Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

It has been done to death on this thread if you bothered reading. So evidence please.

Which data are you referring to and what do you believe it says?

It will be the same excuses as on the covid thread.

"We'll find out in a few years long after anyone remembers I claimed this"

"We never said that it was dangerous, just that there were concerns."

"This was all just a test to see how compliant we are. The next vaccine will have the poison/infertility drugs/secret nanotech/mark of the beast."

Etc etc.

Then can't just accept they were wrong and got scammed by con artists (again).

As we've seen most have just gone quiet like @patnor1011. Some will just keep spamming shite they get fed as it gets fed to them from Twitter like @Phishnet.

None will ever stop to wonder why they were so wrong. They will only reinvent reality so they were never wrong and that they were actually right all along.

Which will leave them as a nice juicy target for the next round of con artists.

It's a beautiful system really. A neverending supply of marks who will actively fight against realizing your scam is a scam and then will do all your advertising for you for free. And at the end of it all, they'll fall for the same thing again and again.

The vaccines have well been proven to be safe. That was the point you missed. No amount of lies, BS, or misinformation can change that.

What trial ?

Except that when this trial you keep hinting at and have decided is the only thing you'll trust comes out and doesn't say what you want it to say, you will change your mind and declare all of the results false.

I remind you that you came into this thread by claiming that the dangers of vaccines were already clear and apparent. (We will ignore the fact that you had to knowingly misrepresenting data to do so and that you admitted as such.)

"Wait and see"

"Any day now"

silence

-The universal response from Covid conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers and those who claimed all this would be permanent

And concludes

The data do not reveal any novel safety concerns or risks requiring label changes and support a favorable benefit risk profile of to the BNT162b2 vaccine.

Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2. Pfizer will continue routine pharmacovigilance activities on behalf of BioNTech according to the Pharmacovigilance Agreement in place, in order to assure patient safety and will inform the Agency if an evaluation of the safety data yields significant new information for BNT162b2.

Thanks for confirming!

That report was circulating in Twitter through a conspiracy nut. They were claiming much the same, roughly 3% fatality.

Someone posted that it was actually going to be a 100% fatality rate and could prove it. Conspiracist was all over this as proof of everything.

Until it was pointed out everyone will die, ergo if you got vaccinated you will die, didn't get vaccinated you will die, eventually.

Said thread dissapeared asap. Just shows people will believe anything if it supports what they what to believe in.

Id genuinely love to run a poll of where people are at now, people who posted conspiraloon madness in this thread and others.

BBC reporting on study of various reporting systems data, including VAERS and v-link, that there's no link between Covid vaccines and deaths:

Article based on this published in the Lancet:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext

Again, with a quick Google (they all come up on the usual search engines btw), you can see what youre posting is silly.

BKK Provita has separated from its previous board member Andreas Schöfbeck. "Embarrassing ignorance or insidious intent to deceive - I don't know what made the board of BKK Provita warn of alleged alarm figures for vaccination complications. In any case, the conclusions from the data situation are complete nonsense"

"that don’t come up on the usual search engines, wonder why?"

You seem to enjoy reading 2nd hand accounts (in this case 3rd hand) from amateur websites with agendas and believing the manipulated data or not noticing the purposely omitted data. Here is the source below. From the NY Times. Some of which was taken and used in the Epoch Times article (Epoch Times btw lol) and then further diluted and manipuated in that absolute shambles of an article you posted.

Have a read.

Amazingly, all available "on the usual search engines" 😮

Kristen Nordlund, a spokeswoman for the C.D.C., said the agency has been slow to release the different streams of data “because basically, at the end of the day, it’s not yet ready for prime time.” She said the agency’s “priority when gathering any data is to ensure that it’s accurate and actionable.”

Another reason is fear that the information might be misinterpreted, Ms. Nordlund said.

Dr. Daniel Jernigan, the agency’s deputy director for public health science and surveillance said the pandemic exposed the fact that data systems at the C.D.C., and at the state levels, are outmoded and not up to handling large volumes of data. C.D.C. scientists are trying to modernize the systems, he said.

“We want better, faster data that can lead to decision making and actions at all levels of public health, that can help us eliminate the lag in data that has held us back,” he added.

The C.D.C. also has multiple bureaucratic divisions that must sign off on important publications, and its officials must alert the Department of Health and Human Services — which oversees the agency — and the White House of their plans. The agency often shares data with states and partners before making data public. Those steps can add delays.