Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1104010411043104510463691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17,920 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's possible to be extremely concerned about people being bombed in Ukraine and also not be critical of a company for supplying essentials to Russian people.

    There's no outrage on my behalf. I was simply giving my opinion on an article.

    Let's leave it at that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    Kremlin says UK's Johnson is "most active anti-Russian leader"




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,405 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Russians are digging in and mining their positions. War of attrition now? In which case the Russians do have a far bigger force to bring in over time. Dont see this ending any time soon unless we get a coup in the Kremlin.

    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,708 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I suppose the Russia people are tough and hardy, right up until the face the prospect of no more strawberry-flavoured dreamy sweety night night baby formula.

    If Putin can only be toppled internally, then the Russian people should feel pain up to the point where they are forced to move upon him and get this war ended. If they are allowed to live comfortably, they can continue doing what they currently are, which is sticking their heads in the sand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,925 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    Not being particularly up with current affairs in Ukraine prior to this war , the only thing that's in my head with the actor/comedian president of Ukraine is ' the mouse that roared '. The Peter Sellers film. :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,040 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Eh, baby food is not an essential food, despite what the IFA and dairy industry here might like us to believe. Nature thankfully gave women to ability to feed babies with their own milk and humankind has proceeded thus for millennia. As for toddlers and so on, they don't actually need food from little Nestle or other brand jars either. These are relatively modern conveniences.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    It is fooking scary to think what would have happened if Trump was still in charge.

    He would probably have demaned Nato bomb Ukraine and be mouthing off that Zelensky was fascist along with the Bidens.

    And fook Nestle.

    They have fooking form in this where they were trying to flood Africa with baby formula a number of years back.

    And don't ever forget they are a Swiss company and those fookers would and have done deals with the most despicable entities to have walked the planet.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,506 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Problem for Putin is that he can't retreat or withdraw (he's very similar to Hitler in 1945 in that regard.....those words are alien to him).

    It's very difficult to see how this pans out, as a war of attrition lasting months or years would be a disaster, even for Russia, given the sheer size of Ukraine. It's possible that he and the Kremlin propagandists will declare at some point that the "Nazis" in Ukraine have been defeated and disarmed, but whether the Russian public would even fall for that one is anyone's guess.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Probably all of them should be booted out apart from the top man/woman (in each country) and his/her gophers/assistants or whatever (to keep some lines of communication open). afair govt. here have said they will wait for collective EU action. Maybe this is being argued over by some countries, how far it should go etc., perhaps we'll hear something after next summit meeting is over. Some of the more hawkish and angry countries (e.g. Poland I think) have started booting Russian diplomats anyway now.




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Ah yes of course fracking will make poor places rich, just like a gas pipeline in West Mayo made it the richest place in the country.

    Would ya ever give over.

    A few token jobs for the locals just to keep warm ar**es in the likes of Dublin.

    One word for you, TURF.

    It will soon be making a comeback 😆

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Doesn't matter what they put on the claims forms, Llyods nor anyone else are going to pay out.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,506 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    My take on the Russian is that they are not bad people at all (apart from the hawkish pro-Putin, pro war loons with Zs on their cars etc). But they have become very sheep like and docile, it seems there is virtually nothing that can rise them out of their slumber. It's not a normal society in any shape or form. Everyone keeping their head down, nobody going against authority, nobody organising demonstrations or active resistance to the regime. Even the Belarussians seem to have far more spark and fire in them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It is not weird, from the Russian point of view. Russia's understanding of an existential risk to its survival doesn't have to conform with your understanding.

    The Russian mindset is that a hostile force advancing from the eastern Ukrainian steppe towards Astrakahn, and then taking it, would be game over for the survival of the Russian state. This would deprive Russia of access to the Caucuses, the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, and its most fertile farmland. Within living memory, a coalition of western armies (Germany, Hungary, Romania, Italy) tried to do just that. You will undoubtedly retort that this is rubbish, nonsense, BS, doesn't apply today etc.,; nevertheless it is foremost in the minds of Russian military planners.




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,744 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Mariupol is the key for him now, once that falls they will roll up behind the Donbas frontline and then call for a ceasefire imo. It fulfils the land bridge objective, secures the Donbas and once the Azov are destroyed he can claim the denazification was a success. Maybe they will make a final push for Kharkiv and Odessa too.

    How to save Mariupol should be a major question at the moment. It's relentless defence has saved the country so far



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I don't want Nestle to provide baby food to Russians, when 126 Ukrainian children have been murdered and 158 wounded, and that's not even touching on that 1.5 million have been made refugees outside Ukraine with a slightly lower number within.

    Sanctions are supposed to hurt, and that's what most people should want.

    Post edited by cnocbui on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Nobody in Europe or the western world wants to push on towards astrakhan. Just want Ukraine to be left in peace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,506 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Good analysis, but even such a ceasefire would leave the regime as a pariah state. There's no way the sanctions, flight bans and sporting bans would be lifted in that scenario (as the regime has absolutely zero right to have a single Russian soldier in Mariupol, a Ukrainian city). I guess though it will remain a total pariah state as long as Putin is alive, no matter what the outcome.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Talk about bad design. The ammo storage in Russian tanks is pathetic. It appears they will go off with nearly every hit. This is the most violent one I've seen so far.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭deise08



    According to this....

    Russia lost half of its combat-ready pilots in Ukraine.

    A well-known Ukrainian political scientist and presenter Taras Berezovets writes about this in his blog on Telegram

    On March 22, the Ukrainian army reached an important record in the confrontation with the Russian army - the 100th aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces was shot down, which bombed the civilian population. As of today, March 23, losses in the equipment of the Russian Aerospace Forces are estimated at 101 aircraft and 124 helicopters. And this is just for a month of war with Ukraine.

    He noted that the training of one high-class pilot in Russia takes about 7 years and requires $8 million. Thus, the losses of the Russian Federation in Ukraine in aviation alone exceeded $800 million. And this is without taking into account the cost of destroyed fighters, attack aircraft and bombers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Rawr


    It's in the Kremlin's interests to build Johnson up as an "anti-Russian" element in an attempt to eclipse how useful he and the Tory government in general have been to them. If he gets outed as a Russian asset, especially now, there might be a focus on getting to the UK to hurry up and cut off the UK's local Russian oligarchs instead of hiding behind "legal delays" that have been bying those oligarchs time to sell up and leave.

    He's been by far their most useful idiot in Europe, but getting them to come out and call him the most active "anti-Russian leader", might be a little too on-the-nose.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,571 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    American and British tanks keep their ammo stored behind blast doors. If the tank gets struck, there's a better chance of the ammo not getting struck as well. Russian tanks leave their ammo stacked on the floor of the tank, so far more like to catch damage and explode.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Northernlily


    Well they sure seem to be working fast! How will Putin react.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    That would be my assessment as well. For the internal audience he could claim the Ukrainian Nazis have been dealt with and then package the withdrawal via the compliant media in Russia.

    That's providing we're dealing with a coherent and logical Putin. He could continue on with this disasterus venture still.

    Personally I think the West should be doing far more to end this illegal invasion now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's like when they decided to mount the fuel tanks for their BTR armoured personal carriers on it's back doors where troops had to disembark ,one hit and everyone inside went up



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    It just demonstrates the contempt that the Russian hierarchy hold for their frontline troops to send them into harm's way in those deathtraps.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,920 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    From the Guardian:

    The Biden administration and European Union are expected to announce a major initiative to direct shipments of liquefied natural gas to Europe during the US president’s visit to Brussels this week, according to US officials familiar with the plan.

    The announcement would come as European officials have asked the US to do more to help them cut their dependence on Russian energy sources.

    President Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, said an agreement would be announced as soon as Friday. According to one US official, it is intended to ensure supplies of American natural gas and hydrogen for Europe.

    Sullivan told reporters aboard Air Force One on Wednesday:


    A major priority for both the president and his European allies is to reduce the dependence of Europe on Russian gas, full stop, and the practical road map for how to do that -- what steps have to be taken, what the United States can contribute, what Europe has to do itself.

    Speaking to EU lawmakers in Brussels on Wednesday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said all EU members “can contribute in reducing our dependency on Russian gas”.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,332 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    it is foremost in the minds of Russian military planners.

    No it isn't. They're highly rational technocrats who know full well that nobody in the West has a notion of doing anything like that. They understand full well that full-scale war between NATO and Russia if it ever came to that (assuming it was confined to 'conventional' weapons) would be fought mainly in the air with American warplanes blowing Russia's military infrastructure to smithereens to ensure the country was effectively defeated before any NATO tanks got anywhere near the steppes.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The last week or two I've seen a few different bits of Russian equipment and Jesus it looks like it was designed and built over 40 years in sheds by someone new finding it every few years and doing what they think the next step should be. Bits of metal on the inside nailed into place with sharp edges sticking out, the kind of shortcuts necessary in emergencies or w/e but in new equipment. There was an article posted on the thread yesterday by some retired yank miltary guy saying he hopped in one of the new Russian tanks in the 90s they were super proud of and he wasn't impressed. Small, cramped, poor sightlines all round etc.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement