Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How can we integrate Unionism into a possible United Ireland?

Options
1910121415127

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Limited polls suggest 57% support it.. but that's without any promotions being done to reveal the facts on the matter. 43% leaves a lot of scope for opposition.

    The political parties are indeed supportive of it, but as most Irish people have seen, the political parties often have agendas that don't have the welfare of Irish people in mind. People aren't going to automatically vote for unification just because the parties tell them to.

    Once campaigners get into the swing of it, with the many different groups (for/against) promoting their views, and the facts... anything could happen, although I suspect unification would fail, simply because people are aware of just how expensive this country is already getting, and unification would increase taxation significantly, both direct and indirect. People will probably think with their bank accounts in mind, once the initial guilt trip over refusing unification happens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    That's one poll, most polls show around 70 percent, no one apart from the partitionists on boards are seriously claiming that the Republic are going to vote no in a referendum.

    If a debate on the matter about an upcoming referendum happened and we started to seriously think about a United Ireland it would undoubtedly pass overwhelmingly, all political parties say they support unification, it's extremely unlikely people will all vote against their parties and vote against a United Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    It makes no difference what side of the treaty your ancestors were on.

    The treaty made the 26 counties leave the UK but didn't let them leave the British empire, it also partitioned the island. This is not what your ancestors fought for. They simply seen the treaty as a way forward to achieving their original goal of a 32 county Republic free from British rule, no one went along with the treaty because they wanted to be part of the British empire and wanted a partition.

    I would find what you are saying to make much more sense if you weren't so concerned about changing the flag of Ireland because your ancestors fought for it, but want to deny them what they were actually fighting for, a 32 county Republic, your ancestors cared far more about that than the flag.

    I'm absolutely certain that if your ancestors were in the IRA and your not just making this up, then what they fought for was a 32 county Republic free from British rule, unless they were British spies? What do you think your ancestors would say to you now about you wanting to deny what they fought for because your worried about a few extra pennies in your pocket?

    NONE OF THEM VOTED FOR THE TREATY BECAUSE THEY WANTED A PARTITION.

    Post edited by Harryd225 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,769 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    My ancestors lived in caves and fought over food, should I follow them too?

    Anyone who is for a united Ireland because some ancestors fought for it is living in the far distant past. It doesn’t matter what they fought for, it matters what I think is best now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    You clearly haven't read the previous posts so you shouldn't just butt in not having a clue what you're on about, the reason for him saying there is no way he would change the flag is because his ancestors fought for it in the war of independence, yet he wants to deny them what they actually fought for, a 32 county Republic because he's worried about a few extra pennies in his pocket.

    Please read the posts before you comment, his staunchly Republican comments on the Irish flag do not correlate with him advocating against a United Ireland for the whole thread, ironically he actually stated this as one of his oppositions to unification, he probably doesn't even really mean what he said, he clearly has an agenda against unification.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Harry, 79% of people in a recent poll said they would said no if they have to contribute to the cost. You keep referring to a study on unification of Germany, the Germans have had a unification tax for 30 yrs.

    Why do you keep saying that there will be no opposition in the South to unification? That poll shows that on the issue of cost alone, 79% of people would outright oppose it.

    That poll shows that people may like the idea of a unified Ireland, but will not contribute to the cost. So in practical terms, there is no hope of a yes vote. I have been saying this to you all along, people here care more about issues that affect them directly, and increased taxation is most certainly one of them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Please read the posts before you comment, his staunchly Republican comments on the Irish flag do not correlate with him advocating against a United Ireland for the whole thread, ironically he actually stated this as one of his oppositions to unification, he probably doesn't even really mean what he said, he clearly has an agenda against unification.

    You see being a Republican as being an all or nothing affair. I don't.

    As for my "agenda" I wrote a long post explaining my position, you dismissed it entirely. You haven't sought to understand or appreciate any view other than your own.

    I'm not going to waste more time trying to explain my stance to you, since you're obviously unwilling to tolerate other points of view.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Right well we'll have to agree to disagree, I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting only 20% of people are going to vote for unification.

