Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
11841851871891901062

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Makes me wonder about two things.

    1. If we are not going to use fracked LNG as the greens wish, then where are we going to get natural gas from. Because as sure as God made little green apples there is going to be fracked natural gas flowing through those pipelines.
    2. With Britain`s own natural gas field also heading towards depletion, how wise is it to leave ourselves at the mercy of another none E.U. country beating the drum of nationalism when we see what that has just resulted in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,076 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The difference I would see there Da is for those 500 previous alerts we were not planning on shutting down plants to replace their output with wind energy that has shown just how unreliable it is. And before you mention the nine new plants to ensure no blackouts, all those plants will be natural gas burning.

    I am no fan of coal or oil burning plants, but along with LNG is it not time we took a hard serious look at planned plant shutdown as well and how viable that actually is at present with a natural gas situation that is not going to improve anytime soon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Plenty of companies have been working on these numbers for many years in terms of what it takes to convert. I would never look at anything South Africa do, they are a political disaster of a country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui





  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,377 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Gas and coal making up 81% of electricity generation at the moment.

    Gas on its own 61%

    Corrib contributes 50% of that gas.

    Corrib gone in 3 years.

    What’s the plan then?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,076 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    No, you won't find many of these huge industrial wind turbines within the eyeline or earshot of Dubliners. Which is of course where they should be built to reduce losses in transmission. End of the day, wind turbines have moving parts that make noise and wear out. No way around that. We can only look forward to seeing banks of turbines off the Dublin Bay coastline, but I wouldn't be holding my breath.

    As for BrokenAngels assertion that you 'can get them stopped' - :) LOL - good luck with that. How many years has it taken for the Derrybrien project to be mothballed, despite evidence not just of pesky noise, nut massive environmental destruction. The Greens of the 1980s would have been first in line to oppose these inappropriate industrial developments.

    Solar farms may ultimately be more acceptable but I'm sure there are manufacturing downsides there. Certainly less intrusive on the skyline and no moving parts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    So you keep claiming despite the vast amounts of investment being applied to renewables year on year.

    https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/renewable-power-investment-2012-2020

    And still our electricity costs are rising year on year because of the EU green energy policy of pegging prices to the most expensive/most taxed elements of any energy generation mix regardless whether 1% or 99.9% energy generated is from renewables.

    And no amount of additional renewables are going to change that unfortunately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    Are the banks doing what the government tell them to do 🤔

    when it comes to banks, insurance companies, petrol stations, etc the government condemn and plead but very rarely do the actually force them at the end of a bayonet for fear of “ constitutional implications”



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Solar farms may ultimately be more acceptable but I'm sure there are manufacturing downsides there. Certainly less intrusive on the skyline and no moving parts.

    I'm not sure they will necessarily be more acceptable. Solar farms proposals are generally located in rural / agricultural areas at a distance from urban areas.

    It has been estimated that Ireland could require an additional 5,400 acres of solar farms by 2030 in addition to existing and planned solar farm installations , bringing the total area to close to 10,000 acres.

    Now the things the greens don't tell us about these solar farms is that they require large open areas of land unhindered by any trees or hedgerows. And in Ireland that requires the permanent removal and destruction of huge areas of hedgerows and potentially millions of trees. Add to that the loss of habitat that hedgerows provide to native birds, insects and animals and birds.

    And not a peep out of the greens about that.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    BnM are planning on using some of the many thousands of acres of raped peatland. It's a barren landscape so not useful for much else



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    The industrial scale deployment of solar panels are not being done on waste land, they are not covering bogs, they are covering acres and acres of farmland. You could probably justify covering sheds and shed like buildings on industrial estates, then again this is all about subsidies, somebody has to work harder to earn the money to pay the subsidies.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Looking at the existing and planned installations most are on farmland.

    As for "raped peatland"

    You mean those 1000s of acres of peatlands that Ireland is supposed to be regenerating?

    The two are not compatible. Solar arrays would simply sink in rewetted Peatland and concrete footings and access ways required would destroy any potential bog viability.

    But look I get it, all energy generation methods necessitates significant environmental damage. Renewables are no different.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The amount of shite posted on this thread, if it was burned we wouldn't need to import any gas from anywhere

    Solar farms can be integrated into land used for sheep grazing BTW and can actually increase biodiversity if done right

    10000 acres is nothing in the context of how much land there is in Ireland

    The is 10 million acres of grassland in Ireland. Proper planning could easily see 10000 acres of solar without even diminishing the amount of land available for grazing



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,377 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I’ll quote this again.

    what’s the plan for 2026?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Incorrect.

    These are not some pretty backyard solar panals. They are industrial sized energy generation installations. Dont kid yourself otherwise.

    Solar farms require the removal and destruction of hedgerows, trees, habitats and other landscape features. And 10000 acres with hedgerows and trees is a huge area of habitat for native birds, animals and insects.

