Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The wondrous adventures of Sinn Fein (part 3) Mod Notes and Threadbanned List in OP

Options
1443444446448449553

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,358 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Disappearing, deleting etc etc.


    Its how all these groups and parties behave.

    SF have done brilliantly blinding people that its all about housing while they take the reigns.


    Some will be in for a shock.


    Leave them at it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    Yee Gods but I have been reading the last few pages here and I agree with a few posters since Moscow switched off an awfully lot of Pro Sf posters have stopped posting.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 934 ✭✭✭mikep


    I see in today's Times that Mary Lou is telling foreign diplomats that reunification is being talked about in every town and city in Ireland and it's achievable and realistic..

    That's news to me....I haven't spoken to many about it and when discussed the general consensus is that it will be a long long time before it happens..

    Anyone out there been discussing it in the towns and cities??



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I haven’t discussed it with anyone. Never crops up in our conversations.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I doubt the good people of Bulgaria and Romania have much interest in paying higher taxes to support a United Ireland. Especially when the ask is from a party who wanted us to leave the EU up until a few years ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 934 ✭✭✭mikep


    Agreed..also I wonder will asking the EU to get behind it result in NI Unionists losing the plot..

    Mary Lou is playing a blinder today by parroting the magic money tree plan from Pearse, he obviously forgot to tell her about the missing €700 million.



  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭rdwight



    Wasn't sure what you were referring to so I had a look at the the last couple of weeks of their account. Multiple references to Hugo Chavez, Cuba, the Catalan partitionists, and Palestine but remarkably there are no references to the war in the Ukraine bar a couple of retweets about the need for neutrality. If the war does ever get a mention it will no doubt be referred to as the "special military operation".

    Positively Orwellian.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,358 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    You’d be forgiven for thinking the silence here is a direct result of HQ sending out a memo to the online supporters and members not to talk about SF deleting all their anti EU pro Russian articles.

    Silence on the matter.


    Very strange.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,416 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    They will be back under 'new' accounts in a few months with a new memo and talking points.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,581 ✭✭✭Fionn1952



    You're both discussing it right now!

    It is amazing how our social circles can sometimes just reflect our own opinions back on us though, it is almost like we select people to socialise with who reflect our own thoughts and biases rather than a random sample. I'd imagine both of your social circles don't talk about their intentions to vote SF terribly often either, yet polling suggests more people intend to do that than vote for any other party.

    That being said, even in my own social circle that would broadly be pro-Unification, it certainly isn't something coming up in daily conversation and it doesn't have a sense of imminence around it.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Saying that it’s not discussed in my circle isn’t discussing it. It’s stating a fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,581 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Ah now, that was just a bit of gentle teasing, Maryanne. Don't take it so hard.

    The core point I made stands; we tend to build our social circles with broadly similar views to our own. It is unsurprising that someone who either does not support or does not care about Unification would be part of a social circle that doesn't discuss Unification. I'm sure MLMD's social circles discuss it quite often.

    Much like my other point, I'm sure there aren't vast swathes of your social circle considering voting for SF, yet polling shows there are more currently considering voting for them than any other political party.

    What your (or my) 'circle' discusses isn't necessarily reflective of broader public opinion is my point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 934 ✭✭✭mikep


    What was being discussed was Mary Lou's assertion that reunification was being talked about widely.

    Thankfully amongst my friends politics is never really discussed.

    Among work colleagues SF are regularly discussed and never has reunification come up .

    I expect for most people it's way,way,way down the list of priorities.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,581 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Christ, as someone who strongly supports Unification and has used most of my posts on here discussing it, it certainly isn't top of my list of priorities. Given the uptick in Shinner support, I doubt it is top of the list of priorities for most of their voters any more either.

    Not a priority doesn't mean it isn't being discussed widely though, and even in the case of you and your friends, not discussing politics doesn't mean they don't have opinions on it, some of your social circle may even have very strong opinions on it. I'm guessing you didn't just assume that your friends didn't support the referenda on gay marriage or abortion rights just because you don't discuss politics as a group?

    I'd be very curious as to how your work colleagues REGULARLY discuss SF and Unification has NEVER come up (even negatively or passing comment about how unimportant it was), unless there's a bit of wordplay obfuscation going on there, and by discussing SF you mean in a largely disparaging manner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,423 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar



    Well said, sums it up nicely.

    While most of us would like a United Ireland, we can see the problems,the possible conflict,the cost, the excuse for violence and other things it might bring.

    Now is not the time, I would suggest, the stage is a long long way from ready, and I feel that’s how a lot of people see it.

    Eventually…….but not now.

    SF on the other hand seem to put ‘UNITED IRELAND’ As their main aim front and central- just do it and worry about the fallout later- or more likely let someone else sort it out.

    Thats the main reason i feel why people tend to shy away from SF, there are other reasons of course.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The old bald heads, beards, and big bellies up in Belfast still calling the shots would be another major concern.



  • Registered Users Posts: 934 ✭✭✭mikep


    Genuinely it hasn't been mentioned at work, generally the discussion relates to the latest plan outlined by an SF rep on the radio during the morning commute, they all seem to be about how terrible everything is and the government are crap but they'll find money to fix things. Most realise that this is shite but some reckon they can't do much worse than the present arrangement.

    I'm reporting my experience...

    On your "wordplay obfuscation", don't worry...I couldn't be arsed ..



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,581 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    unless there's a bit of wordplay obfuscation going on there, and by discussing SF you mean in a largely disparaging manner.


    "On your "wordplay obfuscation", don't worry...I couldn't be arsed ."



    "Most realise that this is shite"

    So pretty much what I suggested.

    I'd be in agreement with them by the way, but let's at least be honest with what we're talking about.

    Passing comments like, 'jaysus they talk some sh*te, but they couldn't be worse than this crowd' I'd believe Unification didn't come up, but I'd hardly describe that sort of passing comment as, SF being, 'regularly discussed' as you initially said.

    Any sort of in depth discussion about them, the topic of Unification inevitably comes up. See the post above from our Brendy patting you on the back....with his take as SF putting Unification front and centre of everything, hard to imagine discussing them in any sort of depth and Unification not getting even a passing mention, even if to disagree with them on it as Brendy does.



  • Registered Users Posts: 934 ✭✭✭mikep


    I've never had in depth discussions but they are regular because SF are great at getting airtime..

    Believe whatever you like.. reunification hasn't been mentioned.

    These discussions are regular but brief as people move on and discuss other things....



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,743 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Check it the Orgy Sinn Féin account.

    It's not as funny as the real thing but it's one of the best parody accounts around.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,358 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    SF lads still MIA.


    Sure we’ll try again tomorrow so….



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pearse still using the lack of understanding of what Dáil motions mean to whip up populist outrage. Slippery slope with this type of thing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,416 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Trying to figure out how to use a VPN client that is not in Russian.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,358 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Been told to stay silent or else.


    Very apt given the situation in the far east right now.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's funny, I'm from a border town and since 98 everything has changed. It's a different world and no one talks about reunification.

    Also, due to where I work, we do regularly talk about Sinn Fein,and there's not one single person who has any interest in a United Ireland.

    be interesting to see where Mary Lou is getting her impressions from.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,581 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I can certainly see it being talked about much less in border counties since the GFA for obvious reasons. Among my social circle in the border counties (I'm from a border town myself, I'm a Fermanagh native), there has been a noticeable uptick in the conversation since Brexit though. I've said it a few times, though I wouldn't claim it as a particularly original thought, but the DUP have done more for Unification than the Shinners ever managed.

    As for your workplace, that's pretty much part of the point I was making; discussing SF in any sort of depth, it is difficult for Unification to completely not come up as a topic for discussion..... though being discussed doesn't necessarily mean in a positive light. My issue was around claims that groups were discussing SF regularly and the topic had just never come up, when others on the thread are disparaging SF for having Unification TOO front and centre, as the core intention behind everything.

    As for MLMD.....you'd have to imagine one of a few things; the first would be that even the sort of person who wouldn't be bothered talking about Unification down the pub inevitably finds themself discussing it when speaking with the leader of SF, who place it so centrally to what they stand for and that has given her a biased view of how much it is being discussed when the leader of SF isn't in the room. The second is that she's engaging in a little of the wordplay I was referring to earlier and including those who are vocally saying they don't want it (after all, those people are still discussing it widely), the third being that the social circles of those with such strong negative feelings towards SF as to be regularly posting in a thread like this also aren't entirely reflective of the opinions of the broader public.

    I'd imagine a mixture of all the above, I'd imagine MLMD's social circle isn't likely to include a huge number of rabidly anti-SF, anti-Unification folk, much like I'd imagine the average poster on this thread doesn't have a huge number of the sort of folk sitting in The Felons bar in West Belfast or Peadar Brown's in Dublin in theirs. The broader reality is probably somewhere in between the two experiences.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,423 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I stand behind my point that SFs overriding focus is a United Ireland.

    Given the times we are in and the issues we have to deal with seems all secondary to their primary focus.

    Housing is a huge issue, prices, health care, …….aaah sure call for more houses, tax deductions and more staff, that will cover all that stuff.

    Meanwhile our two intrepid leaders will hit for the United State to beat the drum for a United Ireland !

    Isn’t everyone in our island going crazy for that idealistic approach.


    Has the whole country bet into a cocked hat, so it has.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Suprised there not been more made of this.



    Looking to sort issue of anon.abuse online,if anything paddy cosgorve messing has shown,is twitter anomity isnt much use.


    Mixed feelings as obviously sinn fein have an extra-ordinarly level of women in positions of promenience and clearly they come in for some pretty horrific abuse.....

    Also with matty kenny and pearse doherty property being attacked/burnt after right wing elements,whipping each other into a frenzy..


    I still feel some anonmity is crutial online,given the way whistle-blowers are treated here and journalists can be hit & miss as regards willingness to rock boat,

    (possibly for fear of missing out on advisor jobs in future governments?)



    A government with ready access to this data could & would easily overstep into oppression,famously a ex-TD who recently had to apoligise publically this week,sent gaurds to interview a blogger at dublin airport.....will there be enough safegaurds



  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭rdwight


    Well, identifying the sources of online abuse is fine in principle. but if the only punishment for eg vile tweets is going to be a slap on the wrist it may not be worth the effort:



    In a response to another user, Ms Ennis tweeted on March 21, 2012: “Some people were hit with the ugly stick, you were raped by the whole forest.”

    Can you think of any other party where a person making such a tweet would still be in a job?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That woman apoligised??


    Tbf.theres little more she can do,and didnt hide behind veil of anomity to abuse/defame anyone,bit of an poor similay to use in light of such cavet?...


    the punishment for defamation is steep enough in courts under libel laws and regularly used already to silence dissent here as most who speak out cant afford court cases,irregardless of how true they may be saying



    Would you not be concerned a government with access to this type data would overstep mark and use it to stamp out opposition....like.i feel its well-meaning,if naive and if another micheal mcdowell type character made it into dept of justice would abuse the position and over reach massively??



Advertisement