Freeman Megamerge

If they turn it twice won't that leave it back the way it was? seems like a complete waste of time to me.

that was a tough read - in essence the judge finally pulled the plug on the circular nonsense - it shows the basics of the tactic ... keep litigation going as long as possible knowing you'll never win but it keeps you in the property.

What I find interesting is the comment about the costs of previous actions - the court has more or less acknoledged that the litigant in all likelihood will never actually pay any of the costs awarded against him. Which I suppose is a difficult one for the courts.

Obviously people need access to the courts system and financial weight shouldn't be an exclusion ... however there is a balance between fair access and abuse of the system. Issac Wunder rulings play a part in these but are like the nuclear option. Would there be any mechanism where by a litigant would have to show either proof of payment of previous cost awards or formal agreements to discharge the debt before being allowed to take another action?

jesus, just checked in on him, so, the swabs used for pcr tests contain carcinogens that break off go into your body and give you brain damage....

this man needs to be sectioned

This is petty but anyway. I was reading the 17 (mainly glowing) reviews of one of his books on Amazon. Then I was clicking into the people who reviewed it and looking at their other reviews (these people genuinely fascinate me)

Anyway, one chap called Gabriel W who states in his review of yer mans book.... "This book verifies my own research over the years and adds a lot more information"

Looking at the rest of his reviews, he also has a review of a Logitech Keyboard where he only gave it 3 stars because "While using the keyboard, the '@' symbol was not correctly marked on the keys. It was eventually located at 'shift 2' which again was incorrectly marked. Now that I know I can manage ok, but it's the reason for the three stars"

I think it gives a good insight into the level of research Gabriel W is is up to...!!!! Anyway, as I said, Petty - but id did give me a chuckle this morning

Exactly - But more importantly, it tells you the level of "research" that Gabriel is capable of. A quick google would have found that out for him in about 3.5 seconds.

His High Court application against Beaumont seeking injunctions was summarily refused, maybe he should have read his own guide to legal actions....

With the story about Catriona Carey's recent activities being published on RTE today, it reminded me of the Rodolphus Allen Trust (of which, I did not realise, she was one of the prime movers). What ever happened to that? It seems to have faded away, with nothing of note in the news media and certainly no convictions. I guess the leaders just kept the cash?

It is alleged that one legal professional mentioned earlier in this thread was directing people to the services of Catriona Carey.

On a totally different matter, where would I go if I wanted a barrister to train me to represent myself in court?

i have missed that request, but then again his live stream videos are over an hour long each and I tend to be headbutting my keyboard after about 3 minutes.

I watched a few minutes of one this morning, said, there were professional trolls on the internet trying to undermine his character, but that was just because they knew the tide was turning and they had sided with evil and would pay the consequences when the righteous came to power.....

glimpses of

it's gone beyond someone I just thought as a crank with too much time on his hands.

His wife is obviously very ill - I've no idea with what but if she was in the neuro ICU in beaumont she isn't in a good position as beds there are for the most seriously I'll people in the country.

He is claiming he has power of attorney over her - which I'd be doubtful he has. I've been down that route with my mam in the last decade and was unsuccessful - it is not an easy thing to get and needs a solicitor and doctors along with family to be involved. As he seems to not trust anyone I am assuming he didn't engage any of them in the process and jus drew up his own etch-a-sketch of a legal looking document.

Anyway - that's a tangent - as he is now saying that as having POA it is the very sick woman's instance that she receive no test, treatment or otherwise for anything to do with covid. He is trying to dictate what she can and can't be treated for .. including a virus which can kill medically vulnerable people - I just can't square that circle.

he also made a reference to helping a polish family get Power of Attorney over their ill family member in castlebar general hospital in the past few weeks - we can all make assumptions as to what this entailed - however the fact that he feels that he is in a position to act as legal advisor to people which may or may not impinge on their health care is very worrying indeed.

On a side note - even though he was marching in and out of the Four Courts and serving 'legal' papers on Beaumont hospital he wants his wife to be cared for by the hospital as they are the best ????

Listening to him is like self inflicted jihad on your own brain

yeah it was EPOA I was trying to secure - but just a little too late in making the application and the doc wouldn't sign off on it (in the subsequent years it has been an absolute ball ache as it wasn't in place)

But surely he'd have to have gone to a solicitor to have gotten POA over his wife's affairs and from what I can see he most definitely wouldn't be the type to go to a solicitor's office.

As for refusing treatment - if he does have POA and refuses treatment the hospital can always go the legal route to have the courts decide if the treatment can be given.

Regardless - imagine your spouse insisting that the doctors don't treat you for a virus that could kill you.

I wasn't aware of that for general POA.

My mother is severely demented at the moment and my dad passed away just after she went in to residential care. Dad of course didn't have a will and as all assets transfer to mam we have zero 'legal' control over anything financially or to do with the house.

I am in the process of applying to be a care rep in the circuit court but the powers there are really limited and I believe just give me some say in medical / fair deal processes .. but nothing else.

I can't even see how much money she has in her bank account at the moment !