Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
14444454474494501190

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17,169 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    This is the France side for Saturday. Two changes from the side who played Italy. One in the backs and another in the forwards. Jonathan Danty is out as expected and replaced by Moefana. Danty is a very good player. Hard runner and good passer. He'll be missed.

    Francois Cros replaces Dylan Cretin who moves to the bench. France have gone for a 6-2 split on the bench. Shows you how much they respect Ireland's pack. I think we actually have the edge there. Would worry about the strength of their replacements though. Lot of power there.




  • Registered Users Posts: 595 ✭✭✭jimdemp


    Last year Sexton played against everyone bar the French. He will be back again for Italy this year. Is Sexton or Farrell deciding to sit out against the French? Billy burns and Ross bynre played last year against france and are not in the squad this year. Sexton sitting out against the best team suits him down to the ground. His outhalf competition get thrown in against the best team with no game time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,682 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Shaping up to be a cracking game. Another big test for Porters scrummaging at LH.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,169 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Maybe a slight weakness on the bench for Ireland up front? Henderson and Sheehan are big power athletes, but POM and Bealham might be better suited to side either than this massive French one.

    We'll see though. We know POM can be very disruptive to opposition rucks especially as the game goes on and they tire out. I'm hoping that we'll have a lead by the time the benches are emptied. Then ask POM to be a (legal) bollix at every ruck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,534 ✭✭✭Downlinz



    Sexton's international career is effectively over if Carbery has a big game against the best team in the competition, he'll take the jersey and won't look back. Hard to believe Sexton would want to give a rival that kind of opportunity, he's probably hugely disappointed to miss out.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,605 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    anyway....

    Carbery must be hitting his marks in training better than Carty seeing as hes getting the start.

    It will be exciting to see if the shape is as fluid with him at 10, his experience at full back will stand to him seeing the picture unfold



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭the baby bull elephant


    Feels like the quality of trolling has really gone down the last few years. Most seem to have opted for a quantity over quality approach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    Mere slip of a lad, 6'5" and 23 stone. Porter could lift him with one finger 😉



  • Registered Users Posts: 595 ✭✭✭jimdemp


    Carbery has no game time, Carty has only started 1 game. Ross Bynre was thrown in the fire against England and France. Billy burns started against the French.. This is happening too often. The back up 10s get no game time and then get thrown in against the big teams. Sexton will start against Italy because he needs game time theyl say and everyone will say how great he is against the Italians. This is happening for years



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,605 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,317 ✭✭✭✭phog



    There are most definitely questions

    For the people that matter e.g Farrell & co no, there's no question whatsoever. Carbery has been 2nd choice anytime he's available, some might like that but Farrell like some of us here have no say what happens in the minds of a few posters who like to think they know better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Disagree about POM but sort of agree about Bealham, I do think overall our bench is strong though, arguably stronger than France's man for man but its hard to directly compare as they have gone for a 6/2 split. For all the talk of who's at 10 I still believe who wins the collisions and the battle upfront will most likely win this game.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Carbery is Farrell's choice when fit. That's clear

    That's not the issue that the other poster was responding about though

    There is no question that Carbery is good enough. He has proven it whenever asked.

    and the other poster responded

    There is no question that Carbery is good enough.

    There are most definitely questions

    Which is fair.

    Carbery hasn't yet convincingly shown that he can execute international-class game-management against a top international side for a game as starting out-half in a competitive fixture.

    The biggest game that he was given a start in so far (afaik) was the first game in the 2018 series vs Australia and he was dropped in favour of Sexton for tests 2 and 3 after that loss.

    Injuries and opportunities notwithstanding.

    Undercooked or not, this game is a massive chance for him to actually show it (if he can).



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Yeah Danty is a big loss, I did think Vakatawa would come straight in to minimise the loss but with Moafana while he's a great young talent and will cause us loads of problems I'm sure the big issue with the French backline is they are lacking that 1 player who can get over the gainline and draw defenders like Danty or Vakatawa can, they'll be relying alot more on width or their forwards getting a tad wider to try draw Irish defenders. Ringrose & Aki will need to have a big game here.


