NATO setting themselves up directly on your border is bound to make them jumpy, its also a huge snub.

    I don't think they've any choice but to play the game the way the US has delt the cards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Crimea never had a choice? This is a common misconception among a lot of people, the vast majority of people in Crimea something like over 90 percent of the people there want to be part of Russia.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    I think you're right on the miscalculation front. Political malcontents from left and the right, for their own reasons, love to buy into the Putin mystique - arch strategist former spook who's playing 4D chess with Washington and their supine NATO running dogs in Brussels who aren't half the intellect of Vlad the wise. It's an odd phenomenon.

    Closer to the truth is his hubris on Ukraine may well be his undoing. He's been serving up sh*te economically to the Russian public for decades, has relied on political suppression, mouthpiece media and a grotty security state to keep the lid on mismanagement.

    The options on Ukraine are almost binary now:

    1. Make good on his threats and military mobilization and go hell for leather in Ukraine. This will likely be a disaster on the economic front and quite possibly the military front as he's done a pretty damn good job at bringing NATO on the same page (bar the wobblers in Berlin), and particularly Eastern countries he courts.
    2. Slink back and destroy his tough guy image in the face of the NATO united front being presented. Option 2 probably isn't a realistic one because of Putin's psychology, so he's boxed himself into option 1. A high-risk, low-reward scenario for him*

    *The reward in a best-case military scenario being the occupation of large swathe of an uncooperative Ukraine and international paraiah status even deeper than 2014



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement