Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why is the Irish Labour party such a failure ?

2456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,912 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Hard to disagree. But I think the seeds were sown how Labour was always the 'little brother at best' in Irish politics went back further still.

    When Labour stood aside in 1918 for a Sinn Fein v The Irish Parliamentary Party showdown.

    Then to make matters worse Labour did not contest the 1921 elections.

    When Labour reached their strongest point they went more central and got rid of the leftist factions in the 1990's. Ever since then I think Labour has had no identity. And has been usurped not only by SF but by PUP and leftist independents.

    Basically now no ordinary person on the street can definitively say what Labour stands for. I predict the Social Democrats will end up over taking Labour as well and that will be the final insult.

    A charismatic leader of the Labour party is one hope. But Alan Kelly is so bland and non descript it sums up Labour's problems!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,942 ✭✭✭growleaves


    'But Alan Kelly is so bland and non descript it sums up Labour's problems!'

    Ah so he isn't a Labour-saving device?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Labour could have been the larger partner in a non civil war party government today but they kept selling out for a seat at the power table. Nobody trusts them and its a top down problem. They need sack the backroom decision makers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,676 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Its a far cry from "Gilmore for Taoiseach" Labour are now.

    They are fighting for the same voters as the Soc Dems, the Greens and even SF now also want a slice of the university educated middle class liberal vote.

    Its also a problem for Labour, the Soc Dems and the Greens that most of their vote base is in more well off urban areas so its a small pond the 3 of them are fishing for votes in.



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Aydin Quaint U-boat


    The Labour under Corbyn that led to Labour having the highest political party membership in all of Europe?

    The Labour under Corbyn that returned Labour to its roots of being a workers party?

    Had Corbyn come out and said "We've had the referendum, we're going to abide by the result", he'd still be Labour leader and quite possibly Prime Minister. His decision to listen to the likes of Starmer to push for the second referendum was Corbyn's death knell.

    If you think Corbyn was merely identity politics, you're a halfwit.

    Irish Labour Party could certainly learn lessons from Corbyn's Labour but for a totally different reasons to your nonsense above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,676 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Problem with Labour is they shifted too right towards the centre.. to the point that not a lot distinguishes them fro FF/FG… because of that vacuum they have caused we have the resurgence of Sinn Fein.

    there has been and is a dearth of talent in labour….from the top down… Gilmore, Burton and Howlin as leaders.. no, sorry. As much charisma and relatability and help to real working people as a paper statue in a hurricane …. Alan Kelly seems to do nothing but sow division and again no charisma, talks to please, every interview or speech is a call for votes as opposed to seducing people by outlining a fair set of proposals that can be the pillars of re establishing this country as a fair, rewarding and prosperous country for its citizens but no…. Citizens and our wellbeing are not his priority … he is pushing for and end to mask wearing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,456 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    I think the takeover by democratic left did them no favours



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    It might have won them the election but it would have decimated their youth vote. Corbyn sat on the fence because Labour members/voters were remain-leaning but most Labour constituencies voted leave.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    How would you know if my Mrs. is doing it cynically or in earnest?

    Does it just have the connotations when she's trying to get elected? What if my Mrs. gets promoted to running a regional social service in a region she doesn't come from. Does that have negative connotations thst she's doing it cynically and views the service users as useful idiots?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I'm not sure why you are mixing in elections? Unless your missus is running for election.


    Lets suppose your missus is trying to effect some change. Lets suppose she works with education of early school leavers (replace that with whatever you want). Suppose she goes for a job managing the local centre because she wants to make some things better for the people. She comes second in the interview process. Then she later hears that the person who got the job, just applied because it was a good salary and pension. That person was trying to get a promotion in the Department of Finance but couldn't cut the grade.

    But they heard about the managers job and realised it would be a handy number if you didn't actually want to bother your hole improving anything - just turn up and get the paycheque. They did well at their interview by bamboozling the interviewers with buzz words and by telling them how the centre was currently getting shafted by the government. Once they get their feet under the table, they spend their day on facebook and youtube. You missus knows that the person doesn't actually give a sh1te about the role or the kids, even though they make the odd ruckus in public to make sure they have board support. Would your missus say "fair play to them" or would she think that the person was wrong to parachute themselves in by pretending they were actually interested in the work and the people? The person just pretended to give a crap to get a handy number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,912 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    And it is all the more galling when you see how SF has created a Public Relations image of the 'party of the people', Despite having a leader from the leafy suburb of Rathgar. And voting against many housing developments.

    SF have created such a brand they can even let anyone run under the 'brand' of SF and they will get elected. In contrast Labour do not seem to know how to play the PR game. How many people would even recognise Alan Kelly if he walked down O'Connell Street??

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,456 ✭✭✭jmcc


    A bunch of pension tourists who were only interested in ministerial salaries and pensions. Yet another political party ruined by these chancers. If they had stayed out of government in 2011, SF would never have gained the electoral traction that it did and become the official opposition while the wannabe FGers in FF signed the Collaboration and Surrender agreement in 2016 which effectively ended FF as a party. The electorate now seems to consider FF and FG to be the same party and opinion polls have suggested that second choice votes are staying within FF/FG. Labour has absolutely failed to exploit the incompetence of FFG and there really isnt a place for yet another Right of centre YATSE party in Irish politics.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I am rolling around laughing at this thread. It will be interesting to see the reality of having to wield power and how that effects SF and it's supporters.

    At present I am still not buying that SF will be in power after the next election. FF, FG and the Green party are running at 50% in the polls at present. SF at 35%, unless this radically changed SF will not enter power.

    SF will cannibalise the other parties of the left ( except Labour who do not get SF preferences to get elected) and take virtually all there seats. They will also take some seats from the independents.

    S/PBP will not have 4 seats after the next election on 1% of the vote, the SD will not have 6 TD's on 2% of the vote. 35% of the vote will give SF about 60-70 seats max but by maximising the vote they will cannibalise the rest of the left parties.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    That's the point!

    She could do some work there over time and try to spread her "ideas" if they were the main thing. But that wouldn't get her into the big job. So she's happy to parachute into another area and play to the voters there just to get elected.

    The same MLM who began her life as a member of FF (and presumably didn't get far there based on her ability ... but recognised that she would might be able to leverage off her background as a relative novelty over in SF)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,322 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    The fact they willingly selected Alan Kelly as their leader sums them up....a shambles...won't be getting my vote. It's a shame because they have some decent people at least at councillor level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,586 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    But they call FG the posh boys.


    Thats the hypocrisy.

    MML Eoin O Brion privately educated just like the people they call posh.


    It’s childish nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭kk.man


    I always said Brendan Howlin had a massive part to play in labours demise. The most knife cutting minister ever in power and FG just enjoyed the ride. Even near the end of his tenure when things were picking up he continued to cut and save. Socialism not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Their target audience isn't and never was large enough here i.e. Working class urban. Most Irish people are/were rural and own property and the well to do urbanites even in manual occupations (former working class?) see themselves are middle class.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yes indeed . My view of Labour is coloured since the 1990s by their ministers in government .

    Howlin an arrogant health minister who just cut , cut , cut during his time as Health Minister .

    Dick Spring and all his 'aides ' and relations getting jobs licking envelopes and being paid large salaries in the rainbow government.

    Ruairi Quinn ensuring most families were less able to afford to send their children to college by raising the registration fees.

    Alan Kelly as an impotent blustering housing minister who thought that he could solve the housing crisis by reversing progressive decisions on apartment sizes which so far has only benefited property developers yet again.

    Aodhán who according to his own mother was christened Aidan , and only changed his name when he was mid degree in a Dublin university . According to her on a TV interview , he came in the door one day with his college scarf on , saying " No ! Call me Aodhán! "

    And Pat Rabbitte talking with such cynicism and sarcasm about the inevitability of broken election promises once a party gets into government...that was the final kick in the teeth for many a loyal labour supporter .

    Certainly was the end for me anyway .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭kk.man


    I think Howlins days as minister for public expenditure was the worst. He actually took pride in the medication his dished out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    What do you think FG supported by Shane Ross and Healy Rae and other cowboys would have done with a free hand in Government? Anything that wasn’t nailed down would have been flogged in a fire sale, Coillte, ESB, every square inch of land. You think the prices we’re paying now are high?


    They would also have torn down the social welfare system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yes . Some doozy alright . His mission was to bring health in on budget even if it killed everyone .

    And can't forget Joan Burton who was the most stringent ( and strident!) Minister for Social Protection who took her job so seriously after the crash that she was thereafter known for Protection of Social Welfare from its recipients . She setup the infamous phone line for neighbours to snitch on their neighbours , regardless of whether they had proof of social welfare fraud or not.

    She was a bluer, blue shirt than anything generated by young Fine Gael .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭kk.man


    Hey don't knock FG...lol...ah no I hear ya but labour and socialism doesn't fit...they always went down hill after some good elections because they never lived up with the idealism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,107 ✭✭✭amacca


    Don't forget Ruari Quinns disastrous education "reforms" .....an ill thought out vanity project to put it gently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Nobody has ever described Michael D as " unassuming "



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,942 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I saw him give a lecture before and he didn't seem pretentious at all, just genuinely interested in the subject.

    I know he's controversial because of his politics but I never get the sense that he's talking down to anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭kk.man


    He would not be my cup of tea but there is no denying his popularity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Just a very clever and very idealistic man .

    Not gone on the accent, but tbh am fond of him other than that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    No party suits really , just bits of different politicians and policies, all mixed up.

    I suspect that is true of a lot of people in this country and why we find it hard to move away from the same old parties .

    I like Roisin Shortfall, but the SDs will never have enough to really get anywhere .

    Ivana Bacik has been a hero but now she is under the labour party whip ( who is that, btw?) who knows what direction she will take ?

    I do like McEntee despite her FG roots .

    This is becoming a list of women, bit biased? Can't think of many male politicians I particularly rate , if I am being truthful. Not off the top of my head . John Hume, Lemass , all dead and gone .

    Post edited by Goldengirl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    The Irish Labour Party was always the party of the suburban, right thinking middle classes rather than the working class, they're more akin to the British SDP or Liberals than the British Labour Party. FF hoovered up most of the working class vote for most of its history, especially in rural areas.

    Now that all the major parties in Ireland are Social Democrat Liberal outfits there is no reason for Labour to exist.



  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Cal4567


    Yes, too many parties fighting over the same social democrat liberal issues, which these days appear to be dominated by identity politics. Add in our rather unique rural population which as another poster has stated, is largely property owning. Also still hard to see any difference between Labour and the Social Dems. Is there any?

    One or two of these parties of the Left probably won't exist after the next election. I wonder if some individuals will start to be courted by SF. For said individuals, it could mean the only opportunity they'll realistically have to get their hands on any power. Up against that, their differences over policy will appear trivial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭kk.man


    I agree Mc Entee is class there is something 'human' about her. John Hume was a good one but a very unstated politician was Seamus Mallon. In general politicians are politicians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,024 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Notwithstanding their appalling time, last time they were in government, for which most grass root supporters will NEVER Ever forgive them for the decisions they made, it would seem to me the Alan Kelly starts every contribution in the Dail, praising a various minister or policy and then proceeds to lambast same. Aodhán Ó Ríordáin is just all over the place and both in essence have been the best spokespeople this current awful government could possibly hope for.

    Brendan Howlin, god bless him is still living in the past.

    I'd give Jed Nash and Duncan Smith some credit trying to keep this S**T show on the road, both have made some decent contributions. Sean Sherlock, a mystery, can't recall hearing as much of a whisper from him lately, Ivana Bacik reminds me of Marmite (Love or Hate) but regardless of her undoubted abilities, a little late coming to the party.

    In essence, I for one not at all sure what it is this party stands for, utterly incoherent in every respect, but the primary reason for their failure is an inability to connect with the electorate along with some pretty dreadful performances over the past few years.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It got them one of their biggest vote shares ever. It was the stepping down of the DL guys who were replaced by FG apologists that killed them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,426 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Throughout the history of the state Labour have been a failure, not just recently as many are alluding to.

    I think the reason is that back at the time of the run up to the formation of the state what is now the republic had very little industry and thus never had a strong base for something like a labour movement.

    All the heavy industry was in Belfast.

    It had steel, shipbuilding etc.

    Dublin only had small industries like rope making, distilling, brewing etc.

    We were mainly a agricultural.

    So they never had a base to build on in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Corbyn was a massive boost to the youth vote for Labour. I was in heavily Labour heavily remain London at the time and youth support for him was massive despite we all knowing he was at best a very soft remainer but had suspicion he was old school anti EU labour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I voted for Labour in that election and thought the coalition was the right call. Bit they should have pulled the plug when Gilmore stepped down or maybe even before when FG wouldn't let Quinn go after church land to pay off all the money owed from the child molestation payouts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Already happened, SF is now stuffed with Labour and dolly mixture left types, they know where the wages are on the left now. Their rainbow battalion of toddlers would be more comfortable with green party types than "the lads" from the old days that SF still occasionally pay lip service to



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,857 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I don't think they had much room for maneuver once they entered that government; we were in a bailout programme and obliged to follow austerity measures. Their real misstep was making a load of promises before the 2011 election they must have known they would be unable to honour.

    IMO those broken promises and their failure to do a proper mea culpa for them along these lines


    are responsible for Labour's failure to regain the trust of left-leaning voters. And as others have pointed out those voters have plenty of other options.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ok, so my mrs wouldnt know any of this stuff, she would have to assume it. And this is precisely the kind of purity test that's applied to anyone who purposes policies to actually make things better. But isn't applied to a politician who will propose any policy thst sounds popular with the general outline regardless of of how it affects to the service users.

    You demonstrat that in how you've set up the scenario that the labour candidate has moved constituency so take a place from a more deserving candidate, and bamboozle people with buzzwords and bluff. But you don't know that. It's just an assumption. It's an additional purity test that only applies to politicians who act on behalf of people less well off then themselves - and the assumption is that they fail the test. Lazily summed up in the phrase "champagne/smoked salmon socialist".



  • Registered Users Posts: 583 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    As said before, they lack the calibre of previous generations - Gilmore, Rabbitte, Quinn, De Rossa and others had strong personalities and trade union / student union backgrounds, as well as being capable ministers. Alan Kelly has a strong personality but little else, and O Riordain has nothing.

    They are also, like all left wing parties in Ireland at the moment, being deprived of oxygen by an ascendent SF, whose populist anger and policies are enticing depressingly many people. Many of Labour’s working class voters would have been instinctively nationalist, so a party that prioritises Irish unification and extensive wealth redistribution was always going to undercut Labour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    People who vote for minority parties surely need to have the cop on to know that at best they will get a few promises passed in government.

    SF don't get everything they promise out of Stormont and FF, Greens and FG don't get everything they want from the coalition and generally if your metric is broken promises then no party anywhere in a democracy passes.

    How you conduct yourself in a coalition is the issue. The Greens backed crooked Bertie and Labour spent more time backing up FG than pushing what they got out of the coalition and both rightly paid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Why should someone stick only to their local area? She probably sees herself as doing even more good by shaping the parties national policy.

    Look, it's easy to see why you might prefer someone you don't like stay in a harmless area whee they can never realistically get elected.

    Do you apply the same standard to other politicians? What's MM doing above in Dublin, running the whole government? Shut he's from Cork. Maybe everyone should stay in their constituency and never aspire for more. Maybe they shouldn't try to represent a whole constituency. Maybe they should stick to local councils. Or maybe whole councils are too big, maybe they should just represent their townsland or maybe just their street.

    This is a purity test only applied to left wing candidates (with the built in assumption thst theyre playing the voters. MM and LV can run the national government and that's fine, but a left wing candidate moves from a constituency they can't realistically win so they can lead their party and that's seen as wrong? Better to run a tiny, probably part-time SF office in Rathgar, than lead the national party?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Indeed.

    Dev's Fianna Fail positioned it's as the party of the working man, Bertie made a fetish of being a 'man of the people' - i.e populist.

    Leo's FG promised to look after those who get up early - i.e. populist.

    Honestly - the term gets flung around like snuff at a wake when people want to have a dig at (usually ) Left(ish) parties but is strangely absent when populist promises like abolishing rates or the USC are bandied about

    No party in a democracy will gain power by appealing only to the elite - they all need populist polices (i.e. those the non-elite find attractive) to gain enough votes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    All Stickies (bar Quinn). Once their Russian paymasters went out of business, they took over the Labour party and used it to feather their own nests.

    A match well made 😂



  • Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    My Father was LABOUR all his life & I guess I inherited that.......im ashamed of it now but for many elections I canvassed & voted LABOUR. They failed when they got into bed & became a mudgard for FF who, in hindsight, played them like a fiddle. The straw that eventually broke the camels back....that turned me totally against the Labour party was when the lovely Joan casually did away with the bereavement grant....no fanfare....no hullabaloo......just a " oh yeah the bereavement grant is gone too". It was basically a leg-up to help with funeral expenses ( I think it was €850 when she scrapped it) . Someone, having contributed to society all their life, paid taxes, on their passing their next of kin got a modest grant towards their bereavement & she scrapped that though the saving to the government was/is minimal. Obviously, there was a myriad of other reasons but that was the clincher for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Problem for labour was they over promised in 2011 to get into power. Most of there promises were never going to be possible to uphold.

    As FG were getting within a whisker of an overall majority Labour made promises to middle Ireland ( on college fees and taxation) that it could never uphold.

    When FG were not close to an overall majority, Labour should have toned down there promises and left FG gain that overall majority. They would have been the main opposition and FF would have not recovered within one cycle.

    Pulling the plug half way through was never an option. It's funny by Labour really protected the unemployed and those depending on SW during this period but these people never thank you as SF will find out.

    Middle Ireland never forgave them because of the broken promises

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    That's not what the term means really. Populist and popular are not the same.

    FG were always the party of the "get up early" people which is code for the middle class who believe they got where they are through graft and poorer people are just not getting up out of bed early enough to be rich.

    FF have always had a fetish for big state building projects (although I agree on the man of the people Bertie shte)

    Populist is things like SF banging on about the "unelected bureaucracts in Brussels" and then suddenly being massively pro EU when the tide turned after Brexit.

    LePen is the same switching from anti EU to anti Euro and those ejits at M5S in Italy seem to have a new direction every week.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement