What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

So it's gone from 14 plus boxes of confidential and sensitive document to they don't have to be confidential.

Ditto.

I'm taking the fact that Donald Trump Senior, Donald Trump Jnr and Eric Trump have all spoken publicly or released statements in recent days and none of them refuted the claims whatsoever as a pretty strong indictment that everything said about the boxes and their contents is 100% true.

You can relax, there's been no shortage of instances throughout his life where Donald behaved completely inappropriately if not outright illegally and yet he rarely has been adequately held accountable for his actions.

That is likely to continue despite the revelations about these documents or the breaking news around his worthless financial submittals so all his worshippers can console themselves with that reality while the rest of us hope that it all comes crashing down around him.

asking for a friend?

I'm guessing it'll also greatly hamper any future attempts at doing the same thing, as other similar companies will be much more hesitant to get involved. So yes, it's a very bad thing for the Trump Org.

I'd guess that there are at very least veracity and/or moral hazard clauses on the commercial loans the Trump Org has in play. Those clauses could we'll leave loans subject to immediate recall.

Where it would become very interesting IMO? Is if any of that debt has been securitized. Suddenly not only is the Trump Org on the hook for fraud but the Banks that securitized and sold the packaged debt would be liable for further perpetuating a fraud.

Now I don't know how Trump's banks are packaging their commercial paper. It may be debt or bond funded or it may fully securitized. The issue will be if it's funded by anything other than bank funds? Any prospectus that issued will have given a risk profile for those debts based upon garbage reports. The bank's now carry the can for their own lack of diligence.

So, the short version: There's still no Durham report, and this latest indictment has nothing to do with 'espionage.'

The foxbots like Boxy who regurgitate this nonsense need to cop on a bit; if you think the President of the US was being spied on, well, I doubt you'd find out about it on Fox news and there's this little organization called the NSA who worry about those things. Do you seriously believe you'd learn about it on Fox or Facebook?

And, for those having trouble understanding what's up with the documents shipped to Mar A Lago:

1. Why were they shipped at all?
2. Were the shippers secure?
3. The Archives think there were confidential documents there. That's B A D. Not e-mails that failed to have the confidential signature on them. Documents that the cleaning staff could look at. Documents described as 'laying around' in Mar A Lago, which has a history of being infiltrated and visited by dodgy sorts like Lev Parnas and convicted felon Igor Fruman: https://theweek.com/speedreads/892721/theres-another-video-fruman-parnas-hanging-trump-time-maralago. And the 'Chinese businesswoman' who was convicted of trespass and will be deported: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/25/chinese-trespasser-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-resort-sentenced.html TBF the latter wasn't charged with Espionage, but she's going to be expelled

The whole 'mar a lago' thing is ridiculous. Southern white house...what a crock. Not secure, easily infiltrated, poorly run. Trump might as well have had the constitution printed on the toilet paper there as much as he crapped on it by holding meetings there and clowning for diplomats.

Indeed the word infiltrate is not in the indictment but the phrase "... associates exploited was domain name system (“DNS”)" is. I'm not overly tech savvy but the very first result on DNS exploits throws up this.

A handy analysis by the author and a tweet from George Conway interpreting what Mazar's letter said: https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/february-14-2022

Excerpt (Conway's tweet quoting Mazar's letter):

“‘decision regarding the financial…statements’=they are false because you lied

‘totality of the circumstances’=the D.A. is serious 

‘non-waivable conflict of interest’=we are now on team D.A.

‘not able to provide new work product’=sorry we’re not going to jail for you”

In addition. Conway's tweeted that Mazar's has probably turned over more than .5 million documents to the AG: https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1493371637600858112

Please highlight the section in Durham's filing where he states white house servers were hacked?

Trump used his private personal phone frequently and refused to get his 'armoured' government issued device, how 'Internet safe' do you think he is?

Half to laugh at the efforts to ignore what is going on with Trump and to try to spin about someone who hasn't been in politics in 6 years.

Real eyes closed, fingers in ears type stuff.