Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
180818385863691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 12,571 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    LOL. The drivel you post is so awful it should come with a health warning. So don't worry, no one is going to trawl back through them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    The fact remains, the only discount Nostradamus folk who are cocksure predicting what will and won't happen are the Putin brigade, and you're chief among them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,571 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    The inevitable retreat? Retreat where? We're talking about Russian troops deployed in Russia.

    As for the capital expended - the US has been struggling and failing to drum up enthusiasm amongst European states. The reaction is luke warm at best, and increasingly European leaders are trying to chart a separate solution that doesn't involve cutting off a major supply of energy. They've allowed Russia to make the dispute about NATO expansion. They tried and failed to enlist China's support. Apparently there was a bad phonecall with Blinken and the Chinese where they were given a dressing down. If anything, Russia and China have drawn closer together as a result. They called a UN security council meeting over the crisis where again, the reaction to the US claims was at best lukewarm and often bemused.

    And most humiliating of all, they seem to have lost Ukraine from the narrative of defending Ukraine. Even they are now saying the rhetoric needs to cool down, that things are no worse than they were a year ago.

    The US is looking very foolish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,571 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Oh right, I'm chief now. Well at least it is a promotion. Every time I read your posts I think that is the dumbest thing I'll read today. I forget that you might make another post.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    The above post is proof-positive of the sub-undergradate lens the Putin cheerleaders view things

    Russia and China are only ever a few years removed from their next bunfight. A row over influence in Central Asia will be the likely next point of contention.

    Unlike Nato alliances that have persisted over decades and in some cases centuries, China and Russia will never have each others back long term, and they'll never lose blood and treasure defending each other in conflict.

    It's the malcontents autocratic anti US imPERialiSM wet-dream, but it's only ever going to be a wet-dream.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    It's a fact Sandypops, the only people giving Nostradamus predictions are the the Putin cubscouts. Where did ye lot get your powers of prediction?

    What condiment will you use to get the stench of crow out of your mouth if you get this cocksure prediction horribly wrong (as you well might)?

    Honest question, will you leave boards for good? Because you're throwing down such an anchor with certainty, that you'll look like an even greater clod than you already are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,571 ✭✭✭✭Sand




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Seriously Sand, do you think you'd actually be able to appear back in the thread if an incursion does occur? I mean, you're telling us 100 percent what will happen, despite the knowledge that Russia put boots on the ground in 2014.

    How will you deal with being a laughing stock if it goes wrong for you? I'm genuinely curious.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Hardly a humiliation for the US if the Russians don't invade, that's their end state. The Russians banked on extracting concessions for the threats, which has been a complete failure. Where do they go from here? Invade and face disaster, or humiliating back down. The US doesn't have to do anything but wait.



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    It is, if you have it chalked down as the US being the aggressors, absolutely devastating...

    Fortunately, that's only in oppositeland, where the Kremlin is the fountain of truth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Can only imagine what's it's going to be alike around here if the Russian embassy is allowed its massive basement extension!!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71


    I am genuinely curious about where Putin is going with this and have as a result come up with a perhaps far fetched theory, based on the following facts.

    1. Putin does not want a war, as he is not an idiot.
    2. NATO does not want a war, as they are not idiots.
    3. NATO will not accept dictates demanding the freedoms of countries like Poland, Czech, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia to address their own security concerns.
    4. NATO does not exist to invade Russia in spite of the wetdreams of the "Putin boys" here, as the NATO governments know that an invasion of Russia would be a self inflicted Nuclear winter. Russia also knows this.

    So given the above what is Putins goal?

    Is his goal domestic? Is he actually trying to strengthen the ties within NATO and possibly motivate countries like Sweden, Finland (and perhaps Ireland) to join so he might better present NATO as the external beast to a Russian population that needs continued distraction from Putins very real internal failures.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,356 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Tell us of the "very real" internal problems you allege that would result in Putin taking such extreme maneuvers of 4D chess.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71


    Falling population, extreme poverty, requirement of Police state controls on media, Russian NGOs, state-sanctioned murder of position on foriegn soil and domestically, no domestic innovation in industry and complete reliance on export of mineral resources to pay for a failed society.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,356 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Falling population is happening all over the globe.

    Russia doesn't have extreme poverty by World Bank metrics.

    It's poverty Rate isn't any worse than Ireland's.

    "Police State controls on media", was there some point in that part of the world when media wasn't under scrutiny

    State-sanctioned murder isn't unique to Russia, insofar as the rest, there's nothing in all of your assertions that merits some extreme action like going to war.

