Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Connacht Team Talk Thread VI - Some like it TOH

Options
1158159161163164423

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    I'm less and less inclined to read the provincial threads, even the Connacht one, because of stupid provincial sniping like this. There are a couple of posters for every province who post drivel, ignore them - it's simple.

    It's also why I very rarely if ever check look at the Ireland thread at all these days.



  • Registered Users Posts: 595 ✭✭✭jimdemp


    Prendergast must be a even better player then i thought because when Connacht dont have him they get mauled. Connacht lack size and the smaller men gas more often. Throw in a weak bench and your in trouble.

    Looks like the are pissed with papaili and made him a full time water boy. They will need to look for another one like him and hope it works out. look at Jordan Mailata went from a one-year contract worth $5,000 to play for the North Sydney Bears to a four-year $64 million contract with the eagles.



  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭AccidentallyOnside


    They are absolutely stockpiled, whether they produced them or not. The central contract system is a way of financially doping primarily Leinster but also to a lesser degree munster (Murray on a central contract? Nonsense!). Leinster are already at a huge advantage due to their larger population and greater commercial revenues when you then pay for huge swathes of their players from a central fund you end up with a situation where one team can sustain a much higher calibre squad than anyone else in the league.

    You're right that this isn't a problem for the IRFU or Leinster, just the other 3 teams and their fans. Once they can post their #TeamOfUs nonsense and the Aviva is full for internationals then they are doing their job.

    If the central contracts were distributed evenly across the provinces that would allow the other provinces fairer access to central funds. Leinster would still be the richest team in the league, and if they could convince all of the players they produce to sign and stay within their budget then more power to them. If Connacht could have the wages of Carty, Marion, Hansen and Bealham covered that would leave us able to go out and secure higher quality NIQ players which would make us more competitive without adversely effecting Leinster at all.

    The current system is working exactly how it was intended to, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't look to change it. Having more competitive teams in the league makes it a more attractive option for broadcasters and fans alike, but would be a threat to Leinsters hegemony so won't happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    So you want to pay inferior players, extra money even though they won’t be making match day squads for Ireland? Of all the drivel I’ve seen posted here. That’s right up there at the top of the list.



  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭AccidentallyOnside


    I'd have Mack over Earls and Marmion over Murray every day of the week (on current ability), so it would seem your real issue is having "inferior players" subsidised for playing for connacht....which is telling.

    That was purely using the current squads though, if central contracts were evenly spread you would almost certainly see more movement of players. This has happened before for a player on a central contract to move province....but that was someone moving from a "lesser" province to Leinster so that's OK.

    The reason Leinster and Munster fans get so offended by the thought of changing the system is that it is currently so heavily weighted in their favour that having it made a bit more equitable (they would still have more money) is a real threat to them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,581 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    It's nobodies fault that Connacht has a small population! It's ludicrous to blame Leinster for Connachts lack of quality players etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭AccidentallyOnside




  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭AccidentallyOnside


    I'm not doing that at all. I'm simply pointing out that the Irfu are running a closed shop; connacht are required to have almost exclusively irish players (like the other provinces), we are already at a disadvantage in producing those players due to lack of population, resources, history, etc. So Leinster are already at a natural advantage, marry that to their excellent infrastructure and systems and Leinster will always have the upper hand over basically every other team in the league. Fine, congrats to them, they are incredibly well run and will be successful because of it.

    What isn't fine is the central governing body further advantaging them by then subsiding those players. That allows them to stockpile players in a way no other team in the league can.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,300 ✭✭✭freyners


    .



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    I'd have Mack over Earls and Marmion over Murray every day of the week (on current ability), so it would seem your real issue is having "inferior players" subsidised for playing for connacht....which is telling.

    Of course you would, you’re a Connacht fan and are completely incapable of an unbiased opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,021 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    While it would be great to make Connacht stronger, the central contract system is there for the benefit of the national team, not any or all of the provinces.

