Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sacked doctor sues former employer for refusing to call trans-woman "she"

Options
18911131429

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nope. I think people want basic common sense, and acceptable social norms (for the majority) to prevail.

    It's just sad that we might need laws to give people rights to that privacy, rather than changing everything for the sake of an extreme minority.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Basic common sense has been happening for decades. Trans women have been using womens toilets for decades and there have been zero issues. Zero reports of all these predators. This is just pure hysteria about a problem that isnt a problem.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The use of the trolley problem as a thought experiment isn’t negated just because this is a real world problem with consequences, that’s precisely the use for such things.

    There is no solution here. Only ways in which to accept sacrifice. People seem happy to sacrifice women’s feelings of safety to appease transgender women’s feeling of safety. All I’m pointing out is why would you consider one and not the other.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,926 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Basic common sense already prevails - it’s completely irrational to discriminate against any group of people in society on the basis of guilt by association. It’s why laws already exist to protect individuals dignity and privacy so that people like the doctor in this particular case don’t have the right to subject anyone to humiliation, degradation and a violation of those same social norms which you wish to protect.

    It’s why there is no real desire, demand or support for the idea of excluding people from equal participation in society on the basis of guilt by association, whether it’s limiting their access to education, employment, housing, or even just arguing that their access to go for a piss in private should be restricted on the basis of what someone who isn’t them might do. The idiot who suggested a licence for men to socialise was rightfully lambasted, yet here you are suggesting similar for people who are transgender as though they should be marked out in society and treated as though they don’t deserve the same freedoms as are already enjoyed by everyone else.

    You can’t even see the contradiction between what you’re arguing against, and what you’re proposing for other people who have the same right to the presumption of innocence as you do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,926 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    There is a solution to your false dilemma - it already exists in the form of law. What you’re doing is the same as the OP in suggesting there is a fundamental conflict of rights between people who are religious, and people who are transgender. In reality these circumstances are dealt with on a case by case basis by examining the facts of each case and applying the law fairly. Turns out the solution was to point out that the doctor would be in violation of his own code of conduct as a medical practitioner if he were to address anyone in a way that suited his personal beliefs, and such behaviour was considered unreasonable.

    In the same way - there is no fundamental conflict between women’s rights and the rights of people who are transgender, other than one that is invented by people who couldn’t care less about either, and pretend there is no solution and sacrifices have to be made, when nobody has to sacrifice anything they are entitled to by law. The idea is that everyone is regarded as being of equal status in law, and protected from unlawful discrimination on a number of grounds already.

    There are no laws which exist to prevent anyone from using facilities if they are in place for public use, whether it be for men, women, children or any of those groups regardless of disability, skin colour religion and so on, which it was previously argued couldn’t be reasonably accommodated by society as it was structured then. As it turns out, the tiny minority of people who argued against accommodating people who were different from them in some way, were wrong, it turns out people can be accommodated, quite easily. What people here are arguing for is the right to subject people who aren’t like them to discrimination, not just as an individual right for themselves, but as a policy!

    How long do they imagine it would be before they themselves would fall foul of such a terrible policy were it ever to even be considered? Their exclusion from equal participation in society on the basis that people want to be kept safe would be swift, which would lead to the kind of infantilised society they claim to be rallying against.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have no idea what your talking about. Are you saying women shouldn’t be afraid of transgender people in their spaces or they are bigoted to think that way? This whole debacle is about feelings.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Common sense has been happening forever.. it's been having a slow kind of death over the last few decades with all the activism going on.

    Oh, I do agree that there is hysteria involved. Both by those who are critical of Trans issues, and those who support them.

    At the same time, you're missing a very obvious point. In the past, actual Trans people were extremely rare. However, when you look at the stats in countries like the US and the UK, there has been a sizable increase in the numbers wanting to transition, and that's without even going into the cases of people who don't transition but still want to be treated equally with their desired gender. It's not longer the case of talking about a tiny amount of people, because the overall trans movement has left the shadows and emerged into the public eye.

    Secondly, there have been issues in the past, as Trans people used to be lumped together with the Queer and Transvestites... and there have been cases of violence associated with them. Not common, mind, but it doesn't match with your "zero" claim.

    It's not a problem until it becomes a problem. Which it could. You don't know where the trans movement is going to go, or the kind of people it will attract. There is still a lot of scope for abuse when the term Trans covers such a wide range of beliefs/attitudes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,926 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Of course you know what I’m talking about - the solution you’re pretending doesn’t exist, actually does already, in the form of law.

    You’re attempting to set up that false dilemma again by asking me am I saying that women shouldn’t be afraid of transgender people in their spaces. I’d say anyone, regardless of their sex or gender or religion or anything else, who thinks that way of other people, IS bigoted in some way, and their fears aren’t just irrational, they are not sufficient justification to limit other peoples freedoms either.

    There already exists in both Irish and UK law exemptions to the equality acts in certain circumstances, and anyone wishing to discriminate against an individual must have reasonable justification for doing so as a means of achieving a legitimate aim. This is decided on a case by case basis when someone claims they are the victim of unlawful discrimination, such as the doctor in this case, and his belief that he was the victim of discrimination on the basis of his religious beliefs.

    He is unsatisfied with the outcome of the Employment Tribunal and so claims to be taking his case to the High Court. The point is he has recourse in law when he feels he is being treated unjustly. Everyone has that right. Some people wish to deny others that right on the basis that they feel those people are being unreasonable.

    Effectively what they’re saying is that they want the right for themselves to be regarded as being above the law which applies to everyone in society equally, so that they alone have the authority to disregard other peoples rights for whatever reason they wish. I have no doubt you can see why that wouldn’t work, because you’re not stupid, and it doesn’t suit you to pretend you are.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There is no solution here

    Only because some people want to submit to Trans people/activists demands. I honestly don't see any need to do so.

    Considering the extremely small numbers of Trans people, it shouldn't be too much of a problem for them to share a single occupancy unisex toilet or changing room. Most places are already required to have something available for those with disabilities. Something similar for Trans people would a viable alternative, and avoid all this nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    The figures of predatory violence in toilets by trans people are absolutely and utterly negligible.

    Approximately 0.01% of the Irish population have gender recognition certs. This is just completely off the wall hysterics over nothing.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 823 ✭✭✭Liberty_Bear


    I can take on board your point.

    Virtue signalling wokerati sociology PHD types are up there with Billie Eilish and mustard on a list of things that I dont particularly like. The sour taste in my mouth was left with the extraordinary leap that the poster made with his connecting of spaces to the tragic murder of that woman.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ahh well, I honestly don't think the fear of violence by Trans people is the real issue. I think it's more about privacy. While Trans people might consider themselves to have changed, a lot of other people have... reservations, and as such, don't want a man in the female changing rooms. Seems reasonable enough to me, without complaining about potential violence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    The nonsense is that trans women have been using womens toilets for decades and there have been no problem but now you want to ban them because of bigotry.

    We'll need gender police at every toilet.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Fun Fact

    The term Non-Binary was invented by Hollywood celebrities.

    Since the introduction of this term , which is regarded as being under the 'Trans Umbrella, so effectively Trans , the number of official trans people has doubled!

    Here's another fun fact

    Trans people are not a 'group'. They are people with a trait, so in the same way red heads are not a group, neither are Trans people a group.

    Gay people are a 'group' because their trait binds them to other gay people, in a way that being trans doesn't bind them to other trans people.

    It's a bit tricky to legislate for people with a trait, when they aren't a group.

    I think there is no such thing as a big Trans movement, it's all pushed by people who love to upset one's idea of what they believe. I.e. by anarchists. That is why this thread exists.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Yeah but lets face it the vast majority dont care and its a small bigoted minority really.

    And you're happy enough to drop the violence issue simply because the evidence doesnt stack up.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    haha.. no... I want to "ban" them because they're men, claiming to be women, and I believe that women (and men too) are entitled to their own specific facilities (such as bathrooms or changing rooms) that are not shared.

    I've dated post-op Trans women, and... they were still men. Changing elements of the physical doesn't remove decades of experience, nor does claiming you've changed into a woman, mean that they suddenly understand everything a girl or woman has experienced in becoming a woman. Nope. Trans women are still men. Oh, I'll respect their requests that I use their preferred pronouns, won't make obvious remarks about shortcomings in their surgery or voice box, but I'm not going to see them the same as biologically born women, because they're not. When science, and psychology can provide an effective procedure to achieve that, then, I'll reassess my position.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You claimed that the violence was zero. It's not zero. It's happened in the past.... and considering the extremely small numbers of Trans people, using such a figure doesn't mean all that much.

    I dropped the violence aspect because I didn't make any previous claims about violence by Trans people in toilets. Until your claim that it never happened.

    As for minorities... thankfully, Trans activists don't represent actual Trans people. We might get some reasonable changes made, if we can just get rid of the morons who often call others bigots because they're so intolerant of others opinions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I know you have problems with trans people because of your previous experiences which you have previously said on here. You clearly have no respect for them at all by forcing them to you use toilets that dont match their gender. Your position doesnt really matter though at the end of the day. The vast majority of people dont give a crap at all which toilet a trans person uses.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Trans people are not a 'group'. They are people with a trait, so in the same way red heads are not a group, neither are Trans people a group.

    Transgender consists of a collection of beliefs and attitudes, ranging from gender fluid to full-on transitioning (but without the gender shift). It's a group the same way other umbrella groups are formed to represent a wide range of beliefs. And no, Trans covers far more than one single trait...

    Not really a fact. More of an opinion, or an interpretation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Statistically the violence is pretty much close to zero because there are so few cases.

    Its just a complete non problem.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have had good and bad experiences with Trans people. You could try getting some for yourself...

    You see, I'm entitled to my opinion in regards to Trans. Until you can provide scientific evidence proving that physically, and mentally, Trans people can change from being a man to a woman, including the experience of puberty, teens, etc... then yes, I'll wholeheartedly admit that a transgender woman is the same as a biologically born woman. But you won't... because you can't. Science doesn't support your belief. Not even slightly, beyond some theories that haven't been even remotely proven.

    My views being counter to yours, doesn't mean that I disrespect all Trans people. As I said before... Trans activists are the real problem here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Your views on how trans people should be forced to do what you want absolutely shows you disrespect all trans people.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,926 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    It's a bit tricky to legislate for people with a trait, when they aren't a group.

    No it’s not, we simply legislate on the basis of prohibiting discrimination against anyone on the basis of any of the protected characteristics recognised in law.


    I think there is no such thing as a big Trans movement, it's all pushed by people who love to upset one's idea of what they believe. I.e. by anarchists. That is why this thread exists.

    The reason this thread exists became apparent a few pages back - the OP has a bee in his bonnet about Boards policy of prohibiting referring to anyone in a way which is designed to be inflammatory and offensive. Kinda goes with the whole “don’t be a dick” rule which is one of the principles upon which Boards was founded. It’s a bit like the reason the case being discussed exists because the doctor felt he was unable to restrain himself from being a dick, and nobody should be able to do anything about his attitude or behaviour towards others.

    It’s precisely because people don’t have the right to subject other people to unfair treatment that the doctor can’t just address people however he wishes. It’s not because of his religion that he is compelled to address anyone a certain way, the compulsion arises from the fact that he can’t help himself being a dick to other people. Just because he’s a doctor who enjoys a privileged status in society doesn’t mean he can treat other people however he likes. But he knew that already before any employment tribunal.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    A long winded way of saying the op is upset he cant be a dick

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 823 ✭✭✭Liberty_Bear




  • Registered Users Posts: 332 ✭✭MarkEadie


    Cue the "I don't condone attacks/abuse... but I understand why it happens" routine.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'd like to be able to be assured if I send my daughter into a toilet or a changing room designated for women, there would not be a man in there.

    I'd feel the same if I was sending my son into a men's only dressing room or toilet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    And where do you wish to be able to send your trans son or trans daughter?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As I said, my son or daughter would use the designated toilet for their sex if those facilities were segregated by sex.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement