Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Canada Convoy

1171820222332

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    In a time of instant global communication, any big thing that takes off on Twitter or Facebook is going to spread quickly and gather support that isn't necessarily from the country of the issue's origin. Whenever that country is not the US, US donors and/or participants will be a major segment, purely as a result of how dominant they are in terms of numbers in the anglosphere.

    Canada has a bit more than 10% of the US population, so even if half of donors were US donors, it still wouldn't say much about whether an issue was primarily grassroots in the locality.

    A similar thing happened in reverse with BLM donations during the 2020 riots after George Floyd's murder, but in reverse. Millions in donations poured into the US from all over, despite many of the countries donations came from having their own BLM chapters or alternate anti-racism organisations already. It's just a function of technology.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭bertiebomber


    I always said it - get your monies out of the banks, this is why they close branches and promote on line banking so they can shut you out at the drop of a hat. Bury it in the garden just reclaim it from the baxtards. What is happening in Canada should be an awakening for us all, they can all do what True-dick is doing !!



  • Registered Users Posts: 991 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    Should have been in tatters long before given his sordid history of Blackface and Sexual Assault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    That's the conservative transport spokes person, who has done a complete 180.

    She fanned the flames at the start, but now like the vast majority of Canadians want them gone.

    They need to move from the blockades, that's illegal. Whether it's on a bridge, whether it's a pipeline or a highway, we can't have them blocking critical infrastructure,"

    Talk about speaking from both sides of your arsé.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    She called Justin out for shamelessly smearing people as Nazis. Since when has she done a 180 on that stance? You appear to be a bit confused



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    You need to watch the full video, not just the heavily edited exchange posted here.

    Basically she is ranting and raving about a protest she fully supported on one hand and then another calling them criminals that must go.

    Pick a lane FFS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,171 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Is this your opinion or has there been any opinion polls around Trudeau's current actions regarding convoy? I think if truckers were blocking Dublin's streets or bridges with Northern Ireland I doubt any actions against them would be that unpopular.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    The tweet I posted wasn't pertaining to the convoy. So did or did she not do a 180 on Justin smearing people as Nazis?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Huh? What do you think it was pertaining to? 🙄

    Anyway there is the full video, they seem to have forgot to clutch the pearls about the confederate flag.

    Anyway, it's pretty simple she fully supported the protest, until the true colors emerged now she calls them criminals that must go.

    So basically she poured a shít load of petrol on the fire and is now crying wambulance because people are getting burned.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    You can be anti convoy and also anti name calling people as racist, nazis etc.. What's where that woman stands apparently



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    You didn't watch the video obviously, she didn't even mention the comments in her exchange.

    Just a tip, don't watch heavily edited twitter videos and expect to get the full picture.

    But as a rule of thumb, no politician should fully support something on one hand and call them criminals at the same time.

    It's not a great look.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Same polling company

    a majority (68%) say that regardless of political stripe, the politicians who have contributed to or supported these protests should be voted out of office

    a vast majority (82%) say that there is no way this protesting should have gone on as long as it has

     two-thirds (66%) of Canadians support Prime Minister Justin Trudeau bringing in the Emergencies Act to give the federal government extra powers to handle the protests across the country

    This one for me is the most alarming and shows that Canadians are done with the anti vax protest

    a majority (67%) believe that it's time to clear out the protesters in Ottawa, even if it means people who will not leave may get hurt, or worse

    Not a popular one Joe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Protestors generally have demands

    You might think the word is problematic, unlike freezing the legally earned funds of people who have committed no crime 😂

    I do notice you're still avoding the question, why not provide us with your position on each of those demands. The ones I posted thast came from the truckers, not the one that you made up, which one the leaders of protest explicitly denied.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    She demanded an apology from Justin for saying Jewish parliament members support Nazi's. Are you claiming she redacted that demand , last time asking?

    btw , here's Justin taking an absolute shellacking from parliament. He's finished.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    have committed no crime

    You'll need to speak with the conservative transport spokesperson on that, she believes they have.

    They need to move from the blockades, that's illegal. Whether it's on a bridge, whether it's a pipeline or a highway, we can't have them blocking critical infrastructure,"

    As for their "demands" I thought that would be pretty obvious, but for clarity no I don't think a minute fringe of anti vax protesters should get to dictate public heath policy in a pandemic. What sort of bizarro world would that be a good idea?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    What are you talking about?

    Conservative Party members can stand with people who wave swastikas. They can stand with people who wave the Confederate flag.

    We will choose to stand with Canadians who deserve to be able to get to their jobs, to be able to get their lives back. These illegal protests need to stop and they wil.

    What's the problem, was their people at these protests waving flags with confederate and nazi symbols on them?

    Yes or No?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    Stop inserting quotes into your posts and start communicating in a clear and conceive manner.

    You have been asked a very simple question multiple times now. I'll ask it once more - Did Lantsman do a 180 on her comments specifically pertaining to Justin calling people Nazi's?

    Its a very simple question that you should be able to provide a simple answer for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I never claimed she did.

    Maybe read my actual posts and watch the actual video, not a heavily edited twitter link.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    You responded to her comments with a non-sequitur simply because you didn't like that Justin was taking a beating. In other words defending Justin by tarnishing the integrity of Lantsman.

    Plus, there was no heavily edited twitter link. Her attack on Justin was played uninterrupted. Here, just to make it even more clearer for you





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    He didn't accuse her though, did he?

    Conservative Party members can stand with people who wave swastikas. They can stand with people who wave the Confederate flag.

    That's conservative party member MP Michael Cooper. Getting interviewed as he takes a few selfies with these harmless protesters.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And there we have it. You've gone down the line of great reset conspiracies. That's not smearing you, you're absolutely pushing conspiracies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,171 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I would say that poll prompted his hard line approach since majority thought he was too weak on the protests



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    "If there's one thing we've learned from history, it's that the people who censor and punish dissent and bring massive government power to bear on peaceful protestors are definitely always the good guys."

    ~Some of the posters in this thread probably.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,131 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    bollox, it's anti-vaxer loons, a hell of a lot of them of the far right persuasion and rather violent.

    the only ones supporting them are of similar mindsets, the majority of the canadian people want them forcibly removed as they are sick of being terrorised by these violent thugs.

    fine, don't want their children vaccinated or to have to wear a mask, then take them out of school and home school them, following the relevant guidelines of the country in question on such matter, not that i expect the anti-vaxer/anti-masker types would be able to manage that.

    otherwise they get the vaccine like children have got plenty of other vaccines, comply with the mask rule in the school where they are going to if one exists, same as children have to abide by other school rules.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,827 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Also, most of them are puppetry for the WEF (the long game) - 2030.

    And with that one sentence, bertiebomber became bertiebombed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭bertiebomber


    You just seem to target me you are a bully and a stalker so do one !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,343 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.



    Whatever your opinion about vaccine mandates and restrictions, surely any reasonable person would agree that the government giving themselves the power to freeze the bank accounts of people who protest against them is a worrying move? It's a bit social credity isn't it? To compel private companies to follow their orders under threat of jail? Imagine if trump had tried similar tactics with blm. It wouldn't be acceptable then and it isn't acceptable now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    a majority (68%) say that regardless of political stripe, the politicians who have contributed to or supported these protests should be voted out of office

    a vast majority (82%) say that there is no way this protesting should have gone on as long as it has

     two-thirds (66%) of Canadians support Prime Minister Justin Trudeau bringing in the Emergencies Act to give the federal government extra powers to handle the protests across the country

    a majority (67%) believe that it's time to clear out the protesters in Ottawa, even if it means people who will not leave may get hurt, or worse


    Authoritarian regimes always, and by their very nature, stem from populist opinion which discards, punishes and often murders its opponents in a frenzy of righteous moral outrage.

    Understanding this remedial-level lesson from history is exactly why liberal societies have created laws which protect the right to speak, even when the words are an insult; to protest, even when the protest is inconvenient; and to assemble, even when assembly obstructs the regime's aims.

    Desecrating those laws for the sake of convenience and in service to populist rage and wishes of harm and death has never led, and will never lead, anywhere good. You would think that people who still froth at the mouth at the mere mention of the name Trump would understand why setting such precedents is unwise in the extreme, whatever good feeling they get in their peepee at the prospect of seeing their political opponents bloodied and murdered on the streets.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,923 ✭✭✭growleaves


    The vaccine mandates are themselves isomorphic to a social credit system. We seem to forget how extreme disemploying people is.

    Lech Walesa was prevented from working as an electrician in Soviet-controlled Poland for organising an independent trade union.

    In China, people who are on Tier D of the social credit system (the lowest tier) are disemployed and receive regular visits from government officials (which is, or may soon be, the situation in Austria).

    Many ordinary people, including many posters here, have made a calculation to side with power. That's all it is.

    When you see posters calling for protestors to be shot dead, that more or less tells you that you ought not to waste time "debating" with these posters ever again. As if what these posters think about 2km travel limits or the budget could be of any interest whatsoever.



Advertisement