Yet another young woman attacked by a male. When will it end?

@credanlady

You mention taxing men in the same post that you congratulated the two men for rescuing the woman Larry Murphy was attacking. So presumably those two hero’s will have to pay your tax on men too. Unbelievable disjointed nonsense.

I think you are just trolling now, in fact I hope you are trolling.

I don't care who does it first but if you want something like this in society you have to lead by example. Gotcha. How am I painting you as a man hater? I asked you when you called someone out and that translates as calling you a man hater? If this is the kind of warp you have to put on things then I won't be going over to any threads you advised. I tried to have a reasonable conversation with you and this is what I get. More fool me.

That's another frustration with stuff like this. Myself, and several others on this threads, have warned for years that there'd be a rise in stuff like with mass immigration, yet now as men, we're somehow getting the blame for problems that we predicted. It's beyond insane.

As I asked earlier Will any of the pro asylum seekers give us any reason why we have allowed him remain in our country.

I don't expect an answer.

@CreadanLady

"With 4, this is probably the only area where the average man on the street could challenge such behaviour without putting themselves at risk. Having the balls to challenge and denounce such behaviour on the spot when you see it. "would you say that to your sister, or mother? Cop yourself on and grow up". Men who are managers in the workplace, or in other positions of authority can and should challenge this behaviour by taking complaints seriously and pursuing and investigating them vigorously when they are brought to their attention. Gardai and courts might need to be involved in this process as well."

I think this is much ado about nothing. There is very little talk like this. I almost never hear it. The only time I hear men criticizing women is when they have a legitimate criticism to make. Mobilizing the male population to police this is not going to do much. They'd be waiting for years to hear just one objectional comment. It's not like men are verbalizing stuff all day long. But that's the impression all this talk is giving.

Yes, they do need to do it if they expect men to do it. And no men won't take them seriously if they don't lead by example; they are the ones asking for this so they should at least set an example.

The inference is yours. I never said you hate men. All kinds of things can be inferred so please respond to what I said, not inferences.

I never said 'the purpose' of feminism is to promote hate. I said it promotes hate. There is a difference. A little psychology might be useful here. Neitzsche said:-

Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.

The more feminism presents men as monsters the more women will see them as monsters and people who see monsters all the time run the risk of becoming the very thing they are fighting - or imagine they are fighting. This is how feminism is damaging women. You would do well to think carefully about this.

It would be more accurate to say that you have already got a leg up in life if you belong to one of the right socioeconomic groups in a developed, tolerant, stable, democracy.

Sorry to spoil your narrative but I've not experienced any advantage purely by virtue of my skin colour or gender. If anything, with positive discrimination, it has been a disadvantage.

Hi CreadantLady , I'm not quite sure if you are serious?

Impose a tax only on men to pay for women refuges for violence caused to women by men?

Would women who are the subject of domestic violence from their female partner be allowed in? as that particular cohort surprisingly has the highest instances of domestic abuse when compared to the other groups.

Would you would advocate for an all female tax to fund supports for those men who make up 30% approx of domestic violence incidents. You will appreciate that these men have fck all supports, especially when compared with the existing supports for women, which women fully deserve every bit of support and care they can get, and more.

As regards the changing the burden of proof, this would be a very very dangerous route to go down. If someone, say a relative or friend is wrongly accused and looking down the barrel of 12-15 years in the slammer, then a they should not be convicted because they "probably" did it. We'd have plenty of our own Birmingham 6 and Guildford 4 cases. "Probably" has no place in criminal courts and should be left to the civil courts and Carlsberg ads.

Sorry, I know I'm coming across as a bit whinge, but i am constantly reminding myself how lucky I am to be born in Ireland and living here at this particular point in time. It just annoys the hell out me when I am linked in some way with these violent thugs just because we share the same genitalia (not literally mind you). It's just so arbitrary. You could impose a new tax to be levied according to the smell of people's farts, which would be equally arbitrary but perhaps more difficult to impose.

This women v men (and vice versa) is just v divisive, and counterproductive.

Why are you assuming Credan Lady is a Woman? Maybe Credan Lady will also pay the man tax?

Yep, I kinda went into full rant mode there. Apologies