Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
11431441461481491062

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Are you even aware of what is happening in the real world at present ? You do not need the predictions of world scientists to see it. Just switch on your TV or open a newspaper.

    Like ourselves and Germany many European countries bought into the myth that there was no need for any other back-up for energy requirements to make up the shortfall from wind power other than gas. This has resulted in us facing a major energy crisis as we have shut down or downgraded our other power generating plants There is not going to be any surplus power available from any European country that is going to be supplied through imaginary interconnectors. Nuclear or otherwise, and certainly not in times of peak demand.

    Even the Finns who have over 50% of their energy requirements supplied by renewables have gone back to harvesting turf as an energy source, so your choices are simple enough at this stage. It`s either LNG, turf, oil, coal or a combination of two or more, because as sure as God made little green apples we are looking at severe and long lasting blackouts otherwise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia




  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Its a bit sad that you think Ireland building infrastructure to help us prosper in the 21st century is idealistic

    Maybe we should go back to selling wheat to the British empire and hoping our potato crops don't fail.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Excellent post, hopefully this will not be ignored. We need people to start thinking about the environment, we can't continue as we have done



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I'm not the one who suggested emergency laws to overrule the planning decisions that refused the re-commissioning of the peat power plants, I must have missed the comment where you accused that poster opening the door to turning the Shannon into a landfill



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Sorry to tell you but nobody bought into that myth. Like I said already in the early 2000's, Mainstream was in Ireland & Europe telling everyone this would happen and how to get ahead of it.

    It's not any of the above, all of this can be provided by renewable technology, it could have been done in the 2000's and can be done now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    If you have been paying attention then you should see by now that because of an agenda based on shutting down every other source of energy supply other than gas as back-up for wind power from one of the most corrupt and dangerous places in the world it was always highly likely, war or no war, to result in us being held hostage on supply and cost.

    My point on taxes was that the Green Party`s love of using tax coercion to further their agenda was always going to hit the wall when it got to the point where people said enough is enough. That day is now here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    There will be enough renewable energy in Europe to power our needs, the interconnectors are to balance the load across the grid. Ireland only really needs to produce about 80% of our peak capacity, the other 20% is only needed for a few hours of the day when we are at peak demand. The fact that the EU has multiple timezones and is big enough that there are different weather conditions across the continent, the vast majority of the time there will be plenty of places in the grid with capacity to generate enough surplus power that Ireland can buy it off them to balance our grid.

    Interconnectors make for a much more efficient grid, where we don't waste generating capacity, nor do we have to have thermal power plants running to balance the load.

    And having access to a massive energy market means there will be plenty of times where there will be far higher generating capacity than there is demand. The are opportunities for companies to buy this off peak power for very little, and store it and release it when prices are higher

    The technological solutions are there, we just need to create the regulatory environment and infrastructure to enable them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Yeah, Its a matter of political will. We have the technology we need



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The green party are the bogeymen that are brought up every time FG or FF raise taxes. It's gas isn't it

    The greatest trick FG and FF ever did, was getting people like you to blame the greens for all the taxes you pay



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,735 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Lets just hope they have not been scrapped already..



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    I suggest you do some research

    nunber 1 all parties signed up to the Paris agreement which included the Carbon tax

    majority of carbon increases have happened when Greens are not in government

    The list goes on, but the two above should give you an idea of what is actually happening


    its worth noting that the likes of Sinn Fein are shouting about the carbon tax but they approved the Paris Agreement, also next time ask what the alternative is and what is their environmental agenda and watch them fall flat on their face. You should not reward stupidity and that’s certainly what you see from a lot of parties



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Why do you somehow believe that I have a particular interest in Sinn Fein`s environmental agenda ?

    I have never voted for Sinn Fein at any level. Be that local, national or European. Not that it`s any business of yours or anything to do with the subject under discussion, but that has been mainly due to their financial policies in the past. Come the next election, like every other party or individual standing, I will look at their proposals before voting.

    You appear to be of the belief through your research that you know something about the Paris Agreement that I missed. So tell me what are the legally binding requirements of this agreement, what penalties are there for none compliance and what court determines what these penalties are?

    Go off researching if you wish, but I can save you time and effort. This agreement is not legally binding, there are no penalties, nor is there a court to determine if any elements of this agreement have been broken. Basically it`s value is worth nothing more than the paper it is written on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The present Green party agenda goes back much further than this present administration, and their supporters have been on here repeatedly crowing about how coercive tax policies were going to force through their agenda whether people like it or not.

    A bit late in the game to be attempting to absolve them of blame when the inevitable has now happened where people have said enough is enough on being gouged by taxes on fuel and energy prices.

    Even the E.U. has come to realise that with a proposal to windfall energy supply companies profits. Even though their own idiotic pricing policy on energy supplies allowed these companies to also gouged their customers to amass those profits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    You are blaming the Green Party for taxes and I’m just pointing out the majority of taxes have nothing to do with the Greens. if you want to ignore them that’s your decision, don’t think everyone else won’t point it out to you

    I didn’t say you voted Sinn Fein by the way just used them as a example of an idiotic party when it comes to the environment



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The more I hear and read from the Green Party and their supporters the more I am inclined to believe they are living in a fantasy world covered in money trees.

    I never bought into the myth, but do not fool yourself it was a myth being pushed by greens that all that was needed was gas to make up the shortfall from wind turbines. It`s the reason that so many other energy plants have been shut down and the "reasoning" behind the plan to shut the largest oil fired plant in the country by next year and the largest coal fired plant two year later. Anyone with a bit of sense could see where this was going to lead before this present war when with just one gas fired plant being off line was going to result in blackouts last Winter.

    Dying to hear how renewable technology is now supposed to fill the gap in even the short or medium term. If we hit the 2030 targets tomorrow, unless I have missed something it would not be enough to fill the gap we are looking at for gas. Especially with the greens so opposed to LNG.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I am pointing out that an energy policy, and a policy that both the Green Party and their supporters have been longtime cheerleaders for, have us now facing an imminent energy crisis that they have no viable answers too.

    If you wish to ignore that a policy of coercive taxes, a measure also cheered on by the Green Party and their supporters, have now hit the wall that is up to you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    More Saudi Arabia of wind nonsense on behalf of wind energy Ireland. Really what that means is consumers in Ireland miss a chance to get shafted again. It does not matter how many turbines or solar panels (made in China) there are, putting yet more random energy generation sources on the grid becomes ever more expensive since they must be 100% backed up with reliable generation sources, in particular gas that consumers must now subsidise with capacity payments.

    Here is how reliable wind generation has been for the last 2 weeks, this scheme cannot and does not work without CCGT. This is why Europe as a whole has become ever more dependent on gas for electricity generation, heat and cooking.



    And yes, random generation can and does go to barely anything here is May 1st. The renewables percentage you see below is hydro generation.

    Stop the pretence that batteries can manage this, these are expensive and can only smooth out the sudden dips in random energy generation while diesel, coal or gas generators kick in.


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    It was never created, mostly because people didn't want it. Why invest in sustainable when you have fossil fuel.....

    Everyone is opposed to LNG 😂

    Some company wants to build a big stupid plant in Ireland and suddenly everyone is an expert on LNG 🤣

    If you are dying to hear, you should try google about renewables. Start here, then look all around to the documents produced for years explaining how it would work. https://www.independent.ie/business/pan-european-power-grid-could-slash-energy-costs-says-ucd-report-41331170.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Serious question. Are you so so far into this renewables fantasy money tree world that you have not even noticed what is happening in the real world at present ?

    We saw what was likely if just one gas fired plant was off line this Winter when it came to renewables, and now when we know there is going to be a severe shortage of gas you are calling LNG a stupid idea and talking about imaginary interconnectors that do not exist, distributing energy from European countries that even if those interconnectors existed would have nothing to distribute.

    Do you seriously believe that countries such as Germany, who have left themselves in the same hole we are in due to shutting down plants and are now increasing the size of two LNG terminals attempting to close their shortfall gap. Or Finland that have gone back to turf harvesting with over 50% of their needs being supplied by renewables are going to have anything to distribute when we need it even if those interconnectors were in place. ?

    Post edited by charlie14 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    There is developing problem right across Western Europe, every country is following the same agenda, that is move everyone off consuming primary sources of energy to secondary generation by means of electricity. In pursuit of that they want to expand electrical generation capacity using random energy sources like wind and sun and to make up for shortfalls by running an extension lead to the other countries grid while at the same time removing existing generation capacity, and with it the margin of error shrinks and the possibility of failure grows. Eirgrid have given warnings that they cannot guarantee there will be enough generation to meet demand in future and Dublin is already constrained.

    As one example take Norway

    Southern Norway seen tipping into power deficit by 2026, says grid operator

    The biggest increase is expected in the southern part of the country, where the most of Norway's power-intensive industries are located, along with new projects such as electrification of the Johan Sverdrup and surrounding offshore fields.

    Norway's current annual power surplus of 15 TWh would dwindle to 3 TWh in 2026, with southern Norway falling into deficit because of its stronger demand growth, Statnett said.

    While power demand is rising in Norway, so is public opposition against building wind power turbines onshore, while opportunities to expand the existing hydropower plants are limited.

    The problem Denmark is already heavily reliant on Norway for balancing its grid, taking surplus power when wind power is abundant, and returning it when it is short. Germany too is becoming increasingly dependent on Norway, for similar reasons. As coal and nuclear power are increasingly shut down, many countries including Britain are looking at Norway to fill the gap when random power is not performing. Wind turbine generated electricity dropped across Europe in 2021 and when the 'Dunkelflaute' can affect Europe for weeks at a time it will matter that no generation capacity exists to meet the increased demand. We are learning the expensive way that random energy generation has its limits.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1





  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    As I said, it’s not random and the plan was made many years ago, that hasn’t changed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Maybe read the thread, the plan was made, never implemented because it was easier to burn coal etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Big problem is the Greens can't grasp that €5-6 grand electricity bills are something average people can't afford.

    Don't seem to have much time for democracy either



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Total misinformation and lies. The 1979 report already stated that Global Surface temperatures were averaging 15c.

    You come on here and claim that 14c and to increase that to 15.5c would be huge is very disingenuous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Magical thinking is no substitute for a plan. All that material that needs to be put in place to harness random energy needs staggering amounts of minerals, metals and energy to be constructed, maintained, AND replaced every 10 to 20 years. Anyone putting wind turbines in the Atlantic will face serious infrastructure corrosion and maintenance problems, the payback time will need to be within 10 years because it will all have to be replaced by that point. I can easily foresee a future where the subsidies stop leaving the coast littered with rusting hulks of turbines because the companies have gone bust and abandoned them.

    The energy from random generation fluctuates across a wide range and must be concentrated to be stored / used in batteries or mechanical storage (reservoirs with hydro-powered generators, e.g Turlough hill.) or chemical storage (converting electricity into hydrogen to be used as a fuel). Batteries don't last and there is nothing remotely "Green" about mining for lithium, cobalt, etc. or manufacturing billions of batteries. Recycling rates for lithium and cobalt are low less than 5% are recycled at their end of life.


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    They've been pedalling a CO2 per capita of 13.3 while internationally we are quoted at 7.6, the tangoed halfwit was right when he cried Fake News.



Advertisement