Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How can we integrate Unionism into a possible United Ireland?

Options
13567127

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 29,073 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    we integrate them by treating them the exact same as any other british people living on the island who has irish citizenship, they can keep their passports, practice the benine parts of their culture, take part in government.

    the fact is a UI is going to happen and we need to be preparing for it now and the british government really don't want NI, so the unionists seeing there is no fear from a UI for them will go a long way.

    at the end of the day, just like there are a tiny few in the republic who want us to rejoin the UK (thankfully never going to happen) there would be a small few unionists who would never except anything that changes the status quo, but they will ultimately have to except a majority vote.

    there isn't going to be any wide spread trouble, what may happen would easily be dealt with by the police, there is no real support for a return to violence on either side and there will be no support from britain in any form if they want to get those trade deals that benefit the countries they are trading with at the expense of british people and industries.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I agree with the earlier posters, your claim that it will cost less than we might think is hardly a good selling point. The question is, what benefit will it bring to the 5m people living in the Republic?

    You claim there are studies which show the economic benefits of unification, I’d like you to link a few of them. I’d also like to read a few studies on the social benefits for both populations after unification.

    And Harry, don’t list the Tory party’s influence over the people of NI as a consideration for Southerners, it isn’t.

    You asked earlier what would it take for me to support unification, show me how it will benefit me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Ever met American Irish in Boston or such, and try suggest that they're American not Irish? haha.

    Edit: Sorry forgot to quote the post I'm quoting.

    Damn you vanilla.

    While the point you make is correct the example is not the best.

    Irish Americans see themselves first and foremost as American.

    The Irish prefix is really just something they use to differenciate themselves from other immigrant American groups, like Italian, German, Polish etc.

    It's a legacy from 150 years ago when you had great swathes of immigrants from Europe coming to America.

    Many Irish Americans even in places like Boston would struggle to name a county other than Dublin, Cork or Kerry.

    A better example for your point would be second and subsequent generations of Irish people living in the UK.

    Call them British or question their Irishness and they will go through you.

    A poster here is very adamant that people of unionist background would be incorrect to call themselves British in a united Ireland.

    If that's the case then equally every Irish person of any generation anywhere in the world other than Ireland is incorrect in calling themselves Irish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Quite right, many Americans claim heritage from somewhere and are proud of it, even if it is tenuous . A few years ago I was in a bar in Manhattan, the guys beside me were Trump supporters giving out about emigrants coming to the US, when they heard my Irish accent they asked what I thought. I just asked them how many of them considered themselves native Americans/Indians, they laughed and said they were Irish, German, Scottish etc Americans, not Indians. The cent dropped a couple of seconds later. It was just convenient to label themselves Irish American, but in reality they are just plain old yanks, but some relative down the line was once an emigrant just like the people they wanted to keep out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,899 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    wow hard to beleive how many people are not bothered with a united ireland, must be very disapointing for sinn fein



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    SF are nothing if not pragmatic, their popularity in the South is based on issues which affect the electorate directly like housing, taxation, health, crime etc. They don’t bang on to often about unification, with good reason, it isn’t an important consideration down here.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Because of the border we couldn't quarantine the whole country like Australia or New Zealand did.

    If the IDA could do half as well there as they do down here the place would take off. Lower housing costs means lower wages. More people gainfully employed means bigger economy, more tax revenue, less handouts.

    Thanks to Brexit the balance of payments on goods with the GB has shifted €5 Billion in our favour because we are importing 20% less and exporting 20% to them. Between Ireland and NI the volume of trade has gone up by 50% and is in NI's favour by €300-400m.

    Unification would be a serious shock. But only because of the widening gap. It used to be East/West Germany or Mexico/USA , it's now closer to North Korea/South Korea. And the gap is still widening. Better to address it sooner than later as it's a can that can't keep being kicked. NI wouldn't drag us down because of inward investment, EU aid (we'd pay less for a start), there'd be jobs on the new motorways to Belfast and Derry, possibly rail upgrades (Derry line is busiest single track line in UK) and re-openings.

    We'd levelling NI up in exactly the same way as the Tories won't, ever.


    The Network Effect means in addition to economies of scale you get synergies when you have a bigger group so should be efficiencies there too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Something like a quarter of all employed people work in the public service and another 20% rely on government benefits, payments for these would have to be standardised with those in the South so those lower the pay and handouts would rise considerably which of course would lead to higher prices. The private sector is no where near as developed as the South.