    Cros is a more physical player than Cretin os obviously a more horses for courses selection. Yeah I agree on the power side of things, especially their 19 & 16 are monsters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 373 ✭✭JimmyCorkhill


    The handicap v France is now +5 with PP, the other day it was +4. Losing Sexton is worth more than 1 point, more like 4/5 points I would have thought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Lots of discussion about the 10 scenario again, but nothing here has changed.

    Sexton is by a distance the best 10 we have in Ireland. His age is an issue and his ability to even be available for the RWC as well as his availability through it if he does is absolutely a concern. But the way he is playing at the moment is top class. He’s arguably one of, if not the best 10 in Europe right now. Certainly at Test level. How many 10s in international rugby are better? So while there is a risk with his availability next year, this needs to be considered.

    The other options are a long way off. Our attack with Carbery at 10 vs Sexton at 10 in the last few months has been pretty much unrecognisable. He’s just not the same kind of player and doesn’t have near the same amount of experience. And for all the talk of Sextons potential unavailability, Carbery has been available a lot less than Sexton in the last few years. Even between November and the 6Ns, when Leinster had a few more games postponed/cancelled, Sexton played more than Carbery. We can’t rely on Carberys fitness any more than Sextons.

    Ultimately Carbery hasn’t a patch on Sexton. And playing a game in Paris isn’t going to change that. Players develop through consistent training and game time that uses repetition to bring on their skills (muscle memory) and experience (improving decision making). Most of that happens at provincial level. The odd Test match here and there would have limited impact.

    Beyond Carbery, Carty is starting to find a bit of consistency. At the young age of 29. He’s still got his issues though. Some of his tactical kicking in recent weeks has been very suspect. Harry Byrne hasn’t been playing. Burns and Ross Byrne aren’t at the level required.

    So looking ahead to the RWC we have a world class 10 who may or may not be available, a back up 10 who is not even close to world class and who also may not be available and then we have a collection of average or below average options. Surely I can’t be the only who thinks that we need Sexton to be available for the RWC? If there’s even a chance that he can be fit and available and still playing well, at this stage we are in a position where we really have to take that chance. Because the other options simply aren’t good enough or even if they are may not be available themselves. Do we really see any of the other options developing their game enough in the next 12-15 months to guide us through a QF against France or New Zealand?



  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Carty turns 30 this year. There won't be a payoff in a couple of years. He's very much a now selection.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,106 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    Agree with that, this is his first 6N start and by far the biggest test of his career so far. Hopefully he nails it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,999 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Whatever questions there are about Carbery apply equally and more to any of the alternatives.

    What sets Carbery apart is that first Schmidt and now Farrell clearly think he's the best option behind Sexton and have never wavered from that position since Paddy Jackson left.

    I've yet to see a coherent explanation for how this is compatible with AN Other clearly being the better option.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Ha ha ha.

    Sextons career isnt over until he decides its over. There was plenty of fawning over his performance against Bath and very little made of his errors against wales.

    Add to that carberys lack of physicality especially for international level and the sexton wont be ditched anytime soon.

    Its plain as day that he intends to be the starting 10 at the WC and no irish manager has not selected him when available for a game against a top 10 side so its hard to see that change now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    But no harm to expose Carbery and Carty to a Cauldron like Parc de Princes.


    I'd say Parc des Princes will be fairly quiet on Saturday, and if our two outhalves turn up there instead of Stade de France I'd safely say we're really f*cked.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,360 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    I think I’ve worked out which Leinster player Jim’s mrs has the hots for. It’s the reason he’s here looking for attention, he’s not getting any at home.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    Tim Corkery isn't getting enough game time.. he should be fast tracked into the senior set up . Throw him in against Italy see what he's made of :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Our biggest problem is that our young 10s aren't getting the minutes at provincial level to develop.

    We've have 4 provinces, which means 4 spots to develop potential Ireland out halves. But Billy Burns (who we know isn't good enough) is starting every week up at Ulster. The IRFU need to ask themselves, are they maximising their resources? If H.Byrne, Crowley or Healy were getting the regular game time that Billy Burns is getting, would they develop and present themselves as options for Ireland? I'd say they probably would, they're all excellent young 10s.

    They did it before, when they didn't let Ulster renew Pienaar's contract. If the IRFU are serious about developing the young 10s, they need to say "Cheerio Burns, you're gone. Alright Ulster, here's Crowley, or here's Harry Byrne". Then they'd get regular games in the URC and in Europe (which they aren't currently getting) and they'd at least have a chance to present themselves as options.

    Because right now, every weekend 80 minutes of game time that could be going to one of our promising young 10s is being flushed down the toilet. And what we're left with is a very good, but injury prone 36 year old, an average injury prone 26 year old, and a 29 year old who is in good form but has massive question marks over his head. And 3 potentially world class u23 10s sitting on the bench for their provinces most weeks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    To me there's tons of doubt. He's not impressed me enough to the point that I feel he's our future. But, this is a good test for him. We will see what he's got.

    It's imperative than someone stands up and grabs the 10 or 22 jersey. So far it's been a drab experience watching the 10's disappoint.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,802 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Yeah, it is nothing short of outrageous that Farrell didn't start Carbery when he was out injured.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Ah come on, we've been hearing the 'Sexton's career is effectively over if the latest flavour of the month plays well...' for years now.

    Carbery doesn't lay a glove on Sexton. I hope he goes well on Saturday and believe he has all of the capabilities to lead us to a win, but we have seen Carbery pull one top performance out of the bag on plenty of occasions, but never three, four or five of them in a row even at provincial level.

    We've heard it with O'Gara, Jackson, Carbery, Carty etc. Sexton is still Ireland's best 10 (and it's not even close) and even if Carbery plays well against France, Sexton will be straight back into the team once fit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,169 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Squidge Rugby reviewed Ireland's victory over Wales and made some good points about our attack. Namely that our attacking shape hasn't changed much in well over 18 months. But rather our decision making of when to run the dummy line and when to actually pass has become very good. It looks almost instinctual rather than the product of continuous drilling in training and refinement when actually on the pitch during a test match.

    The system is now so embedded that if an attack doesn't work the way we want it the first time, we can reload and try again, this time with a different kink to it. Or we can make decisions in the middle of the planned attack and go a different route, like hitting VDF and putting him through a gap rather than the planned attacking of looping around to Sexton.

    This is why I'm concerned about Saturdays game. All of these good performances have come with Sexton on the pitch. He's the best decision maker we have and in a game plan that puts a lot of focus on automatisms and familiarity, it's a big ask to drop in someone with relatively little experience not only with the system, but with top level rugby as a whole. I hope Carbery comes through and performs well. I just don't think it'll happen though.




  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    There are 2 basic issues with this take.

    First, the provinces aren’t solely there to develop players for the national team. They have their own priorities which involves winning league and European games. They don’t want to be starting a 22 year old who needs work if it’s going to hurt their short term goals. Which is completely fair. Plus, the development of others around them can be adversely impacted. The provinces would never allow themselves to be dictated to like that. And they’d be right.

    The player also has a say in where they go. If they don’t want to move then they don’t.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Yes but he can’t stay fit for any period of time, so it’s hard to have any run of games. Your argument that he should be getting games for Ireland to build confidence. Is putting the cart before the horse.

    Also his performances for Ireland have not all been good. He was good against Argentina, excellent if you include the stint at full back. He was pretty poor last Saturday though.

    As Hansen getting MOTM last week proves, it’s a fairly hollow accolade. Not really a reflection of performance.



Advertisement