Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Loki - Disney+ (***Spoilers***)

1234689

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Anyone know how I add someone to my ignore list on the new site.

    Asking for a friend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,840 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    ive tried watching the series. Fell asleep through a few episodes so I went back to rewatch snd it’s not allowing me. So now I’m on episode 6 snd I can’t/won’t let me go back to watch the previous ones. Is this the norm with Disney?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭connemara man


    I've found the watch from the start of an episode awkward in Disney+ but you need to search the show and not follow the main highlighted show then go to the episode list and hit play from start. It's a pain



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Have to say, I'm stunned by the reaction to this. I binged eps 2-6 after watching the first one when it debuted (only because I heard there was an AoS link in it).

    I watched 5 episodes this week and came on here expecting universal acclaim. Not only was this an excellent TV show, I personally thought this was one of the strongest entries to come out of the MCU.

    It was so good, I was actually okay going into the final with the expectation that I was going to get Ralph Bonnered and give us a variant Loki as the big bad, but the way they went all in with "He Who Remains", and the multiverse stuff was just the icing on the cake.

    Hats off to the writers as well, they did an extraordinary job of taking the complex Richards origin story breaking it down into something that was very digestible.

    Post edited by kerplun k on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    I definitely think Loki's popularity and Hiddleston's performance caused his transition from villain to antihero within the MCU. In Thor, he pretty much killed his brother with that robot thing he was controlling and Thor only survived because he got his powers back. That's so far removed from the Loki we see in this show and that's without the scepter.


    I still loved the show though. Looking forward to season 2



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,081 ✭✭✭ziedth


    As a hole, I thought that was an excellent show. The best MCU shoe despite the few faults I have with it.

    Not a comic MCU fan or anything so I'm the villains means nothing too me although I liked him.

    Apart from falcon which was a misfire I think MCU TV has been really watchable - Not unlike the films..... no shame in being entertained by something despite its flaws



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭Acosta


    Thought his performance was a bit OTT.

    Decent enough in the end. I enjoyed it more as it went on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,297 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    I felt the same, it was not serious enough a portrayal. Very hammy.

    Loki said that he was frightening, I didnt think that was conveyed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭suffering golfer


    I don't get the ending at all if I am honest. If he who remains is the last of himself, I assume he already killed all the other versions of himself, otherwise he still be fighting himself. So how does killing him create a new version of himself that is more evil as that version is already killed by him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,994 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,994 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    so this was the plot of Counterpart



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,341 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    He is constantly pruning and managing the time line for that to be the case.

    He is now dead, and the time line will do whatever, whereever. So no one is stopping more Kang's from rising up in their timelines.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I liked that ending; very low key (not a pun) and my personal theory didn't pan out - that it was a Loki controlling the TVA in the citadel. The ending though was just the right kind of finale twist that immediately grabbed me for season 2, and I'm looking forward to seeing how this love struck, self-aware Loki tackles this new, different and worse(?) universe. And the big trailing question mark is the judge: what info was she given that necessitated her new mission? Is it some kind of fallback in case the two Lokis refused the call?

    Overall I enjoyed the series. Sure, anyone looking for pure Loki tricks and devilment might have been disappointed but I'm also glad they managed to pivot towards the conflicted anti hero we got to know after the Avengers.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They could surely have fitted in a bit of mischievousness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,926 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Showrunner Kate Herron who directed all the episodes has stepped down and won't return for season 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,553 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    Looking at her filmography she didn't have too much big stuff, and then suddenly she's got this and now leaving.

    If it was Disney getting a lesser known director, then you'd assume they'd try to tie them into a contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,297 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    She isnt the showrunner, she is the director and executive producer.

    Michael Waldron is the head writer.