    This is clearly a Unionist misunderstanding, no one in the Republic seriously thinks that a vote on unification would be rejected in the Republic. All the political parties are in favour of it and claim they would support it, they would convince the public easily to vote yes a referendum once the debate leading to an upcoming referendum starts. It's far different from asking people completely out of the blue if they want to pay more taxes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I think it is clear from that poll that only 20% would support it if it meant they had to pay increased taxes as a result of unification. It’s all about the money Harry.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    It's all about the money when you ask people a question out of the blue if they want to pay more taxes, going into no detail whatsoever about what this actually means. People are thinking about their livelihoods, they are thinking would I still be able to survive with these extra taxes, I'm surprised more people didn't say no to that question. The vast majority of people answered yes when asked a simple question about wether they want unification.

    The question makes no sense it goes into no detail about how much tax, would people be willing to pay an extra few euro in tax to facilitate a United Ireland? I'm sure they would. Would be people be willing to pay an extravagant amount of tax that would destroy their livelihoods? I doubt it.

    If they had made that clear in the question then I would take the results of the poll seriously.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    thats what the flag means to you and people in the Republic. Thats not what it means to Unionism.

    A joint capital might be the way forward.

    There will have to be concessions.

    Anybody who thinks its going to be a Republic of Ireland with NI tacked on is seriously deluded and in this case, toxic to reunification.



  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    why should NI and Unionists give up their identity?

    Do you see the conundrum?

    Thats why there will most likely have to be compromises. Even SF have said this will be the case.

    Can people not get it through their heads. its a toxic position to take if you want a reunified country. if you don't, fair enough. a Republic of Ireland with a tacked on NI won't happen. its not a United Ireland if you discount nearly a million people in the plans.

    Flags, anthems, joint capitals, symbols, a southern aknowledgement of the battle of the boyne with a day off or some shite, allwoing unionists have dual citizenship, and so much more.

    imo its not going to happen any time soon. its as deeply engrained as Palestine problem, as Russian distrust of the west. it will take another few generations to remove the hate and bitterness.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ahh well, I didn't say that they should, and in fact, earlier in the thread, I said that Unionists would fight to retain their identity even should unification occur.

    imo its not going to happen any time soon. its as deeply engrained as Palestine problem, as Russian distrust of the west. it will take another few generations to remove the hate and bitterness.

    Agreed. I also think there should be more efforts to bring NI and the Republic closer in terms of culture and expectations, because most people I've spoken to, see NI as a very different culture than that of those in the Republic.

    NI needs to get it's house in order first. It's really that simple. There are too many negatives for unification, but those negatives could be countered or minimized over time, rather than rushing into unification.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    You are vastly overestimating the amount of differences between the protestants in the North and the rest of Ireland, apart from their protestant religion and the orange order there are little to no differences between us, I'm assuming you're only talking about the Unionists as I don't see how anyone could claim the people of Derry or South Armagh are any less culturally Irish to the rest of us, with the exception of Belfast, which is similar to Dublin in it's massive difference to the rest of Ireland, there's no real difference.



  • Registered Users Posts: 874 ✭✭✭Max001


    Harry. Have you ever been to Northern Ireland. I mean apart from 100% Roman Catholic estates like the Ardoyne. Or a black taxi tour ?

    If you'd spent any time in Northern Ireland, mixing with a cross section of both communities, you would never, ever have just written what you did. You have not got one clue about the myriad of differences between the overwhelming majority of people in Northern Ireland and the people of the Republic of Ireland.

    I'll give you one example. I could give you hundreds. Of all kinds. And my examples show just how completely ill informed and delusional you are. You made me laugh. Because either you're a teen, who barely knows anything about anything. Or, you're literally living in some kind of mental fantasy land and have never stepped off Craggy Island.

    My examples. I'll give you two. Like elsewhere in the UK. Religion and formal religious attendances are decreasing. You simply don't see the massive attendances here that you see weekly in churches across the Republic. Or, rather you do. But, only in Roman Catholic churches.

    The Orange Order. The Orange Order is as relevant to the average Protestant, whether living in Northern Ireland or amongst the diaspora who left because of The Troubles, as ........old episodes of Scooby Doo.

    My friends from all over the Republic regard Northern Ireland as very different and Northern Irish people as incredibly different. And my friends are highly educated, cultured professionals, who travel widely and often. Not least to Northern Ireland. They would also laugh at your statement. Don't forget Harry. I've lived and worked in all three capitals. Belfast, Dublin and Cork.

    I'm not going to debate this with you Harry. Its a very bad use of my time. It would be like debating that the world is round. With a flat earther. Either you're clueless. Or you're being deliberately disingenuous. I believe a bit of both. Based on the terminology you use.

    In fact, your comments here, remind me of some of the older stall holders that I used to know, in the English Market in Cork. People I got to know well and talked to for hours. People who hadn't been to Northern Ireland since the 1960's. Or, the people I met in County Clare who were burned out of their homes in Belfast in the 1970's and had never been back since. They also thought, we should all just get along, if Paisley and his crowd and the Orange Order would just calm their heels or go away.

    Yes, London, Dublin and Stormont all agree that a united Island is inevitable. Unionist agree. Maybe mostly in private. I don't know what they've said lately. But is anyone taking an practical steps beyond those mandated in the Good Friday Agreement or N.I. Protocol?

    I very much doubt it. The report you keep citing is meaningless. It suggests an economic uplift to both countries. But it neglects to define the cost. Much of which would be borne early on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    What makes you think people will give in-depth thought to the vote? The three most pertinent considerations will be:

    1. Do I want unification?
    2. Is this going to cost me money?
    3. Which is more important to me, 1 or 2.

    The recent poll shows the answer to question 2 was the deciding factor, even after asking answering positively to question 1.

    This comes as absolutely no surprise to me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    I'm not going to argue this with you any further, no one anywhere apart from yourself is seriously suggesting that a vote on unification is going to be rejected by 80% of people in the Republic.

    As I said, the poll was asking random people out of the blue if they wanted to pay more taxes, I myself probably would have said no in this poll as I would have had to consider would I still be able to make ends meet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I am not suggesting anything, I am telling you that in a recent poll carried out by Ipsos, 79% were opposed to unification if it was going to cost them.

    Will I make ends meet. That is precisely the consideration people will have when voting for unification. Harry, you simply cannot, no matter how deluded you are, state that there will be no cost for Irish people, associated with unification. Those polled were not asked if they wanted to pay more tax, and the question did not come out of the blue, it was asked in relation to unification.

    What are you basing your opinion on support for unification on? Guesswork? Or are you going to point to polling results?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm not going to debate this with you Harry. Its a very bad use of my time. It would be like debating that the world is round. With a flat earther. Either you're clueless. Or you're being deliberately disingenuous. I believe a bit of both. Based on the terminology you use.

    Spot on. Exactly how I feel about his posts/responses.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,769 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Never going to work. A romantic delusion belonging in the past.

    If there is to be a federal solution it will be the Federal Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, with the six counties retaining their current autonomy, and maybe more.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,769 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    A very good point that our ancestors fought a civil war over whether 26 counties was enough, and that those who wanted more had to accept defeat. Next time the silly notion of doing what our ancestors fought for is brought up, I will point to that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,769 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Of course you will get a different answer because that is how people will vote.

    Take for example, housing. You might think that everyone believes there should be a constitutional right to housing. So polls show a huge majority in favour of that. However, if it turns out that a constitutional right to housing meant that every Traveller family is entitled to a McMansion with stables and 20 acres, do you think that referendum would have a snowball's chance in hell?

    People will always be in favour of abstract concepts such as a right to housing or a united Ireland. However, it is their response when the details are explained (you will pay more taxes for a united Ireland) that you get a real insight into their views.



  • Registered Users Posts: 799 ✭✭✭kazamo


    I think a United Ireland was the reasonable aspiration of all living in the South but I think the time for it has unfortunately passed.

    Even bypassing the likely large financial burden of the six counties, it is nearly quarter of a century since lasting peace was achieved, and the two communities are still at loggerheads. They seem to agree on nothing apart for the dislike they have for each other.

    Northern Ireland has been turned into the worst social science experiment by the British Empire and its demand to hold all plundered land, no matter what. Not long ago Stormont was closed for about a year over various scandals such as Cash for Ash and the Irish Language Act, but that didn’t matter as the UK was still funding them.

    Why would we attach ourselves to that madness, life is hard enough as it is.


    One possible solution is Northern Ireland becomes an independent state with joint funding from both ROI and the UK. The funding could be based on the votes cast for each side. IMO, we in the South are like the hurlers on the ditch, maybe having to contribute will focus minds ?



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Kaiden Happy Mouthpiece


    We could always take the UK government example on this and tell everyone that after the referendum they will all have their own personal unicorn, which can be found in the same locality as the end of the rainbow.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Kaiden Happy Mouthpiece


    Stormont was closed for 3 years .....

    And the very last thing we need is to live in an independent country with no grown ups in charge, where DUP / SF will be the literal lunatics running the asylum. In the name of all that's holy have we not suffered enough ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,221 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I presume I'm one of those you're referring to here? As one of those who tore holes in the study you posted based on little more than a minor specialisation in economics as part of my undergraduate degree. You can parrot the phrases "some of the greatest experts from around the world" and "widespread international praise" as many times as you like, it won't make it true. It's a puff piece that was paid for and put together to misinform those without any economic education (though honestly, anyone with even a passing interest in the subject would spot the flaws if they read the report itself rather than the headlines, a third level education wouldn't be a requirement to understanding it and it's flaws). The Sinn Fein press office did their job and got some journalists to publish the headlines their flawed models produced though so fair play to them I guess...

    As a data specialist though, believe me, it wouldn't take more than a few weeks to show entirely the opposite results with "state of the art models" if I wanted to. It's part of the old truism of "lies, damned lies and statistics". You can choose to delude yourself that such speculative data modelling forms a solid foundation upon which to build the future of the two nations on this island but I doubt you've given it that much though tbh: you're merely parroting the propaganda because that's your understanding of what a "Good Republican" does.

    As for my being a unionist? My mother is from that notorious clan of Orangemen, the Houlihan's while my grandfather on my father's side was a member of B Coy. 2nd Battalion and took part in various military actions including the Whitehall ambush before being arrested for his part in the burning of the Custom House and held in Kilmainham for the remainder of the War of Independence. Unlike many of the claims regarding involvement in the war, I know that to be verifiable since after his retirement from the National Army he worked for the Bureau of Military History and his War of Independence medal is a treasured family heirloom (I was even granted access to read his military record at one point as thanks for a donation of a chest of his papers from that time to the Military Archives),

    Fine Unionist stock altogether. 🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,655 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    I am pretty certain that your grandfather did not think the the people of Carrickmore or Crossmaglen any less deserving of independence than those in Carrick-on-Shannon or Carrickmacross. Sad that his descendants are mainly interested in money.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    This is pure nonsense based on little more than "my knowledge is better than your knowledge"

    for someone who claims to know so much, Protestants are barely a majority anymore 48% are protestant and 45% are Catholic, this is far from the "overwhelming majority" that you were rambling on about.

    Your claim that the people in the North are completely different to those in the Republic is nonsense, I seriously doubt the people in Monaghan see the people in South Armagh as an "alien force" or that the people of Donegal see the people of Derry as "incredibly different".

    The protestants are nowhere near as obsessed over the orange order and the Presbyterian church as you claim, most protestants aren't bothered about it, religion and this obsession with the orange order are dying out, most protestants simply want to get on with their lives, you seem to be living in the past.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,489 ✭✭✭✭Dav010




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Again, you are misleading the situation. The poster he was replying to previously expressed his staunchly Republican views and claimed there is no way he would consider changing the flag based on the fact that his ancestors fought for it. Yet this same poster has been advocating against a 32 county Republic for the whole thread, which is what his ancestors actually fought for, not trivial crap like flags.



Advertisement