    The same hedgerows, trees and habitats we have the greens continously banging on about. But oddly enough not in this instance

    No one mentioned grazing btw



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Just more and more nonsense. There are existing companies leasing land to build solar pv right now. They require 50 acres which is the size of a big field and they explicitly say that animals can continue to graze the land

    You constantly paint the worst possible outlook for renewables.

    The energy sector is changing rapidly. Now that the focus is on how expensive and unreliable Gas is, there is space to finally ramp up the transition to renewables. The fossil fuel industries propaganda machines are going to be very busy holding back the tide



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    The quacks on this thread pushing solar are ignoring the duck curve. Lets see what happens to grid management costs (and our electricity bills) when you put uncontrolled solar roof top generation on the grid. Who would have thought clouds would become a problem. Electricity at the wrong time is not just wasted, it’s a burden. Where does the generation come from before sun rises and when the sun sets? which also coincide with peak demand.

    And no batteries are not a solution either. economics and materials supply works against that.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    "Surging coal use in China will displace imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) used in power plants, freeing up hydrocarbons for the rest of the world. China became the world’s biggest importer of seaborne gas last year: a key reason why gas prices were spiralling upwards even before the Kremlin began to manipulate supply."

    Keep those irrelevant solar proposals coming, China wins and uses even more coal and slave labour to make them.

    "Chinese authorities built an array of coal-burning power plants in less-populated areas to support polysilicon manufacturers and other industries that use up a lot of energy.Producing solar panels in China creates much more carbon dioxide than in Europe, said Cornell University energy systems professor Fengqi You. He also said that in countries or regions that don’t rely heavily on fossil fuels, such as Norway and France, installing a high-carbon, Chinese-made solar panel might not reduce emissions at all."



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Oh and don't you dare pretend to care about biodiversity when calling for more fossil fuels and arguing against renewable energy. Climate change is devastating biodiversity all around the world. We're rapidly running out of time to save the great barrier reef and amazon rainforest (for example)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The answers already have been provided. It just takes planning and investment and interconnectors. And batteries are definitely part of the solution for grid storage. There is no shortage of materials for iron flow batteries or sodium ion batteries or gravity based energy storage...

    A big, diverse and interconnected grid is the solution. You have been told this dozens of times



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The only way to save the Amazon is to create a significant military force that goes in and kills all the ranchers. Good luck with that.

    It's the worst environmental tragedy on the planet but having watched it happen and get talked about since the late 70's, with no action, I have given up hope anything will ever be done about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Blah blah whataboutery

    The propaganda against renewals is being turned up to 11. The oil and gas industry know they're running out of time before they're left with loads of stranded assets



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    That's simply a minimum area considered viable. The majority of planned installations will cover extensive areas of agricultural land. And as detailed the total area designated for development is 10000 acres, possibly more.

    I am not against Solar farms as you seem to think. However what should be acknowledged is that their development will require significant environmental damage and the removal of existing landscape features including hedgerows and trees. And not a peep about that.

    No one mentioned grazing livestock btw.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Lol You go around dictating that somehow you're right and that factual information about solar farm installations is "nonsense". And then try the old "don't dare" and "You have been told" bs.

    Though looking at your other posts elsewhere your discussion skills are similarly crass tbf.

    And again I'm not against renewables. The fact is that all energy generation methods result in significant environmental damage. However there seems to be little appetite for the greens to swallow that bitter pill.

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The amazon is being threatened by deliberate deforestation, which is shameful, but you could bring in that army you mentioned and the forest will continue to decline due to droughts and heat stress because of climate change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    how many acres in ireland are available on roof space? The roof space of the Facebook DC alone would hold thousands of solar panels and in one of the most optimal parts of ireland for solar

    You are so stuck in the past you have no idea what options are available. Ireland could install millions of solar panels today without the need to put one in a field

    Im sure you will come back with some rubbish it ain’t possible, but ask Kingspan who filled up roof of plants with solar to meet their demands. All done years ago



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    'The greens' know that there are going to be tradeoffs and these are going to be harder and more costly the longer we delay tackling climate change.

    We only have one chance to stop this. If we fail there is no going back.

    We should have treated this like an emergency 2 decades ago, but we didn't, and because of this it's even more of an emergency now

    https://shows.acast.com/in-the-news/episodes/why-are-we-losing-the-amazon-rainforest



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    They also "plan" to close the coal generation plant in Moneypoint by 2025, you know the one that has the capacity to store 3 months of fuel on site. The plan ( I am not joking) is that climate change means the weather in this country becomes sunnier and windier. That 1000MW generation can be added through "demand management" (i.e. kick them off the grid to use diesel generators), that a 500KM long extension cord to France will supply the green power via nuclear generation . . . . forgetting that the French plants have aged and need more maintenance and downtime and forgetting that much of Western Europe is pulling from that source as well. Someone also thinks we can make up the difference in gas supply by tapping Norway and piping it to the country through Moffat. Did I mention we intend to increase the demand for electricity generation by installing 400,000 heat pumps by 2030 and a million electric cars? Silly question really where is all the money coming from for these dreams?

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



Advertisement