    IRFU are not going to mess with anything that has even a minor chance of impacting the national team.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    The problem here is that the IRFU giving Leinster less money makes it harder for Leinster to retain players and increases the chances of players going abroad. And that hurts the national team. And the national team funds everything. You’re asking for the IRFU to cut off its nose to spite its face. The IRFU haven’t set this system up because they love Leinster more than anyone else. They have it set up because it’s the best way from a national perspective to manage the game here. That may not suit everyone, but there is no solution that will.



  • Registered Users Posts: 795 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    Josh Murphy would be a serious addition...

    Would like Alex Sorka as well... If they want to call it a long term loan (i.e. 2-3 year) then I am happy with that... Sorka will hardly play 100 min of 1st team Rugby in 2 years... Connacht are giving out minutes... Sorka was rated higher than Cian Pendergast at underage...



  • Registered Users Posts: 795 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    I have suggested this before... There is no need to rob Leinster players but borrowing younger players could be mutually beneficial... Look at Cian Pendergast and Oisin Dowling...

    Cian is ours but look how he has progressed with game time, he had barely 30 min for his Ireland U20s, he was playing second fiddle to Alex Sorka, a player a year younger than him. Oisin played more in season in Connacht(even though he was injured for most of it) than 3 years for both Leinster and Leinster A..

    Clearly Connacht were down to bare bones... It was pretty clear we were short... How is this helping Irish Rugby...



  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭Zeugnis



    A lot of nonsense has been spouted in the last couple of pages, but this I agree with - Josh Murphy is going to be great :)

    As Connacht fans, we're disappointed by Saturday, and naturally the string of tight recent defeats compounds that, even if the circumstances were not the same and the performances overall were much better. But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. We're going places, and a lot of players have really developed and are coming into their own over the last eighteen months: Murray, Oliver, Prendergast, Dowling, Burke, and of course Mack Hansen.

    We've been unlucky with some of our departures, and Fifita for Roux is not a reasonable replacement. Now we lose Dillane as well. This is a real equity issue which the IRFU should respond to by bringing in an international level lock, we've just lost two of them, it's not an unreasonable ask. The only reservation I'd have is whether it's where the money would be best spent from Connacht's POV, as I like the three senior locks we have (I bring Thornbury's name up enough) although I guess three isn't enough (let's hope Darragh Murray gets back and develops like his brother).

    The calls to cut away Leinster's legs are ridiculous and frankly spiteful. But some modification to the central contracts system should be made. The Murray contract shows me that it's not been used in line with the official theory, and there should be discussion as to whether it is the mechanism best designed to serve the national team. It may be that a move to the English approach of per-appearance payments is better, because of its emphasis on form. Or maybe a hybrid model, where the IRFU kicks in some salary money up front and pays for appearances as well.

    Alternatively, if we want to shift to incorporating a clear policy of provincial subsidy, then there could me a maximum and minimum number of central contracts per province, so that there is both an equity and a performance component.

    Lastly, let's bear in mind that the changes to the fixture list mean that players from other provinces will choose themselves to seek opportunities in Connacht. The talk about drafting, i.e. forcing moves, is ridiculous. As the principal Irish pipeline, some of our recruits will certainly be Leinster Academy graduates. But others will be from other provinces, or the underage system. It's worth noting that two of our most successful Irish additions in recent years came from Munster, i.e. Oliver and Wooton (Arnold too, this season). But ambitious players across the country who don't feel they're getting the right chances will be considering how a move to Galway might work for them. The future is bright.

    Post edited by Zeugnis on


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,172 ✭✭✭✭Clegg




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,535 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR


    This is a great signing for Connacht, Josh himself and the IRFU. He is going to play week in week out. I'd class him as a replacement for Roux as the Fifita signing hasn't seemed to work out. We could do with another lock and and a specialist 8 and maybe a hooker. I say hooker as there's no competition there. They just alternate between Heff and Delahunt and I think they need a kick in the ass to motivate them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    I think that that's a decent bit of business. Ruck protection, set piece (particularly defensively) are areas everyone has identified that we've struggled the last few years. We have some promising young players like Aungier, Ward, Ilo, Murray, Dowling who hopefully as they gain minutes will start to shore those areas up. Murphy will add to it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    I don't really understand the need for other provincial supporters to steam into this thread and react to every post after a hugely disappointing loss. Sure there are some over reactions but it's the same when their teams lose a game, it would never dawn on me to go in those threads and react to the more extreme posts. It's the same with booing, oh jesus a team losing at home is booing decisions undeservedly, yeah that's what happens..... It doesn't happen to Leinster much because they don't lose at home much but when they do (eg that comes to mind is Scarlets in pro12 semi a few years back) there is plenty of booing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭Zeugnis


    While I'm a fan of this signing, only five of Murphy's forty four starts have been in the row. Blindside flanker is his typical role, and consequently I don't think he can be seen as a replacement for Roux, although he can be used there. Somewhat similar to Eoghan Masterson.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭realhorrorshow


    I wonder will Eoghan Masterson be retained, seems to me that Murphy may fill his current role.

    Even though I think Murphy is a 4/6 and our greater need is at 5 & 8, I'm very happy with his signing. Provides a high quality alternative to Prendergast, who I have been a tad concerned about us burning out given his age, our reliance on him at the lineout and in the loose, and his abrasive style.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,535 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR


    Also Niall Murray has played a lot of pro games for his age. It would allow him to get more breaks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,341 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    Murphy is a good signing I feel. He's a good player. Has played well for Leinster whenever he's got a chance. He's just behind a load of top internationals there. Has a bit of size and physicality as well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,581 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Good move for Connacht! I would let Butler leave! He's average at best. Murphy and Prendergast will form a solid nucleus for Connacht. Add in Boyle and the improved Oliver and that's a good start. Masterson Sr is still a good option! Masterson Jr rarely gets into the squad! McCormick will be a really good addition too! I'f Murray Jr is a good solid lock, Connacht will have options.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    I wouldnt let Butler go. Think youre bit unfair saying hes average at best.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    As performances go that rated. In all my years of watching Connacht rugby where we had a losing 13 game sequence this game rated higher. It was such a hapless performance on so many levels. There is no point in picking out any individual, it was just all across the park. I can't say anymore other than it embarrassed me as a fan. It embarrassed me to listen to the commentary. It was an absolute disgrace on so many levels



  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Michael Zozimus Moran


    Thought just occurred to me that Murphy a class player has moved to Connacht at exactly the wrong time. Prendergast I can see playing for Ireland very soon and likely for the best part of the next decade in my view at 6 for Ireland.

    He is Connacht recruited and produced and Murphy is an import. Aside from the fact that Premdegast is already a better player Murphy as I see it can only hope to play when Prendergast is away with Ireland or injured.

    Strikes me that his reasons while notable and pure are I’ll timed to a team where he should be playing first team rugby but due to a feat of fate will not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    I would expect Murphy to play plenty. It’s not easy to tell with someone who gets ten games a season or so right now but I would expect him to be in Connacht’s first choice 23 at a minimum, with injuries that will mean plenty of starts even if he’s not first choice XV though I think he will be.

    He can obviously play second row and possibly 8? From what I have seen he is more physical than most of our current forwards. Prendergast Oliver Murphy would be pretty interesting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,581 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Murphy gives Connacht a ball carrying option. He's a good all round player and he's a similar type player to SOB. The Connacht SOB. Connacht will be a better squad with his addition.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,535 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR


    Tom Daly, Porch, Robb and Fitzgerald fit for Friday night. Tom Farrell out with a for injury.

    I'd go with:

    Buckley Delahunt McGrath Dillane Dowling Masterson Oliver Boyle Marmion Fitzgerald Porch Daly Arnold Wootton McNulty

    Subs: Heffernan, Duggan, Illio, Fifita, Butler, Blade, Forde, Robb.



Advertisement