Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

Options
13233353738297

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    He's only "one of Johnson's supporters in Westminster" if we have a very expansive concept of "Westminster". He's a member of the Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, which is responsible for one of the more rural parts of Staffordshire. Most of the District is, well, moorland. The Council is based in Leek (pop. 20,800, which makes it about the size of Mullingar, but not nearly as lively). Leek is about 260 km from Westminster.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,647 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Yeah, I see now even his Twitter handle says Cllr, D'Oh!



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,977 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Timing Dear Boy, Timing, as awful as it is to connect what's happening in Ukraine with Boris's survival, its painfully obvious, Putin'S behaviour and actions have in essence assured Boris's travails have already been forgotten.

    #no10Partygate is but a distant memory.

    Boris has more lives than Larry the Cat 😉


    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    In the short term, the Ukraine crisis distracts attention from partygate, etc, which is to his advantage.

    But it contains its own potential traps. Russian oligarchs have been backing up trucks and depositing pallets of cash into Conservative party coffers in exchange for a friendly regime that provides visas for cash, turns a blind eye to money-laundering in London, and is in general well-disposed to the Russian kleptocracy. This warm and close relationship may explain why the UK has been relatively kid-gloved in its response to the invasion of Ukraine so far, treating it primarily as an occasion for photo-opportunities and displays of performative cruelty towards Ukrainian refugees.

    Or, of course, it may not explain it. Maybe they just like performative cruelty. But the suspicion of corrupt influence will certainly arise, and a government already widely regarded as entitled and corrupt may struggle to allay that suspicion. Much political capital which they might have used for this purpose has already been burned in the Owen Paterson and partygate affairs.

    These things are cumulative. Any respite for Johnson is likely to be short-term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,204 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I disagree that the Ukraine situation is a problem for Johnson. Taking money from Russians is in the normal realm of politics and falls straight into whataboutery and "your crowd would be even worse". That's why the normal corruption stories don't hold any weight at all against Johnson (appointing friends to high positions, giving donors contracts for this and that). Partygate was different as even his voters were opposed to it and didn't try to defend it.

    Partygate has weakened him but it's in the rear view mirror now. Now we're back to the normal cut and thrust of politics "you're not going far enough with sanctions and actions to help Ukraine". "We're doing X, y and z for Ukraine, and your lot would probably support Putin and Jimmy Saville".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Taking money from Russians is really not in the normal realm of politics in any country that isn't Russia. Or perhaps Belarus.

    I agree that corruption suspicions/allegations/counter-allegations/what have you are fairly standard stuff in politics. What's different here is who the Conservatives are supposed to have been corrupted by. It's one thing for the Tories to be thought to be in hock to the City of London; you more or less price that in when you vote Tory. It's quite another for them to be thought to be in hock to the Putin regime.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,204 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It shouldn't be normal to take money from Russians, bit it's normal in the UK. The suspicion of the labour party being communist sympathisers and linked to the Russians means the Conservatives can take all the money they want from Russians without consequence.

    That situation might change because of the invasion, but I think they're fine. They can just stop taking as much money from Russians and they'll be fine. The Conservatives almost never apologise and their voters are very resilient



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The problem Johnsons government has, as El_Duderino points out, is not the taking of the money. Normally, as has been the case for years, this would be little more that a political punch bag, where Labour accuse Tory of being corrupt and Tories say Labour are tied to the Unions and want to socialise everything.

    But the invasion changes things. Putin is now clearly seen, for those that weren't paying any attention, as a dictator intent on causing problems for the West. Being seen to take money to give preferential access and treatment to those associated with him is not a good look. IN addition, their pathetic initial response, a few banks, a few unconnected rich Russians, was universally panned and they had to quickly come up with something else.

    Now they are being completely outdone by the EU in terms of refugees and the US in terms of support. This all at a time when supposedly Brexit Britain was going become the leader of the world.

    So questions will be asked. When such a slow response. They will, of course, easily bat away the claims of corruption, but then then are left with looking ill prepared and unable to deal with the crisis in front of them in a way that they should have. Free of the shackles of the EU, GB should be striding on the international stage getting everyone into line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,394 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Now that the general public are beginning to tire of this wall to wall coverage of that skirmish in Ukraine, it's time surely to get back to partygate, says The Mirror.


    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/no-10-lockdown-christmas-party-26344146

    Now whatever about all those goings on, what is most eyebrow raising is the last paragraph:

    It came as a JL Partners poll showed that half the Cabinet - including Boris Johnson - would be on course to lose their seats if an election were held now.The MRP model, which maps polling results onto every seat in the country, suggests support for the Tories has dropped to 2005 levels in the wake of the partygate row.It puts Labour on 352 seats, a gain of 150, with an overall majority of 14 for Keir Starmer's party, while the Conservatives would lose all six seats in Scotland and all 14 in Wales.

    Goodness me, an overall majority for Keir Stamer's party! Well if that happened at least we wouldn't have to listen to people complaining about the UK's FPTP system for a while.

    Now on this " This warm and close relationship may explain why the UK has been relatively kid-gloved in its response to the invasion of Ukraine so far...."

    Well according to the FT

    https://www.ft.com/content/69f72de5-d727-496d-9f9d-316db7bdaf03

    Western leaders are split on whether Russia should be removed from Swift, a move that would deliver a heavy blow to the country’s banks and its ability to trade beyond its borders.

    In a G7 call on Thursday, British prime minister Boris Johnson pushed “very hard” to remove Russia, according to officials, but he later admitted to MPs that it was “vital that we have unity” on the issue among western allies.

    Anywayz, I'll tell you what we'll do. We'll make sure that if Johnson's is to get a boost in the polls because of the war we'll negate that by blaming money laundering, oligariks and all the rest of it on Johnson. Because all that started when he became PM. Hows about that for an idea?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Ah the old, well it can't be his fault, it was like that when he got there excuse

    Johnson is the PM, the buck stops with him. Leaders are meant to lead, to make changes. He was well aware of these issues and has done sweet FA to stop them. Therefore, either he doesn't know what to do, or doesn't care.

    FPTP is a terrible system, not matter who wins. What is really galling is when a party achieves a massive majority with such a small amount of the vote (40% I think it was). If Labour were to win it would be at best a small majority, which is fine as at least individual MPs still have power.

    Nobody is arguing that FPTP is a terrible system because the Tories are in government. They argue that FPTP is a terrible system and point to the crazy situation of the Tories having such a large majority of a relatively low level of the overall votes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It wasn't Johnson; it was a big Tory who ran away.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,365 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Anyone remember this stuff? First tranche of fines reportedly set to be issued today. Inquiry apparently named Operation Hillman; as in Avenger?

    Angela Rayner says the PM "and ministers including chancellor Rishi Sunak" should resign if they are fined. I wonder has she been tipped off about Sunak being implicated?




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    That is a mistake by Rayner, it gives an easy out if they don't technically get fined.

    But Johnson stood up in Parliament and said parties never happened, yet these fines show that it did happen and as such Johnson lied to Parliament.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,365 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Apparently Sunak is known to have been issued with a questionnaire, so presumably that's why Rayner brought his name up

    IIRC he was on the fringes of one of the 'gatherings' or left the room as it was kicking off or something...



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    IIRC, he was in 10 Downing Street for unrelated reasons when one of the parties took place, but he didn't leave; he participated in the party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,204 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah. Labour have to try something. Johnson will have to weather this latest part of the story, and he will weather it.

    It's been ages since the story broke and totally lost momentum (there's even a new scandal in the meantime where an ex KGB agent got a peerage FFS). Even if he's fined they'll just carry on with the usual lines like 'the people want us to get on with the job of running the country'.

    It will count towards the general sense of a sh1tshow and at some point the dam will break. Johnson will resign and Sunak will become PM, but this won't be the event that causes it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I don't think the Lebedev business is a new scandal; it was controversial at the time and now it has been revived and is back in the public eye since, on account of Current Events, the Tory party's blatant prostitution of itself to Russian money is politically salient once more.

    Which makes the point that these things never really go away; even if you weather them initially they hang around in the shadows and can arise zombie-like to bite you again.

    And they have a cumulative effect. The succession of sleaze may not have cost Johnson his office yet, but it has certainly cost him much of his authority. This week he tried to whip the Tory party to vote against a Labour motion calling for the security assessment on Lebedev to be published. Enough backbenchers refused to make a whip against impossible; in the event the party was only whipped to abstain. The vote was carried and the security assessment will have to be published. The backbenchers revolted because they were previously whipped to defend the obviously corrupt Owen Paterson and then hung out to dry when Downing Street u-turned and dumped Paterson anyway. They won't be treated like that a second time, and so Johnson has lost the ability to force his party to help him conceal stuff.

    So, because of the Paterson affair, the Lebedev affair is going to hit Johnson harder than it otherwise would have. And the same will be true of partygate; we still have all the FPNs to come, including possibly one for Johnson, and then the publication of the Grey report. Johnson will have to deal with these when weakened by the Paterson and Lebedev businesses; if he had just come out and admitted an error of judgment when it was first alleged that regulation-breaching gatherings were held in Downing Street, he would have been in a much stronger position.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,620 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    A Welsh Conservative MP has come out as transgender.

    Last night at a Conservative Party dinner, which Jamie Wallis was present at...




  • Registered Users Posts: 20,204 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I was thinking the Lebedev story might be the one to topple him. It's not technically a new story and some people saw it as a big story when it first broke, but the Russian invasion has made it a new story for lots of people. Depends on joe much they can drag it out. They dont have to publish it until late next month so of they can delay it by a few months then it's momentum will dissipate too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,365 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Oh right. I reckon he'd be unlucky to be brought down by this, unlike some of his Cabinet colleagues. Doesn't strike me as much of a 'party animal'...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭Fasano


    He doesn't seem like a party animal, but I believe he does live at No 10 Downing Street, unlike Boris who lives at No 11.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,204 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    This stuff about Mrs. Sunak Non-Dom status and Rishi holding a US green card while chancellor, is really great news for Boris. Terrible news for the party, but great for Boris.

    Rishi was the only real front-runner to replace Boris and now he's in big trouble. I'd eat my hat if it wasn't all leaked by No.10. It guarantees Boris short-meduim term safety over all the accumulating scandals as there isn't a front runner to replace him now. David cameron's dad was found to be avoiding tax in the Panama Papers. He didn't apologise and it didn't cost him much politically.

    On a side note, I think if Sunak had told everyone to go fcuk themselves, stay away from my family, no laws were broken and if youn dont like it, you can fcuk off etc. (using the correct words and said in received pronunciation), then he could still be I'm contention to replace Boris. Backing down rules him out (in the short term at least). The English want leaders who are normal people. They want leaders who are above them, touched by grace. Normal people abide by the rules, the English want a leader who makes the rules for normal people, but lives by the upper class rules.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,977 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    And here's me thinking Irish Politics vicious and underhanded 🤔

    "Richie " sunak has proved to be quite the additional deflection for Boris .I see Sunak now looking for an enquiry about who "Leaked" info about him and his wife , the Leakage inflection clearly not preserve of a certain Irish political party.

    I was aware of Sunaks wife wealth (£2 billion) apparently, daddy one of India's richest men.

    I don't know if Boris is behind these leaks but my word its a deflection that's working , Sunak was the darling of conservatives only a month ago, perhaps its he who's now Toast, so to speak 😏

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users Posts: 33,620 ✭✭✭✭Penn




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,653 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    What does this mean, his non-party is now deemed to be a party and therefore he lied to Parliament and broke the code/is expected to resign? I cant seem him volunteering for that



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,705 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Expect a bibble about it not being lying as he wasn't aware it could be a party even though it was.


    edit: or something about it being inappropriate to go while there's a war on. Which will buy him months.



  • Registered Users Posts: 36,326 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    If he doesn’t go then British society has crossed the rubicon. The precedent established would be completely poisonous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,653 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    yeah the spinning will come straight away. Now he has been fined and the matter is concluded does that mean the Sue Gray report can be released? Its that report that will fill in the colour of all these parties and if he wont resign now the contents of that report should put him under huge pressure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    He'll accept the fine, although refuse to admit any guilt, and say that as a leader he takes ultimate responsibility although it really had nothing to do with him.

    Then, they need to wait for the Gray report, as its more important that the full facts are known, and of course lessons learned, rather than simply knee jerk political witch-hunt.

    Finally, his party will rally around saying UK is playing a leading role in Ukraine and now is not the time to destabilise the amazing push back against Putin led by Johnson and to even talk about dumping Johnson is playing directly into the hands of Putin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭cmac2009


    The cyncic in me believes the trip to Ukraine was made in anticipation of this story being released this week.

    He'll never step down and the outrage that was there when the original story broke has simmered down. Don't think this will be the end of him, unfathomable really considering he broke the law.



Advertisement