Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1240241243245246810

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Public debt will only further fuel inflation!

    The state borrowing and spending more will only make matters worse. The Irish government would do well to start cutting its cloth in anticipation of rates rises, because it has to happen soon. Borrowing more will leave us even more exposed when rates go up also.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Running a perpetual deficit sounds grand in theory except for one factor. All debt is someone else’s investment and as a result you need investors to buy your debt. As your debt increases the risk of default increases and investors need a higher rate to compensate for this risk. The central bank could step in and act as the investor to buy the government debt (i.e. QE) but if this is used in fiscal spending as you suggest all this leads to is inflation and devalued currency.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    My proposal is about spending taxes more wisely. Massive shift I understand

    Rents were limited to 4% for the last number of years, that did not work

    We are absolute masters at fiddling the books for profit, maybe we could use this skill to solve housing. Borrowing to build carbon neutral housing close to employment centres has a double environmental impact in heating and commuting. Europe is very keen to fund projects with green credentials

    If taxes are one off the best way to spend them is on capital projects that deliver returns well over the cost of capital. Housing for workers is the obvious low hanging fruit



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Well as I outlined in my post above , I dare anyone to tell the other vested interest groups outlined that spending will be targetted on housing and your needs are just not going to be catered for unfortunately there are other needs that also need addressing. Also you need to take into account that most if not all of the other groups I outlined have a higher demographic and that means that if governments want votes they will pander to them this is how it has been since politics began. We cannot afford it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    In affect what you are suggesting is large scale social housing under a build to rent model.

    For rents to be truly affordable you need to control/reduce the construction costs or subsidies the rent to keep it affordable. If you are subsidies the rent the big difference is that the rent is going back into the social housing scheme as opposed to going to some private investor like what is happening under HAP.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I'd call it an alternative to the private rental market. Focus it on workers so that your guaranteed an income stream. We know that injecting investment at the top does not result trickle down, put it in the middle, different story for everyone



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Logic makes sense

    two problems that I see:

    1) you would be restrained by the EU fiscal rules as the debt would be government debt. If this could be structured in some housing body and kept off the governments book it should work

    2) People will complain that their taxes are being used to provide housing and they had no help with their housing

    (I.e. people will complain about HAP because people get help to get a roof over their head. If you got rid of HAP and replaced with social housing people complain that people are getting free houses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Moral hazard in spades. its like 2 people trying to climb out of a hole the lad on the bottom says I am going to climb over you and stand on you head to get out and even do you were further ahead and wont be able to reach the top once I get out its ok as I got out and you should be happy for that fact even do I am leaving you behind in the hole. Villa thanks but no thanks I pay enough in taxes for an already p1ss poor service I get in return , guaranteeing everyone a house is not going to work, how do you sort it out, which workers do you prioritize and to what areas in the country the most obvious area is Dublin and the other major cities So the biggest flaw I see within your investment strategy is why should people pay more in taxes and who have coughed up hundreds of thousands for a house in the burbs or surrounding areas of Dublin (or any other major city) pay for this when they could not afford to buy in these areas when they were buying.




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    You must remember you are already paying for it in the form of HAP. Only difference is money doesn’t leave the country to pay investors and instead can be reinvested



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    But people on HAP do not own the property. This poster I believe is looking to subsidise the buying of property for a certain cohort of workers who match a certain criteria



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    No I think he is saying they could rent at affordable level.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    1 as we have learned from this thread, Housing is an issue throughout the EU

    Worries are growing about anti EU sentiment. EU economies are struggling 0 rates and QE are not really working, rather leading to asset price bubbles. Affordable housing with significant potential to be revenue positive would be a significant win for the EU bloc as a whole. Think of the competitive advantage over othe countries. Germany has done quiet well in no small part due to stable housing costs

    If rents are linked to wages they are an excellent inflation hedge and attract investors seeking consistent reliable income. Our current system attracts investors that sweat the asset, pump its value and offload when signs of a crash are on the horizon. There is significant scope for the whole system to be privately funded once proven.

    2 We never had rents at current levels so it would be hard to not make a profit, maybe it could help fund those peoples pensions



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    We are existing on the forebearance of Germany and fiscally prudent countries.

    We had a young population that had much less risk than other EU countries and yet spent the most on covid19.

    These are the rules.

    I'd be inclined to think a strategic default on 50% of our debt would be the best option, especially while our economy is doing okay. Soon Pfizer etc will not have the same revenue from covid19 and our corporation tax starts to decline. If German's say no more to Ireland we're in a very awkward position.

    Anyway, back to housing.

    Any thoughts on this:

    €600k for an acre. My wife is interested. It seems a lot to me?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭DataDude


    1A Alma Road, Monkstown, Dublin - Hunters Estate Agent - 4566720 - MyHome.ie Residential

    Cool location and all, but that is a sliver of a site in someone's garden (have a look on google maps overhead) and the house is €2.3m. Mind boggling price.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Immigration is a hot potato nobody wants to discuss but better discussed than left to fester. Should we be closing the gates for a while? Maybe. It's s very different country to when I grew and people were all trying to get out, now it's actually attractive. Maybe the numbers allowed in outside EU should be reduced until the housing crisis levels out?

    It's a tough but definitely should be discussed as does affect people looking to get on the ladder. But crashing the economy also would not be good....



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Am quite concerned about what’s happening now.

    It is Celtic Tiger stuff already in the industry, massive amount of development happening and no one can get staff. Inflation is at its worst in many years.

    There’s a type of mania again, overproduction is going to happen in the next five years, as sure as night follows day.

    There is undoubtedly a boom underway, which will meet demand at some point. But it could happen suddenly, if net immigration were to slow significantly it’d be a painful shock.


    The end is almost certainly a couple of years off, but it could be all the more painful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If the EU was to change its rules it would require a new Treaty.

    Rents are more or less linked to wages at the moment in RPZ where the only increase allowed is the lower of 2% or CPI. Linking rents to wages is no different as wages should increase in line with CPI.

    The private funded model you talk about is the model that is in place today. The vast majority of these investors have invested for a consistent reliable income and hence why pension funds own so much property in Dublin



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I know this isn’t a political thread but I have to say I really struggle with the vote SF narrative. I get the usual suspects have failed and people want change but this whole SF will sort out the housing market and enable everyone to buy a house is just nonsense. Let’s say they manage to fix it, it will be done through individual and corporate tax hikes or weakening sectors like health care even further as they would have to put so much money in to housing.

    MNC’s are huge for Ireland, whilst some of their workers take up some housing, their benefit to the economy far outweighs this, I think it would be awful if they packed up and left. I would expect SF to drive them somewhere else who would stick to the new minimum tax laws.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    There is still a lot of catch up required on the building front. You are right that there is a risk of building to much especially if we don’t have immigration but I think that is 5 years off. The biggest risk in the short term is we build the wrong type of properties and end up with a oversupply of one particular type (I.e. 1/2 bed apartments) and a under supply of other types of properties such as larger apartments or houses that a family with kids would need.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Check out this interview with Julian Brigden starts 12 minutes in. We can talk for 400 pages about supply and demand but I feel this will have the biggest impact on house/asset prices in the future.

    Need to brush up on financial terminology

    Cpi is general inflation

    Ppi is the rise in costs for producers (which may be passed on to consumers)

    GFC great financial crash




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Ireland’s planning history is simply abysmal. To use a terrible phrase there is no joined up thinking, so you get areas with loads of new houses but overcrowded schools and no amenities. Still the people who make submissions routinely get dismissed as cranks.

    So have no doubt the wrong sort of homes will be built. It’s crazy, but the system is very largely developer led, and I say that as someone who has done very well from Irish construction.

    I don’t think things will slow for a few years either, but inward migration is the wild card. If it continues the market gets even hotter but when it goes into reverse, as it will, there’ll be a problem. If it doesn’t happen for a few years the problem will be serious.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Hi All,

    New to this and said I'd join this discussion. My wife and I have been saving for a number of years to buy a house. We had been paying crazy rent in Dublin city centre up until the pandemic, we moved to her hometown as we were both working from home, rent much cheaper so saving more etc. So what to do now? Surely there could not be a worse time to buy? We have viewed a number of property's recently and the price they are going for is ridiculous. I work in the Construction industry and commute for work now, so I know what a house 'should' be worth. Are people crazy to buy houses that are at least 70k overpriced and sometimes even more? Will they regret it in a few years when they go to upgrade and find their house is in negative equity just to get on the property ladder? Or maybe we are the ones that are the fools, unwilling to buy a house that we wouldn't buy if there was no housing crisis?

    Interested to hear peoples opinions. Should one bite the bullet and buy a house or wait and see. We are renting a 3 bedroom house which is comfortable for now so undecided.

    Thanks all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    If I was asked I'd say houses probably will be more expensive by 2024, but in the long term it's hard to imagine property can stay so expensive relative to wages over a longer period. But the catch is you are paying rent now, would a mortgage you'd take out probably be quite a bit cheaper than the rent?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    It all depends on your personal circumstances and what you think will happen to house prices in the near to mid term.

    • If you are renting for say 2,000 Euro a month that is 24k a year.
    • Your age... If you be able to get a 30 year mortgage or will this be restricted by your age if you wait a few years.
    • If you think house prices will become cheaper in 3 years time then you need to work out how much cheaper and whether it is worth waiting or better off buying now. (24k x 3 years = 72k) Will houses prices drop from their current price by 72k or more over a 3 year period.
    • If houses prices increase by say 8% in year 1 then you will need prices to drop by 80% etc...

    Personally I don't see houses prices dropping in value for the next 3 years because of lack of supply and the fact that we are seeing wage increases in the economy which will mean that people will be able to borrow more as the LTI rules are based on gross salary. But as I said this is my personal view and others will have different views and no-one will know for sure what will happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I was in a similar boat to yourself when the madness kicked off two years ago.

    Long term (10+ years), I think it's fairly certain that prices in REAL terms (i.e. relative to wages) will fall. Looking at demographics the "bulge" is currently in the home buying age (birth rates are plummeting and death rates are about to ramp up). Supply is also ramping up at an incredible pace. Interest rates can only go up. Those three factors plus the fact there's a fairly fundamental mismatch between what people earn and what houses cost (Id say 90%+ homeowners today could never have come close to affording the house they live in at current market prices) mean the current price to wage ratio can only be sustained during a period of rapid population growth (fundamentally similar to a pyramid scheme I guess).

    All that said we took the plunge and bought this year. Probably paying €200k+ more than what the same house would have gone for in 2019. The main reasons being that, whilst supply/demand factors will probably improve in the coming years, the current mismatch is just so great that its hard to see a short term price correction. More importantly though is wage inflation - it's astronomical. Likely not across all sectors but in my peer group and industry I'm seeing 10-15%+ increases as the norm. I got a 25% increase offered by 3 different companies within a few weeks of floating a CV and my company matched in a heartbeat. It's crazy times. So whilst it seems inevitable prices will fall relative to incomes - in actual euro terms I'm no longer certain things will come back to where they were a few years back.

    But then again - what do I know! Best of luck!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cheers thanks, a very insightful answer. I just feel everything is gone manic at the moment. Are companies really making that much more money than pre pandemic to be offering employers 25% increases? Something just doesn't add up, for me personally I cant see things lasting the way they are. Is this not a similar situation to the Boom? People could not buy property quick enough. The main difference here is the borrowings are not as reckless. In many newspaper articles the Bank of Mam and Dad was mentioned as fueling houses prices? Surely that is not sustainable. I could well be wrong but I just dont see the panic. Right now is not a good time to buy, everyone knows that. But no one knows the future which is why I think we will wait and see. Our rent is currently €850 per month, so even if we waited 12 months to suss out the market its not too much money wasted. Thanks for your reply.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    If third level institute had purpose built facilities to house students, that would surely help with some areas of supply...

    I have family living near UL & LIT...the amount of students house(which are left vacate during the summer) is mad stuff, a few estates/cul de sac's were they live are 45% student houses...



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cheers thanks for reply, I guess we will wait and see.



Advertisement