    I have plagiarised the above from this article:

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/what-would-be-the-economic-costs-and-benefits-of-a-united-ireland-1.4557508



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,546 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I've seen reports that the NHS in Northern Ireland is very run down and underfunded with long waiting lists (on top of NI being probably the poorest region in the UK). The idea that they would be economically worse off in a united Ireland seems a bit far fetched.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,172 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    They may be a greater threat to a UI than any Unionist objections.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Shao Kahn


    The best way to integrate unionism into a UI, is to give the unionist's regular border polls for NI to rejoin the union. It's only fair really. In order to respect their unionist wishes.

    Imagine a border poll was 51 - 49 one way or the other. The losing side will want another vote fairly soon, within 10 years anyway. And you couldn't blame either side for wanting this tbf.

    "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives, and it puts itself into our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." (John Wayne)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The point that people will hold on to an identity that they feel that they have earned through some kind of hardship. The Irish in the US talk about how difficult it was to be Irish (here and there), and so, consider their Irishness as being supremely important. It's an emotional connection, rather than a logical one.

    Unionists in the North will do exactly the same, and the stronger that any pressure exists for them to give up that identity, will simply make them hold on to it harder. Unification with the South will simply reinforce that identity because they weren't truly given the choice to decide for themselves without external pressure, and so, they will resist everyone because of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,172 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    We could go one better and have the poll for the whole island to rejoin?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    I claimed that it was down to the Tory party what happened to the IRISH border and many other things concerning us, how does the Irish border have nothing to do with us? Doesn't effect us at all no?

    The first and only rigorous academic study of the economic impact of unification, In this study that is seen as the as the first and only major examination of the potential economic effects of an all-island economy, the ‘Modeling Irish Unification’ report — undertaken by Canadian consultancy KLC and University of British Columbia academics, who have carried out similar reports on German and Korean unification — suggests “significant long-term improvement” in the economies of both the North and the Republic resulting from unification.

    “GDP in the Republic could rise by €30m to €152m in the year of policy implementation. In total, Irish unification could boost all- island GDP in the first eight years by as much as €35.6bn,” the report concluded, yet people like yourself seem so certain that unification will "ruin the 26 counties" based on little to no evidence and overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    I can only put this down to a partitionist agenda of yourself and others who are fundamentally opposed to a United Ireland.


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/business/arid-20388959.html

    Post edited by Harryd225 on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Because of the border we couldn't quarantine the whole country like Australia or New Zealand did.

    We couldn't quarantine the whole country because there was no political will to do so. There were flights going from Dublin to UK airports throughout most of the covid period.. not because of the North, but because our politicians love to confuse matters. If they'd truly wanted to quarantine the nation, the North could have been managed. They didn't.

    Unification would be a serious shock. But only because of the widening gap.

    No... unification would be a shock because of the existing gap. All your reasons point to long-term projections, based on our economics remaining somewhat stable.. Except, that covid has had a tremendous impact on Europe, and that's going to grievously affect the Irish economy over the next decade, if not longer. And that's without dealing with the range of vulnerabilities within the Irish economy/society that exist today, under a relatively successful economy.

    Everything points to long-term investment in the North, before it became useful to the point where it wouldn't be a major drain on the Irish economy. Yes, the North has some extremely solid business sectors, but they're typically small sectors... overshadowed by the wide range of economic negatives. Negatives that the Irish taxpayer will be expected to cover. I see very few upsides for the Republic in such an arrangement.. and stands to create a range of debt that could affect the next two-three generations of Irish people. And for what? Just so Republicans can get proud over a united Ireland, while everyone else looks to less disposable incomes for the next few decades.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    What makes you actually believe any of this? In the post above you I talked about the first and only rigorous academic study of the economic impact of unification, a study that is seen as the as the first and only major examination of the potential economic effects of an all-island economy, the ‘Modeling Irish Unification’ report — undertaken by Canadian consultancy KLC and University of British Columbia academics.

    This study shows that in all likelihood there would be major benefits for the whole island, yet you and others go on about "less disposable incomes for the next few decades" for no logical reason at all only to further your agenda.



  • Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How do you integrate unionism?

    The same way Britain does...ignore them 99% of the time, then pay lip service to their "British" culture when a coalition partner is needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Again, you are making unfounded accusations. I am not a partitionist, I suspect you will struggle to find anyone who wants a partition. What I am is indifferent to the fact that it exists and don’t see the benefit to me unification, and I think telling a million unionists they are no longer part of the union is going to be at least as much trouble as telling Nationalists they are British.

    Now I know it suits your agenda to think I am unpatriotic, fact is, I support the country I live and work in, ROI, NI is a UK problem.

    And, one study? That’s it? Where is the study on the social impact in the North of unification?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,262 ✭✭✭jh79


    The same study says that NI benefits not the Republic.

    35bn is a pittance over 8 years. The study requires all budget surpluses to be invested exclusively in NI. Harmonization of taxes and social welfare etc and massive redundancy in PS numbers in NI.

    Do you honestly think that 35bn over 8 years would cover all that? Sure our GDP is 350bn as it is!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    One study. One. A single study that suggests that the costs would be less than what all the other experts have pointed to. Good lord. None of this is hard to see, when looking at the cost of the North to Britain, the general state of Northern infrastructure, their own problems with poverty, etc etc etc. As for where I've gotten my info, I've looked at the reports on the Norths economy, and social status, which are easily found online.

    Look I get it. From your repeated use of the term "Partitionist" for people who oppose a United Ireland, you're obviously willing to ignore the realities of the situation to push your own agenda. The feel good notion of a United Ireland. Grand. I get it. However, I'm more concerned with how badly it would affect the Republic, and everyone living there.

    I asked for a number of simple points from you, and you deflected, aiming to downplay the costs rather than show the benefits to the people of the Republic. If Unification was such a wonderful thing for us to embrace, then you would easily have been able to point to a wide range of benefits.. You haven't.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,262 ✭✭✭jh79


    The study the poster is referring to doesn't estimate the costs it just looks at possible benefits.

    Does anybody really believe 35bn over 8 years would cover the costs?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    So this is what the partitionists have had to resort to? Complete lies? It doesn't say that at all, the study claims that uniting the 32 counties would significantly increase economic growth on both sides of the border.

    Speaking at the event of the study, Michael Burke, economic consultant and former Senior International Economist at Citibank in London, discussed the impact of a unified Ireland "In my view - and I think it is substantiated by this very voluminous research - Irish unification is a growth story, is a success story, is a prosperity story, and that's why I very much welcome the report".



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,262 ✭✭✭jh79


    What page on the report does it say that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Are you serious? You don't have a clue about the study then, it's the first and only rigorous academic study of the economic impact of unification taken by the some of the greatest experts in the field who also held similar studies on the unification of Germany and Korea, do you seriously think they didn't take the costs into account when they talk about the benefits?

    You're twisting the words completely, it was an estimated 35bn, which means that money would be generated each year for the future, apparently though that's nothing but peanuts to the partitionists, yet you and the others say that the 3 billion a year cost of Northern Ireland would ruin the Republic and give us all "less disposable income for decades".

    Clutching at straws here now lads.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    As you claim to have a clue, the poster asked a simple question and it would seem he/she has read the report, so where in the report does it state what you claim it does?

    Does the report do a cost benefit analysis and state that it benefits ROI economically?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,262 ✭✭✭jh79


    The report gives a number of unification scenarios and then predicts possible benefits.

    35bn over 8 years is for the whole island. Given NI awful economy, that is a good increase but a pittance from our perspective given our GDP is 350bn.

    Scenario 3 to get the 35bn over 8 years involves;

    "Unification in combined scenario 3 means the ROI pays 100% of NI’s government deficit, harmonization of functions of government reduces NI’s government expenditure by 2% annually from 2018-2025, and adoption of the ROI’s tax regime and foreign investment policy platform attract a higher presence of multinational firms....."

    It doesn't take into account increased SW or PS pay, capital investment etc. Just looks at benefits.

    Granted, 35bn over 8 years is technically a benefit but does anybody really believe that covers the cost!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    In the executive summary, Professor Steven Raphael, UC Berkeley, wrote: "Political and economic unification of the North and South would likely result in a sizable boost in economic output and incomes in the North and the Republic.


    Marcus Noland, Executive Vice President and Director of Studies at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, provided comment on the study, writing: "Modeling Irish Unification is an important, timely examination of the economics of Irish unification, applying state-of-the-art modeling techniques to the issue at hand. The modeling work illustrates a variety of channels which are likely to be at play in the Irish case, and concludes that Irish unification would be economically beneficial to both parts of the island.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,504 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    I'd be very confident that a united Ireland would see a major economic injection boost provided SF took less of a role in governance, SF are an anathema to economic growth


    Not everyone who believes in unification is a SF voter or a socialist, I'm one of them , on integrating unionists, I'd be happy to rejoin the commonwealth as a gesture to unionists, its a harmless club of nations with a poor man's Olympics every four years



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,262 ✭✭✭jh79


    Do you think 35bn over 8 years would pay for social welfare and PS pay in NI?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You can change the flag and anthem but I'll be damned if I'll take your Ulster tayto!



Advertisement