Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
198991011031043691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    If anyone can do it it will be the West.


    No one in Europe would starve but the diet would change.


    The real goal would be China and Russia focusing on the trade with each other and the non Western world.


    Sideline Europe and build a block to oppose America


    I wouldn't be surprised if Russia and China have long had an understanding that they would work together to increase their leverage in the world and weaken the West, and take opportunity to do that long term and as situations arise.


    The Russian Minister for Defense might not know what Putin is planning but I'd guess Xi jinping does and that he would see this as a build up to taking Taiwan in years to come.



  • Registered Users Posts: 858 ✭✭✭jolivmmx


    The West is saliently aware of its dependence on energy from outside sources. It is moving towards Nuclear. Do not think that it is only China that can have a long-term strategy



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,482 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Notable shift in rhetoric from the Ukraine Government now too. Up until this weekend they were arguing that it's far from certain whether an invasion is imminent. Now they've announced the evacuation of Government institutions from Eastern Ukraine - key Government personnel, documents and assets being moved to Western Ukraine. That's telling in itself tbh. It's a Clausewitz moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 182 ✭✭Ahherelads2022


    I think in peace time Nuclear power is the way to go. Don't know how we don't invest in it here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Cost. The economics of nuclear are horrendous.


    If people argue for it from a national energy security position or to reduce carbon from electricity then that's different. I hope France follow through with their reactors but they are not looking at it as an monetary investment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I'd advise Russian speakers in the Ukraine to avoid bars, crowded places or Vans parked by people with Russian accents.


    They might be accidented to death at a set time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,356 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    It is supremely ironic for Irish people to parrot a British point of view regarding Crimea.

    Britain, that country that went around the globe invading, subjugating and redrawing boundaries; many of which created problems that persist to this very day. Northern Ireland being one, a British line drawn right across Ireland, balkanizing the island and creating an apartheid-like state.

    Those injustices came to a head in 1969 and before Britain would commit her own troops to quell the ethnic violence, there were a few days when people wondered would the army of the RoI step-in. That never happened and it resulted in a 30 year low-level war.

    You'll find however, among certain British points of view that the IRA were actually proxies of the RoI.

    Today of course we have the GFA and the commitment to peaceful means. We've accepted the NI british statelet has a right to exist until the majority of the people there express otherwise, democratically.

    I wonder why then, would some Irish people not accept that Crimea also has a democratic legitimacy to take her place among greater Russia?



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Shao Kahn


    Many people can't see the bigger picture with conflicts such as this. They only see things through a very narrow prism of what interests them. Ukraine is in a tug-of-war over some much larger geopolitical issues than just one nation's sovereignty.

    I wouldn't be so smug about Russia's economy going forward either. They have massive natural resources, and are only beginning to tap into their vast potential.

    Projects such as this are a good example of the long term planning they are putting in. They are certainly not standing still economically, and will undoubtedly be a significant world player in the future.


    "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives, and it puts itself into our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." (John Wayne)



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @BluePlanet I wonder why then, would some Irish people not accept that Crimea also has a democratic legitimacy to take her place among greater Russia?

    There was no legitimacy ,

    Just Russian soldiers who said having a vote with no options or face violence at the hands of the Russian military,

    Why were Russians only allowed to vote, why was Russian soldiers and groups bused into Crimea from Russia allowed to vote ,

    Why were Ukrainians blocked from voting ,

    And how did 110% of the population vote to join Russia , when in 1991 3 million in Crimea Russians applied for Ukrainian citizenship ...







  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,036 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    The big bad west/NATO/USA have not invaded Ukraine or Russia, nor have they ever threatened to. They exist in the Baltic states at the explicit desire of the democratically elected governments there. Russia on the other hand has already invaded and is occupying parts of the sovereign nation of Ukraine. There is only one side here that is breaking international law and invading, killing and annexing foreign territory. The defence here seems to be sympathy for the Russians because they feel threatened and surrounded. Yet nobody threatens them, NATO exists at the will of sovereign members that host them which is their right. Nobody has ever declared a desire to invade Russian territory. However, if Russia continues with its plans to occupy and invade Ukraine, killing many innocent Ukrainians and ruining the lives of others, Russia itself will have created the only situation where their unfounded fears might actually materialize. By invading, they'll go from a country that nobody cares about beyond trading for natural resources, to a menace that must be faced by all of Europe and NATO. This is not even in the interests of Russia.

    If Putin sends his army home, his citizens will be safe. Nobody really cares about Russia, NATO has no interest in occupying any part of it. The eu just want to pay for natural resources. The eu by its very nature can only expand by the will of countries that wish to join it. It is only the Russians who wish to use war, violence and coercion as a tool to expand. I know which type of regime I would like to be associated with. I'd rather be bribed by economic stability than subjugated militarily. Putin is old and his expansionist strategy is very old, you get more bees with honey. In the long term there's only one winner here and it isn't the maniac threatening people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Agreed, Russia and China are viewing things in as a realignment of their regional politics and especially global politics.


    Russia ending an outlook that has dominated it since Peter the Great, China a world order it has chaffed at for 2 centuries, prior to that a millennium of not caring about the world beyond its own region.


    A few years of sanctions are not definig events, not in the history of a country.


    They are planting Oak trees for Navy masts in 500 years, as Henry VIII did. The northern ports you linked to are going to come in to their own in the second half of this century.

    Not quarterly projections, not 10 or 20 years but a beginning reordering of the entire global order.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Not on this ,

    That I can remember but hey .....

    Not likely last year but I've been posting about putin and his actions in Ukraine for about 8/9 years,

    And for most part I've been correct on what, where he was going to do, or did it

    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,036 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    The problem they face is not adversarial but from within. As a population becomes more affluent and individuals gain more autonomy, information becomes impossible to control and the selfish interests of the citizens overcome the will of the regime. By the time these countries develop economically to their full potential they will be so integrated into the global supply chain and their people will have such autonomy, that the regime itself will have had to adapt to be more focused on the appeasement of its own middle class than it will on some expansionist grand plan. That is the beauty of capitalism, it's insipid, you can't stop it, it is greed that will bring about world peace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,892 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Hilarious at this point how your salivating at the prospect of a strong Russia and strong China. Two places where you simply wouldn't have the freedom to actually publish such opinions of contrary even if you wanted to.

    Its gas how much the likes of yourself hate everything about where you grew up.

    Sidelining Europe. New super powers. East focused. Its all absolutely hilarious. When did this start with you? Was it when Ireland invaded its neighbours in an imperialist manner? Or what started this self hate.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The bigger picture in Russia is much smaller than it seems.

    Russia still depends on foreign investments and competence to extract oil and Gas,build pipelines,supply chain etc etc.

    I work in the oil industry in Russia,and was one of few that actually got a work visa during covid,cause they refused most unless you are an expert as they call it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    Buying oil from head chopping women traffickers is NOT corruption if you’re a NATO member, only bad guys like Russians are corrupt just like in the movies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Or shooting down civilian airliners over ukraine



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I don't want it. I think China is a global threat to Human decency, not just democracy, basic freedoms. Russia is a small support cog in that


    Just because I don't want them to rise doesn't mean that they will not nor that it is not obvious what their strategy is long term.

    The next fifty years is all about mid to East Asia, China and India mostly and a cohort of their neighbours, where over 50% of global economic growth will be.

    Pointing out something happening is not the same as wanting it. There are many things in life like that. Do you understand that?


    I think the ending of Western hegemony will be a retrograde step for the world. I classify myself as a Western Chauvinist.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Does putin think siding up to china will bring him more power ,if anything if something did kick off china would send the Russians as cannon fodder,

    And I'm sure that coal fired aircraft carrier Will hold up well compared to the 10+ Chinese ones under construction



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,392 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    So, 16th - 20th it will kick off?


    I know a lot of countries are reducing embassy staff and reports of troop movements to staging grounds,

    I'd say when we see the Chinese pull out its about to begin.

    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Even the Germans are changing the tune





  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    putin seriously needs to rethink his position here ,he has nothing to gain and everything to lose




  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭Enter name here


    Putin has nothing to rethink, it's the woke brigade that needs to rethink. Biden needs a war to defuse his situation at home and take the focus off how he has made the world a much much poorer and dangerous world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,681 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Blue Planet: you say: Health service attack regarded as a for-profit crime rather than any proxy attack by Russia

    Its fairly clear that much if not most of this activity is Russian-based. Even if it's not done by the Government it is likely to be with their knowledge and consent. Reminds me of the Green Men and the Wagner group. In a gangster state the division between the Government and the Gangsters is not all that clear.

    A Government which allows criminal gangs to operate freely, is culpable and should be held to account.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,681 ✭✭✭Economics101


    If the war is clearly because of Russian aggression then any US President will get political support at home. If (as the Russian trolls seem to think) that it's due to US or NATO aggression Biden or any sitting president will meet massive domestic political opposition.

    The idea that Biden needs a war to defuse his situation totally mad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭Enter name here


    Biden is the one pushing for a conflict, no doubt about it. That's what happens when you install a puppet POTUS to appease the woke.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement