Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

Read.

The clotting disorder is called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), and it is rare—in 17 million people who got J&J, 54 cases of TTS were reported, 36 of those people were cared for in an intensive care unit, and nine people died (which represents over 15% of cases). 

17 million recipients, 9 died.

That's it ... you've convinced me ... close the thread now.

you've proved beyond doubt ... how can we all be so blind

thanks a million

Not vaxxed, won't let him in 🤣

You dug yourself into a hole with your lies and you are now grasping at a straw. For the billionth time, no one said that vaccines were 100% safe.

Has anyone ever made this claim that vaccines are 100% safe? Can you name one thing in the history of Mankind that is or was 100% safe?

The point of my posts is usually to point out your lies, and bullshit so other gullible people doesn’t swallow them as easily as you have. I thought told you that before.

.

So you can’t answer simple questions about your beliefs? Rather you make up another fantasy about me in your head. That’s quite weird.

Lol. If I post regularly and quickly it's: "Ugh, you're such a loser who's obviously paid to post!"

If I happen to miss a night: "Ugh, looks like he's too scared to face me."

Can't win with you guys.

Ok great. Finally! See how easy it is for you to back up your claims.

Makes me wonder though. When actually can back up your claims, you post the links directly and without the usual song and dance of dodging the question, making up excuses and generally trying to weasel out of your claim.

So how come you posted this evidence so quickly, yet it took pages and pages of your dodging giving evidence that the EMA wasn't renewing due to safety?

I think that shows beyond doubt that you were lying about that and you aren't honest enough to just admit it.

So Denmark isn't using the J&J because they believe that the benefits don't outweigh the risks. Cool beans.

How come they're the only ones? Are they not involved in the conspiracy? Why do you trust Denmark out of all the countries in the world?

How come Reuters is allowed to report on this? Why aren't they being sued like you claimed for the EMA thing? Why should we trust Reuters over other media organisations especially when you believe they are part of the conspiracy cause they agree with the FDA and CDC?

Why are they telling the truth here, but not with the FDA, CDC and EMA?

Also, I notice that you've again avoided my questions about how other conspiracy theorists are pretending you don't exist. Does this question strike a nerve or something?

Hey, so do you not know why thalidomide wasn't sold in the US?

Fun story. One you clearly don't know.

Lol. I don't think you understand what lies are dude.

Notice in your unsourced, plagerised passage it says:

So again, why was it not sold in the US?

How many of those birth defects occured in America and why was that?

And are you now going to use this latest tangent to avoid my points about your previous claim that you were so excited for me to tackle?

And questions weaseled away from as per normal.

Ok. So we'll just take it for granted that you are telling the truth about Finland and Slovenia. It would just be more pagges of you weaseling and dodging to try and get you to back this up.

So why have these countries decided to announce the J&J vaccine isn't safe while all other countries have? Why do you trust these countries so completely?

And no mate, I'm asking you because it's your claim. Stop dodging, it makes you look silly and cowardly.

You claimed that media sources couldn't report on the safety issues of the vaccines because they would get sued. Yet now, you point to Reuters, one of the main streamist main stream media outlets, as reporting on the safety issues. Why aren't they being sued?

You keep mentioning "Contractual" stuff, but you keep dodging away when you're asked to detail this with any depth. This is because you're making **** up like when you claimed to be "in the know".

And likewise, you've avoided the other question: Why should we trust Reuters when they endorse the FDA's and CDC's statements of the vaccine's safety. You believe that they are lying about that. So why would Reuters back them up? Doesn't the fact Reuters backs them up mean that they are also lying and part of the conspiracy.

I think you are avoiding this question because you can't answer it. You don't have an answer because like all conspiracy theorists you never actually think about your claims beyond the surface level or beyond the headlines fed to you. Please keep dodging the question as that will show I'm right about this.

So you just pretend that the other conspiracy theorists who are not at all backing you up or even acknowledge your claims and existence don't exist either.

Huh, that might explain why you guys never actually interact...

The only person here hiding in their parents box room is you. I’ve been living life. It’s great. Keep away from conspiracy nuts because you end up so far down a hole that you can’t find your way out and start thinking articles say things they don’t, and other people say things they don’t. As awful as it is having a family member stuck down that hole you are in, I’m sure yours would like you to surface to normality again. Judging by your posts though, you may be beyond help.