Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

3 New Navy Vessels for Irish Naval Service

Options
19899101103104163

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Presumably its formation looked towards East (there used to be 2 ASM units in Dublin) South and West. It grew from the Maritime Inscription who's role was based around Port control, and the 4 main ports at the time being Dublin, Waterford, Cork and Limerick/Shannon Estuary. Our organisation has been token in that regard for some time.

    Worth noting that ASM was formed from an already existing body, and the NS predecessor lacked the skilled staff required to train the Maritime inscription's successor in their new role, as it itself had only just been created having absorbed some of the vessels from the old organisation under a new command structure.

    Very interesting write-up about the early history of the Irish Naval presence.

    ThenavalforcesoftheIrishstate.pdf (maynoothuniversity.ie)



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,874 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I'm not talking about the Boom years suggestion of relocating Dublin Port, I'm talking about the proposal being pursued by Drogheda Port Company right now. As it is a smaller project and not a replacement for Dublin Port, Gormanstown is not required. There is a tender out for financial and economic consultancy services right now;

    As I alluded to in my post, the new port is unlikely to be viable on a purely commercial basis, DoD getting involved could make it viable. The advantage for DoD would be having a blank canvas to create a modern port, rather than trying to integrate into an existing port and the security challenges that would bring (assuming there is even an existing east coast port which will have them). Its operation being linked with Gormanstown could also alleviate some of the challenges of space restrictions at other locations. Time it would require to have operational would certainly be a problem though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    It's not "Boom time", its a current position, there was only an article this week in the papers suggesting it, and yes the developers for that new dock have asked for Gormanstown, again this isn't something from the Celtic Tiger, but a current ask. And really with the pivot to direct shipping to the rest of the EU, I'm not sure why the case is even being tried, other than wanting the landbank in Dublin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,874 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Removing port facilities in Dublin and replacing at Bremore was a policy of the PDs, if not the government they were part of. There is no such policy now and the only plans are to strengthen Dublin Port in its current location. Any articles you see now and people wondering "what if" but it's not going to happen.

    Bremore is a plan from Drogheda Port Company, they are pursuing it in spite of Dublin Ports expansion. Like I said, it's hard to see that being commercially viable but maybe there's an opportunity for the NS to "buy in" to it for the benefit of both.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,080 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Wild horses couldn't drag NS personnel to billet in some kip like Bremore. And given the service strength right now, they could afford to be fussy.

    Dun Laoghaire or Wicklow. And Dun Laoghaire ftw.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,832 ✭✭✭Alkers


    Having built the Dublin tunnel, it will never happen



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I agree, doesn't stop a fairly regular commentary and proposals about how it would magically solve all of Dublin's housing issues.



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    The provision of Ports and Airports to meet National Strategic and commercial needs is a task of Government. Unfortunately the "P" in PPP is often hidden money with parallel gain objectives. Many named developers are NOT spending their own private money as many have no liquid assets but are backed by varieties of Vulture Funds. Deliberately destabilising an existing port by siphoning away cargo traffic is the equivalent of empty commercial properties in Cork, Dublin and elsewhere, with Flag businesses moving or closing down.

    As regards the "boats" statistically one could be based in Dublin area and one in Cork and one in Limerick and Waterford. Navigationally they are to be equipped to OPV standards with ECDIS etc. Berthing possibly within a secure marina but preferentially a secure Naval Berth like a secure gated floating dock system like White point Cobh or Monkstown also in Cork harbour.



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Forget Waterford put it beside beleview in kilkenny



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Rosslare not a goer?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Why waste limited resources and manpower on the south east at all? Dublin covers the east coast and Cork the south coast. After that something between Galway and Donegal for the western sea area, if there is money left over in the kitty.

    In other news, it will be interesting to see what boats the RN get their hands on for immigration patrols in the English Channel and how that lease deal is structured.




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Theres a huge jump between the RN saying they won't be chasing migrants because the sides are too high, and the RN seeking to lease suitable vessels to do the job. The RN Top scrambled egg are on record saying it is not their job.

    Also, he's talking shite. The Irish NS were rescuing people from dinghys in the Med using similar size vessels as the RN OPV fleet. At the ends he contradicts himself by saying the RN and Marines can't do the job because they are not warranted.

    British navy rejects plan to push back Channel migrant boats | Reuters

    Royal Navy rejects Priti Patel’s ‘illegal’ plan to push back Channel migrant boats | News | The Times



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,080 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Favourite for RN migration boat specification....