    I dont think she will be missed.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Perhaps; it's arguable this show exists purely to set the ground for the multiverse as a backbone of Phase 4 cinematic MCU, and so the actual characterisation was lacking. But what was given I liked; there was a point with the MCU where Loki's inevitable betrayal got old - lampshaded in Ragnarok where Loki had finally learned to front up his emotions.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There comes a point where the change is so much a character morphs and becomes another character. We can see changes in a character in an episode, but they usually change back before the end of the episode/series to protect the characters IP as it were. It's Loki, Pixelburp, but not as we know him. To mix my TV shows. :)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭Tails142


    Loved this show, I thought the visual style was brilliant, tuned in every Wednesday for it. Can't wait for Season 2



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,682 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I thought this was great. Like the other Marvel shows, I liked that it was relatively short and self-contained and that all episodes were directed by the same person. MCU seems to be better suited to this 6 part tv format than film. The movies have been slowly morphing into big budget tv episodes anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    Pretty happy with it in the end. Thought it was an awful lot better and more coherent than the previous two shows. There was perhaps a bit of a sense that the finale was anticlimactic but that was until it was revealed that there would be a 2nd season.

    Be interesting to see how season 2 fits in. Is it going to be in the standard season format where we can expect it next summer, or is it going to have to slot into the current roadmap, somewhere in 2023 and beyond?

    I would assume it's the former, but given that it's seemingly establishing the next phase of films and the bad guy who'll be spanning it, it's hard to predict what its scope is going to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,440 ✭✭✭Homelander


    As someone who liked Wandavision but thought Falcon and Winter Soldier was utter crap, I found this a very decent watch with a solid ending that leaves you hungry for more Marvel content that builds on it. Which, of course, is the point, but mission accomplished in a very satisfying way.

    After Falcon and Winter Soldier, I couldn't care less if both characters flew into the sun.

    Loki though - great visual style, good characters, good performances, some great CGI but it's never too heavily reliant on it either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 64 ✭✭Lamar Davis


    I thought Owen Wilson was excellent in it but over all it was ok ,like Homelander said Falcon and Winter Soldier was utter crap and i enjoyed Wandavision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,926 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    This show was a strange one for me - I liked it all especially that it introduced Kang except that it had Loki as the hero.

    He had a great arc in the movies and I thought the idea of resetting him to a villain would be fun but this just made him a good guy again in the first hour without the journey the had in the films.

    Because I was a bit meh on it and had been told I needed to finish it before seeing What If… and No Way Home I binged it and as is way if I binge I don’t remember details properly. Can someone remind me ? The TVA deals with timelines and try to ensure an alternate timeline doesn’t branch out but is this the same as the multiverse? For example, did the the TVA destroy the Toby MacGuire Earth and in the season finale Loki restored it? I don’t remember any connection to What If… and in No Way Home Dr. Strange knows there is a multiverse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,553 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    First hour to us, he watched his entire life and how it ended.

    Would give someone perspective.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    The audience perspective is what matters not the passage of time on screen. It isn’t the same at all.

    and why bother rebooting him as a bad guy if they were just going to put him back the to the same way he was before dying.

    he is a great villain and at the very least they could have done a show where he is up to mischief if. It outright villainy.

    and the events don’t seem to have had an impact on the MCU - most likely Kang will be confined to this series

    It was a great series just Loki doesn’t beling there as the hero.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    most likely Kang will be confined to this series

    Kang has been confirmed to appear in Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania




  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol



    Just another example to add to the never ending list to never presume what will or will not impact the larger MCU.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    As I said I didn’t read the spoiler.

    fact remains though that despite the TVA elements of the story being good it is a waste of Loki

    he needs to be up to no good, not up to good



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I agree to an extent, Loki shouldn't be a hero, once he becomes a hero with no self interest he stops being Loki but I think there was enough of an internal struggle going on in season 1 where it kind of worked. My biggest issue was the live interest which I just don't think worked. There was very little chemistry between the actors.

    I also have questions about the scale and reach of the TVA, were they just controlling the timeline on Earth? We didn't see any alien members. I don't think it was explained very well, I reckon once Loki destroyed them our universe could start branchinh out again and those branches would start from the very beginning of existence allowing the Maguire and Garfield universes to exist.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I know you didn't read the spoiler, my point was we should all by now know not to question what will or won't be key to future shows/movies - especially not to let it impact your viewing or assessment of a show. Who would have seen Ant Man & the Wasp being such a key driver of how they ended the Infinity Saga?

