Cleopatra's Affairs with Roman Emperors

I watched Carry On Cleo a number of times and there was no sign of Jaysus in it.

Tell us more about these "various Roman calendars" that have discrepancies of 30 years or more from one another. Otherwise we might think you were just pulling stuff out of your arse, and you wouldn't want that, would you?

You’re thinking of Star Wars OP

None of you seem to be taking the ‘Phantom Time Hypothesis’ into account.

I'm sure I'm going to regret saying this but that hypothesis doesn't hold water. Observations of solar eclipses show it to be incorrect.

Is Dan Brown off his meds and posting in After Hours again?

I apologise. It was unfair of me to do that.

But the entire village were drug addicts. So may not be reliable witnesses.

Just because words begin with a single syllable word it doesn't mean they share linguistic similarities. We should invent a way for people to google this.

The Superman story also has parallels with Moses, wicker basket floating across the giant river of space (an then there are the Jewish immigrant themes of moving to another world where they become stronger).

Ask the catholic thread 😂

Are The History Channel forums down?

Indeed, given your own boardsie name, I can't help but believe you. However, what of Biggus Dickus? Do you have a vewwy good fwend in WOHme, called Biggus Dickus ?

I haven't argued anything in relation to dates on any calendar.

nothing related to dates. it says so in the bible.

When I saw the content in the OP, the pedant in me wanted to scream this at the OP 😉

The Ascension of Octavian/Augustus to the role of Emperor, is the 1st emperor. She cavorted with a dictator and his lieutenant. Yes, Augustus was of the Julio-claudian dynasty but he was the 1st emperor.

That simple truth alone undermines the OP's premise of Cleopatra's affairs with emperor's.

As for her having sons other than Caesarion, Alexendar and Ptolemy that somehow escaped being killed or captured by Octavian in his consolidation of power post Actium?

It's a premise in itself flimsy, yet the OP proposes that not only did Cleopatra have a secret child? That the child was Jesus...

I mean, it's an interesting line of thought but one that a bare minimum of classics research would point at being 99.9999% unlikely.

Couple that with the fact that Augustus was a ruthless bastard who would not only brook no opposition but, that he also went to great lengths to cripple any nexus of such that would arise? It's not an idea I'd row in behind.

The word 'cat' is probably Latin in origin, and didn't appear until the sixth century. Cleopatra or Jesus would never have heard the word.

The word 'Catholic' has Greek etymology, and wasn't used to refer to religion until well over a hundred years after the death of Jesus. It meant 'All as one.' Nothing to do with cats. It would be almost another eight hundred years before Catholicism became a discrete branch of christianity.

The word 'Catechism' is Greek in origin and means 'to teach orally'. Nothing to do with cats.

The history of our words is the history of humanity.

Do you realise you responded to yourself? There is a poster in the CT forum that posts stuff that is as nonsensical as your posts that does the same.