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,747 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Dont really have any sympathy for the british on regards to there migration issue. What was the joke tommy tiernan had, he couldnt understand the english they invade half the planet and then get upset when those people that country where invaded follow them home



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    It's in the Tory's interest to have a constant stream of migrants. Expect a lot of speeches announcing schemes and initiatives, but nothing actually done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    In all countries there are a bank of jobs that are regarded as only doable by well educated, nicely turned out young people. These jobs are where the worker is in direct contact with customers as in shops .hotels, gastro-pubs etc. The target staff are often students or married females that want a few hours. In general where Hotel groups find indigenous staff are too difficult to employ they will find ways to recruit from abroad.

    The Irish staffs wouldn't regard such jobs as a career but those coming in from abroad settle in permanently more readily. Our population is well over 5m. I believe it is much higher due to burgeoning tax takes. The State thinks there may be 150,000 un-registered citizens in addition to all the EU free to travel cohort.

    If we now take global unrest and population dissatisfaction we will see an increase in migration attempts providing a steady pool of work at anything migrants.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,285 ✭✭✭source


    Revenue are looking to replace their 2 cutters.


    Customs service to spend €20 million on new boats to help tackle drug trade  https://jrnl.ie/5684730



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,080 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They evidently intend to make the replacements much more capable vessels. The latter of the two current, Faire, cost €2.3m at 2008 values. Although with runaway inflation, maybe 20 mil won't actually get them much more than the outgoing models.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    It is difficult at times to follow the logic of purchasing certain capital items and not following through on the need to maintain a steady programme of use, training and manning. It's not clear how revenue operate and qualify. Initially there was some naval assistance. Bigger vessels will need a different and higher level of crewing with access to maintenance facilities.

    Our history is bad when things get problematic like the ceasing of ASW after Cliona's fire and the stripping back of ship capabilities when refurbishment is considered too expensive. We need a whole package approach when the State acquires vessels such as a dedicated Home port and dedicated Berths at other ports for stationing or temporary deployment. Likewise we must maintain capability of vessels and update as required.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    When the Customs got their boats, the only concern was yachts bringing stuff in from North Africa.

    Now suddenly the border in the Irish Sea may mean they need to be able to go much further, for longer.

    €2.3m adjusted for inflation is the same as €2.4m today.

    CPI Inflation Calculator - CSO - Central Statistics Office



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,080 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I'm glad to hear then, that the two boats will be a deal more capable, for the reasons you describe.

    But at the end of the day, two boats is still two boats, even with a greater increase in systems capability and offshore seakeeping, its not a much larger footprint. It must be twinned with greater naval capacity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,832 ✭✭✭Alkers


    What's wrong with the current boats? They are new enough to be getting rid off rather than getting extra boats in addition to



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,080 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The CPI deals with baskets of consumer goods and services, many of which are kept at artificially low prices by the retail multiples squeezing suppliers and using loss leaders.

    For something like these boats, the cost of raw materials like aluminium and zinc has gone up 30% in the last year alone and over 50% since the crash prices of 2008. 2.3m is more realistically 3.75m at this point. It still means that at a 10m delivery price, the boats will be more capable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,080 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They aren't built of steel like naval ships, they are lightweight, largely aluminium, launches. And so service life is not really something that can be ignored. They do take a pounding in Irish coastal waters and as we see above, the new boats are obviously intended to be much more capable.

    Keeping these two on would also increase the manpower requirement of Revenue Customs by between 24 and 36. That's not a cost they can absorb with current budget.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,747 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    A few questions on the custom cutters Mod if its a security issue please remove.

    1. If the cutters are on a raid there is a chance the criminals are armed. Do the cutters have the navy just over the horizan on speed dial just in case something goes wrong?

    2. The soon to be retired Cutters could they see any service life with an expanded Naval Reserve for port duties at new locations if they where transfered?



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Those are exactly the questions that should be analysed and answered. Cutters are an enforcement asset. Currently we rely in policing on the Bank Door principal that citizens are compliant and won't enter a bank with locked doors. Only robbers do that and armed police respond usually. On the matter of future cutter use that question should also be answered with necessary refitting and updating.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    1. Yes.
    2. No. NS have already looked at them, and actually operated them when they first arrived, and have deemed they are not suitable for NS or NSR use. Their operation requires crew to be qualified to a high (and somewhat unique) standard, and not within the skillset of those who would only be operating them on a part-time basis. In addition the launches operated are different to those used by the NS and NSR.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    While that may be the case in the UK, it is not the case in Ireland. The basket is reviewed every 5 years, and only includes full price items.

    The boat is not made of just aluminium and zinc. Manufacturing, equipping and labour costs would be in line with the CPI. Given that many contracts use the CPI as an index, I'd be willing to assert the valuation is accurate, in this case.



Advertisement