    I also disagree on Loki, he is at his best when we do not know where he stands, what his motives are, and we see his internal conflict - I find him a pretty boring and bland character when he is just 'up to no good'.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    They visibly showed all the branches veering off all along the timeline so I think it is safe to presume the start would be the beginning of existence. That also ties into how the TVA had to continuously jump to different times to trim them, it wasn't dealing with what was happening 'now'.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Yeh but I still have questions about their reach, like did the TVA have authority over Arishem? There are also pretty big holes like if Sylvie was a deviation why wasn't her branch clipped at birth instead of well into her childhood. Tbh I think Marvel have rushed into the TV shows both in terms of they they affect the MCU as a whole but also in terms of the writing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    We do know where he stands in this show.

    it was obvious from the start that the TVA were not the good guys they thought they were - they destroying lives.

    Sure Loki was scheming to take over (very half heartedly) but did anyone doubt he would not do the right thing?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    That doesn't seem to have much to do with my point that I disagree with your opinion that he needs to be 'up to no good'. I don't think the show nailed him as his high points in the MCU, like Ragnarok, but it was far better than when he was a pure bad guy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    It has everything with the point.

    You said you think Loki is at his best when we don’t know where he stands.

    In my post I pointed how we know exactly where he stands at all points in the series.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Thing about the show is, we had more than one Loki anyway; while "our" one might have become more the ostensible hero, all the variants covered the character's relative shifting allegiances and moralities. Sylvie remaining the antagonist throughout, alongside the romantic interest (which remains the MCU's most brilliantly subversive move).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    True we see many Loki’s but even when played by Hiddleston the variants are all supporting characters. “Our” Loki is the Loki I want Tonder being bad.

    Loki being in love with himself is indeed brilliant .

    I need a reminder? Sylvie hates being called Loki - why is that? And why did she pick the name Sylvie?

    Post edited by Useless Lump on


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Your post claimed that he is best when he is 'up to no good', which is what I responded to. The fact you've now moved the goal posts and want to discuss whether they hit my preference of a grey character doesn't change the fact that it has nothing to do with your OP or my response.

    I've already agreed they didn't hit the grey character as well they have in the past but it is tough to near impossible do when they have an obvious big bad. It is like saying there isn't a sense of danger in most Marvel shows/movies because we know the title character is very unlikely to die. I much prefer the TVA story arch, knowing Loki will likely do the right thing, than a less impactful story where we got a more grey Loki.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    I haven’t moved any “goal posts” because there isn’t any goal posts.

    Loki is best when he is up to no good. You added your opinion of what I posted along with the comment that you think Loki is best when the audience doesn’t know where he stands - meaning in this series. I simply responded that from the very start of it it is plainly obvious where Loki stands and every step of the way.

    It is related to my original post and to your response - because it is about whether Loki is good or bad.

    I have no idea why you think it is a different topic.

    And as I type I’m wondering what you mean about “moving goal posts”. Isn’t that something a person does in an argument or competition? This is neither.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Kevin Feige confirmed this has been the most watched MCU show on Disney+ - not to any huge surprise I'd have said. 5.23 billion minutes of watch-time, which works out as an average of 872 million minutes per episode.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    The best of the D+ shows, with Hawkeye as a close second.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'd say it was always going to be a slam-dunk, given how popular Loki was before the show was even commissioned. The thirst for Tom Hiddleston alone likely got eyeballs on the series.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    What were the opinions though?

    Disney+ doesn’t have a rating system and I’d be very interested in knowing the reaction because as I understood part of the Hiddleston thirst is that Loki is a bad guy (or at at least not a good guy).

    Here he is entirely a hero regardless of his claims to the contrary.

    for myself I prefer him a bad guy/up to mischief. And I couldn’t get into the show because of that. Really hoping Loki returns to the movies by the end of Love and Thunder.

    As I am here, the timelines that the TVA are erasing are all belonging to Earth 616, am I correct? I assumed at the time that they were erasing other Earths in the Multiverse but that would be incursions and someone like Clea would have come mot deal with it before now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    I'm just surprised I haven't seen any overt Kang references since.

    Stuff like the [Dr Strange and MoM spoiler]

    Purple Energy of the Darkhold Wielding Dr Strange had me thinking maybe but I dunno. If there was stuff to see it was to subtle for me



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,521 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Mod - Enough bickering. Back on topic about what's going on in the show's episodes, please.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer




Advertisement