    I thought Putin was some sort of autocratic dictator like leader that wasn't democratically accountable, so why would HE be worried about appearances?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71


    So why is he doing it? You thrown out all the same old lies coming from the Kremlim for years, so please tell us in you enlightened opinion.


    Which one of my 4 points is untrue?

    Thereafter what is the logic of those 4 true statements.

    1. He is playing to a domestic audience
    2. He is a lunatic

    Which is it Comrade?



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    He's just waiting on a mate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It seems ordinary Russians don't seem to support any kind of attack on ukraine,alot of Russian will have Ukrainian relatives,

    Others see Ukraine as being zero threat to Russia, can't see how Putin will spin this , there is no genocide been committed against the Russians in Ukraine ,the shelling in eastern Ukraine is coming from the Russians side and if ukraine shoots back they are accused of war crimes by the Kremlin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,571 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    The Russians not invading is the status quo. People have been crying "The Russian are coming! The Russians are coming!" for months now. And not once has anyone even tried to explain why Russia would invade now. What can they hope to gain that they do not already have from 2014? Crimea and its naval base? They have it already. A frozen conflict to exercise a veto on Ukrainian membership of NATO? They have it already. The status quo is not ideal for Russia, but its certainly better than invading Ukraine.

    The reality is if the Russians were hoping to intimidate Ukraine/NATO they would not be saying "We are not going to invade Ukraine". They would be staying completely silent about their intentions and let others worry about it. By saying they are not going to invade they surrender a useful tool to extract concessions. What concessions are even possible? To extract concessions by intimidation, there has to be the possibility they will be conceded. Nobody (including the Russians) can reasonably expect NATO, the US or the EU to concede anything to Russia.

    Does Russia even have the capability to invade and hold Ukraine with just 100,000 troops? For the liberation of Kuwait, the US and its allies amassed a million troops. Ukraine is 30+ times the territory, and 10 times the population - to be held by just 100,000 troops? When you allow for supporting forces, the actual number of combat troops able to take and hold territory is going to be a small fraction of that 100,000. The Russians have repeatedly brought together between 90,000 and 130,000 troops to carry out military exercises in 2019 and 2020. 100,000 is too small for an invasion, but it is about the right size for a military exercise.

    So the whole "Russia is going to invade soon" narrative doesn't really get off the ground when any one with some common sense looks at it. For a crime to happen, there needs to be motive and opportunity. There is no reasonable motive that has been offered, and the opportunity is highly dubious.

    Assuming 100,000 troops (or at least their equipment) has been redeployed (I mean, the US would never lie -right?) to Russia's western border regions there is two probable causes: 1) its for a military exercise of the type the Russians have carried out before. 2) It is the new normal, giving Russia increased options to intervene should Ukraine attempt to militarily defeat the Russian separatist enclaves.

    The US looking foolish is that they are increasingly isolated with their rhetoric about an imminent Russian invasion. Europe isn't falling into line. China has told the US to quit it, and is now openly backing Russia. The UN security council meeting was a waste of time. Their press briefings are reduced to making wild claims about crisis actors, with no evidence whatsoever. And even Ukraine is asking the US to calm down. And nobody in the US is going to fight to protect Ukraine's borders when US borders are an open joke. The Russian invasion narrative is over - don't worry, the US will try again in a few months.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,433 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Falling population, says a lot about a Country, any Country, which for every 1'000 Birth's, has 495 Abortions. Quote NDTV:-The demographic crisis is definitely a failure of the state's policies," said Sergei Zakharov, a demography expert at the Higher School of Economics based in Moscow.He told AFP that measures to increase the birth rate encourage families to have children earlier but do not change how many children they want in total.He said the government's influence on birth rates is "limited" and shifting births to an earlier period will result in a "demographic gap" in the future.For Stepan Goncharov of the independent Levada Centre pollster, the low birth rate is connected to widespread "uncertainty about the future".Living standards in Russia have continuously deteriorated since 2014, with the economy strained by repeated Western sanctions, dependence on the oil and gas sector and widespread corruption. UNquote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭zv2


    The plot thickens: "The Kremlin has often announced plans to station Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad to counter the US missile shield being developed in Eastern Europe. Washington claims that the shield is to counter possible missile attacks by Iran. However, Russian officials say it is directed against their country." Russia deploys nuclear-capable missile system in Kaliningrad: reports | News | DW | 07.02.2018

    Possible counter attacks from Iran? lol

    But all this talk about America vs. Russia is just a carry over from the cold war which was engineered to scare everyone, including the Russians. The real players here are not nations, the real players are the intelligence services. They, like the banks, are above nations and above loyalty to any politician. For them nations are just like pieces on the chess board. They are there to bring about their agenda. And we don't normally know what the agenda is until it is established.

    What Putin is and what his dreams are is irrelevant. To say his opinions matter is to imagine he has power. He, like most of them, is just a pawn.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,664 ✭✭✭eire4


    With the Legitimate part been in inverted commas. Can't really disagree with your description there of what the current Russian government is and the extreme authoritarianism that it embodies as a result of that corruption.



  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭animalinside


    "The real players here are not nations, the real players are the intelligence services. They, like the banks, are above nations and above loyalty to any politician. For them nations are just like pieces on the chess board. They are there to bring about their agenda. And we don't normally know what the agenda is until it is established.

    What Putin is and what his dreams are is irrelevant. To say his opinions matter is to imagine he has power. He, like most of them, is just a pawn."

    You cannot SERIOUSLY be suggesting that Putin, the former elite-level KGB agent, doesn't know what's going on with his own intelligence services and is being strung along by them?!

    Putin literally IS the intelligence services. Putin is as immersed as anyone could possibly be in the intelligence services - he got to such a high rank in the KGB he had to move to the presidency to have more power.

    About Biden or Trump or a lot of leaders it's a very plausible theory, you probably got the idea from people saying it about them. To suggest it about Putin is absolutely laughable and betrays a woeful understanding of world politics. To "imagine he has power" about Putin - Literally NOONE has ever said that about Putin before that I know: pro-Putin, anti-Putin, it's a ludicrous suggestion. Please leave, adults are talking here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Those are SAM interceptor missiles, and are not a nuclear delivery system unlike the Iskander system.

    You used the language of "warhead" deliberately evoking nuclear delivery systems.

    The only country that advanced it's nuclear warhead capable systems in Europe was Russia in Kaliningrad. Putin is in a sook because the defensive anti ballistic missile system installed weakened their nuclear delivery system and the radar is more powerful than he would like.

    So he broke treaty by installing a medium rang nuclear delivery system right next to Poland.

    You don't know your facts, are operating off Google and are decidedly low-knowledge.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Low knowledge b*llsh*t

    No account of Putin put him anywhere near the top of the KGB when he was in service.

    He was a shoeshine boy in the backwater of Dresden towards the end of the cold war and ended up a cab driver in Petersburg when he was made redundant.

    The real story of Putin's KGB career is that he was from the Leningrad end of operations, Moscow origin KGB officers got all the opportunity, promotion prospects and actual proper assignments. Leningrad cohort KGB officers were regarded as provincial, uncultured to essential intelligence work, and sent on dogsbody assignments to places like Dresden keeping watch on tractor factory communist party branches in the DDR.

    In fact, Putin apparently developed a rather large chip on his shoulder from his KGB career.

    You're buying into the 4D Chess mystique again.

    He did head the FSB briefly a year, but that was political appointment by Yeltsin who could barely walk straight.

    His intelligence career was low level when he was active.

    Post edited by Yurt2 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭animalinside


    No account really? What about the account of Catherine Belton, who wrote Putin's People which won book of the year 2020 in: The Economist, the Financial Times, the New Statesman and The Telegraph?

    According to journalist Catherine Belton, this downplaying was actually cover for Putin's involvement in KGB coordination and support for the terrorist Red Army Faction, whose members were frequently hiding in East Germany with support of the Stasi, and Dresden was preferred as a "marginal" town with low presence of Western intelligence services. According to an anonymous source, a former RAF member, at one of these meetings in Dresden the militants presented Putin with a list of weapons that were later delivered to the RAF in West Germany. Klaus Zuchold, who claimed to be recruited by Putin, said the latter also handled a neo-nazi Rainer Sonntag, and attempted to recruit an author of a study on poisons.[44] Putin also reportedly met Germans to be recruited for wireless communications affairs together with an interpreter. He was involved in wireless communications technologies in South-East Asia due to trips of German engineers, recruited by him, there and to the West.[38]



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Like I said, low level grotty work like giving Baader Meinhof Gruppen hippies in West Germany weapons was dogsbody work.

    He was nowhere near the top of the KGB when in active service.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In case you missed it,Russia have been coming since 2008 invasion of Georgia,and last was Crimea in 2014.

    Russias Hybrid warfare is why they dont need to mass a large amount of troops

    What more proof do you need?

    Do you need Putin to knock on your front door?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,874 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    @zv2 the cold war which was engineered to scare everyone, including the Russians.

    A newly hatched conspiracy theory? Haven't heard this one before anyway.

    The real players here are not nations, the real players are the intelligence services. They, like the banks, are above nations and above loyalty to any politician.

    Oh brother we don't want to go there (the "banks" dogwhistle) now as well do we?...Just when you think thread can't possibly get worse, another depth is plumbed!



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement