Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
11681691711731743691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,947 ✭✭✭circadian


    I'd hardly be looking at Stalin as a paragon. Sure, the Soviets were instrumental in winning the war, as was everyone else involved.

    Stalin was, however, a lunatic and was the cause of millions of deaths.



    Either way, this has nothing to do with thr discussion at hand. Good distraction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,876 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Troll Thread derail tactic no. xxx, start some stupid stale discussion about who "won" WW2, who was the most evil dictator (lads on here will tend to give good old Joe Stalin the benefit of the doubt I'd guess! The man was under pressure, you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs!), who had the best tank etc etc. Yawn.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Cheerful S


    My form none of your concern. Back on topic. This imminent war headline appeared in the media for weeks. Still no invasion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,301 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    This is nonsense. Obviously so when all you acknowledge is Western material aid and repeatedly ignore for example things like air superiority which the Soviets would not have been able to achieve in 1944 without the Luftwaffe focusing on defence of Germany. Or all the tanks that never made it to the Eastern front because they never made it out of the factory.

    So no the laurels dont belong to dictator Stalin because he was culpable in the deaths of many of those Soviet citizens through his alliance with the Nazis and purge of red army - which strengthened the Nazis and left Soviets vulnerable to assault.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Irish Embassy working hard to ensure all surrogate born babies get out of Ukraine. https://www.thejournal.ie/ukraine-surrogacy-simon-coveney-5688453-Feb2022/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr



    America defeated the Germans, Italians and Japanese. It was their resources and ability to project force that defeated all three Axis powers. Plus they did so with lighter casualties than everyone else.

    I'm simply stating the obvious: that without US resources Stalins troops would have faced the Germans on foot, barefoot, with only bayonets. The US supplied all of that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,153 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    True. I think it was Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev who said that. Maybe they both did? Without that extra help Russia woild have collapsed even if they ultimately did most of the dying and killing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,646 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog




  • Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Apparently the Russians are saying they are not familiar with any such reports. Very odd. News editor from Moscow Times asking on twitter for people to share any such reports (apparently she has looked and couldn't find any).



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Why are you trying to deflect with atrocities committed by Stalin? Do you hate Russia so much you cannot accept the simple facts of history that the Soviet Union played by FAR the biggest role in defeating Hitler.The Soviets couldn't have defeated Hitler without help from America I agree.

    I agree with you, everyone was instrumental in winning the war, from Russia to Australia they all played their part.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Cheerful S


    Off-topic but Harry is correct. This is a great documentary to understand the western version of the war is very incorrect.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97iOxxH_64s&ab_channel=StarMediaEN

    Russian generals were master tacticians and often outclassed the Nazi generals on the battlefield. Often think the Nazis lost because of the weather, not a fact all most of the Russian victories occurred during the summer and springtime. They developed new tanks, missiles, and guns all by themselves in the factories of Siberia. Some of the weapons were highly advanced Nazis had nothing like it.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,310 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I seem to recall reading a lovely phrase in one of my text books recently: It took the world's most homicidal regime to defeat the world's most genocidal regime.

    Had not the Soviet leadership completely dismembered its army just before the war, they would have had no need to claim that they had lost so many times more men than the other Allies because they would have been vaguely competent to begin with, unlike, say, the British which started out the gate with a vague idea what it was doing.

    As it was it was fortunate that the Soviets had invaded Finland and Poland without cause in order to drive home just how badly they had messed up their army. Their losses to Germany could have been even worse had they been good neighbors.

    All entirely unrelated to the amount of Russian assets currently poised to invade Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,301 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And the Soviets had jet fighters, v2 rockets, snorkel subs, anti bomber tech did they?

    Utter nonsense not going to engage with this red herring anymore

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,652 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Are most of the commentators on this thread in their late teens, early 20's.

    I was foolishly under the impression that there would be some serious, logical discussion about the issues pertaining to the current situation in Russia/Ukraine. ( My interests are purely military strategy in nature).

    Instead, we get one poster who's favourite word seems to be "gaslighting", used in contexts that suggest a misinterpretation of the word and another multi-post contributer who refers to some as "putinbots" etc.

    Both keyboard warriors, among many others, seem to have way too much time on their hands and basically clog up an otherwise interesting thread with vacuous nonsense.

    Having witnessed both the West and Russians ( Chechyn MP's) at work in Syria over the years, its pretty clear how way off the mark many, many posters are in their assumptions.

    It's basically like this: The Russians don't #$@! around, because they cannot afford to overreact.

    The West always f#$#! around, because they can always afford to overreact. The West can also always be manipulated into overreacting.

    Russia will do precisely what it needs to do, nothing more.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,947 ✭✭✭circadian


    Why are you deflecting from the current issue at hand? If you want to debate the finer details of WW2 then start your own thread. I'm sure the holocaust denier Cheerful Spring would be more than happy to join you in that one.



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So the West can overreact because it can and it can also be tricked to overreact but Russia can't overreact so their plan is to trick "the West" into overreacting so then Russia can react to the overreaction?

    That's some 7D chess right there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @greenpilot Having witnessed both the West and Russians ( Chechyn MP's) at work in Syria over the years, its pretty clear how way off the mark many, many posters are in their assumptions.

    You've been to Syria ,

    Seems we've a few people who have seen the situation in Syria on the ground



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Cheerful S


    Why did the Germans lose the east then? D Day was the second half of 1944. Russia was fighting the Nazis since 1942. Watch the documentary may learn something, Soviet weaponry got better as time passed, they show all the advancements in this doc. By the way, the Kalashnikov rifle is still one of the best guns ever made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Nothing was really overestimated with Soviet army losses. The lowest estimate I could find anywhere online in regards to Soviet losses was 8 million. The highest I could find was find was 15 million. I claimed it was ten million which is the main historically agreed estimate on Soviet losses.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Northernlily


    He's flexing and toying and has the fear put into Western Media and Leaders with his Belarusian crony. Nothing huge will happen.

    He has people everywhere riled up and is probably enjoying it.

    Ignore him and he'll quieten.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,482 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Fear to what end though? No concessions have been secured whatsoever it would appear. A fairly failed strategy considering the large amount of military aid Ukraine is now receiving as a result of this crisis.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,367 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    Has somebody stolen some of your words, or what’s the story with this post?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    1 in 3 Pregnancies end with the child being killed.


    He should outlaw abortion bar certain exemptions and have very severe penalties for providing it outside of that, very severe. More in his line to help Russia rather than going off in a jaunt in to Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    People don't understand how Ukraine and Russia are viewed as one in Russia.


    Rus, comes from the Kievan Rus.


    Russia started in Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,305 ✭✭✭Man Vs ManUre


    Russia, I know it’s a bit annoying someone in Kyiv keeps trying to login to my Instagram, but I wasn’t asking you to invade on my behalf.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But most understand Ukraine is a sovereign state who see ukraine as no threat whatsoever to Russia or it's security



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭pcardin


    Can any of Kremlin bots here explain me a difference between Adolf and Vladimir, and National Socialist German Workers' Party and Yedinaya Rossiya?




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,434 ✭✭✭jmreire


    When you use the word deluded Harry, check if it applies to yourself first,,,the US has always paid compensation to innocent victims of their attacks, A simple "Google" check would have told you that, but you are so anti-American, it clouds your judgement. As for ISIS et al, they have been around a long time before either Iraq or any of the recent wars....They go back to the time of Mohammad, if you want to see when it started. Its called Wahhabism, and its primary aim is to convert the whole world to Islam....it has had many names throughout history, isis being a more modern one. They were fighting the Russians in Chechnya ( and the locals as well, even then killing the unbelievers ) Their primary purpose in Life, even in todays world is still to kill the enemy's of Islam, and convert the unbelievers. And that was what the Islamic Caliphate was about in Syria and Iraq.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,646 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement