Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How can we integrate Unionism into a possible United Ireland?

Options
24567127

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I don’t care more or less about Offaly people either, they are just the same to me as anyone else I meet. Bobby Sands died 40 years ago, I was 12, doesn’t mean anything to me.

    You are confusing indifference with hatred, I don’t hate either party in NI, I am indifferent to their claims, but I do recognise that both should be afforded the respect they deserve.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    The most popular party in Northern Ireland is also the most popular in the Republic, we are strongly linked not only by sharing the island but politically as well, it makes perfect sense to unite the Island economically as well, there are major economic benefits for all the counties of Ireland, which I’m sure is the only thing that will convince people like yourself who are only worried about a few extra pennies in their pocket.

    Much of the discussion to this point in relation to a United Ireland has centred on the issue of the North’s subvention, the annual subsidy it receives from the UK exchequer to cover its costs, which amounted to £9.4 billion (€10.8 billion) in 2019.

    There are various elements that underpin the North’s subvention. The largest three elements that underpin the north’s subventions are pensions, Northern Ireland’s share of the UK’s national debt and defence spending. 

    Most academics argue that most of the money involved in these transfers would not apply in the event of a united Ireland. The cost of the subvention objectively – in terms of what is relevant to the debate about Irish unity – is no more than £2 billion to £3 billion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Though SF may be polling well at the moment, the most recent poll here showed that two thirds of people in the south do not support them. In a poll last week, 24% of those polled in NI supported SF which may make them the biggest party, but 76% do not support them.

    It makes perfect sense to you, but a million Loyalists disagree, and unless you can sell a unites Ireland to them, they ain’t buying.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Just out of curiosity what would put you in favor of a United Ireland? What would you have to know beforehand?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I’m indifferent. I really don’t think having a United ireland will change my life or most other Southerners. I believe that the viewpoint of a million Loyalists should be respected and I believe they will be equally as unhappy and potentially troublesome as some of the more ardent Nationalists, so why bother? Do we want a million unhappy people in our country and have to pay for the privilege? I think not. Harry you can drive from one country to the other, live, work, socialise, do whatever you want without barriers, so why wake a sleeping beast?

    i think people like you like to talk this up like it is something important in our lives, it really isn’t. We are more interested in things that affect us directly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick


    If it ever happened (BIG IF), it would only be a matter of time before a so called united Ireland descended into complete and utter anarchy. If you think the past troubles in the North were bad....

    It's a hugely sensitive topic and no amount of discussion and debate here - thrusting viewpoints back and forth - is going to make a blind bit of difference. You're just going to end up going to bed with a lot of pent up frustration or anger, and probably kick the cat (or dog), or even the wife!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭John Doe1


    Well, as an East Donegal protestant of an Ulster Scot background, I can tell you that it has been done before.

    Although with a larger demographic change, there will likely have to be proportional concessions: New Anthem/Flag/Taytos but I believe it can work out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,665 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    What do unionists do in the situation the union collapses. Scotland want out then the English. They can't blame dublin for this. Most moderate unionists would then see a united ireland as the only real alternative. There is some extream unionists who don't see themselves as Irish and would rather an independent NI over a UI but they would be a shrinking minority. Most people in Ireland would welcome a UI and most people in Britain would welcome NI leaving the union so it does seem likely.

    Alot of nationalists live happily in the union so I imagine in a UI many unionists can do aswell. With the collapse of religion the main difference between nationalists and unionists has been removed anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,546 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I think Scotland leaving the UK would be a huge blow to Ulster unionism - their form of unionism was always based on the idea of the four 'home nations'. It reducing to a rump state would leave them on very shaky ground and fearful for their future.

    I don't buy the argument though that they would simply fade away if a united Ireland were to happen. They would retain their British passports (probably for generations), keep flying the Union Jack, still celebrate the Twelfth etc. But break up of the UK would certainly create a major identity crisis for them, especially if it was seen that England was determined to ultimately go it alone and become a single sovereign state without the attachment of the three Celtic nations.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I honestly find the proposal impossible, and it's probably not going to happen within our generation. It would need a new and younger generation to make this happen.

    I think the first order of business would be to make sure, that all the paramilitaries will have to go and go permanently. The UFF, the UDF, and all possible republican paramilitary activity would have to be dealt with, to ensure that a possible United Ireland is a peaceful one and stays a peaceful one. What we don't want is paramilitary activity within the whole Republic of Ireland.

    What would also have to go, are all these murals in Northern Ireland, all of them, of both sides, Republican and Loyalist, regardless if some people like them, some say they are Graded or Listed, they would have to go. No names of people who died and are seen as "heroes", no wording like "no retreat so surrender" or "still under siege" as well as references to Cuba or Palestine. This would all have no place in a united Ireland as well.

    That alone would be a huge undertaking, but it would be the first step necessary for a United Ireland. People are very resistant to change up in the North, whatever side you're looking at, - sadly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,052 ✭✭✭✭neris


    we dont, we stay as we are. we dont need the North and all the bigotry and issues that come with it. we have our own problems with a country as 26 but we get by and dont the added issues of the north



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    The partitionists are going all in on this thread, no holding back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Why would the nationalists be against change? Hard to have any justification for taking down the murals to IRA volunteers when the political wing of the IRA is now the most popular party in Ireland North and South, the loyalists have a few murals mainly confined to a small few areas that were mainly put up out of spite because the Catholics have them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The partition already exists.. it's not as if we're wanting to change anything.

    but, sure, answer me this.. what are the actual benefits to the South with regards to reunification? and do those benefits outweigh the negatives? Don't deflect either. If unification is so wonderful, you should be able to provide a wide range of positives that will improve the lives of people in the South.

    cause I can only think of a few minor somewhat positive aspects from unification, and a shitload of negatives.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,217 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Never mind the Unionists, even a moderate citizen of Northern Ireland would need to be crazy to want to join a United Ireland. Giving up the NHS for the HSE would be a big ask. The swathes of redundancies as the 25% of the population currently working for the public sector find their jobs no longer relevant. Then factor in the economic reality of the Republic having to try and support NI financially and you'd be asking them to join a destitute new country...

    A United Ireland is a fantasy imo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,598 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Northern Tayto, Southern Cadburys. Unification sorted. You can all thank me later.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Well for a start there are the economic benefits, as I said earlier the exaggerated cost of Northern Ireland is usually estimated by the partitionists at 10 billion, what they don't tell you (or don't know) that the majority of those costs would not apply to a United Ireland.

    The largest three elements that underpin the north’s subventions are pensions, Northern Ireland’s share of the UK’s national debt and defence spending, most academics agree that most of the money involved in these transfers would not apply in the event of a united Ireland, the real cost is no more than 3 billion, still a fair chunk but nowhere near the exaggerated costs some would have you believe.

    There have been many studies that show a United Ireland would actually be a great investment for the Republic of Ireland, now this does not mean that there will be magical profits straight away as soon as it happens, it would take time but within a few years we would start to see some small benefits slowly turning into massive ones for everyone, I'm sure of it, of course there are some people who don't like to invest and only care about a temporary few extra pennies in their pockets but I think under a real discussion about a United Ireland most people would see the benefits, apart from the partitionists who merely use their falsified economic concerns of having to pay ten billion a year as an excuse for their fundamental opposition to a United Ireland.

    Now I don't want to make this post too long so I'm not going to go into much detail on the rest of the benefits I'm going to point out here but one benefit is an end to division and finally moving forward as a nation and finally putting the past behind us once and for all, uniting the people of the island and not just the states, which may not mean much to people like yourself but would mean a lot to a lot of people.

    Another benefit is that the Tory party is no longer going to decide what's best for the people of Ireland, as was evident with the IRISH border in relation to brexit the people of Ireland North or South had little to no say in what happens, at the end of the day it was down to the tories, these issues have been arising ever since partition and brexit only confirmed that these issues will continue to arise.

    I could go on forever listing the benefits of a United Ireland but I'll leave it at that as I don't want to make this post too long.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I know. And also, as long as te SF is strong uniting Ireland doesn't make any sense at all to me. I think in my opinion a United Ireland is never supposed to happen either quickly or overnight or with the same attitude as Brexit happened in the UK something like "us taking back control ourselves but not knowing how".

    A United Ireland would however be a natural consequence of Brexit going on and gone wrong massively for the UK, but it would also need a totally new and younger generation to make it happen in a peaceful way. And then there are also financial consequences for Dublin and the newly integrated North.

    Uniting Ireland will happen at some point in my opinion, but now is not the time. Maybe in 20 or 30 years.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    apart from the partitionists who merely use their falsified economic concerns of having to pay ten billion a year as an excuse for their fundamental opposition to a United Ireland.

    You're still deflecting. I asked for the benefits to the South, and all you've really said is that it would cost us less than what was stated previously. That means it would still cost the Irish State, and the taxpayer quite a bit to bring the North into line with the rest of the country, with few actual benefits for those in the South. And no, most academics don't agree on the difference, just that some do. Many others seem to believe that unification would be a serious economic shock to the Republics economy. And a united Ireland wouldn't be the end to division.. that's just wishful thinking.

    You've simply sought to downplay the costs rather the showing the benefits.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    While they would be a bitter pill to swallow, I love the idea of some dour Northern Protestants coming down to Dublin and shaking up our dysfunctional government, health "system", housing etc. They are quite a practical people with no BS and with their ship building heritage they might be better at implementing systems and making order out of chaos. Of course this is all built on lazy old stereotypes but a wee fenian Dub can dream.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    How am I deflecting? I was talking about the bloody South!

    Did you read the whole post or just the first paragraph? I talk extensively about how there major profits and gains to be made for the Republic of Ireland under unification and how the costs of ten billion year which some people claim it would cost us is falsified misinformation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 223 ✭✭Sadler Peak


    You won't have to because a united Ireland is not going to happen.

    I can see the Republic voting it down.

    A SF government in the Republic will be the death nail of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    So all major political parties being in favour of it and you still believe that the people are going to just vote it down?

    Numerous studies have show Northern Ireland could be a great investment for the Republic of Ireland for anyone who can see past the first few years.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I quoted from the 3rd paragraph.. so yeah, I obviously read the whole thing. And I wouldn't consider anything you wrote as being "extensive", nor really highlighting actual benefits to the Republic. As I said you downplayed the costs rather than dealing what the benefits would be to (southern) Irish people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,728 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The DUP would now have a great point to campaign on these days if they could ever rid themselves of their crippling myopia.

    Cheap cans.

    Oh, barstoolers of the Republic. A vote to unite Ireland would be a vote to be united under the minimum alcohol pricing laws. Why not keep NI around and come up here for your beer runs instead? We have a Tesco superstore in Newry. It's great.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    You supplant the Unionist identity with an Ulster identity instead. The new boogeymen are not "the Irish", but the southern Irish (ex. Ulster)

    Less Union Jacks, more Red Hands of Ulster. Give a devolved government to Ulster aswell and I would think most would be happy with that in the long run.

    They can still hang onto their Ulster Scots (lol) identity etc too



  • Registered Users Posts: 223 ✭✭Sadler Peak


    I'd say they may think differently in private.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,654 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The NHS is free, but the idea that it is better in NI is long out of date. At macro level this shows up in people living longer in the 26 counties. It shows up in the longer waiting lists in NI, to the point where actually waiting is not an option for many people and they have to fund the operation privately. The HSE is hardly perfect or even satisfactory, but it is tending to improve while the health service in NI gets worse. This "free" service is funded by national insurance charges that amount to £1000 extra for people on average salaries, and London is proposing to increase this in April. By simply collecting this amount from people in NI you could still have "free" health after a UI. The whole health thing is not a real problem but an exaggerated one from people who haven't thought about it.

    Yes, there will be redundancies in the public service, although some data collection is needed to identify where this surplus exists. But most public jobs are in education and health and these will carry on, if there was a redundancy/early retirement scheme then many would choose this.

    The broader question of affordability is the real one and depends on the actual calculations, which are far from known at present. The unknowns include the actual level of expenditure, the actual level of tax and income and the arrangements made for public debt and pensions etc. I see no reason for Irish taxpayer to take on board UDR pensions and the like that might be in the NI budget. The NI economy certainly has the ability to grow more quickly than at present and cut any gap, especially when the rest of the country is overheated.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,172 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    I think you have something there a UI with each province having a large amount of self government i.e. no Dublin or Belfast rule. A new flag, new anthem a new UI capital. Invite the new King to open schools etc. or the President on a case by case basis.



Advertisement